購租屋決策分析－實質選擇權的應用

Applying the Concept of Real Option to the Household Decision Making of Tenure Selection

10.6375/JHS.200208.0079

林左裕(Tsoyu-Calvin Lin)；曾建智(Chien-Chih Tseng)

實質選擇權 ； 二項式選擇權評價模式 ； 購租屋決策 ； Real Option ； Binomial Option Pricing Model ； Tenure Selection

住宅學報

11卷2期（2002 / 08 / 01）

79 - 100

繁體中文

本研究將實質選擇權的觀念應用到家計單位的購屋決策上，指出當未來的房價為不确定狀況，且租屋市場的存在同樣能滿足其住屋需求下，家計單位在考慮是否進行購屋決策時，其背後隱含一何時(timing)購屋的機會選擇，為一個遲延決策選擇權(defer option)的要領價值，并利用二項式選擇權評價模式(binomial option pricing model)，實際推導此一選擇權的價值。使用本研究的模型架構進行分析，可以清楚的由數據進行投資決策之判斷，有助於家計單位正确評估購租屋決策。結果指出，當未來房價的波動性較大時，此一選擇權價值上升；當個人資金必要報酬率提高，會使得選擇權價值下降；當租金水準提高時，選擇權的價值亦提高。

This study applies the concept of real option to the household decision making of tenure selection. As the house price in the future remains uncertainty, tenure selection is like a timing option to buy a house. This study does not only indicate that this option is an American put option, but also derive the value of the put option through binomial option pricing model. On the one hand, if the household selects to pay the rent for one period instead of buying a house, the expenditure may be reimbursed due to the decrease of house price. On the other, the expenditure may rise due to the increase of house price. This study offers a useful model for household to determine whether it is a right decision to buy or rent a house. The result shows that the more volatile the house price, the higher the option value; the higher the ratio of equity to house price, the lower the option value.

1. Black, F., Scholes, M. S.(1973).The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.Journal of Political Economy,81(3)
2. Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., Rubinstein, M.(1979).Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach.Journal of Financial Economics,7(3)
3. Dixit, A. K., Pindyck, R. S.(1995).The Options Approach to Capital Investment.Harvard Business Review,73(3)
4. Hull, J. C.(1997).Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives.New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
5. Kulatilaka, N., Wang, G.(1996).Real Option Framework for Evaluating Infrastructure Investment.Journal of Financial Studies,4(2)
6. Luehrman, T. A.(1998).Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers.Harvard Business Review,76(4)
7. Myers, S. C.(1977).Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.Journal of Financial Economics,5(2)
8. Nordvik, V.(2000).Tenure Flexibility and The Supply of Private Rental Housing.Regional Science and Urban Economics,30
9. Pindyck, R. S.(1991).Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment.Journal of Economic Literature,29
10. Ross, S. A.(1995).Uses, Abuses, and Alternatives to the NPV Rules.Financial Management,24
11. Ross, S. A.(1998).Valuation of Interacting Real Options in a Tollroad Infrastructure Project.The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,38
12. Trgeorgis, L.(1993).The Nature of Options Interactions and the Valuation of Investments with Multiple Real Options.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,28(1)
13. Trigeorgis, L.(1991).A log-transformed binomial numerical analysis method for valuing complex multi-option investments.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,26(3)
14. Trigeorgis, L., Mason, S. P.(1987).Valuing Managerial Flexibility.Midland Corporate Finance Journal,5(1)
15. 張大成 Chang, Ta-Cheng(1996)。隨機最適模型在經濟學上的三個應用。國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所。
16. 張大成 Chang, Ta-Cheng、 賴景昌 Lai, Ching-Chong(2000)。BOT放棄價值的評估－以台灣高速鐵路為例。管理學報 Journal of Management，17(3)

1. 蔡汶靜,林左裕(2021)。租賃契約條件對商用不動產租金影響之研究。住宅學報，30(1)，49-69。
2. 賴國樑、柯俊禎、林左裕(2010)。應用實質選擇權於工業區優惠投資專案之研究。東海管理評論，11(1)，1-34。
3. 劉千嘉(2022)。高齡租屋族群的特性與租屋歷程：奠基於住宅普查與住宅需求動向調查的發現。人口學刊，65，85-137。
4. 楊屯山,陳翰柏,林哲群(2023)。租金與住宅使用成本關係之再探討：實質選擇權觀點。住宅學報，32(2)，57-82。