题名

「大學生學習責任感量表」的發展與效度分析之研究

并列篇名

The Scale Development and Validation of the College Student Learning Responsibility

作者

邱紹一(Shao-I Chiu);洪福源(Fu-Yuan Hong);黃志灯(Chih-Teng Huang)

关键词

效標關聯效度 ; 學習責任感 ; 驗證性因素分析 ; confirmatory factor analysis ; criterion-related validity ; learning responsibility

期刊名称

測驗學刊

卷期/出版年月

67卷2期(2020 / 06 / 01)

页次

95 - 118

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

培育學生的學習責任感,不但是教育發展的重要課題,更是學生未來成功就業所必備的指標。本研究根據學習責任感的定義與內涵,邀請六位教育心理專家進行量表之效度審查,經探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析與效標關聯效度分析,編製「大學生學習責任感量表」,以臺灣964位大學生為樣本進行探究。研究結果顯示:(1)經因素分析歸納出大學生學習責任感的三個因素:「良好的學習態度」、「嘗試學習與遵守規則」、「課堂間的學習行為」。其中,以「嘗試學習與遵守規則」最具解釋力,同時也是現況最佳者,突顯了這種學習責任感在大學生學習經驗上的重要地位,且這三個因素所構成的量表具有良好的信效度;(2)本研究進一步以「學生自我效能」、「內控信念」等二個層面來考驗本量表的效標關聯效度,結果也發現本量表有不錯的效度,其中以「學生自我效能」的效標關聯效度最高。最後,本研究進行討論,並對未來研究提出相關建議。

英文摘要

Cultivating students' sense of learning responsibility is not only the most important issue in educational development but it is essential indicators of the future success of students for employment. According to the definition and contents of learning responsibility, and inviting six educational psychologist for the validity of the scale review, this study developed university students' learning responsibility scale. There were 964 university students participated in this study and found that: (a) three latent variables containing "good learning attitude", "trying to learn and abide by the rules" and "learning behavior in the classroom". These three factors constitute the scale has good reliability and validity; (b) the study further analyze criterion-related validity of this scale by student self-efficacy and internal locus of control. The results also found that this scale has good validity, with "student self-efficacy" was the highest. Based on the findings of this study, discussion and suggestions were made for practical work for the school and for future research.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Anderson, C.,Avery, P. G.,Pederson, P. V.,Smith, E. S.,Sullivan, J. L.(1997).Divergent perspectives on citizenship education: A Q-method study and survey of social studies teachers.American Educational Research Journal,34(2),333-364.
  2. Anderson, L.,Prawat, R.(1983).Responsibility in the classroom: A synthesis of research on teaching self-control.Educational Leadership,40(7),62-66.
  3. Anderson, S. E.,Williams, L. J.(1996).Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work.Journal of Applied Psychology,81(3),282-296.
  4. Bacon, C. S.(1993).Student responsibility for learning.Adolescence,28,199-212.
  5. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academy of Marking Science,16,76-94.
  6. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:W. H. Freeman and Company.
  7. Bellner, A. L.(1999).Senses of responsibility: A challenge for occupational and physical therapists in the context of ongoing professionalization.Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,13,55-62.
  8. Bentler, P. M.(1988).Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  9. Bentler, P. M.(1993).EQS: Structural equation program manual.LA:BMDP Statistical Software.
  10. Bickmore, K.(1997).Teaching conflict and conflict resolution in school: (Extra-) curricular considerations.Connections ’97 International Social Studies Conference,Australia:
  11. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Browne, M. W.,Cudeck, R.(1993).Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Testing structural equation models,Newbury Park, CA:
  13. Bryan, L. A.,McLaughlin, H. J.(2005).Teaching and learning in rural Mexico: A portrait of student responsibility in everyday school life.Teaching and Teacher Education,21,33-48.
  14. Crandall, V. C.,Katkovsky, W.,Crandall, V. J.(1965).Children’s beliefs in their own control of reinforcements in intellectual-academic achievement situations.Child Development,36,91-109.
  15. Devellis, R. F.(1991).Scale development: Theory and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  16. Dollinger, S. J.(2000).Locus of control and incidental learning: An application to college student success.College Student Journal,34(4),537.
  17. Farh, J. L.,Podsakoff, P. M.,Organ, D. W.(1990).Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.Journal of Management,16(4),705-721.
  18. Goffman, E.(1961).Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction.Indianapolis, IN:Bobbs-Merrill.
  19. Goffman, E.(1959).The presentation of self in everyday life.New York, NY:The Overlook Press.
  20. Hackman, J. R.,Oldham, G. R.(1980).Work redesign.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
  21. Hu, L. T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6,1-55.
  22. Huang, D. H.(1988).Taipei, Taiwan,National ChengChi University.
  23. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39,31-36.
  24. Kennedy, K. J.(1996).New challenges for civics and citizenship. ACT.Australia:ACSA.
  25. Lewis, R.(2001).Classroom discipline and student responsibility: The students’ view.Teaching and Teacher Education,17,307-319.
  26. Lickona, T.(1996).Teaching respect and responsibility: Reclaiming children and youth.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems,5(3),143-151.
  27. Lyons, M.(1994).Reflections on client-therapist relationships.Australian Occupational Therapy Journal,41,27-29.
  28. Mueller, R. O.(1996).Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS.New York, NY:Springer.
  29. Osborne, K.(1995).In defence of history teaching in the past and the meaning of democratic citizenship.Toronto, Canada:Our School-Our Selves Educational Foundation.
  30. Pearl, A.,Knight, A.(1998).Democratic schooling: Theory to guide educational practice.NJ:Hampton Press.
  31. Richards, G. E.,Ellis, L. A.,Neill, J. T.(2002).The ROPELOC: Review of personal effectiveness and locus of control: A comprehensive instrument for reviewing life effectiveness.Self-Concept Research: Driving International Research Agendas,Sydney, Australia:
  32. Rotter, J. B.(1966).Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and applied,80(1),1-27.
  33. Sternberg, R. J.(2002).Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Minutes of the Presidential task force on psychology and education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association..
  34. Tabachnick, B. G.,Fidell, L. S.(2007).Using multivariate statistics.New York, NY:Allyn & Bacon.
  35. Trice, A. D.(1985).An academic locus of control scale for college students.Perceptual and Motor Skills,61,1043-1046.
  36. Trilling, B.,Fadel, C.(2009).21st century skills: Learning for life in our times.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
  37. Zimmerman, B. J.(1994).Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education.Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications,Hillsdale, NJ:
  38. Zimmerman, B. J.,Kitsantas, A.(2005).Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs.Contemporary Educational Psychology,30,397-417.
  39. 何英奇(1988)。大專學生之責任感與自我統整:艾立克森青年自我統整理論之倫理分析。教育心理學報,21,77-98。
  40. 吳詩婷(2000)。嘉義縣,國立中正大學碩士論文。
  41. 洪福源(2008)。彰化縣,國立彰化師範大學博士論文。
  42. 陳正昌,程炳林(2001).SPSS、SAS、BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用.臺北市:五南.
被引用次数
  1. 許籐繼,林子廉(2021)。基隆市國小學生學習責任、課堂紀律與學習成就及其關係之研究。臺北市立大學學報.教育類,52(2),55-78。