The Validity of Personal Best, Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulated Learning, and Academic Achievement: Theory of Planned Behavior as a Framework

自強不息、自我效能、自我調整學習與學業成就之效度：計畫行為理論觀點

吳慧珉(Huey-Min Wu)；莫慕貞(Magdalena Mo Ching Mok)

academic achievement ； personal best ； self-efficacy ； self-regulated learning ； 自我效能 ； 自我調整學習 ； 自強不息 ； 學業成就表現

測驗學刊

66卷3期（2019 / 09 / 01）

321 - 346

英文

The relationships between personal best goals, perceived personal best goals from teachers, self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement are explored in this study. The sample for this study includes the academic achievements and background variables of 7,709 students taken from the 2014 Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement database. There are two hypothesized models in this study. Model 1 is based on studies regarding personal best goals and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Model 2 is based on the Theory of Planned Behavior alone. A structural equation model was used to test the validity of the two proposed model, indicating a good model fit for Model 2. The results of Model 2 show that personal best goals would affect academic achievement through self-regulated learning; perceived personal best goals from teachers affects academic achievement through self-regulated learning; and self-efficacy affects academic achievement both directly and through self- self-regulated learning.

本研究探討自強不息、自我效能、學生知覺的自強不息、自我調整學習和學業成就表現之關係，研究樣本是來自臺灣學生學習成就資料庫，包含學科資料與背景問卷資料，共7,709人。本研究以計畫行為理論為基礎，同時探討個體因素與社會脈絡因素對於高中學業成就之影響。本研究驗證兩個理論假設：模式一是以自強不息和計畫行為理論為基礎；模式二是只以計畫行為理論為基礎；並使用結構方程模式驗證模式一和模式二，結果顯示：模式二以計畫行為理論為基礎探討影響高中生學業成就之因素，模式適配度良好，具有良好之效度。另外，結果亦顯示自強不息會透過自我調整學習影響學業成就；學生知覺老師眼中的自強不息透過自我調整學習影響學業成就；自我效能透過自我調整學習影響學業成就，且同時直接影響學業成就。

