從不同形式的描繪對象來看全盲者的空間表現發展末階

Spatial Representation of Totally Blind People: The Late Developmental Stages

伊彬(Bin I)；徐春江(Chuen-Jiang Shiu)

空間表現 ； 全盲者 ； 觸覺繪畫 ； 發展 ； spatial representation ； blind ； tactile drawings ； development

藝術教育研究

15期（2008 / 05 / 01）

71 - 100

繁體中文

本研究以不同形式的物體作業，探討全盲者末階的空間表現。總計16位參與者依視覺條件分爲：先天無光覺全盲者六人，先天有光覺全盲者五人，後天全盲者五人，年齡自17歲11個月至23歲三個月，共收集135張全盲者的圖畫。研究結果爲：1.18歲以後全盲者空間表現較前期更精緻成熟，視覺限制並未造成表現發展的停滯。2.不同的視覺條件、作業命題會影響表現差異。3.全盲者末階與明眼者初階表現近似，兩者間出現階序不同。因此，全盲者末階空間表現與明眼者不同。支持伊彬、徐春江等學者所主張觸覺不能取代視覺，全盲者與明眼者的空間表現不同。反對Kennedy等學者所主張的觸覺能夠取代視覺，全盲者與明眼者空間表現相同的理論。

The present research studies the late stages of spatial representation of totally blind people through various 3D stimuli. Sixteen totally blind people, aged 17 to 23 years old, classified into 3 types according to visual conditions, participated the study. One hundred and thirty five drawings were collected and analyzed. The results suggest: 1. the visual condition does not prevent blind people's drawing to develop into a finer and more mature stage after 18 years old. 2. The participants' drawing performances varied with different tasks and participants' visual conditions. 3. Blind people's late stages of drawing development is similar to the sighted people's primitive stage; whereas the sequence of the developmental stages is dissimilar. The research concludes that vision cannot be replaced by tactility when performing perspective drawings. The conclusion is consistent with earlier researches done by I & Shiu and rejects Kennedy's theory.

