题名

臺北市迪化街URS之藝術和創意轉型：誰的文化？誰的城市？

并列篇名

The Arts and Creative Transformation of Dihua Street Urban Regeneration Stations in Taipei City: Whose Culture? Whose City?

作者

邱淑宜(Shu-Yi Chiu)

关键词

都市再生前進基地 ； 創意街區 ； 藝術和創造力教育 ； urban regeneration stations ； creative neighborhood ； art and creative education

期刊名称

藝術教育研究

卷期/出版年月

28期（2014 / 12 / 01）

页次

65 - 98

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

藝術和創造力教育，在Florida（2002，2005，2009）和Landry（2000）創意階級和創意城市論述倡議下，躍升為培養創意人才、形塑創意氛圍和提升區域競爭力的萬靈丹。本文以臺北市都市更新處設置在迪化街的都市再生前進基地（URS）為例，探討進駐URS的文創工作者所傳遞之藝術和創造力教育對形塑迪化街為創意街區的影響，尤其關照是誰推動和介入迪化街URS的藝術和創造力教育相關的政策論述？以及是什麼形式的文化美學和生活品味，透過URS的文創工作者植入迪化街區？最後則是URS所推動的是誰的都市活化與再生？本文將藉由經驗研究的田野資料與西方論述交織對話，討論藝術和創造力教育之影響層面如何擴及至臺北市都市發展策略，並指出其潛在的危機和陷阱。
英文摘要

