流行插畫風格偏好與判斷因素之世代差異

Generational Differences in Preference and Judgement Factors to the Styles of Popular Illustrations

10.6622/RAE.2016.31.01

林演慶(Yen-Ching Lin)

世代差異 ； 風格偏好 ； 流行插畫 ； 偏好判斷 ； generational differences ； style preference ； popular illustration ； preference judgement

藝術教育研究

31期（2016 / 05 / 01）

1 - 36

繁體中文

本研究以訪談調查、內容分析與統計檢定等方法探討不同世代對於流行插畫風格的偏好判斷傾向，包含偏好與否及偏好判斷的因素組合。自大臺北地區募集180位參與者進行施測訪談，其中青少年與成人各半，各組男女亦各半。研究結果顯示：世代間對於流行插畫的偏好判斷因素具有顯著差異；不同世代對於各種風格流行插畫的偏好判斷因素亦具有顯著差異，而認知評價是最重要的偏好判斷因素。此外，成人的偏好判斷並沒有持續朝向認知因素發展，反而趨向類似兒童的題材與情緒判斷，推測此一現象可能源自於文化環境的世代差異影響，但仍需未來研究再加以確認。

This study explores generational differences in preference and judgement factors to the styles of popular illustrations by means of interview survey, content analysis and statistical test. A total of 180 subjects were recruited from the Taipei area, evenly divided between adolescents and adults, as well as males and females. The results showed significant differences of preference and judgement factors between generations and the same as in different illustration styles; cognitive assessment is the most important factor of preference judgement. In addition, the preference judgement factors of adults are not corresponding to the progress of cognitive development in that they are not moving forward to more advanced stages, but backward to those of subjective and emotional judgments of children. This phenomenon may be caused from the fact of generational differences in adepting to the visual cultural environment, but still needs to be confirmed in the future studies.

