徑路搜尋法在高中學生物理學科知識結構測量上的應用

The Application of Pathfinder to Measure Physical Knowledge Structure of Senior High School Students

10.6429/FES.200207.0001

黃湃翔(Pai-Hsiang Huang)

知識結構 ； 徑路搜尋法 ； 評量 ； knowledge structure ； pathfinder method ； measurement

教育與社會研究

4期（2002 / 07 / 01）

1 - 33

繁體中文

近代心理學和教育學的理論普遍認爲訊息是以組織化和結構的方式記憶，如此以利儲存、提取和橾作，因此，如何正確評量學習者所具有的知識結構，以協助學習者改善其認知表現，就顯得相當重要。徑路搜尋法是目前評量知識結構相當客觀的研究工具，使用徑路搜尋法除了可以得到表徵知識結構的網路圖解，亦可以獲得評價知識結構的三種指數。徑路搜尋法提供測驗工具另一有潜力的選擇，此方法不僅相當精確量化，也符合現代的知識表微理論，因此，研究者决定采用此方法探究高中學生物理學科的知識結構和學習表現的關係。

The idea that information in memory is organized or 'structured' so as to facilitate storage, retrieval, and manipulation is pervasive in modem psychological and educational theory. Therefore, how to properly evaluate learner's knowledge structure and assist their cognitive performance has become an important research topic. Many scholars adopt different methods to measure knowledge structure, the pathfinder method is a objective research instrument. We could obtain pathfinder graph and three indexes of evaluating knowledge structure in using pathfinder method. Pathfinder method offers a potential alternative assessment tool that is not only quantitatively rigorous; but is also consistent with modern theories of knowledge representation. Hence, we use pathfinder method to study senior high school students' physical knowledge structure.

1. Acton, W.H.,Johnson, P.J.,Goldsmith, T.E.(1994).Structural Knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures.Journal of Educational Psychology,86,303-311.
2. Anderson, J.R.(1990).Cognitive psychology and its implications.New York:Freeman and Company.
3. Anderson, J.R.(1983).The architecture of cognition.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
4. Chen, C.C.(1996).The Ohio state University.
5. Chi, M.T.H.,Feltovich, P.J.,Glaser, R.(1981).Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Psychology,5,121-152.
6. Collins, A.M.,Loftus, E.F.(1975).A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82,407-428.
7. Collins, A.M.,Quillian, M.R.(1969).Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8,240-247.
8. De Groot, A.D.(1965).Thought and choice in chess.The Hague, Netherlands:Mouton.
9. Diekhoff, G.M.(1983).Relationship judgments in the evaluation of structural understanding.Journal of Educational Psychology,75,227-233.
10. Ellis, H.C.,Hunt, R.R.(1993).Fundamentals of cognitive psychology.Madison, Wis.:Wm. C. Brown Communications.
11. Glaser, R.,Chi, M.T.H.,M.T.H. Chi,R. Glaser,M. Farr(eds.)(1988).The nature of expertise.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Goldsmith, T.E.,Davenport, D.M.,R.W. Schvaneveldt(ed.)(1990).Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
13. Goldsmith, T.E.,Johnson, P.J.,Acton, H.W.(1991).Assessing structural Knowledge.Journal of Educational Psychology,83,88-96.
14. Gomez, R.,Housner, L.D.(1992).Pedagogical knowledge structures in prospective teachers.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Austin, TX
15. Greene, R.L.(1987).Effects of maintenance rehearsal of human memory.Psychological Bulletin,102,403-413.
16. Jonassen, D.H.,Beissner, K.,Yacci, M.(1993).Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Koubek, R.J.,Moutujoy, D.N.(1991).Toward a model of knowledge structure and a comparative analysis of knowledge structure measurement techniques.Wright State University.
18. Lakin, J.H.,Chipman, S.F.,Segal, J.W.,Glaser, R.(eds.)(1985).Thinking and learning skills|Research and open questions.Hilisdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Miner, A.C.,Reder, L.M.,J. Metcalfe,A.P. Shimamura(eds.)(1994).Metacognition: Knowing about knowing.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
20. Morton, J.,Bekerian, D.,N.E. Sharkdy(ed.)(1986).Advances in cognitive science 1.Chichester:Ellis Horwood Ltd..
21. Morton, J.,Bekerian, D.,N.E. Sharkdy(ed.)(1986).Advances in cognitive science 1.New York:Halsted Press.
22. Piaget, J.(1952).The origins of intelligence in children.New York:International University Press.
23. Quillian, M.R.,M. Minsky(ed.)(1968).Semantic information processing.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
24. Rips, L.J.,Shoben, E.J.,Smith, E.E.(1973).Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12,1-20.
25. Rumelhart, D.E.,Norman, D.A.,R.C. Atkinson,R.J. Herrnstein,G. Lindzey,R.D. Luce(eds.)(1988).Stevens` handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Learning and cognition.New York:Wiley.
26. Smith, E.E.,Shoben, E.J.,Rips, L.J.(1974).Structure and process in semantic memory: A feature model for semantic decision.Psychological Review,81,214-241.
27. Sternberg, R.J.(1999).Cognitive Psychology.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace College.
28. 江淑卿(1997)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
29. 宋德忠、林世華、陳淑芬、張國恩(1998)。知識結構的測量：徑路搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。教育心理學報，30(2)，123-142。
30. 岳修平譯、Gagne`, E.D.原著(1998)。教學心理學－學習的認知基礎＝The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning。台北:遠流出版社。
31. 泠金堂(2000)。徑路搜尋法在知識結構測量上的應用。國立台南師範學院初等教育學報，13，275-306。
32. 洪振方(1996)。科學知識重建的認知取向分析。國立高雄師範大學學報，7，293-328。
33. 郭重吉(1990)。學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。彰化師範大學學報，1，279-320。
34. 黃秀瑄、林端欽譯、John. B. Best原著(1991)。認知心理學。台北:師大書苑。
35. 楊文金(1991)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
36. 蔡佳燕(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所。

1. 黃美盼、林原宏、易正明(2007)。徑路搜尋方法之加減法文字題知識結構分析。測驗統計年刊，15(上)，29-57。
2. 劉少維、李淑玲(2008)。在家教育癌症病童參與傳統電腦遊戲和虛擬實境遊戲的遊戲動機之比較研究。特殊教育學報，28，97-122。
3. 趙毓圻、熊召弟、于曉平(2011)。臺灣中小學奈米科技實驗教材之內容分析。教育科學研究期刊，56(4)，1-42。
4. (2013)。以路徑搜尋法探討學生就業力知識結構—以護理專業為例。教育與心理研究，36(4)，103-129。