從學習週記看完形理論在攝影教育上的應用

Research into the Application of Gestalt Theory in Photographic Education Using Weekly Records

陸維元(Wei-Yuan Lu)

主題分析法 ； 完形心理學 ； 影像解析 ； 攝影 ； 攝影教育 ； photographic education ； photography ； gestalt theory ； image analysis ； thematic analysis

藝術教育研究

20期（2010 / 12 / 01）

37 - 64

繁體中文

本文首先指出在學術界有關攝影教育的研究嚴重不足的現況。據此，研究者規劃以完形心理學爲理論核心，影像解析爲主體的實驗性攝影課程「影像美學」，並於94學年下學期於清華大學通識中心施行，嘗試深入探究攝影的教與學。而研究目的在於探討該課程對學習攝影是否有正面助益。本研究透過收集學習週記，並運用「主題分析法」分析文本資訊與詮釋學習攝影之經驗，透過學習者觀點來看教學效益。整體而言，本研究的結果呈現「影像美學」課程對於學習攝影的正面效果。學習者不論在自我評價、攝影技術、創作意圖、對完形理論的認識與應用上都有朝正向發展的趨勢。然而，對於創作過程中理智與直覺的衝突，研究者認爲這一問題明確的建議了未來研究的方向。

This paper first recognizes that there is very little literature which bears directly on photographic education in academic circles. It then turns to the formulation of a new teaching programme, ”Image Aesthetics”, which integrates image analysis with Gestalt theory, in an attempt to conduct research into photography teaching and learning. The primary aim of the study is to examine whether the curriculum can be helpful in improving students' understanding and practice in photography. This is followed by an introduction to the empirical procedures, including the collection and analysis of weekly records, adopted to assess student learning experience. Afterwards, Thematic Analysis has been applied to analyze the learning records, which express opinions from the students' perspectives. Assessment results of the weekly records show an overall positive effect on their learning in terms of self-evaluation, photographic technique, having intent, and the understanding and application of Gestalt theory. Discussions of the seeming contradiction between intuitive composition and intellectual composition are also provided in the last part of this paper. These issues have not been fully addressed in the study and are considered worthwhile for further research.

