成年人藝術創作依戀行為之個案研究：以Moya為例

Art-Tachment in Adults: A Case Study of Moya

江學瀅(Shyue-Ying Chiang)

客體關係 ； 潛在空間 ； 藝術治療 ； 藝術教育 ； 藝術創作依戀行為 ； object relation ； potential space ； art therapy ； art education ； Art-tachment behavior

藝術教育研究

28期（2014 / 12 / 01）

1 - 33

繁體中文

本研究根據客體關係心理學之過渡性客體發生的潛在空間心理動力理論，從藝術創作、藝術教育與藝術治療的角度，探究非專業成年藝術創作者面對生命困境時，主動而為的藝術創作行為，並以藝術創作依戀行為稱之。由於潛在空間動力理論強調生命經驗之歷程，本研究以敘事探究為方法，探究一位職場成就穩定卻面臨內在困境的個案發展藝術創作依戀行為的生命經驗。研究結果顯示，個體早年的客體關係發展會逐漸形成個人重要生命議題，藝術創作存在於現實的具體形式能協助個體建構潛在空間，進而幫助個體面對生命議題並因應現實帶來的衝擊。藝術創作依戀行為形成的近因主要來自於現實的工作壓力帶來之心理耗竭，遠因則與藝術教育經驗相關，更深刻的成因則來自於早年客體關係互動時所發展出來的重要生命議題。當個體從藝術創作依戀行為體會自主性並感受成就與愉悅時，能從潛在空間運作獲得心理能量，更穩定的立足於內在自我與外在現實之間，獲取現實生活之心理補償與內在穩定感。

＂Art-tachment＂ is a new terminology that describes the behavior of adult non-professional artists attempting to practice art. This research attempts to study the dynamics of the specific phenomena from the perspectives of art, art education and art therapy, and to interpret it from the theory of potential space of the object relation theory. Using narrative inquiry as the research method to understand the development of art-tachment behavior, this research addresses the reasons of obtaining the creative experience of adulthood with Moya as the research participant for the case study. The result shows that the major reason to start with making art is the difficulty in reality, however, the successful experiences of art education causes long term effects. Moreover, from the experiences of object relations from one's early, one will develop an important issue of life which one needs to deal with for the rest of his or her life. Since art activities connect the inner self and the outer reality which happens in the potential space, art-tachment behavior could help the non-professional adult artist experience the independence and integration which help adjust the self which then becomes therapeutic art activities.

