题名

以條件評價法估算土地使用變更的外部性對房地產價格之影響程度與作用範圍

并列篇名

The Effect of Externalities in Land Use Conversion on House Prices: An Application of the Contingent Valuation Method

作者

胡海豐(Hai-Feng Hu)

关键词

土地使用變更 ； 外部性 ； 條件評價法 ； land use conversion ； externality ； contingent valuation method

期刊名称

住宅學報

卷期/出版年月

24卷2期（2015 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 26

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

先前關於土地利用「外部性」的量化研究，多數缺乏空間尺度的資訊，無法得知不同外部性型態對於周遭環境的影響範圍。本研究採用「條件評價法」，藉著加入「距離」因素的虛擬土地使用變更情境問卷，得知「都會公園」對其鄰接房地產價格有17.5%的正向影響，其程度隨著距離增加而遞減，至7,103公尺後降為零；「百貨公司」對其鄰接房地產價格有14.4%的正向影響，影響範圍6,948公尺；「室外型變電所」有14.5%的負向影響，影響範圍7,000公尺；「室內型變電所」有12.8%的負向影響，影響範圍6,607公尺。這些數據可以提供課徵Pigou稅或私人契約協商所需資訊的初步基礎。
英文摘要

Most previous quantitative studies have lacked information on the spatial range of the externalities based on various types of land use. Therefore, by adding the ＂distance＂ factor to questionnaires on the virtual land-use scenarios employed in the contingent valuation method, the effect of the positive externality of a metropolitan park on neighborhood house prices has been determined to be +17.5% in this study, and the intensity of this externality has decreased to zero when reaching a boundary of 7,103 m. Similarly, in a scenario involving a department store, the positive effect is +14.4% and the boundary is 6,948 m; in a scenario with an outdoorstyle substation, the negative effect is -14.5%, and the boundary is 7,000 m; and in a scenario of an indoor-style substation, the negative effect is -12.8%, and the boundary is 6,607 m. The data provide basic information that can be used when implementing Pigouvian taxes and private contract negotiations.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 吳珮瑛、黃一琳、劉哲良(2014)。距離與自然資源願付價值之關係—對評估資源邊際價值及總價值的啟示。農業與經濟，52，1-44。
    連結：
  2. 沈明展、林淑雯、邊泰明(2005)。臺灣地區工業園區公共服務價值評估之研究。臺灣土地研究，8(2)，49-71。
    連結：
  3. 林祖嘉、黃麗蓉(2014)。嫌惡性風水對商用不動產價格之影響。住宅學報，23(1)，51-72。
    連結：
  4. 林淑萍、蘇韻蓉、廖春玉(2005)。MAS 金錢態度量表之信度與效度之研究：以台灣私立大學學生為例。績效與策略研究，2(2)，85-101。
    連結：
  5. 洪鴻智(2000)。公共選擇與環境風險設施管制政策工具的選擇。都市與計劃，27(1)，47-63。
    連結：
  6. 洪鴻智、李承嘉、詹士樑、林華慶、蕭婷允、文嬿翔(2013)。水梯田濕地生態與景觀之保育與價值評估。臺灣土地研究，16(2)，1-22。
    連結：
  7. 胡志平(2006)。生態遊憩區價值之估計：假設市場評價法之應用。建築與規劃學報，7(1)，1-17。
    連結：
  8. 胡海豐(2010)。交易成本分析法的操作性問題：以土地使用變更制度的經濟效率性比較為例。建築與規劃學報，11(2)，89-110。
    連結：
  9. 張剛維、林森田(2008)。尋租行為與土地使用分區管制：財產權觀點之分析。台灣土地研究，11(2)，127-153。
    連結：
  10. 張清標、鄭玉珠、劉彥良(2009)。國小教師人格特質與休閒活動偏好之相關性研究。運動與遊憩研究，3(4)，93-116。
    連結：
  11. 陳文雄、廖子菁、葉家瑜(2013)。分析「超高壓輸電線路」對土地價格的影響。農業經濟叢刊，18(2)，121-165。
    連結：
  12. 傅祖壇、葉寶文(2005)。應用CVM 在健康效益之評估：高血壓疾病預防之願付價值。經濟論文叢刊，33(1)，1-32。
    連結：
  13. 曾喜鵬、薛立敏(2004)。家戶在都會區內部之遷移與住宅選擇模式－以住宅消費失衡與調整為觀點的解釋。建築與規劃學報，5(1)，1-28。
    連結：
  14. 曾菁敏(2008)。空間外部性、交易成本與市地重劃對住宅土地價格影響之研究：台南市的實證分析。住宅學報，17(1)，23-50。
    連結：
  15. 楊宗憲、蘇倖慧(2011)。迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究。住宅學報，20(2)，61-80。
    連結：
  16. 鄭亦卉、林晏州、林寶秀(2009)。聯合分析法中替選方案呈現方式對公園使用者願付費用之影響。戶外遊憩研究，22(1)，77-98。
    連結：
  17. Frost, J. 2014 "How to Interpret a Regression Model with Low R-squared and Low P Values," (http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/how-to-interpret-a-regression-modelwith-low-r-squared-and-low-p-values)
  18. Frost, J. 2013 "Regression Analysis: How Do I Interpret R-squared and Assess the Goodness-of-Fit?"(http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/regression-analysis-how-do-iinterpret-r-squared-and-assess-the-goodness-of-fit)
  19. Grace-Martin, K. 2012 "Can a Regression Model with a Small R-squared Be Useful?"(http://www.theanalysisfactor.com/small-r-squared/)