1. 吳愼愼(2006)。藝術人的終身學習：生命故事敍說的教學實踐。藝術教育研究，12，1-38。
   連結：
2. 謝顒丞、李政家(2005)。大學院校攝影設計課程規劃之研究。師大學報：人文與社會類，50(1)，105-129。
   連結：
3. 吳嘉寶(Wu, Jiabao)(1997年2月19日)。訊息時代中影像美學理論架構初探─從認知心理學的訊息處理理論出發(Xunxi shidai zhong yingxiang meixue lilun jiagou chutan-Cong renzhi xinlixue de xunxi chuli lilun chufa)。取自(Quzi) http://www.fotosoft.com.tw/book/papers/library-1-1002.htm。
4. 吳嘉寶(Wu, Jiabao)(2001)。我們何時才有攝影教育(Women heshi caiyou sheying jiaoyu)。取自(Quzi) http://old.photosharp.com.tw/discussion/Wu/wu-2.htm。
5. 蔣載榮(Jiang, Zairong)(2002a)。爲什麼臺灣的大學裡沒有獨立的攝影系(Weisheme Taiwan de daxue li meiyou duli de sheyingxi)。取自(Quzi)http://gc.shu.edu.tw/~tjchiang/profile03_3.html
6. Arnheim, R.(1997).Visual thinking.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
7. Arnheim, R.(1986).New essays on the psychology of art.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
8. Arnheim, R.(1980).A plea for visual thinking.Critical Inquiry,6(3),489-497.
9. Arnheim, R.(1974).Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye.Berkeley, CA:University of California.
10. Boyatzis, R. E.(1998).Transforming qualitative information.London, UK:Sage.
11. Bryman, A.(ed.),Burgess, R. G.(ed.)(1999).Qualitative Research (Ⅲ).London, UK:SAGE.
12. Eubanks, D. L.,Murphy, S. T.,Mumford, M. D.(2010).Intuition as an influence on creative problem solving: The effects of intuition, positive affect, and training.Creativity Research Journal,22(2),170-184.
13. Fensham, P. J.,Marton, F.(1992).What has happened to intuition in science education.Research in Science Education,22,114-122.
14. Gombrich, E. H.(2006).The story of art (Pocket ed.).London, UK:Phaidon.
15. Jarvis, J.(1992).Using diaries for teacher reflection on in-service courses about teacher-training.ELT Journal,46(2),133-142.
16. Kennedy, J. M.(1980).A commentary on Rudolf Arnheim's approach to art and visual perception.Leonardo,13(2),117-122.
17. Kleinman, K.(ed.),Van Duzer, L.(ed.)(1997).Rudolf Arnheim: Revealing visions.Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan.
18. Memmert, D.(2007).Can creativity be improved by an attention-broadening training program? An exploratory study focusing on team sports.Creativity Research Journal,19(2-3),281-291.
19. Newbury, D.(1995).Birmingham,University of Central England.
20. Norton, B.(2000).Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change.London, UK:Longman.
21. Nunan, D.(1992).Research methods in language learning.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University.
22. Patton, M. Q.(2002).Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
23. Rogers, A.,Allen, D.(1996).What's happening to photography.Journal of Art and Design Education,15(1),23-30.
24. Sadtono, E.(ed.)(1991).Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom.Singapore:SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
25. Scott, G. M.,Leritz, L. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2004).The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,16(4),361-388.
26. Seliger, H. W.(ed.),Long, M. H.(ed.)(1983).Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition.Rowley, MA:Newbury House.
27. Shirley, D.,Langan-Fox, J.(1996).Intuition: A review and directions for research.Psychological Reports,79,563-584.
28. Stiggins, R. J.(2001).Student-involved classroom assessment.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall.
29. Zakia, R. D.(1993).Photography and visual perception.Journal of Aesthetic Education,27(4),67-81.
30. Zakia, R. D.(1997).Perception and imaging.Woburn, MA:Focal.
31. Zakia, R. D.(2002).Perception and imaging.Woburn, MA:Focal.
32. 吳嘉寶(1993)。鏡頭下的沈思─中華民國攝影教育協會1993年學術論文集，臺北=Taibei=Taipei:
33. 李秀珍(2006)。國立新竹教育大學人資處美勞教學碩士班=Guoli xinzhu jiaoyu daxue renzichu meilao jiaoxue shuoshiban。
34. 郭小平譯、翟燦譯、熊蕾譯、Arnheim, R.(1993)。對美術教學的意見。長沙=Zhangsha:湖南美術出版社=Hunan meishu chubanshe。
35. 郭宗德(2009)。臺北藝術大學藝術與人文教育研究所=Taipei yishu daxue yishu yu renwen jiaoyu yanjiusuo。
36. 黃金俊(2006)。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系=Guoli Taiwan shi fan da xue gong ye jiao yu xue xi。
37. 黃鈴池(2005)。數位化時代臺灣攝影教育策略之研究。臺南女院學報，24，279-300。
38. 蔣載榮(2002)。觀‧念‧攝影─影像的視覺心裡剖析。臺北=Taibei=Taipei:雪嶺文化=Xueling wenhua。

1. 黃金俊(2020)。高職學生攝影想像力量表之編製。藝術教育研究，40，75-115。
2. 劉光夏(2022)。活化藝術教學：翻轉教室在大學攝影課堂之實踐探究。藝術教育研究，43，111-147。
3. 陸維元(2012)。完形理論應用於大學攝影教學之學習成效評估。藝術教育研究，24，73-109。
4. 陸維元(2019)。國民中小學攝影教學應用與問題之探索性研究：12位教師的觀點。藝術教育研究，37，83-133。