题名

空屋移轉模型-住宅部門之互動分析

并列篇名

Housing Vacancy Transfer Model-A Study of Housing Sector Interaction

作者

華昌宜(Chang-I Hua);胡志平(Chich-Ping Hu)

关键词

住宅變遷 ; 人口遷移 ; 空屋鏈長度 ; housing change ; population migration ; length of vacancy chain

期刊名称

住宅學報

卷期/出版年月

30卷2期(2021 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 24

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文利用美國Cleveland的人口資料探索家庭間及住宅間的互動關係。人口遷移會伴隨相反的空屋移轉,也代表住宅需求與供給的改變。在1937-39年的統計資料中,顯示三個年度空屋鏈長度分別為3.07、3.83、4.21,呈現逐年增加的趨勢。依十分位分成十組家庭,利用邊際總和調整因子重新分配家庭分配,結果發現模型的配適度極佳。中等租金水準家庭的空屋鏈長度高於高租金及低租金水準家庭。空屋鏈結束最主要的原因是家庭遷入與家戶形成,住宅拆除對於空屋結束並不是很重要的因素。相關分析結果顯示,人口遷移乘數和空屋鏈長度與租金十分位數間的差異值間具有高相關。

英文摘要

This article uses the population data of Cleveland in the United States to explore the interaction between families and houses in the process of housing change. Population migration will be accompanied by the opposite transfer of vacant houses, which represents changes in housing demand and housing supply. In the statistical data of the three years from 1937 to 39, the result of empirical analysis shows that the lengths of the vacancy chain in the three years are 3.07, 3.83, and 4.21 respectively, which shows an increasing trend annually. Divide the households into ten groups according to the rent level of decile, and then use the marginal sum adjustment factor to redistribute the household distribution. The result shows that the model fits very well. Moreover, the length of vacancy chain for households with medium rent levels is higher than the those of families with the highest rents and the lowest rents. The main reason for the end of the vacancy chain is the family move-in and the household formation. The demolition of the house is not a very important factor for the end of the vacancy chain. According to the result of the correlation analysis, there is a high correlation among the population migration multiplier, the length of the vacancy chain and the rent decile gaps.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 林韋宏, W. H.,彭建文, C. W.,林子欽, T. C.(2003)。住宅屬性對空屋形成機率影響之研究。住宅學報,12(2),91-107。
    連結:
  2. 花敬群, C. C.(2001)。自有率、空屋數量與住宅市場調整。住宅學報,10(2),127-137。
    連結:
  3. 張金鶚, C. O.,彭建文, C. W.(1999)。空屋與餘屋面面觀。住宅學報,5,97-98。
    連結:
  4. 彭建文, C. W.(2004)。台灣地區空屋狀況變遷與原因分析。住宅學報,13(2),23-46。
    連結:
  5. 彭建文, C. W.,張金鶚, C. O.(1995)。台灣地區空屋現象與原因分析。住宅學報,3,45-71。
    連結:
  6. Fisher, E. M.,Winnick, L. B.(1961).A Reformulation of the Filtering Concept.Journal of Social Issues,7,47-85.
  7. Green, H. W. 1940 Cleveland Market Data Handbook.
  8. Green, H. W. 1938 Movement of Families within the Cleveland Metropolitan District. Cleveland.1939 Edition.1940 Edition.
  9. Green, H. W. 1938 Real-Property Inventory of Cleveland Metropolitan District.1939 Edition.1940 Edition.
  10. Grigsby, W. G.(1963).Housing Market and Public Policy.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  11. Hua, C. I.(1972).Harvard Uinversity.
  12. Kristof, F. S.(1965).Housing Policy Goals and the Turnover of Housing.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,31,232-245.
  13. Lansing, J. B.,Clifton, C. W.,Morgan, J. N.(1969).New Homes and Poor People.Michigan:Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan.
  14. Lansing, J. B.,Kish, L.(1957).Family Life Cycle As an Independent Variable.American Sociological Review,22,512-519.
  15. Lowry, I. S.(1960).Filtering and Housing Standards.Land Economics,34,362-370.
  16. Rapkin, C.,Winnick, L.,Blank, D. M.(1953).Winnick Housing Market Analysis.Washington, D.C:Housing and Home Finance Agency.
  17. Ratcliff, R. U.1949 Urban Land Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Smith, W.(1964).Filtering and Neighborhood Change.Berkeley:Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, University of California.
  19. U. S. Department of Census, Bureau of Census. 1960 U. S, . Census of Housing: 1960. Vol. IV(4). Components of Inventory Change-Inventory Characteristics Final Report HC (4), Part 1B. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
  20. U. S. Department of Census, Bureau of Census. 1943 U. S. Census of Housing 1940. Vol. I(1), Data for Small Areas, Part 2. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
  21. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1962 U. S. Census of Housing: 1960. Vol. IV(4). Components of Inventory Change-Inventory Characteristics Final Report HC (4), Part 1B. No. 13. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
  22. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1963 U. S. Census of Housing: 1960. Vol. I(1). State and Small Areas, Part 6. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
  23. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1964 Statistical Abstract of the U.S.
  24. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1966 Current Population Reports, Population Characteristics, Series P-20. No. 152.
  25. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1972 Current Housing Reports, Housing Vacancies, Series H-111 - 71-5 (annual).
  26. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1963 U. S. Census of Housing: 1960. Vol. II(2), Metropolitan Housing, Part 2. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
  27. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1971 Pocket Data Book, U. S. A.
  28. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1966 Current Population Reports, Population Characteristics, Series P-20. No. 156.
  29. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1947 County Data Book.
  30. U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. 1963 U. S. Census of Housing: 1960. Vol. II(2). Metropolitan Housing, Part 1. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
  31. U. S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Census. 1943 U. S. Census of Housing: 1940. Vol. II(2). General Characteristics, Part 1. Washington, D.C. Government Printing Office.
  32. White, H. C(1971).Multipliers, Vacancy Chains, and Filtering in Housing.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,35,88-94.