大學生後形式思考與創造性表現能力的關係

The Relationship between Postformal Thinking and Creative Performance among College Students

邱文彬(Wen-Bin Chiou)

大學生 ； 形式性思考 ； 後形式思考 ； 創造力 ； College Students ； Creativity ； Formalistic Thinking ； Postformal Thinking

藝術教育研究

12期（2006 / 12 / 01）

65 - 84

繁體中文

本研究根據後皮亞傑學派的觀點，探討屬於青年期後期大學生的認知發展層次與創造力表現的關係。樣本包括407位19至25歲的大專校院學生，採用典範信念量表測量形式性思考、相對性思考、以及辨證性思考等三種認知思考型式，使用威廉斯創造力測驗測量創造力表現。辨證性思考、相對性思考與創造力表現的六個向度有顯著正相關，形式性思考則與它們有顯著負相關。事前比較的結果支持後形式性思考者在創造力表現應顯著高於形式性思考者的假設，多變量變異數分析亦顯示相同的趨勢。多元區別分析指出創造力表現的六個向度能夠有效區別形式性思考者與後形式思考者，呼應後形式思考發展與創造力表現的平行關係。本研究最後提出未來研究方向、創造力教學及藝術教育的啓示。

The aim of present study was to investigate the relationship between cognitive development levels and creative performance among college students based on the post-Piagetian perspective. Participants were 407 college students, ranging from age 19 to 25 years. The Paradigm Belief Scale was employed to measure the three cognitive styles which are formalistic thinking, relativistic thinking, and dialectical thinking. Williams Creative Thinking Inventory was used to measure participants' creative performance. Correlation Analysis showed that dialectical thinking and relativistic thinking were positively correlated with creative performance, whereas formalistic thinking was negatively correlated with creative performance. The results of planned contrasts revealed that participants with postformal thinking scored higher than those with formalistic thinking, and these findings were consistent with the predictions. Further MANOVA analysis also exhibited a similar pattern in accordance with the findings observed in planned contrasts. Multiple Discriminant Analysis showed that the linear combination of creativity's six dimensions was able to discriminate the participants with formalistic thinking and those with postformal thinking, which echoed the argument describing the corresponding relationship between postformal thinking and creative performance. Future directions and implications for the creativity pedagogy and arts education were also discussed.

1. 邱文彬(1999)。台北，國立政治大學心理系。
   連結：
2. 邱文彬(2003)。視覺思考及其教學觀的初探模型：認知發展與建構取向。藝術教育研究，6，21-38。
   連結：
3. Amabile, T. M.(1983).The social psychology of creativity.New York:Springer-Verlag.
4. Barron, F.(1955).The disposition toward originality.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073
5. Basseches, M.(1984).Dialectical thinking and adult development.
6. Basseches, M.,M. L. Commons,J. D. Sinnott,F. A. Richards,C. Armon(1989).Dialectical thinking as an organized whole: Comments on Irwin and Kramer.Adult development: Comparisons and applications of developmental models.
7. Bruner, J. S.,H. E. Gruber,G. Terrell,M. Wertheimer(1962).The conditions of creativity.Contemporary approaches to creative thinking.
8. Cook, T. D.,Campbell, D. T.(1979).Quasi-experimentation.
9. Darden, W. R,Perreault, W. D.(1975).A multivariate analysis of media exposure and vacation behavior with life style covariates.Journal of Consumer Research,2,93-103.
10. Guilford, J. P.(1967).The nature of human intelligence.New York:Harper & Row.
11. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.).
12. Henle, M.,H. E. Gruber,G. Terrell,M. Wertheimer(1962).The birth and death of ideas.Contemporary approaches to creative thinking.
13. Kirk, R. E.(1995).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavior sciences (3rd ed.).
14. Koestler, A.(1964).The act of creation.New York:Macmillan.
15. Koplowitz, H.,M. L. Commons,F. A. Richards,C. Armon(1984).A projection beyond Piaget`s formal-operations stage.Beyond formal operations: Late adolescence and adult cognitive development.
16. Kramer, D. A.(1983).Post-formal operations? A need for further conceptualization.Human Development.
17. Kramer, D. A.,J. D. Sinnott(1989).A developmental framework for understanding conflict resolution processes.Everyday problem solving in adulthood.
18. Kramer, D. A.,Kahlbaugh, P. E.,Goldston, R. B.(1992).A measure of paradigm beliefs about the social world.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science,47,180-189.
19. Kramer, D. A.,Woodruff, D. S.(1986).Relativistic and dialectical thought in three adult age-groups.Human Development.
20. Kuder, G. F.,Richardson, M. W.(1937).The theory of the estimation of test reliability.Psychometrika.
21. Kuhn, T. S.(1970).The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.).Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
22. Labouvie-Vief, G.(1982).Dynamic development and mature autonomy: A theoretical prologue.Human Development.
23. Labouvie-Vief, G.(1980).Beyond formal operations: Uses and limits of pure logic in life-span development.Human Development.
24. Newell, A.,Shaw, J.,Simon, H.,H. E. Gruber,G. Terrell,M. Wertheimer(1962).The processes of creative thinking.Contemporary approaches to creative thinking.
25. Piaget, J.(1950).The psychology of intelligence.New York:International Universities Press.
26. Riegel, K. F.(1973).Dialectic operations: The final period of cognitive development.Human Development.
27. Rothenberg, A.,Hausman, C. R.(1976).The creativity question.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
28. Rybash, J. M.,Roodin, P. A.,M. L. Commons,J. D. Sinnott,F. A. Richards,C. Armon(1989).Making decisions about health-care problems: A comparison of formal and postformal modes of competence.Adult development: Comparisons and applications of developmental models.
29. Schaie, K. W.(1977).Toward a stage theory of adult development.International Journal of Aging and Human Development,8,129-138.
30. Schuster, C. S.,Ashburn, S. S.(1988).The process of human development.New York:Little Brown & Company.
31. Sinnott, J. D.(1981).The theory of relativity: A metatheory for development?.Human Development,24,292-311.
32. Sinnott, J. D.,M. L. Commons,F. A. Richards,C. Armon(1984).Postformal reasoning: The relativistic stage.Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development,New York:
33. Stein, M. I.(1974).Stimulating creativity.New York:Academic Press.
34. Torrance, E. P.(1962).Guiding creative talent.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
35. 林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。台北:心理。
36. 葛樹人(1991)。心理測驗學。台北:桂冠。

1. 蔡銘鴻、洪美伶、林家旭(2014)。面具彩繪歷程創造力評估模型之實證研究。美容科技學刊，11(2)，137-162。
2. 陳瓊花(2013)。創造力的載體：從「創意表現」探討創造力具體化的圖像類型、表現策略及其意涵。資優教育研究，11，42-71。
3. 鄧佩珊、蔡登傳、余泰魁(2014)。不同認知型態對詞圖構思與分鏡腳本表現之影響。設計學報，19(1)，1-18。
4. 饒達欽、張中一、吳明雄(2008)。高中職學生藝術創造力影響指標之研究：以全國競賽得獎學生爲對象。藝術教育研究，16，1-28。
5. (2007)。台灣創造力教育研究之回顧。教育曙光，55(3)，47-59。