永續建築居住效益對購屋選擇之影響

The Influence of the Residential Benefit of Sustainable Building on House-purchase Choice

10.6375/JHS.200806.0051

張桂鳳(Kuei-Feng Chang)

永續建築 ； 居住效益 ； 購屋選擇 ； 生活品質 ； sustainable building ； residential benefit ； house-purchase choice ； quality of life

住宅學報

17卷1期（2008 / 06 / 01）

51 - 70

繁體中文

因應國際永續建築發展與台灣倡導永續、省能源政策之下，現階段消費者對於住宅的選擇，不僅是滿足住之需求以及住宅產品本身之外，在購屋選擇上亦會考慮到住宅之附加價值，如住宅所處環境條件、採光照明、通風、噪音等居住環境品質因子等等。因此，本文應用Grace(2005)提出成本利益分析(cost-benefit analysis, CBA)應用於永續性能研究及行銷學理論，建立研究架構為：「永續建築」是否會直接影響「購屋選擇」，或亦透過中介變數住宅「居住效益」而影響消費者惠顧意願。研究結果得到，「永續建築」構面可萃取整體環境性能、操作性能、垃圾改善、環境負荷、節能設計及維護管理等六個因素；在「居住效益」則為生活品質及成本回收等因素構成；並驗證假說「永續建築對購屋選擇有正向顯著影響及永續建築對於成本效益有正向評價時，可提高購屋選擇」的部份說法。且以「生活品質」為中介變數較「成本回收」對購屋選擇之正向相關影響力高，表示消費者不只是滿足住之需求以及住宅產品本身，而在購屋選擇上會考慮到住宅的永續建築環境價值。

As international sustainable building development and sustainability and energy-saving policies are advocated in Taiwan, modern consumers not only focus on residences in which to live, but also consider added values of the residences such as environmental factors that include lighting, ventilation, noise…and so on. In this paper we use cost-benefit analysis in relation to the sustainability index model proposed by Grace K.C. Ding (2005) as well as marketing theory to specify a structural model for this study that ”is house-purchase choice affected by sustainable building or through the residential benefit variable.” The results indicate that ”sustainable building” can consist of six factors, such as integrated environmental performance, operating performance, waste reduction, environmental loading, energy saving and maintenance. ”Residential benefit” can include both quality of life and cost recovery factors. Furthermore, tests of ”house-purchase choice” are affected by sustainable building and are supported by the data and the statement that ”sustainable building will affect the house-purchase intention through the residential benefit variable,” especially the quality of life factor as an indirect variable. Therefore, this research shows that the homebuyer will not only satisfy a living demand but will also consider the additional residential benefit from sustainable building on the house-purchase choice.

1. 張桂鳳、江哲銘、周伯丞(2007)。永續建築評估工具GBTool2005本土適用性之研究。建築學報，60，177-196。
   連結：
2. 劉祥得、翁興利(2007)。商品價值評估及惠顧意願之結構化模式分析―以圖書消費為例。顧客滿意學刊，3(1)，121-158。
   連結：
3. Babakus, E.,W. G. Mangold(1992).Adapting the Servqual Scale to Hospital Services: An Empirical Investigation.Health Services Research,26(6),767-786.
4. Baker, J.,D. Grewal,M. Levy(1992).An Experimental Approach to MakingRetail Store Environmental Decisions.Journal of Retailing,68(4),445-460.
5. Best, R.,G. De Valence(1999).Building in Value Pre-Design Issues.London:Arnold.
6. Bourdeau, L.(1999).Sustainable Development and the Future of Construction: A Comparison of Visions from Various Countries.Building Research & Information,27(6),354-366.
7. Chang, K. F,C. M. Chiang,P. C. Chou(2007).Adapting Aspects of GBTool 2005-Searching for Suitability in Taiwan.Building and Environment,42(1),310-316.
8. Dupuit, Jules(1952).On the Measurement of the Utility of Public Works.International Economic Papers,2,83-110.
9. Gann, D. M.,A. J. Salter,J. K. Whyte(2003).The Design Quality Indicator as a Tool for Thinking.Building Research & Information,31(5),318-333.
10. Grace, K. C. Ding(2005).Developing a Multicriteria Approach for the Measurement of Sustainable Performance, Australia.Building Research & Information,33(1),3-16.
11. Grewal, D.,R. Krishnan,J. Baker,N. Bonn(1998).The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name, and Price Discounts on Consumers` Evaluations and Purchase Intentions.Journal of Retailing,74(3),33-1352.
12. Hill, R. C.,P. A. Bowen(1997).Sustainable Construction: Principles and a Framework for Attainment.Construction Management and Economics,15,223-239.
13. ISO/TS21931-1(2006).Sustainability in Building Construction-Framework For Methods of Assessment for Environmental Performance of Construction Works.Switzerland:International Organization for Standardization.
14. Kaiser, H. F.(1960).The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement,20,141-151.
15. Langston, C.,G. K. C. Ding(2001).Sustainable Practices in the Built Environment.Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann.
16. Levin, H.(1997).Systematic Evaluation and Assessment of Building Environmental Performance.Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Building and the Environment,Paris:
17. Raymond J. C.(2005).Building Environmental Assessment Methods: Redefining Intentions and Roles.Building Research & Information,35(5),455-467.
18. Sirohi, N.,E. W. McLaughiin,D. R. Wittink(1998).A Model of Consumer Perceptions and Store Loyalty Intentions for a Supermarket.Journal of Retailing,74(2),223-245.
19. Vogtländer J. G.,A. Bijma,H. C. Brezet(2002).Communicating the Eco-efficiency of Products and Services by Means of the Ecocosts/value Model.Journal of Cleaner Production,10(1),57-67.
20. Wakefield, K. W.,J. Baker(1998).Excitement at the Mall: Determinants and Effects on Shopping Behavior.Journal of Retailing,74(4),515-540.
21. Wakefield, K. W.,J. G. Blodgett(1999).Customer Response to Intangible and Tangible Service Factors.Psychology and Marketing,16(1),51-68.
22. 內政部建築研究所(2002)。綠建築設計績效制度及獎勵條例之研訂。台北:內政部建築研究所。
23. 內政部建築研究所(2007)。綠建築解說與評估手冊。台北:內政部建築研究所。
24. 方嘉琳(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄大學。
25. 江盈如(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。
26. 江哲銘(2004)。永續建築導論。台灣:建築情報季刊雜誌社。
27. 吳月鳳(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄第一科技大學。
28. 沈鈺峰(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。
29. 張桂鳳(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立成功大學。
30. 陳裕益(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。
31. 陳簾予(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。
32. 黃亮達(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南華大學。
33. 榮泰生(2006)。SPSS與研究方法。台北:五南。

1. 陳奉瑤、梁仁旭(2018)。綠建築標章之溢價率分析－以新北市住宅大樓為例。臺灣土地研究，21(1)，61-85。
2. 黃苡筑、林怡芯、田政哲(2016)。影響台中市居民對大樓型預售屋購買意願影響因素之研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報，33(2)，45-56。
3. 温怡玲、湯幸芬、温怡玲、湯幸芬(2016)。觀光夜市居民健康與居住環境品質之研究。島嶼觀光研究，9(3)，75-105。
4. 趙俊隆、林榮春(2016)。住宅規劃量表發展之研究。顧客滿意學刊，12(1)，117-138。