新家人關係－建構單身女性跨代共居住宅意象初探性研究

New Family Relationship: A Pilot Study on Establishing the Image of Intergenerational Co-Housing for Single Women

劉麗娟(Li-Chuan Liu)；吳慈華(Tzu-Hua Wu)

單身女性 ； 跨代 ； 共居住宅 ； 隱喻抽取技術 ； single women ； intergenerational ； co-housing ； ZMET

住宅學報

31卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

81 - 105

繁體中文

隨著高齡少子化社會來臨、女性平均壽命較男性長，不婚、離婚及喪偶高齡單身女性人數漸增，加上不婚主義盛行，年輕單身女性成為普遍現象。近年來青銀與跨代共居蔚為風潮，使跨世代單身女性共居住宅可成為此兩群體的住宅選項之一。本研究運用隱喻抽取技術（ZMET）探討女性跨代共居住宅意象，結果顯示跨世代單身女性對共居的首要選擇為「平房」與「庭院」，並期望透過跨代住宅追求「健康」、「成就感」、「做想做的事」及「安全感」等，本研究期能透過結合不同世代的單身女性群體住宅意象分析，提供未來跨代共居住宅規劃建議及參考。

The advent of an aging society with a low birth rate, together with women's longer average life expectancy compared with that of men, have contributed to an increasing number of older single women who are either unmarried, divorced, or widowed. Moreover, the prevalence of the notion of not getting married has led to more young single women. Intergenerational co-housing, having become a trend over the past few years, serves as a residential option for young and older single women. This study employs the Zaltman Metaphor Extraction Technology (ZMET) image of women's intergenerational co-housing. The results reveal a ＂single-story house＂ and a ＂house with a yard＂ to be the primary choice of co-housing for single women across generations. In addition, these women are expected to gain health, a sense of accomplishment and security, and the freedom to do whatever they wish to through intergenerational co-housing. By analyzing the image of single women's intergenerational co-housing for different generations, this study provides recommendations and insights into future planning for intergenerational co-housing.