  20. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. 1947"Capital Returns from Soil Conservation Practices," Journal of Farms Economics. 29(4): 1181-1196
  21. Asabere, P. K.,Huffman, F. E.(1997).Hierarchical Zoning, Incompatible Uses and Price Discounts.Real Estate Economics,25(3),439-451.
  22. Bishop, R. C.,Heberliein, T. A.,Kealy, M. J.(1983).Contingent Valuation of Environmental Assets: Comparisons with a Simulate Market.Natural Resources Journal,23,619-633.
  23. Blomquist, G. C.,Whitehean, J. C.(1995).Existence Value, Contingent Valuation, and Natural Resources Damages Assessment.Growth and Change,26(4),573-589.
  24. Boyle, M. A.,Kiel, K. A.(2001).A Survey of Price Hedonic Studies of the Impact of Environmental Externalities.Journal of Real Estate Literature,9(2),117-144.
  25. Bulter, M. R.,Garnett, R. F.(2003).Teaching the Coase Theorem: Are We Getting It Right?.Atlantic Economic Journal,31(2),133-145.
  26. Caldari, K.,Masini, F.(2011).Pigouvian versus Marshallian Tax: Market Failure, Public Intervention and the Problem of Externalities.European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,18(5),715-732.
  27. Carlsen, F.,Langset, B.,Rattsø, J.,Stambø, L.(2009).Using Survey Data to Study Capitalization of Local Public Services.Regional Science and Urban Economics,39(6),688-695.
  28. Carson, R. T.(1998).Valuation of Tropical Rainforests: Philosophical and Practical Issues in the Use of Contingent Valuation.Ecological Economics,24(1),15-29.
  29. Case, K. E.,Fair, R. C.(2007).Principles of Economics.NJ:Pearson Edition, Inc..
  30. Christiansen, V.,Smith, S.(2012).Externality-Correcting Taxes and Regulation.Scandinavian Journal of Economics,114(2),358-383.
  31. Coase, R. H.(1960).The Problem of Social Cost.Journal of Law and Economics,3,1-44.
  32. Coase, R. H.(1988).The Firm, the Market, and the Law.Illinois:The University of Chicago Press.
  33. Cohen, J.,Cohen, P.,West, S. G.,Aiken, L. S.(2003).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale:Erlbaum.
  34. Colwell, P. F.(1990).Power Lines and Land Value.Journal of Real Estate Research,5(1),117-127.
  35. Colwell, P. F.(1997).Tender Mercies: Efficient and Equitable Land Use Change.Real Estate Economics,25(4),525-537.
  36. Colwell, P. F.,Foley, K. W.(1979).Electric Transmission Lines and the Selling Price of Residential Property.The Appraisal Journal,47(4),490-499.
  37. Colwell, P. F.,Trefzger, J. W.(2005).Supply-Side Effects and Contingent Valuation Analysis.Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education,8(1),45-59.
  38. Davis, R. K.(1963).Harvard University.
  39. Del Rosal, I.(2011).The Empirical Measurement of Rent-Seeking Costs.Journal of Economic Surveys,25(2),298-325.
  40. Delaney, C. J.,Timmons, D.(1992).High Voltage Power Lines: Do They Affect Residential Property Value?.Journal of Real Estate Research,7(3),315-329.
  41. Diamond, P. A.,Hausman, J. A.(1994).Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,8(4),45-64.
  42. Dickie, M.,Gerking, S.(1996).Formation of Risk Beliefs, Joint Production and Willingness to Pay to Avoid Skin Cancer.The Review of Economics and Statistics,78(3),451-463.
  43. Flouri, E.(2004).Subjective Well-Being in Midlife: The Role of Involvement of and Closeness to Parents in Childhood.Journal of Happiness Study,5(4),335-358.
  44. Frank, R. H.,Bernanke, B. S.(2009).Principles of Economics.NY:McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  45. Freeman, A. M.(2003).The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods.Washington DC:Resources for the Future.
  46. Guignet, D.(2013).What Do Property Values Really Tell Us? A Hedonic Study of Underground Storage Tanks.Land Economics,89(2),211-226.
