题名

定期定額與單筆投資之績效評估—蒙地卡羅模擬分析

并列篇名

Simulation Analysis of Lump-sun Investing and Dollar-Cost Averaging

DOI

10.29963/TOJEB.201006.0003

作者

秦銘璟(Ming-Chin Chin);余威廷(Wei-Ting Yu);楊絲婷(Shih-Ting Yang)

关键词

共同基金 ; 定期定額投資 ; 單筆投資 ; 蒙地卡羅模擬 ; Mutual Fund ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Dollar-Cost Averaging Investment ; Lump Sum Investment

期刊名称

真理財經學報

卷期/出版年月

22期(2010 / 06 / 01)

页次

67 - 86

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文以蒙地卡羅模擬方法比較股票型共同基金投資策略—定期定額法與單筆投資法—之績效。以1989年1月至2008年12月共20年的台灣加權股價指數和及美國S&P500指數的月資料為模擬背景,各自模擬1000筆20年的股價指數變動。進而依多空頭買賣時機和不同持有投資期間共十六種情況計算定期定額投資和單筆投資的年化投資報酬率,並以t檢定檢驗其顯著的差異。模擬結果顯示:當投資時機為多頭買進時,不論賣出時機為何,單筆投資的短期績效較好。但隨著持有期間延長,定期定額長期績效表現較佳,證明其分攤風險、降低平均成本的優勢。另當投資時機為空頭時,不論賣出時機與持有長短期,均以定期定額表現較佳。

英文摘要

This research is based on Monte Carlo simulation method to compare mutual funds investment strategies in stock markets- Dollar-cost averaging investment and Lump Sum investment. Data was collected monthly from January 1989 to December 2008, both Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index and American's S & P 500 index for back ground. Each simulates generates 1000 stock prices for simulation. During investment period of buying and selling there are total of 16 scenarios to calculate the annual rate of return for both Dollar-cost averaging investment and lump sum investment. Also we certify testing the effectiveness of difference. The result shows that a lump-sum investment has better performance in a short term among some scenarios. However, as the investment period increased, Dollar-cost averaging investing has better performance because it has the advantages of diversification and lower average prices.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Abeysekera, S. P.,Rosenbloom, E. S.(2000).A Simulation Model for Deciding Between Lump-sum and Dollar-cost Averaging.Journal of Financial Planning,13,86-96.
  2. Cohen, Jerome Bernard,Zinbarg, Edward D(1977).Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management.Richard D. Irwin, Inc..
  3. Constantinides, G. M.(1979).A Note on the Suboptimality of Dollar-Cost Averaging as an Investment Policy.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,14(2),443-450.
  4. Dubil, R.(2005).Lifetime Dollar-Cost Averaging: Forget Cost Saving.Think Risk Reduction ,Journal of Financial Planning,86-90.
  5. Leggio, Karyl B.,Donald, L.(2003).An Empirical Examination of the Effectiveness of Dollar-Cost Averaging Using Downside Risk Performance Measures.Journal of Economics and Finance,27(2),211-223.
  6. Lockwood, L. J.,Mcinish, T. H.(1990).Tests of Stability for Variances and Means of Overnight/Intraday Returns during Bull and Bear Markets.Journal of Banking and Finance,14,1243-1253.
  7. Pye, G.(1971).Minimax Policies for Selling an Asset and Dollar Averaging.Management Science,17(7),379-393.
  8. Rozeff, M. S.(1994).Lump-Sum Investing versus Dollar-Averaging.The Journal of Portfolio Management,Winter,45-50.
  9. Williams, Richard E.,Bacon, Peter W.(1993).Lump Sum Beats Dollar-Cost Averaging.Journal of Financial Planning,6(2),64.
  10. 李憲良(2004)。實踐大學企業管理研究所。
  11. 林真如(1996)。國立台灣大學財務金融學系。
  12. 邱玉珍(2005)。輔仁大學金融研究所。
  13. 張博皓(2001)。國立成功大學企業管理研究所。
  14. 黃鏡宇(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學商學研究所。
  15. 葉芳柏、葉芝宇(2007)。財務工程:基礎理論與Excel實務模擬。臺北縣:全華圖書有限公司。
  16. 管中閔(2004)。統計學:觀念與方法。臺北市:華泰文化事業有限公司。
  17. 劉偉健(2006)。亞洲大學國際企業學系。
  18. 謝劍平(2004)。財務管理:新觀念與本土化。臺北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。
  19. 鍾佳瑋(2004)。實踐大學企業管理研究所。
  20. 羅時芳(2000)。國立交通大學經營管理研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 劉海清、傅英芬(2014)。基金規模與投資績效-投資方式之觀點。中原企管評論,12(2),51-70。