According to Florida (2002, 2005, 2009) and Landry (2000) art and creative education can be employed as a panacea for fostering creative talent, shaping creative milieus, and promoting local competitive advantage. This paper uses the example of UrbanRegeneration Stations (URS) set up by the Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office at Dihua Street (West Central Taipei City), in order to foster art and creative education with the goal of transforming Dihua Street into a creative neighborhood. Using empirical data gathered between 2012 and 2014 routed through Zukin's discourse on ＂Whose culture? Whose city?＂ this paper demonstrates how creative practitioners in the URS employ art and creative education to shape Dihua Street as a creative neighbourhood. In particular it focuses on who is involved in policy making, and creating dominant policy discourse; and whose cultural aesthetics, lifestyle, and taste is being fore-grounded in the re-making of Dihua Street? The paper concludes by highlighting some possible dangers and limitations of such an approach.
主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王佳煌(2010)。文化∕創意產業、創意階級∕城市論著的批判性檢視。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，48(1)，131-90。
    連結：
  2. 顏亮一(2006)。市民認同、地區發展與都市保存：迪化街個案分析。都市與計劃，33(2)，93-110。
    連結：
  3. 葉穎（2012，7 月 3 日）。都市再生∕以 URS 都市針灸術讓大臺北有新面貌。欣傳媒。取自www.xinmedia.com/t/article.aspx?id=3177 Ye, Ying (2012, July 3). Urban regeneration/URS's urban acupuncture for new vision of Taipei City. Xin Media. Retrieved from www.xinmedia.com/t/article.aspx?id=3177
  4. 臺北市政府文化局（2013，11 月 19 日）。臺北市成功申辦 2016 世界設計之都：邁向不斷提升的城市 Adaptive City 用設計實現市民生活願景。臺北市政府文化局新聞稿。取自http://www.taipeidesign.org.tw/download_news.aspx Department of Cultural Affairs, Taipei City Government. (2013, November 19). Taipei City's campaign of 2016 World Design Capital: Towards adaptive city. Department of Cultural Affairs, Taipei City Government, Press Release. Retrieved from http://www.taipeidesign.org.tw/download_news.aspx
  5. 臺北市政府都市發展局（2012）。臺北市議會第 11 屆第 4 次大會：臺北市政府都市發展局工作報告（101 年 1 月至 101 年 6 月）。臺北市議會。取自 http://www.tcc.gov.tw/iFrame.aspx?n=7B5BF7DC2EE91802 Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government. (2012). Taipei City Council, 11th (4) annual meeting: Department of Urban Development working report (January-June, 2012). Taipei City Council. Retrieved from http://www.tcc.gov.tw/iFrame.aspx?n=7B5BF7DC2EE91802
  6. 臺北村落之聲（2012）。大稻埕、小拚桌。臺北村落之聲。取自 http://www.urstaipei.net/archives/2954 Village Taipei. (2012). Da Dao Cheng, small collected table. Village Taipei. Retrieved from http://www.urstaipei.net/archives/2954
  7. 臺灣歷史經理資源學會（2012）。第三屆理監事簡介。臺灣歷史經理資源學會。取自 http://blog.xuite.net/resmgmt/wretch/159830185 Institute of Historical Resources Management, Taiwan. (2012). The introduction of the third board committees. Institute of Historical Resources Management, Taiwan. Retrieved from http://blog.xuite.net/resmgmt/wretch/159830185
  8. 臺北市政府都市發展局（2012）。臺北市政府都市發展局 101 年 5 月份施政報告。臺北市：臺北市政府都市發展局。Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government. (2012). Department of Urban Development report, May 2012. Taipei: Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government.。
  9. 大稻埕故事工坊（2012）。URS44 分享報創刊號。取自 http://mychannel.pchome.com.tw/channels/u/r/urs44new/content.htm Da Dao Cheng Story Studio. (2012). URS44 sharing newspaper: Issue 1. Retrieved from http://mychannel.pchome.com.tw/channels/u/r/urs44new/content.htm
  10. 臺北市都市更新處（2011，6 月 22 日）。市府致力臺北市西區再生不遺餘力，就實質環境、文化、產業等均已大幅改善，逐步達成翻轉軸線目標。臺北市都市更新處新聞稿。Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office. (2011, June 22). Taipei City Government launches into renaissance of west side in terms of environment, culture, and industry, and gradually achieves its goal of turning over axis. Department of Cultural Affairs, Taipei City Government, Press Release.。
  11. 臺北市都市更新處（2013）。「臺北市都市再生前進基地推動計畫」補助要點。臺北市：臺北市都市更新處。Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office. (2013). Application of Taipei City urban regeneration station programme. Taipei: Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office.
  12. 楊正海（2009，12 月 24 日）。北市力拚東西軸線翻轉老西區風華再現，聯合晚報，版 A12。Yang, Zheng-Hai (2009, December 24). Taipei City's campaign of turning over east and west axis-Renaissance of old west side. United Evening News, A12.
  13. 臺北市都市更新處（2010）。「臺北市都市再生前進基地」推動計畫。臺北市：臺北市都市更新處。Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office. (2010). Taipei City Urban Regeneration Station programme. Taipei: Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office.。
  14. Peck, J. (2007). The creativity fix. Retrieved from http://www.eurozine.com/pdf/2007-06-28-peck-en.pdf
  15. 臺北村落之聲（2014）。關於 URS 都市再生前進基地。臺北村落之聲。取自 http://www.urstaipei.net/%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BCurs#wrapper Village Taipei. (2014). About URS urban regeneration station. Village Taipei. Retrieved from http://www.urstaipei.net/%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BCurs#wrapper
  16. 文化部（2012）。藝術介入空間計畫補助作業要點。臺北市：文化部。Minstry of Culture. (2012). The grant programme of arts in space. Taipei: Minstry of Culture.
  17. 臺北市政府都市發展局（2011）。臺北市議會第 11 屆第 1 次大會：臺北市政府都市發展局工作報告（99 年 7 月至 99 年 12 月）。臺北市議會。取自 http://www.tcc.gov.tw/iFrame.aspx?n=7B5BF7DC2EE91802 Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government. (2011). Taipei City Council, 11th (1) annual meeting: Department of Urban Development working report (July-December, 2010). Taipei City Council. Retrieved from http://www.tcc.gov.tw/iFrame.aspx?n=7B5BF7DC2EE91802
  18. Arts Council England(2007).Arts and regeneration: Creating vibrant communities.London, UK:Arts Council England.
