北美三大音樂教育哲學觀於臺灣國中小音樂教育之適用性

Applicability of North America's Three Major Philosophy of Music Education to Taiwan's Elementary and Junior High School Music Education

10.6622/RAE.202105_(41).0004

紀雅真(Ya-Chen Chi)；林小玉(Sheau-Yuh Lin)

音樂教育哲學觀 ； 美感論 ； 效益主義 ； 實踐論 ； philosophy of music education ； aesthetics ； utilitarianism ； praxialism

藝術教育研究

41期（2021 / 05 / 01）

109 - 148

繁體中文

音樂教育哲學在20世紀成為音樂教育學門中獨立的研究領域，相關著作檢視音樂教育價值、目的及教學活動中潛在的意義，帶動音樂教育哲學議題探究之風潮。其中，北美地區音樂教育領域對於音樂教育哲學論述最為興盛。本研究包括兩階段，第一階段以哲學探究法與文獻研究法，瞭解北美效益主義、美感論與實踐論音樂教育哲學觀之內涵；第二階段透過三回德懷術問卷，探討臺灣音樂教育學者及音樂教師共12位諮詢委員，對於北美音樂教育哲學觀之看法，以及北美音樂教育哲學觀在臺灣國中小學音樂教學中的適用性。研究結果發現，效益主義獨重音樂附加價值，美感論為音樂的美感特質發聲，實踐論彰顯音樂教育實踐與脈絡價值。德懷術諮詢委員對北美音樂教育哲學觀傾向融合美感論與實踐論主張的「協同合作觀」。這兩種音樂教育哲學觀，亦被認為適用於臺灣音樂教育中。效益主義觀點則較少被視為當前臺灣音樂教育目的及實施之依據。

Philosophy of music education became an independent research field in the 20th century. Philosophical articles in music education examined goals and values of music education, as well as the meaning underneath music teaching activities. These discourses led the trend of philosophical inquiry. In the North American research field, studies relating to philosophy of music education flourished. This study includes two stages: first, to examine the views of utilitarianism, aesthetics, and praxialism by philosophical inquiry and literature review; second, to understand the opinion to utilitarianism, aesthetics, and praxialism from 12 music professors and teachers in Taiwan, and to determine the applicability of these philosophies to Taiwan's elementary and junior high schools by three-round Delphi questionnaires. Results of this study showed that utilitarian view of music education put emphasis on the ancillary value of music. Aesthetics promoted the importance of aesthetic qualities in music. Praxialism highlighted the value of practicum and context in music education. Regarding the philosophy of music education in Taiwan, participants were more inclined to take a synergistic view that combined opinions from aesthetics and praxialism. The arguments from utilitarianism were less seen as the basics to guide goals and practice in Taiwan's music education.