1. 吳濟華, J. H,葉晉嘉, C. C.,周佳儀, C. Y.(2005)。高雄都會區女性住宅消費行為意向之研究。住宅學報，14(1)，67-84。
   連結：
2. 林婷鈴, T. L,蕭如伶, R. L.(2012)。廠商層級與消費族群品牌形象知覺差異分析：以運動休閒用品 ATUNAS 品牌為例。臺大管理論叢，23(1)，29-58。
   連結：
3. 胡惠君, H. J.(2015)。察覺 App 使用者之心智模式：以即時通訊軟體 LINE 為例。設計學報，20(2)，25-42。
   連結：
4. 張桂霖, G. L.(2013)。老人居住安排滿意與否之改變。住宅學報，22(1)，55-80。
   連結：
5. 張桂霖, G. L.,張金鶚, C. O.(2010)。老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換：家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討。人口學刊，40，41-90。
   連結：
6. 張桂霖, G. L.,張金鶚, C. O.(2013)。年齡增長與居住安排：從初老到老老之相同樣本縱斷面研究。都市與計劃，40(2)，157-189。
   連結：
7. 張慈佳, T. C.(2017)。性別角色態度對臺灣老人居住安排的影響。人口學刊，54，81-122。
   連結：
8. 陳建良, C. L.(2005)。親子居住安排在家庭內與跨家戶成員間的權力互動。住宅學報，14(2)，51-81。
   連結：
9. 陳淑美, S. M,林佩萱, P. S.(2010)。親子世代的財務支援、照顧需要對老人居住安排與生活滿意度影響之研究。住宅學報，19(1)，29-58。
   連結：
10. 陳靜怡, C. Y.(2018)。探討住宅權屬對高齡者主觀社會地位與自評健康條件之影響。住宅學報，27(2)，85-110。
    連結：
11. 曾思瑜, S. Y.(2002)。北歐高齡者住宅 · 設施政策與體系建構之研究：以瑞典和丹麥為例。建築學報，41，23-42。
    連結：
12. 黃耀榮, Y. R.(2012)。都市地區不同世代之「在地老化」住宅空間與設施需求研究：以板橋地區香社里、香雅里、社後里等社區為例。建築學報，80，1-27。
    連結：
13. 劉明德, M. T.,方之光, Z. G.,張裕幸, Y. S.,謝佩如, P. R.(2007)。運用隱喻抽取概念技術 (ZMET) 來建立線上角色扮演遊戲玩家的共識地圖。中山管理評論，15(3)，667-695。
    連結：
14. 劉明德, M. T.,吳碧珠, P. C.(2014)。建構住宿者期望之民宿意象。觀光休閒學報，20(2)，205-240。
    連結：
15. 薛立敏, L. M.,張日青, R. C.(2013)。老人是否持有不動產與獨居之聯合決策分析：並由居住滿意度分析老人獨居之性質。住宅學報，22(2)，87-117。
    連結：
16. Ache, P.,Fedrowitz, M.(2012).The Development of Co-Housing Initiatives in Germany.Built Environment,38(3),395-412.
17. An, J.-Y.,An, K.,O’Connor, L.,Wexler, S.(2008).Life Satisfaction, Self-Esteem, and Perceived Health Status Among Elder Korean Women: Focus on Living Arrangements.Journal of Transcultural Nursing,19(2),151-160.
18. Arifin, E. N.,Hogervorst, E.(2015).Elderly’s Self-Rated Health Status and Functional Capacity at the District Level in Indonesia.Journal of Population Ageing,8(3),147-172.
19. Barry, A.,Heale, R.,Pilon, R.,Lavoie, A. M.(2018).The Meaning of Home for Ageing Women Living Alone: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.Health & Social Care in the Community,26(3),e337-e344.
20. Beck, A. F.(2020).What Is Co-Housing? Developing a Conceptual Framework from the Studies of Danish Intergenerational Co-Housing.Housing, Theory and Society,37(1),40-64.
21. Bresson, S.,Denèfle, S.(2019).Diversity of Self-Managed Co-Housing Initiatives in France.Urban Research & Practice,8(1),5-16.
22. Chatterjee, S.,Pandey, M.(2019).Consumer Satisfaction Attribute Mapping in Hospitality Industry Through ZMET.International Journal of Business Innovation and Research,20(1),87-105.
23. Chen, P. J.(2008).Exploring Unspoken Words: Using ZMET to Depict Family Vacationer Mental Models.Advances in Hospitality and Leisure,4(4),29-51.
24. Choi, Y. H.(2005).Life Satisfaction and Depression According to Living Arrangement in Elderly.Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing,17(3),400.
25. Christensen, G. L.,Olson, J. C.(2002).Mapping Consumers’ Mental Models with ZMET.Psychology & Marketing,19(6),477-501.
26. Coulter, R. H.,Zaltman, G.(1994).Using the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique to Understand Brand Images.Advances in Consumer Research,21,501-507.
27. Darab, S.,Hartman, Y.,Holdsworth, L.(2018).What Women Want: Single Older Women and Their Housing Preferences.Housing Studies,33(4),525-543.
28. Davidi, S.(2019).From the Margins to the Center: Urban Housing for Single Jewish Women in Pre-state Israel.Women’s History Review,28(1),85-110.
29. Devlin, P.,Douglas, R.,Reynolds, T.(2015).Collaborative Design of Older Women’s CoHousing.Working with Older People,19(4),188-194.
30. Fromm, D.(2012).Seeding Community: Collaborative Housing as a Strategy for Social and Neighbourhood Repair.Built Environment,38(3),364-394.
31. Glass, A. P.(2012).Elder Co-Housing in the United States: Three Case Studies.Built Environment,38(3),345-363.
32. Godoy, K. E.,Leite, I. d. S.(2019).Tourism and Photography: A Bibliometric Study of Using Image Analysis Methodologies in Tourism Research.Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo,13(3),71-91.
33. Jolanki, O.,Vilkko, A.(2015).The Meaning of a “Sense of Community” in a Finnish Senior Co-Housing Community.Journal of Housing For the Elderly,29(1-2),111-125.
34. Kassarjian, H. H.(1977).Content Analysis in Consumer Research.Journal of Consumer Research,4(1),8-18.
35. Khoo-Lattimore, C.,Prideaux, B.(2013).ZMET: A Psychological Approach to Understanding Unsustainable Tourism, Obility.Journal of Sustainable Tourism,21(7),1036-1048.
36. Khoo-Lattimore, C.,Thyne, M.(2008).The Voice Behind Shoice: Understanding Key Motives that Drive Consumer Home Choice.Pacific Rim Property Research Journal,14(1),81-94.
37. Khoo-Lattimore, C.,Thyne, M.,Robertson, K.(2009).Getting to the Heart of the Matter: A Hedonic Reason for Home Purchases.Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference
