题名

利用實質選擇模型來評估不動產價值與最適租金─以台北小套房為例

并列篇名

Applying the Concept of Real Options to the Pricing of Houses and Rent in Taipei

DOI

10.6375/JHS.201212.0047

作者

洪志興(Chih-Hsing Hung)

关键词

實質選擇權 ; 租金 ; 不動產定價 ; 不動產價值 ; real option ; rent ; pricing housing value ; real estate theoretical value

期刊名称

住宅學報

卷期/出版年月

21卷2期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

47 - 69

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

過往探討不動產價值的文獻,僅是從租金收益的單一角度去衡量不動產價值,並未以實質選擇權的角度來考慮未來不動產預期的出售價格,所以本研究是以實質選擇權的方法,同時考慮租金收益與未來預期的資本利得情況下,並且假設投資人在極大化自己財富,則評估出不動產的最適出售價值,再根據不動產的最適出售價值來估計不動產的實質價值與合理租金,並且探討不動產泡沫化程度。本研究發現租金與不動產價格的波動率越高,則不動產的實質價格會越大。當租金成長的速度小於不動產價格成長的速度,則會造成不動產的價格泡沫化。本研究根據台北市不動產資料為模擬基礎,發現台北市的租金價格可能被低估,也就是台北不動產的價格可能被高估。

英文摘要

This study not only focuses on fundamental models that derive the market housing price as a sum of the expected present value of rental income, but also focuses on real estate capital gains. This study applies the concept of real options to future housing prices, and uses the real options pricing model to price the houses. It assumes that the real estate investors are rational, that they will maximize their own wealth, and that they will then appraise the real estate in terms of the most suitable sales value, the real estate theoretical value and the extent of the real estate bubble. This study discovers that the higher is the rent and the volatility of real estate prices, then the higher will be the theoretical price of real estate. When the interest rate is lower, then the interest rate and the theoretical value of real estate will be negatively correlated. However, when the interest rate is rising over time, the interest rate and the real estate theoretical value will not necessarily have the same relevance. This study, which is based on Taipei real estate data, not only discovers that Taipei rental prices are underestimated, but also finds that Taipei real estate prices are overestimated.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 張金鶚, C. O.,高國峰, K. F.,林秋瑾, V. C. C.(2001)。台北市合理房價-需求面分析。住宅學報,10(1),51-66。
    連結:
  2. 張金鶚, C. O.,陳明吉, M. C.,鄧筱蓉, H. J.,楊智元, C. Y.(2009)。台北市房價泡沫知多少?—房價vs.租金、房價vs.所得。住宅學報,18(2),1-22。
    連結:
  3. 張金鶚, C. O.,楊宗憲, C. H.,洪御仁, Y. R.(2008)。中古屋及預售屋房價指數之建立、評估與整合─台北市之實證分析。住宅學報,17(2),13-34。
    連結:
  4. Ayuso, J.,Restoy, F.(2006).House Prices and Rents: An Equilibrium Asset Pricing Approach.Journal of Empirical Finance,13,371-388.
  5. Blanchard, O. J.,Fisher, S.(1989).Lecture on Macroeconomic.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
  6. Campbell, S. D.,Gallin, M. A. D. J.,Martin, R. F.(2006).A Trend and Variance Decomposition of the Rent-price Ratio in Housing Markets.FEDS Paper,29
  7. Capozza, D. R.,Seguin, P. J.(1996).Expectations, Efficiency, and Euphoria in the Housing Market.Regional Science and Urban Economics,26,369-385.
  8. Case, K.,Shiller, R.(1989).The Efficiency of the Market for Single-family Homes.American Economic Review,79,125-137.
  9. Clark, T. E.(1995).Rents and Prices of Housing Across Areas of the United States: A Cross-section Examination of the Present Value Model.Regional Science and Urban Economics,25,237-247.
  10. Clayton, J.(1996).Rational Expectations, Market Fundamentals and Housing Price Volatility.Real Estate Economics,24,441-470.
  11. Diewert, W. E.,Alice, O. N.,Nakamura, L. I.(2009).The Housing Bubble and a New Approach to Accounting for Housing in a CPI.Journal of Housing Economics,18,156-171.
  12. Gallin, J.(2008).The Long-run Relationship between House Prices and Rents.Real Estate Economics,36(4),635-658.
  13. Gallin, J.(2006).The Long-run Relationship between House Prices and Income: Evidence from Local Housing Markets.Real Estate Economics,34(3),417-438.
  14. Katz, A. J.(2009).Estimating Dwelling Services in the Candidate Countries: Theoretical and Practical Considerations in Developing Methodologies Based on a User Cost of Capital Measure.Price and Productivity Measurement,Nakamura, Manchester:
  15. Lambrecht, B. M.,Myers, S. C.(2008).Debt and Managerial Rents in a Real-options Model of the Firm.Journal of Financial Economics,89,209-231.
  16. Leland, H.(1994).Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure.Journal of Finance,49,1213-1252.
  17. Mauer, D. C.,Sarkar, S.(2005).Real Options, Agency Conflicts, and Optimal Capital Structure.Journal of Banking and Finance,29,1405-1428.
  18. McCarthy, J.,Peach, R.(2004).Are Home Prices the Next Bubble?.Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review,10,1-17.
  19. Meese, R.,Wallace, N. E.(1994).Testing the Present Value Relation for Housing Prices: Should I Leave My House in San Francisco?.Journal of Urban Economics,35,245-266.
  20. Merton, R.(1974).On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates.Journal of Finance,29,449-470.
  21. Mikhed, V.,Zemčík, P.(2009).Do House Prices Reflect Fundamentals? Aggregate and Panel Data Evidence.Journal of Housing Economics,18(2),140-149.
  22. Poterba, J. M.(1984).Tax Subsidies to Owner-occupied Housing: An Asset Market Approach.Quarterly Journal of Economics,99(4),729-752.
  23. Sarkar, S.(2003).Early and Late Calls of Convertible Bonds: Theory and Evidence.Journal of Banking and Finance,27,1349-1374.
  24. Sarkar, S.,Goukasian, L.(2006).The Effect of Tax Convexity on Corporate Investment Decisions and Tax Burdens.Journal of Public Economics Theory,8,293-320.
  25. Shiller, R. J.(2005).Irrational Exuberance.NJ:Princeton University Press.
  26. Timmermann, A.(1995).Cointegration Tests of Present Value Models with a Time-varying Discount Factor.Journal of Applied Econometrics,10(1),17-31.
被引用次数
  1. 洪志興(2017)。頂級豪宅價值結構之分析:需求者行為觀點。住宅學報,26(2),51-73。
  2. 楊屯山,陳翰柏,林哲群(2023)。租金與住宅使用成本關係之再探討:實質選擇權觀點。住宅學報,32(2),57-82。