1. Alexander, P. A.(Ed.),Winne, P. H.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of edu-cational psychology.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates.
2. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:Freeman.
3. Boekaerts, M.,Corno, L.(2005).Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on as-sessment and intervention.Applied Psychology: An International Review,54(2),199-231.
4. Boekaerts, M.,Musso, M.,Cascallar, E.(2012).Self-regulated learning and the under-standing of complex outcomes.Educational Psychology International,1-81.
5. Bong, M.,Skaalvik, E. M.(2003).Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How differ-ent are they really?.Educational Psychology Review,15,1-40.
6. Burnham, K. P.,Anderson, D. R.(2004).Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection.Sociological Methods & Research,33,261-304.
7. Burrus, J.,Moore, R.(2016).The incremental validity of beliefs and attitudes for predic-ting mathematics achievement.Learning and Individual Differences,50,246-251.
8. Byrne, B. M.(2013).Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applica-tions, and programming.New York, NY:Routledge Academic.
9. Cheng, E. W. L.,Chu, S. K. W.(2016).The role of perceived e-collaborative perform-ance in an extended theory of planned behavior model.International Journal of e-Col-laboration,12(4),24-40.
10. Cheng, P. Y.,Hsu, P. K.,Chiou, W. B.(2012).Undergraduates’ intentions to take exam-inations for professional certification: Examinations of four competing models.Asia Pacific Education Review,13,691-700.
11. Collie, R. J.,Martin, A. J.,Bottrell, D.,Armstrong, D.,Ungar, M.,Liebenberg, L.(2016).Social support, academic adversity and academic buoyancy: A person-centred analy-sis and implications for academic outcomes.Educational Psychology,1-15.
12. Collie, R. J.,Martin, A. J.,Papworth, B.,Ginns, P.(2016).Students’ interpersonal rela- tionships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement.Learning and Individ-ual Differences,45,65-76.
13. Dotterer, A. M.,Lowe, K.(2011).Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,40(12),1649-1660.
14. Hagenauer, G.,Hascher, T.,Volet, S. E.(2015).Teacher emotions in the classroom: As-sociations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal tea-cher-student relationship.European Journal of Psychology of Education,30(4),385-403.
15. Hagger, M. S.,Chan, D. K. C.,Protogerou, C.,Chatzisarantis, N. L. D.(2016).Using meta-analytic path analysis to test theoretical predictions in health behavior: An illus-tration based on meta-analyses of the theory of planned behavior.Preventive Medicine,89,154-161.
16. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
17. Hong, J.,Hwang, M.,Kuo, Y.,Hsu, W.(2015).Parental monitoring and helicopter par-enting relevant to vocational student.Learning and Individual Differences,42,139-146.
18. Kam, J. A.,Middleton, A. V.(2013).The associations between parents’ references to their own past substance use and youth's substance-use beliefs and behaviours: A comparison of Latino and European American youth.Human Communication Re-search,39,208-229.
19. Kline, R. B.(2011).Principles and practice of structural equation modelling.New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
20. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action-control: From cognition to behaviour.Heidel-berg, Germany:Springer-Verlag.
21. Lee, J.,Shute, V. J.(2010).Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic per-formance: An integrative perspective on student learning.Educational Psychologist,45(3),185-202.
22. Liem, G. A.,Ginns, P.,Martin, A. J.,Stone, B.,Herrett, M.(2012).Personal best goals and academic and social functioning: A longitudinal perspective.Learning and In-struction,22,222-230.
23. Lipnevich, A. A.,Preckel, F.,Krumm, S.(2016).Mathematics attitudes and their unique contribution to achievement: Going over and above cognitive ability and personality.Learning and Individual Differences,47,70-90.
24. MacFarlane, K.,Woolfson, L. M.(2013).Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the in-clusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior.An International Journal of Research and Studies,29,46-52.
25. Maltby, J.,Day, L.,Macaskill, A.(2010).Personality, individual differences and intelli-gence.Harlow, UK:Pearson.
26. Martin, A. J.(2006).Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empir-ical analysis.British Journal of Educational Psychology,76,803-825.
27. Martin, A. J.(2012).The role of personal best (PB) goals in the achievement and behavioral engagement of students with ADHD and students without ADHD.Contemporary Educational Psychology,37(2),91-105.
28. Martin, A. J.,Collie, R. J.,Mok, M. M. C.,McInerney, D. M.(2016).Personal best (PB) goal structure, individual PB goals, engagement, and achievement: A study of Chin-ese- and English-speaking background students in Australian schools.British Journal of Educational Psychology,86,75-91.
29. Martin, A. J.,Durksen, T.,Williamson, D.,Kiss, J.,Ginns, P.(2015).Personal best (PB) goal setting and students’ motivation in science: A study of science valuing and aspir-ations.Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist,31,85-96.
30. Martin, A. J.,Elliot, A. J.(2015).The role of personal best (PB) and dichotomous achie-vement goals in students’ academic motivation and engagement: A longitudinal inves-tigation.Educational Psychology,1-18.
31. Martin, A. J.,Liem, G. A. D(2010).Academic personal bests (PBs), engagement, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis.Learning and Individual Differences,20,265-270.
32. Mega, C.,Ronconi, L.,De Beni, R.(2013).What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,106(1),121-131.
33. Mok, M. M. C.,Wong, M. Y. W.,Su, M. R.,Tognolini, J.,Stanley, G.(2014).Personal best goal and self-regulation as predictors of mathematics achievement: A multilevel structural equation model.Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development,3(1),79-91.
34. Muthén, L. K.,Muthén, B. O.(1998).Mplus statistical analysis with latent vari-ables: User's Guide.Los Angeles, CA:Muthén & Muthén.
35. National Academy for Educational Research. (2016, February 16). Introduction of Taiwan assessment of student achievement. Retrieved from http://tasa.naer.edu.tw/
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development=OECD(2010).PISA 2009 re-sults:What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I).Paris, France:Author.
37. Pintrich, P. R.(2004).A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students.Educational Psychology Review,16(4),385-407.
38. Pokropek, A.,Borgonovi, F.,Jakubowski, M.(2015).Socio-economic disparities in aca-demic achievement: A comparative analysis of mechanisms and pathways.Learning and Individual Differences,42,10-18.
39. Salanova, M.(Ed.),Grau, R.(Ed.),Martinez, I. M.(Ed.),Cifre, E.(Ed.),Llorens, S.(Ed.),García-Renedo, M.(Ed.)(2004).Nuevos horizontes en la investigactión sobre autoeficacia.Castellón, Spain:Colección Psyique.
40. Teo, T.,Zhou, M.,Noyes, J.(2016).Teachers and technology: Development of an ex-tended theory of planned behavior.Educational Technology Research and Develop-ment
41. Thijs, J.,Fleischmann, F.(2015).Student-teacher relationships and achievement goal orientations: Examining student perceptions in an ethnically diverse sample.Learning and Individual Differences,42,53-63.
42. Victori, M.,Lockhart, W.(1995).Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning.System,23(2),223-234.
43. Ware, H.,Kitsantas, A.(2007).Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment.Journal of Educational Research,100,303-310.
44. Winne, P. H.(2010).Improving measurements of self-regulated learning.Educational Psy-chologist,45,267-276.
45. Winne, P. H.,Nesbit, J. C.(2010).The psychology of school performance.Annual Re-view of Psychology,61,653-678.
46. Yu, K.,Martin, A. J.(2014).Personal best (PB) and ’classic’ achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoy-ancy.Educational Psychology,34(5),635-658.
47. Zhang, N.,Campo, S.,Yang, J.,Janz, K. F.,Snetselaar, L. G.,Eckler, P.(2015).Effects of social support about physical activity on social networking sites: Applying the the-ory of planned behavior.Health Communication,30(12),1277-1285.
48. Zimmerman, B. J.(Ed.),Schunk, D. H.(Ed.)(2001).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Zimowski, M. F.,Muraki, E.,Mislevy, R. J.,Bock, R. D.(2003).BILOG-MG 3 [com-puter program].Chicago, IL:Scientific Software.

1. 鄧鈞文,陳俊瑋(2022)。中等學校體育師資生「師資培育學程選擇動機量表」之修訂與信效度檢驗。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，11(1)，1-26。
2. 林哲瑩,李嘉軒(2022)。自我效能團體對經濟弱勢少年自我效能的影響之評估研究。社會發展研究學刊，30，29-57。
3. 歐淑玲,倪麗芬(2021)。運用自我效能提升護生專業知識與技能、批判思考及溝通合作力。長庚護理，32(2)，28-40。
4. 熊師瑤,余民寧(2022)。軍校生恆毅力概念建構與量表發展研究。教育科學研究期刊，67(3)，77-112。
5. (2022)。師資培育學程選擇動機與學習成就的關係：以教育專業科目在校成績與教師資格考試表現為例。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報，11(2)，21-41。