  19. Belfiore, E.(2002).Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK.International Journal of Cultural Policy,8(1),91-106.
  20. Bell, D.,Jayne, M.(2003)."Design-led" urban regeneration: A critical perspective.Local Economy,18(2),121-134.
  21. Bourdieu, P.(1984).Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste.Oxon, UK:Routledge.
  22. Bourdieu, P.,Darbel, A.,Schnapper, D.(1991).The love of art: European art museums and their public.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  23. Brenner, N.(Ed.),Marcuse, P.(Ed.),Mayer, M.(Ed.)(2012).Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city.London, UK:Routledge.
  24. Buckingham, D.,Jones, K.(2001).New Labour's cultural turn: Some tensions in contemporary educational and cultural policy.Journal of Education Policy,16(1),1-14.
  25. Comunian, R.(2010).Rethinking the creative city: The role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy.Urban Studies,48(6),1157-1179.
  26. Cooke, P.(Ed.),Lazzeretti, L.(Ed.)(2008).Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
  27. Craft, A.(Ed.),Jeffrey, B.(Ed.),Leibling, M.(Ed.)(2001).Creativity in education.London, UK:Continuum.
  28. Creative Partnerships(2006).Creative partnerships and the creative industries.London, UK:Arts Council England.
  29. DCMS(2004).Culture at the heart of regeneration.London, UK:Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
  30. Dickson, B.(2011).Education and the arts.Edinburgh, UK:Dunedin Academic.
  31. Eijk, G. V.(2010).Exclusionary policies are not just about the 'neoliberal city': A critique of theories of urban revanchism and the case of Rotterdam.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,34(4),820-834.
  32. Florida, R.(2002).The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  33. Florida, R.(2005).Cities and the creative class.London, UK:Routledge.
  34. Florida, R.(2009).Who's your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life.New York, NY:Basic Books.
  35. Florida, R.(2007).The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent.New York, NY:Harper-Collins.
  36. Guetzkow, J.(2002).,未出版
  37. Julier, G.(2005).Urban designscapes and the production of aesthetic consent.Urban Studies,42(5/6),869-887.
  38. Krätke, S.(2010).'Creative cities' and the rise of the dealer class: A critique of Richard Florida's approach to urban theory.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,34(4),835-853.
  39. Landry, C.(2000).The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators.London, UK:Earthscan.
  40. Lees, L.,Melhuish, C.(2013).Arts-led regeneration in the UK: The rhetoric and the evidence on urban social inclusion.European Urban and Regional Studies,20(1),1-19.
  41. LeGates, R. T.(Ed.),Stout, F.(Ed.)(1996).The city reader.London, UK:Routledge.
  42. Liebau, E.(Ed.),Wagner, E.(Ed.),Wyman, M.(Ed.)(2013).International yearbook for research in arts education 2013.New York, NY:Waxmann.
  43. Lloyd, R.(2010).Neo-bohemia: Art and commerce in the post-industrial city.New York, NY:Routledge.
  44. Mirza, M.(Ed.)(2006).Culture vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts?.London, UK:Policy Exchange Limited.
  45. NACCCE(1999).All our futures: Creative and cultural education.London, UK:DfEE.
  46. Pratt, A. C.(2011).The cultural contradictions of the creative city.City, Culture and Society,2,123-130.
  47. Sasaki, M.(2010).Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study.Cities,27,S3-S9.
  48. Sefton-Green, J.(Ed.),Thomson, P.(Ed.),Jones, K.(Ed.),Bresler, L.(Ed.)(2011).The Routledge international handbook of creative learning.London, UK:Routledge.
  49. Storey, J.、張君玫譯(2001)。文化消費與日常生活。臺北市=Taipei:巨流=Ju Liu。
  50. UNESCO(2006).Road map for arts education.Lisbon, Portugal:UNESCO.
  51. Wilson, A.(Ed.)(2005).Creativity in primary education.Exeter, UK:Learning Matters.
  52. Zukin, S.(2010).Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  53. Zukin, S.,Braslow, L.(2011).The life cycle of New York's creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplaned cultural zones.City, Culture and Society,2,131-140.
  54. Zukin, S.、王志弘譯、王玥民譯、徐苔玲譯(2012)。裸城純正都市地方的生與死。臺北市=Taipei:群學=Qun Xue。
  55. 文建會(2010)。最小的無限大：文建會營造紀實 1994-2010。臺北市=Taipei:文建會=Council for Cultural Affairs。
  56. 林怡廷(2013)。大稻埕新文藝復興。臺灣光華雜誌，12，98。
  57. 林崇傑(2012)。全球競逐下的臺北都市再生實踐。臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌，66，34-40。
  58. 教育部(2005)。藝術教育政策白皮書。臺北市=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education。
  59. 教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書：打造創造力國度。臺北市=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education。
  60. 陳郁秀(2003)。文化航行：創意世紀。文化視窗，50，20-27。
  61. 陳歆怡(2012)。臺北市文化局長劉維公：用設計改造城市。臺灣光華雜誌，11，102-103。
  62. 黃海鳴(2003)。藝術介入社會的一種模式。藝術家雜誌，240，197-201。
  63. 詹至禹編(2008)。「風乎舞雩」：教育部顧問室創造力教育中程計畫推動實錄。臺北市=Taipei:教育部顧問室=Ministry of Education, Advisory Office。
  64. 臺北市政府(2013)。Adaptive city 設計臺北：不斷提升的城市。臺北市=Taipei:臺北市政府=Taipei City Government。
  65. 臺北市政府都市發展局(2010)。2010 年臺北市都市發展局年報。臺北市=Taipei:臺北市政府都市發展局=Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government。
  66. 臺北市政府都市發展局(2012)。2012 年臺北市都市發展局年報。臺北市=Taipei:臺北市政府都市發展局=Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government。
  67. 臺灣經濟研究院(2003)。,臺北市=Taipei:文建會=Council for Cultural Affairs。
被引用次数
  1. 岑學敏(2023)。士紳化以外：臺北大稻埕的文化經濟與舊城襲產再／創造。文化研究，37，57-102。
  2. 黃舒楣(2020)。規劃亞洲城市大計：回顧故宮南院落腳嘉義太保的規劃足跡。文化研究，30，114-127。
  3. 王志弘(2019)。臺灣都市與區域發展之文化策略批判研究回顧，1990s－2010s。文化研究，29，13-62。
  4. 殷寶寧(2016)。創意街區、飲食文化與都市再生：臺北市大稻埕迪化街美食地景與文創轉向。文資學報，10，29-66。
  5. 趙子元,陳坤宏,洪于婷,林漢良,林思玲,古淑薰(2019)。尖峰都市在地理空間發展上的體現：台灣22縣市個案與理論意義。中國地理學會會刊，64，1-32。
print cancel