  47. Hanemann, M.,Loomis, J.,Kanninen, B.(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Doule-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73(4),1255-1263.
  48. Hite, D.(2009).Factors Influencing Differences between Survey and Market-Based Environmental Value Measures.Urban Studies,46(1),117-138.
  49. Hu, H. F.(2013).The Intertemporal Dynamic Relationship between Floor Area Ratio and Land Prices.Planning for Sustainable Asian Cities,Tokyo:
  50. Jackson, T. O.,Pitts, J.(2010).The Effects of Electric Transmission Lines on Property Values: A Literature Review.Journal of Real Estate Literature,18(2),239-259.
  51. Keith, J. E.,Fawson, C.,Johnson, V.(1996).Preservation or Use a Contingent Valuation Study of Wilderness Designation in Utah.Ecological Economics,18(3),207-214.
  52. Kotchen, M. J.,Reiling, S. D.(2000).Environmental Attitudes, Motivations, and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species.Ecological Economics,32(1),93-107.
  53. Lee, D. R.,Tollison, R. D.(2011).Rent Seeking and Inefficiencies Resulting from Pecuniary Externalities.Kyklos,64(4),579-588.
  54. Mankiw, N. G.(2001).Essentials of Economics.FL:Harcourt College Publishers.
  55. Mark, J. H.,Goldberg, M. A.(1986).A Study of the Impacts of Zoning on Housing Values over Time.Journal of Urban Economics,20(3),257-73.
  56. Mitchell, R. C.(2002).On Designing Constructed Markets in Valuation Surveys.Environmental and Resource Economics.,22(1-2),297-321.
  57. Pogodzinski, J. M.,Sass, T. R.(1990).The Economic Theory of Zoning: A Critical Review.Land Economics,66(3),294-313.
  58. Pohlman, J. T.,Leitner, D. W.(2003).A Comparison of Ordinary Least Square and Logistic Regression.The Ohio Journal of Science,103(5),118-125.
  59. Pollakowski, H. O.,Wachter, S. M.(1990).The Effects of Land-Use Constraints on Housing Prices.Land Economics,66(3),315-324.
  60. Roberts, J. A.,Sepulveda, M. C. J.(1999).Demographics and Money Attitudes: A Test of Yamauchi and Templer's (1982) Money Attitude Scale in Mexico.Personality and Individual Differences,27(1),19-35.
  61. Rosen, S.(1974).Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.Journal of Political Economy,82(1),34-55.
  62. Schatzki, T.(2003).Options, Uncertainty and Sunk Costs: An Empirical Analysis of Land Use Change.Journal of Environmental Economics & Management,46(1),86-105.
  63. Shabman, L.,Stephenson, K.(1996).Searching for the Correct Benefit Estimate: Empirical Evidence for an Alternative Perspective.Land Economics,72(4),433-449.
  64. Siegan, B. H.(1972).Land Use without Zoning.MA:Heath-Lexington.
  65. Simons, R. L.,Lei, M. K.,Beach, S. R. H.,Brody, G. H.,Philibert, R. A.,Gibbons, F. X.(2012).Social Environment, Genes, and Aggression: Evidence Supporting the Differential Susceptibility Perspective.American Sociological Review,76(6),883-912.
  66. van Duijn, M.,Rouwendal, J. N.(2012).Analysis of Household Location Behavior, Local Amenities and House Prices in a Sorting Framework.Journal of Property Research,29(4),280-297.
  67. Zethraeus, N.(1998).Willingness to Pay for Hormone Replacement Therapy.Journal of Health Economics,7(1),31-38.
  68. 李國強(2009)。現代所有權觀念下限制所有權的根據。財產法暨經濟法，19，151-189。
  69. 張紘炬(2007)。抽樣方法與調查分析。台北=Taipei:華泰=Hwa-Tai。
  70. 陳中獎、黃榮福(2004)。不同環保團體對環境資源願付價值差異之研究：以七股濕地為例。環境教育學刊，3，17-36。
  71. 彭建文、楊宗憲、楊詩韻(2009)。捷運系統對不同區位房價影響分析：以營運階段為例。運輸計劃季刊，38(3)，275-296。
  72. 賴碧瑩(2010)。市地重劃之地價影響因素研究：以高雄市為例。公共事務評論，11(2)，47-59。
被引用次数
  1. 黃元杰(2017)。犯罪地圖政策公佈對房價之探討-以台北市為例。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2017。1-45。 
print cancel