運用調整後之標準化殘差法檢視賴氏人格類型之分類

Examining Classifications of the Li Personality Types through Adjusted Standardized Residual Analysis

方將任(Jiang-Ren Fang)；黃財尉(Tsai-Wei Huang)；謝文軒(Wen-Hsuan Hsieh)；林佩蓉(Pei-Jung Lin)

人格類型 ； 調整後之標準化殘差 ； 賴氏人格測驗 ； adjusted standardized residual (ASR) ； The Li Personality Test ； types of personality

測驗學刊

64卷1期（2017 / 03 / 01）

27 - 49

繁體中文

「賴氏人格測驗」為國內廣泛使用與肯定的人格分類工具，然實務上常發現有些特質難以歸類，再加上其分類標準的統計效果未見討論；因此，本研究欲進一步運用調整後之標準化殘差（adjusted standardized residual, ASR）法輔助檢視此人格測驗分類系統於統計上的適切性。本研究以450位大學學生為樣本，在.05與.01統計顯著水準下，檢視每位受試者在五種人格類型分數得分上的相對差異情形，並交叉比較分類結果。本研究發現，手冊中被歸為疑問型的人格類型，包含人格特質並不突出的真正疑問型，以及出現明顯雙重特質的「兼型」人格類型。另外，在各類型的分類標準中，發現A’、C’、D’等亞型人格分類分數的下限過低，以致有被歸入F型而彼此區辨不清的現象。文末根據發現並提出上修亞型人格的下限分數、縮小疑問型的界定範圍、增加「兼型」人格類型的歸類，以及注意內外向人格因素的解釋等建議。

The Li Personality Test is one of famously applied personality tests in Taiwan. However, no evidences were shown its five-typed criteria supported statistically. Through a nonparametric statistical test (adjusted standardized residual, ASR, approach), the study intends to examine the appropriateness of personality categorized system provided by the Li Personality Test. There were 450 university students participating in the test. Two critical levels of significance, .05 and .01, were used as criteria of classification. Findings showed that ＂non-identified＂ personality type can be classified into the ＂obscured＂ and the ＂compatible＂ ones. Additionally, the lower bound of the classification for subtypes in manual (A’, C’, D’) were too low to distinguished from each other and were dominantly classified as presented with the F type. According to the findings, suggestions of adjusting the lower bounds of personality subtypes, narrowing down the bounds of ＂obscured＂ personality types, adding possible ＂compatible＂ personality types, and concerning the interpretations of introversive and extroversive personality factors, were provided in the end of text.

1. 王素闌(2013)。大學生人格特質、自傷行為與自傷意念之相關研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，15，23-54。
   連結：
2. 竹田機器工業株式會社（2006）。YG 性格檢查。取自http://www007.upp.sonet.ne.jp/tkk/product/personality/personality_index.htm
3. Bain, P.,Vaes, J.,Kashima, Y.,Haslam, N.,Guan, Y.(2012).Folk conceptions of humanness beliefs about distinctive and core human characteristics in Australia, Italy, and China.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,43(1),53-58.
4. Fassoulaki, A.,Paraskeva, A.,Papilas, K.,Karabinis, G.(2000).Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor.British Journal of Anaesthesia,84(2),266-269.
5. Haberman, S. J.(1978).Analysis of qualitative data.New York, NY:Academic Press.
6. Haberman, S. J.(1973).The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables.Biometrics,29,205-220.
7. Hentschel, U.,Kiessling, M.(1985).Season of birth and personality-anotherinstance of noncorrspondance.Journal of Social Psychology,125,577-585.
8. Ishigooka, J.,Iwao, M.,Suzuki, M.,Fukuyama, Y.,Murasaki, M.,Miura, S.(1998).Demographic features of patients seeking cosmetic surgery.Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences,52,283-287.
9. Lee, C.,Haims, A.,Monico, E.,Brink, J. A.,Forman, H.(2004).Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks1.Radiology,231,393-398.
10. Perren, S.,Alsaker, F. D.(2006).Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bullyvictims, and bullies in kindergarten.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,47,45-57.
11. Radliff, K. M.,Wheaton, J. E.,Robinson, K.,Morris, J.(2012).Illuminating the relationship between bullying and substance use among middle and high school youth.Addictive Behaviors,37,569-572.
12. Reiter, H.(1976).Some personality correlates if behavioral rigidity.Mankind Quarterly,17(2),143-144.
13. Saewyc, E. M.,Brown, D.,Plane, M. B.,Mundt, M. P.,Zakletskaia, L.,Wiegel, J.,Fleming, M. F.(2009).Gender differences in violence exposure among university students attending campus health clinics in the United States and Canada.Journal of Adolescent Health,45,587-594.
14. van Ijzendoorn, M.(1995).Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the adult attachment interview.Psychological Bulletin,117(3),387-403.
15. Zouris, M.,Walker, G.,Dye, J.,Galarneau, M.(2006).Wounding patterns for US marines and sailors during operation Iraqi freedom, major combat phase.Military Medicine,171(7),246-257.
16. 王保進(2002)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。
17. 王寶墉(1995)。現代測驗理論。臺北市:心理。
18. 林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計。臺北市:東華。
19. 邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術。臺北市:雙葉。
20. 邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市:五南。
21. 陳妙(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。中國上海市，華東師範大學。
22. 陳詩雩(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化縣，明道大學。
23. 黃瑋玲(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，中國文化大學。
24. 葛樹人(1991)。心理測驗學。臺北市:桂冠。
25. 劉玉華(2013)。醫護學生的人格特質差異分析：以某醫學大學為例。新臺北護理期刊，15(1)，27-34。
26. 劉焜輝(2003)。心理衡鑑：臨床心理學（二）。臺北市:天馬。
27. 鄭默譯、鄭日昌譯、Kaplan, M.、Saccuzzo, P.(1998)。心理測驗原理：原理、應用與問題。臺北市:五南。
28. 蕭芳玉(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學。
29. 賴保禎(1993)。賴氏人格測驗：指導手冊。臺北市:千華圖書。
30. 賴保禎(1986)。基氏人格測驗：指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
31. 賴保禎、賴美玲(2003)。新訂賴氏人格測驗：指導手冊。臺北市:千華圖書。
32. 薛玲玲、許碧珊(2003)。專科新生班級「賴氏人格測驗」結果探討與分析。經國學報，19，69-78。

1. 蔡珊妮,許建中(2023)。評估HEXACO人格量表的跨文化適用性與效度。臺灣諮商心理學報，11(2)，106-132。
2. 薛清江,楊淑娥(2019)。構思數位虛擬世界中的科技風險之通識教學提醒策略：奠基於Sherry Turkle的「人格特質」與「手機成癮」之跨域觀點。通識學刊：理念與實務，7(2)，1-35。