1. 葉自強, Tzyh-Chyang(2011)。淺釋音樂教育哲學的意涵、應然、及其研究上的限制。音樂研究，15，115-135。
   連結：
2. Abeles, H. F.,Custodero, L. A.(2010).Critical issues in music education: Contemporary theory and practice.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
3. Adler, M.,Ziglio, E.(1996).Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health.Bristol, PA:Jessica Kingsley.
4. Alperson, P.(1991).What should one expect from a philosophy of music education?.The Journal of Aesthetic Education,25(3),215-242.
5. Birge, E. B. (1937). History of public school music in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Olivia Ditson.
6. Bowman, W.,Frega, A. L.(2012).What should the music education profession expect of philosophy?.The Oxford handbook of philosophy in music education,New York, NY:
7. Coates, P.(1983).Alternatives to the aesthetic rationale for music education.Music Educators Journal,69(7),31-32.
8. Colwell, R.(1986).Music and aesthetic education: A collegial relationship.The Journal of Aesthetic Education,20(4),31-38.
9. Dykema, P. W., & Gehrkens, K. W. (1941). The teaching and administration of high school music. Boston, MA: C. C. Birchard.
10. Elliott, D. J.(2009).Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
11. Elliott, D. J.(1995).Music matters: A new philosophy of music education.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
12. Faherty, V.(1979).Continuing social work education: Results of a Delphi survey.Journal of Education for Social Work,15(1),12-19.
13. Fung, C. V.(2018).A way of music education: Classic Chinese wisdoms.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
14. Gonzo, C.(1992).Toward a rational critical process.Handbook of research on music teaching and learning,New York, NY:
15. Johnson, C. M.,Memmott, J. E.(2006).Examination of relationships between participation in school music programs of differing quality and standardized test results.Journal of Research in Music Education,54(4),293-307.
16. Jorgensen, E. R.(2001).A dialectical view of theory and practice.Journal of Research in Music Education,49(4),343-359.
17. Jorgensen, E. R.(2006).Reflections on futures for music education philosophy.Philosophy of Music Education Review,14(1),15-22.
18. Jorgensen, E. R.(1992).On philosophical method.Handbook of research on music teaching and learning,New York, NY:
19. Leohnard, C.,House, R. W.(1959).Foundations and principles of music education.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
20. Mark, M. L.(1996).Contemporary music education.New York, NY:Schirmer.
21. Mark, M. L.(1982).The evolution of music education philosophy from utilitarian to aesthetic.Journal of Research in Music Education,30(1),15-21.
22. Mark, M. L.(Ed.)(2008).Music education: Source readings from ancient Greece to today.New York, NY:Routledge.
23. McCarthy, M.,Goble, J. S.(2002).Music education philosophy: Changing times.Music Educators Journal,89(1),19-26.
24. Nielsen, F. V.(2006).A view on the future of an international philosophy of music education: A plea for a comparative strategy.Philosophy of Music Education Review,14(1),7-14.
25. Pestalozzi, J. H. (1912). Letters to Greaves: Training of eye and ear: Music in education. In J. A. Green (Ed.), Pestalozzi’s educational writings (pp. 229-232). New York, NY: Longmans, Green & Co.
26. Phelps, R. P.,Sadoff, R. H.,Warburton, E. C.,Ferrara, L.(2005).A guide to research in music education.Lanham, MD:Scarecrow Press.
27. Raskin, M. S.(1994).The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities.Journal of Social Work Education,30(1),75-89.
28. Regelski, T. A.(2004).Social theory, and music and music education as praxis.Action, Criticism & Theory for Music Education,3(3)
29. Regelski, T. A.(2005).Music and music education as praxis for “making a difference.Educational Philosophy and Theory,37(1),7-27.
30. Reimer, B.(1970).A philosophy of music education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
31. Reimer, B.(2003).A philosophy of music education: Advancing the vision.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
32. Reimer, B.(1989).A philosophy of music education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
33. Stevenson, D. A.(2007).Boston, MA,Boston University.
34. Thompson, K. P.(2010).A brief overview of philosophy of music education in the United States.Journal of Aesthetic Education,174,16-27.
35. Winship, A. E. (1905). The mission of music in the public schools. In M. J. Mark (Ed.), Music education: Source readings from ancient Greece to today (3rd ed., pp. 113-115). New York, NY: Routledge.
36. 方瑞霙, Rui(2012)。高雄市=Kaohsiung，國立高雄師範大學教育學系=Department of Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University。
37. 王文科, Wen-Ke,王智弘, Zhi-Hong(2009).教育研究法.臺北市=Taipei:五南=Wu Nan.
38. 王恩芳, En-Fang(2008)。臺北市=Taipei，臺北市立教育大學音樂學系=Department of Music, Taipei Municipal University of Education。
39. 何育真, Yu-Chen(2009)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學音樂學系=Department of Music, National Taiwan Normal University。
40. 吳俊憲, Chun-Hsien(2000)。美感哲學觀及「藝術與人文」課程領域教育意涵。臺灣教育，600，39-44。
41. 杜祖貽, Zuyi,劉述先, Shuxian(2006).哲學、文化與教育.香港=Hong Kong:香港中文大學出版社=The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
42. 林小玉, Sheau-Yuh(2010)。音樂教育哲學之範疇與議題：音樂教師面對的挑戰。美育，174，4-15。
43. 林小玉, Sheau-Yuh(2015)。美感教育在二十一世紀的時代性。臺灣教育，693，9-15。
44. 林小玉, Sheau-Yuh(2008)。從當代音樂教育哲學之發展論美感教育之定位與省思。教師天地，153，29-35。
45. 林淑馨, Shu-Xin(2010).質性研究：理論與實務.臺北市=Taipei:巨流=Chu Liu.
46. 洪詠善, Yung-Shan(2018)。素養導向教學的界定、轉化與實踐。課程協作與實踐，臺北市=Taipei:
47. 紀雅真, Ya-Chen(2014)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學音樂學系=Department of Music, National Taiwan Normal University。
48. 教育部=Ministry of Education(1962).初級中學音樂課程標準.臺北市=Taipei:正中=Zheng Zhong.
49. 教育部（2018a）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：藝術領域。臺北市：作者。 Ministry of Education. (2018a). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Arts area of elementary, junior and ordinary senior high schools. Taipei: Author.
50. 教育部（1968）。國民小學暫行課程標準。臺北市：正中。 Ministry of Education. (1968). Elementary school temporary curriculum standards. Taipei: Zheng Zhong.
51. 教育部=Ministry of Education(1994).國民中學音樂課程標準.臺北市=Taipei:Author=作者.
52. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2008).國民中小學課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域.臺北市=Taipei:Author=作者.
53. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2018).教育部美感教育中長程計畫：第二期五年計畫（108 年至 112 年）.臺北市=Taipei:Author=作者.
54. 莊琬婷, Wang-Ting(2005)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系=Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
55. 許舒斐, Shu-Fai(2006)。臺北市=Taipei，臺北市立教育大學=Department of Music, Taipei Municipal。
56. 郭禎祥, Zhen-Xiang(1991)。追求精緻的藝術教育：DBAE。美育，12，3-9。
57. 陳賢舜, Hsien-Shun(2008)。臺北市=Taipei，國立政治大學教育研究所=Department of Education, National Chengchi University。
58. 楊蔭瀏, Yin-Liu(1996).中國音樂史綱.臺北市=Taipei:樂韻=Yuen Yuhn.
59. 廖聖潔, Sheng-Chieh(2016)。臺北市=Taipei，國立臺北教育大學音樂系=Department of Music, National Taiwan University of Education。
60. 蔡孟翰, Men-Han(2008)。新竹市=Hsinchu，國立新竹教育大學人資處音樂教學碩士班=Master Program for Music Teaching, Department of Human Resource, National Hsinchu University of Education。
61. 賴美鈴（編）, Mei-Ling(Ed.)(2019).韶光典韻育風華：中小學音樂課程發展史.新北巿=New Taipei:國家教育研究院=National Academy for Educational Research.
62. 賴美鈴, Mei-Ling(1997)。國家科學委員會專題研究計畫結案報告國家科學委員會專題研究計畫結案報告,國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
63. 簡茂發, Mao-Fa,劉湘川, Xiang Chuan(1993).八十一學年度國民教育階段學生基本學習成就評量：國小組試題編製及抽測結果報告.臺中市=Taichung:國立臺中師範學院=National Taichung Teachers College.

1. (2023)。探究聆賞者在各種情緒類型音樂的喜愛度與感受情緒。藝術教育研究，46，1-40。