1. Applegate, J. S.(1989).The transitional object reconsidered: Some sociocultural variations and their implications.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal,6(1),38-51.
2. Bachar, E.,Canetti, L.,Galilee-Weisstub, E.,Kaplan-DeNour, A.,Shalev, A. Y.(1998).Childhood vs. adolescence transitional object attachment, and its relation to mental health and parental bonding.Child Psychiatry and Human Development,28(3),149-167.
3. Beebe, B.,Lachmann, F.(2005).Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions.Hillsdale, NJ:Analytic Press.
4. Bollas, C.(1989).The shadow of the objects.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
5. Bowlby, J.(1982).Attachment: Attachment and loss.New York, NY:Basic.
6. Cauldwell, A. F.(1992).Cincinnati, OH,The Union Institute.
7. Clair, M.(2004).Object relations and self psychology: An introduction.Belmont, CA:Thomson.
8. Clandinin, D. J.,Connelly, F. M.(2000).Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research.San Francisco, CL:Jossey-Bass.
9. Coles, R.(1989).The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
10. Crossley, M. L.(2000).Introducing narrative psychology.Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press.
11. Dewey, J.(2005).Art as experience.New York, NY:Perigee Trade.
12. Downey, T.(1978).Transitional phenomena in the analysis of early adolescent males.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,33,19-46.
13. Feldman, E. B.(1995).Philosophy of art education.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
14. Grolnick, S.(Ed.),Barkin, L.(Ed.),Muensterberger, W.(Ed.)(1978).Between reality and fantasy: Winnicott's concept of transitional objects and phenomena.New York, NY:Jason Aronson.
15. Hirsch, M.(1994).The body as a transitional object.Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,62,78-81.
16. Jacobs, M.、于而彥譯、廖世德譯(2003)。溫尼考特。臺北市=Taipei:生命潛能=Life Potential。
17. Jalongo, M. R.(1987).Do security blankets belong in preschools?.Young Child,2(3),3-8.
18. Klein, M.、呂煦宗譯、劉慧卿譯(2005)。嫉羨與感恩。臺北市=Taipei:心靈工坊=Psy Garden。
19. Kramer, E.(1993).Art as therapy with children.New York, NY:Magnolia Street.
20. LaMothe, R.(2005).Creating space: The fourfold dynamics of potential space.Psychoanalytic Psychology,22(2),207-223.
21. Levis, S.(1994).Chicago, IL.,Institute for Clinical Social Work.
22. Litt, C. J.(1986).Theories of transitional object attachment: An overview.International Journal of Behavioral Development,9(3),383-399.
23. Mahalski, P. A.(1983).The incidence of attachment objects and oral habits at bedtime in two longitudinal samples of children aged 1.5-7 years.The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines,24,283-295.
24. Mahler, M. S.(2002).The psychological birth of the human infant: Symbiosis and individuation.London, UK:Karnac.
25. Malchiodi, C.(2007).The art therapy sourcebook.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
26. Miles, B.,Huberman, M.,Saldaña, J.(2013).Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
27. Naumburg, M.(1987).Dynamically oriented art therapy: Its principle and practice.Chicago, IL:Magnolia Street.
28. Newman, B.,Newman, P.(2011).Development through life: A psychosocial approach.Belmont, CT:Cengage Learning.
29. Ogden, T. H.(1985).On potential space.International Journal of Psychoanalysis,66,129-141.
30. Papalia, D.、Olds, S.、黃慧真譯(1998)。發展心理學。臺北市=Taipei:桂冠=Laureate。
31. Passman, R.(1987).Attachment to inanimate objects: Are children who have security blankets insecure?.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,55,825-830.
32. Patton, M. Q.(2002).Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Thousand Oaks, CL:Sage.
33. Perkins, D.(1994).The intelligent eye: Learning to think by looking at art.Los Angeles, CA:Getty.
34. Polkinghorne, D. E.(1988).Narrative knowing and the human sciences.New York, NY:State University of New York Press.
35. Poon, J.(1996).Berkeley, CA,The Wright Institute.
36. Tabin, J. K.(1992).Transitional objects as objectifiers of the self in toddlers and adolescents.Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,56(2),209-121.
37. Vivona, J. M.(2000).Toward autonomous desire: Women's worry as post-oedipal transitional object.Psychoanalytic Psychology,17(2),243-263.
38. Wastell, D.(1999).Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: Overcoming the social defenses with transitional objects.MIS Quarterly,23(4),581-600.
39. Winnicott, D. W.(1992).The child, the family and the outside world.New York, NY:Perseus.
40. Winnicott, D. W.(2005).Playing and reality.New York, NY:Routledge.
41. Winnicott, D. W.(1953).Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first not-me possession.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis,34,89-97.
42. Winnicott, D. W.(1965).The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development.London, UK:Hogarth Press.
43. 江學瀅、蔡順良(2009)。一名拒學症青少年藝術創作歷程中的投射認同現象。臺灣藝術治療學刊，1(1)，71-93。
44. 胡幼慧編(2005)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市=Taipei:巨流=Chuliu。
45. 蔡順良(1997)。國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,國家科學委員會=National Science Council。

1. 江學瀅(2018)。資源班兒童藝術教育治療團體模仿現象之個案研究。藝術教育研究，35，1-32。
2. 王麗雁(2015)。藝術教育碩士班學生視覺藝術學習歷程探究：關鍵時刻、困難與美好記憶。藝術教育研究，30，21-61。
3. 余季音(2016)。析論美感經驗及其與自我之深層互動。藝術教育研究，32，103-132。
4. 張佩妮(2021)。「藝術治療」、「藝術教育治療」與「藝術教育」之比較。諮商與輔導，430，26-29。
5. (2023)。敘事塗鴉的客體化與自我覺察之探究－幼兒個案研究。幼兒教育年刊，34，29-51。