1. 伊彬、鄧逸平、黃永宏(2004)。從中華兒童叢書（1965-1999）到信誼基金會（1979-2001）出版兒童圖畫書插畫風格之演變及其意義。藝術教育研究，7，23-53。
   連結：
2. 陳瓊花(1998)。試探性研究：兒童與青少年在描述，表示喜好，和判斷─件作品時的觀念傾向。師大學報，43(2)，1-19。
   連結：
3. 陳瓊花(2000)。兒童與青少年審美思考之調查研究。師大學報，45，45-65。
   連結：
4. 趙惠玲(2005)。臺灣地區兒童與青少年視覺影像反應研究。藝術教育研究，9，33-70。
   連結：
5. 鄭明憲(2003)。兒童對視覺意象意義的建構。藝術教育研究，5，1-22。
   連結：
6. Aldrich, V. C.(1994).Philosophy of art.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
7. Bornstein, R.(1989).Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.Psychological Bulletin,106(2),265-289.
8. Brunner, C.(1975).New York, NY,Graduate School of Arts and Science, Columbia University.
9. Clayton, J. R.(1974).Salt Lake City, UT,Department of Educational Administration, University of Utah.
10. Coffey, A. W.(1968).Amherst, MA,Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts.
11. Cox, M. V.(1992).Children's drawing.London, UK:Penguin.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Robinson, R. E.(1990).The art of seeing.Malibu, CA:The Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
13. Efland, A. D.(1995).The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art eduaction.Studies in Art Education,36(3),134-153.
14. Feldman, E. B.(1971).Varities of visual experience.New York, NY:Prentice Hall.
15. Freedman, K.,Wood, J.(1999).Reconsidering critical response: Student judgments of purpose, interpretation, and relationships in visual culture.Studies in Art Education,40(2),128-142.
16. Gardner, H.(1990).Art education and human development.Los Angeles, CA:The Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
17. Gardner, H.(1989).Zero-based arts education: An introduction to ARTS PROPEL.Studies in Art Education,30(2),71-83.
18. Gardner, H.,Winner, E.,Kircher, M.(1975).Children's conceptions of the arts.Journal of Aesthetic Education,19(3),60-77.
19. Golomb, C.(1992).The child's creation of a pictorial world.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
20. Goodman, N.(1968).Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols.Indianapolis, IN:The Bobbs-Merrill.
21. Hardiman, G. W.,Zernich, T.(1977).Influence of style and subject matter on the development of children's art preferences.Studies in Art Education,19(1),29-34.
22. Hekkert, P.,van Wieringen, P. C. W.(1990).Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings.British Journal of Psychology,81,483-495.
23. Housen, A.(1983).Cambridge, MA,Harvard Graduate School of Education.
24. Kern, E. J.(1984).The aesthetic education curriculum program and curriculum reform.Studies in Art Education,25(4),219-225.
25. Leder, H.,Belke, B.,Oeberst, A.,Augustin, D.(2004).A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.British Journal of Psychology,95,489-508.
26. Lin, Y.,I, B.(2012).Generation and gender differences in beauty and preference assessments to popular illustration.22nd Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics,Taipei, Taiwan:
27. Lin, Y.,I, B.(2011).Generation and gender differences in aesthetic responses to popular illustration.Visual Arts Research,37,30-41.
28. Maquet, J.(2003).The aesthetic experience: An anthropologist looks at the visual arts.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
29. Osborne, H.(1971).Taste and judgment in the arts.Journal of Aesthetic Education,5(4),13-28.
30. Parsons, M. J.(1987).How we understand art.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
31. Parsons, M. J.,Blocker, H. G.(1993).Aesthetic and education.Champaign, IL:University of Illinois Press.
32. Read, H.(1972).The meaning of art.London, UK:Faber & Faber.
33. Salkind, L.,Salkind, N. J.(1997).Gender and age differences in preference for works of art.Studies in Art Education,38(4),246-256.
34. Schifferstein, H. N. J.(Ed.),Hekkert, P.(Ed.)(2008).Product experience.San Diego, CA:Elsevier.
35. Steinberg, D.(1986).Preschool children's sensitivity to artistic style in paintings.Visual Arts Research,12(1),1-10.
36. Stokrocki, M.(2001).Go to the mall and get all: Adolescents' aesthetic values in the shopping mall.Art Education,54(2),18-23.
37. Taunton, M.(1982).Aesthetic responses of young children to visual arts.Journal of Aesthetic Education,16(3),94.
38. Van Meel-Jansen, A.(2006).The magic number five in art appreciation.Empirical Studies of the Arts,24(1),107-118.
39. Winner, E.(1982).Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts.Cambridge, MA:Havard University Press.
40. Wolf, D. P.(1988).Artistic learning: What and where is it?.Journal of Aesthetic Education,22(1),143-155.
41. Woods, W. A.(1991).Parameters of aesthetic objects: Applied aesthetics.Empirical Studies of the Arts,9(2),105-114.
42. 王孟惠、伊彬(2005)。高中學生年級與性別對於圖畫書插畫風格偏好之探討。中華民國設計學會第十屆學術研究成果研討會論文集（上），臺北市=Taipei:
43. 伊彬(2008)。插畫與電視廣告之實徵美學：世代間的美感和偏好。新北市=New Taipei City:Airiti Press。
44. 伊彬、王晢茗(2009)。青少年與成年人對於動態影像之審美判斷與眼球運動差異：以音樂錄影帶為例。中華民國設計學會第十四屆設計學術研究成果研討會論文集，臺中市=Taichung:
45. 伊彬、林演慶、張琬琪(2006)。流行文化圖像與臺灣青少年的審美與偏好：互為因果的糾結。傳播研究簡訊，45，10-13。
46. 許信雄(1994)。兒童對國畫的偏好之研究。海峽兩岸兒童藝術教育的改革與研究論文集，臺北市=Taipei:
47. 郭禎祥(1994)。多元文化觀與藝術教育。師大學報，39，545-582。
48. 郭禎祥(1996)。幼童對美術館的初起概念。美育，78，41-53。
49. 陳瓊花(1997)。我國青年藝術觀念探討之一：繪畫表現上「像」與「不像」問題的看法。美育，87，29-38。
50. 陳瓊花(1999)。兒童與青少年描述藝術作品時的觀念傾向。美育，106，39-55。
51. 黃淮麟(2001)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所=Graduate School of Design, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
52. 賴思蒨(2007)。彰化市=Changhua，國立彰化師範大學藝術教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Art Education, National Changhua University of Education。

1. 許子凡,林演慶(2020)。表現形式與性別對資訊圖像偏好與注目性之影響。藝術教育研究，40，1-37。
2. 林演慶(2017)。性別差異之多元尺度空間意象分析：以流行插畫為刺激物。藝術教育研究，33，103-135。
3. 林演慶(2022)。臺日國小一年級國語教科書美感風格設計之內容分析比較。藝術教育研究，44，81-126。
4. 張長蓉,伊彬(2022)。臺灣2004年到2019年民間出版兒童圖畫書之插畫風格特徵。藝術教育研究，44，1-46。
5. (2022)。學習背景對青少年觀看流行插畫風格之審美評價差異。亞東學報，42，115-134。
6. (2023)。國小國語教科書插圖風格和版式設計之內容與文本分析比較。設計學研究，26(2)，107-132。