1. Arnheim, R.(1976).Art and visual perception.Berkeley:University of California.
2. Cahill, H.,Linehan, C.,McCarthy, J.,Bormans, G.,Engelen, J.(1996).Blind and partially sighted students` access to mathematics and computer technology in Ireland and Belgium.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,90,175-181.
3. Chen, M. J.,Therkelsen, M.,Griffiths, K.(1984).Representational drawings of solid objects: A longitudinal study.Visual Arts Research,10(19),27-31.
4. Cox, M. V.(1986).Cubes are difficult things to draw.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,4,341-345.
5. D`Angiulli, A.,Kennedy, J. M.,Heller, M. A.(1998).Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,39,187-190.
6. D`Angiulli, A.,Maggi, S.(2003).Development of drawing abilities in a distinct population: Depiction of perceptual principles by three children with congenital total blindness.International Journal of Behavioral Development,27(3),193-200.
7. Duthie, R. K.,N. H. Freeman,M. V. Cox (Eds.)(1985).Visual order.London, England:Cambridge University.
8. Freeman, N. H.(1980).Strategies of representation in young children: Analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes.London:Academic Press.
9. Gardner, H.(1980).Artful scribbles.New York:Basic Books.
10. Gibson, J. J.(1962).Observations on active touch.Psychological Review,69,477-491.
11. Gibson, J. J.(1971).The ecological approach to visual perception.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
12. Golomb, C.(1973).Children`s representation of the human figure: The effects of models, media, and instructions.Genetic Psychology Monographs,87,197-252.
13. Guerin, F.,Ska, B.,Belleville, S.(1999).Cognitive processing of drawing abilities.Brain and Cognition,40,464-478.
14. Harris, D.(1963).Children`s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity.New York, NY:Harcourt, Brace & World.
15. Heller, M. A.(2002).Tactile picture perception in sighted and blind people.Behavioral Brain Research,135,65-68.
16. Hopkins, R.(2000).Touching pictures.British Journal of Aesthetics,40,149.
17. I, B.(1995).Culture, Society, and Education: 1995 INSEA-Asian Regional Congress Proceedings.Taichung:INSEA-Asian.
18. I, B.(1995).Urbana-Champaign, IL,University of Illinois.
19. Kennedy, J. M.(2003).Drawings from Gaia, a blind girl.Perception,32,321-340.
20. Drawing & the blind
21. Kennedy, J. M.(1993).Drawing & the blind.New York:Yale University Press.
22. Kennedy, J. M.,Juricevic, I.(2006).Foreshortening, convergence and drawings from a blind adult.Perception,35,847-851.
23. Kennedy, J. M.,Juricevic, I.(2003).Drawings by Tracy, a blind adult.Perception,32,1059-1071.
24. Kennedy, J. M.,M. Hagen (Ed.)(1980).The perception of picture.New York:Academic Press.
25. Kennedy, M. J.(1983).What can we learn about pictures from the blind?.American Scientist,71,19-26.
26. Kennedy, M. J.(1984).Drawing by the blind: sighted children and adults judge their sequence of development.Visual Arts Research,10(1),1-6.
27. Lewis, H. P.(1963).Spatial representation in drawing as a correlate of development and a basis for picture preference.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,102,95-107.
28. Lopes, D. M. M.(1997).Art media and the sense modalities: Tactile pictures.Philosophical Quarterly,47,425-440.
29. Lopes, D. M. M.(2002).Vision, tough, and the value of pictures.British Journal of Aesthetics,42(2),191-201.
30. Lowenfeld, V.(1947).Creative and mental growth.New York, NY:Macmillan.
31. Lowenfeld, V.,Brittain, L. W.(1987).Creative and mental growth.New York, NY:Macmillan.
32. Nicholls, A. L.,Kennedy, J. M.(1992).Drawing development: From similarity of features to direction.Child Development,63,227-241.
33. Park, E.,I, B.(1995).Children`s representation systems in drawing three-dimensional objects: A review of empirical studies.Visual Arts Research,21(2),42-56.
34. Piaget, J.,Inhelder, B.,F. J. Langdon,J. L. Lunzer, (Trans.)(1956).The child`s conception of space.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35. Sathian, K.,Zangaladze, A.,Hoffman, J. M.,Grafton, S. T.(1997).Feeling with the mind`s eye.Neuroreport,8,3877-3881.
36. Schier, F.(1986).Deeper into pictures: An essay on pictorial representation.New York:Cambridge University Press.
37. Shimizu, Y.,Saida, S.,Shimura, H.(1993).Tactile pattern recognition by graphic display: Importance of 3-D information for haptic.Perception & Psychophysics,53(1),43-48.
38. Thomas, D.,Evelyn, K.(1997).Issues and aids for teaching mathematics to the blind.Mathematics Teacher,90,344-350.
39. Thomas, G. V.,Silk, A. M.(1990).An introduction to the psychology of children`s drawing.New York, NY:New York University.
40. Van Boven, R. W.,Hamilton, R. H.,Kauffman, T.,Keenan, J. P.,Pascual-Leone, A.(2000).Tactile spatial resolution in blind Braille readers.Neurology,54,2230-2236.
41. Victoria, J.(1982).Correspondence between implied points of view and selected points of view in children`s drawings of familiar and unfamiliar objects.Visual Arts Research,15,33-42.
42. Willats, J.,G. Butterworth (Ed.)(1977).The child`s representation of the world.New York, NY:Plenum Press.
43. 伊彬、徐春江(2001)。全盲兒童與青少年對單一模型與部份遮蓋模型的描繪－視覺在空間表現發展之角色。視覺藝術，4，127-164。
44. 伊彬、陳玟秀(2002)。日常生活3D物體轉換成2D觸覺圖形之認知探討。中華民國設計學會2002年設計學術研究成果研討會論文集，台北:
45. 伊彬、陳玟秀(2002)。國科會91年度研究計畫補助結案報告國科會91年度研究計畫補助結案報告,未出版
46. 伊彬、黃壬來編(2003)。藝術與人文教育上冊。台北:桂冠圖書。
47. 佐藤泰正、陳英三譯(1983)。視覺障礙兒童心理學。台灣省視覺障礙兒童混合教育計畫師資訓練教育計畫。
48. 徐春江(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所。
49. 鄒品梅(1983)。視覺障礙兒童美感經驗之研究。台北:台北市立師範專科學校。

1. 陳亭伃、伊彬(2017)。國小高年級全盲兒童人物繪畫表現教學策略初探。特殊教育季刊，144，11-22。
2. 洪子庭,伊彬(2020)。強調寫生與自由聯想之教學策略應用於全盲青少年圖像創造力之養成。藝術教育研究，39，1-44。
3. 李鏡琪,伊彬(2021)。視障者雙視觸覺圖畫書類型分析與圖畫書使用者意見。藝術教育研究，42，79-120。
4. 馬睿平、洪珮華、林榮泰(2017)。學童手繪空間表現與三維設計能力之關係探究。設計學報，22(3)，45-68。
5. 張婉琪、伊彬(2011)。教導先天全盲成人再現正立方體之個案研究。藝術教育研究，22，1-36。
6. 張婉琪、張文智、伊彬(2013)。從既有文獻中比較視障者繪畫材料的特性。特殊教育季刊，129，35-43。
7. (2017)。教導青春期前期全盲兒童學習自然寫實繪畫之限制與取代策略。國際藝術教育學刊，15(1)，151-201。