38. Khoo-Lattimore, C.,Thyne, M.,Robertson, K.(2009).The ZMET Method: Using Projective Technique to Understand Consumer Home Choice.The Marketing Review,9(2),139-154.
39. Kobrin, F. E.,Goldscheider, C.(1982).Family Extension or Nonfamily Living: Life Cycle, Economic, and Ethnic Factors.Western Sociological Review,13(1),103-118.
40. Kotler, P.,Zaltman, G.(1971).Social Marketing: An Approach to Planned Social Change.Journal of Marketing,35(3),3-12.
41. Krokfors, K.(2012).Co-Housing in the Making.Built Environment,38(3),308-314.
42. Labit, A.(2015).Self-Managed Co-Housing in the Context of an Ageing Pulation in Europe.Urban Research & Practice,8(1),32-45.
43. Labit, A.,Dubost, N.(2016).Housing and Ageing in France and Germany: The Intergenerational Solution.Housing, Care and Support,19(2),45-54.
44. Lattimore, C. K.(2008).Home Truths: Top Three Reasons For Why People Buy Residential Real Estate.Book of Abstracts: 15th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference,Krakow, Poland:
45. Lee, M. S.,McGoldrick, P. J.,Keeling, K. A.,Doherty, J.(2003).Using ZMET to Explore Barriers to the Adoption of 3G Mobile Banking Services.International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management,31(6),340-348.
46. Leith, K. H.(2006).Home is Where the Heart is ... or Is It?”: A Phenomenological Exploration of the Meaning of Home for Older Women in Congregate Housing.Journal of Aging Studies,20(4),317-333.
47. Liang, Y.-W.,Lee, A. S.,Liu, S.-F.(2016).A Study on Design-Oriented Demands of VR via ZMET-QFD Model for Industrial Design Education and Students’ Learning.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,12(5),1205-1219.
48. Lu, S.-C.,Wu, K.-Y.(2019).Application of ZMET to Develop the Cultural Image of Pottery Industry at the Miaoli County.3rd International Conference on Advanced Education and Management Science (AEMS2019)
49. Oppenheim, R.(2019).Living on Your Own: Single Women, Rental Housing, and Post-Revolutionary Affect in Contemporary South Korea by Jesook Song.Journal of Korean Studies,24(2),411-414.
50. Pareja-Eastaway, M. 2017 “Reflections From an Outsider–Older Women’s Cohousing,” (OWCH, Barnet, North London). Accelerating Housing Production in London.
51. Pedersen, M.(2015).Senior Co-Housing Communities in Denmark.Journal of Housing For the Elderly,29(1-2),126-145.
52. Reynolds, T. J.,Olson, J. C.(2001).Understanding Consumer Decision Making: The Means-End Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy.UK:Psychology Press.
53. Rugg, J. J.,Quilgars, D. J.(2015).Young People and Housing: A Review of the Present Policy and Practice Landscape.Youth and Policy,114,5-16.
54. Russell, C.(2007).What Do Older Women and Men Want? Gender Differences in the ‘Lived Experience’of Ageing.Current Sociology,55(2),173-192.
55. Shearer, R. L.,Aldemir, T.,Hitchcock, J.,Resig, J.,Driver, J.,Kohler, M.(2020).What Students Want: A Vision of a Future Online Learning Experience Grounded in Distance Education Theory.American Journal of Distance Education,34(1),36-52.
56. Truong, V.-A. T.(2019).Applying the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique on Understanding Place Image.Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies,27(2),153-173.
57. Tummers, L.(2015).Understanding Co-Housing From a Planning Perspective: Why and How?.Urban Research & Practice,8(1),64-78.
58. Ward, R. A.,Spitze, G.(1992).Consequences of Parent-Adult Child Coresidence: A Review and Research Agenda.Journal of Family Issues,13(4),553-572.
59. Wolf, D. A.,Soldo, B. J.(1988).Household Composition Choices of Older Unmarried Women.Demography,25(3),387-403.
60. Woo, A.,Cho, G.-H.,Kim, J.(2019).Would You Share Your Home? The Multifaceted Determinants of Preference for Shared Housing among Young Adults.Applied Geography,103,12-21.
61. Yu, Q.(2019).A Room of Her Own: Housing for New York’s Working Women, 1875-1930.Columbia University.
62. Zaichkowsky, J. L.(1994).The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising.Journal of Advertising,23(4),59-70.
63. Zaltman, G.(2003).How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market.Brighton, Massachusetts:Harvard Business Press.
64. Zaltman, G.,Coulter, R. H.(1995).Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-Based Advertising Research.Journal of Advertising Research,35(4),35-51.
65. 王文伶, W. L(2012)。國立臺北科技大學=National Taipei University of Technology。
66. 王俐文, L. W.(2009)。被「詮釋」掉的風險：單身女性合租者之空間安全感研究。文化研究月報，88，40-53。
67. 古家萍, C. P.,王雲東, Y. T.,黃心苑, N.,王鐘貴, C. K.,林寬佳, K. C.(2009)。老人群體居住安排變動與醫療服務使用之多面向長期研究。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，33(6)，568-581。
68. 阮慧敏, H. M(2017)。青銀共居高齡化社會的解方？。消費者報導雜誌，437，41-46。
69. 劉正, C.,齊力, L.(2019)。臺灣高齡者的居住狀況與機構照顧的需求趨勢。國土及公共治理季刊，7(1)，70-81。

1. 顏千惠,鄭曉楓(2023)。女大當嫁？未婚單身女性在表達性藝術療癒工作坊中的自我概念轉變歷程。臺灣諮商心理學報，11(2)，1-34。