台灣學術場域的知識生產、傳播與消費：人文社會科學的學術出版分析

The Production, Dissemination and Consumption of Knowledge in the Taiwanese Academic Field-An Analysis of Academic Publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities

10.6429/FES.200302.0001

陳明莉(Ming-Li Chen)

學術出版 ； 場域理論 ； 世界體系 ； 知識生產 ； 知識傳播 ； 知識消費 ； 學術自主性 ； academic publishing ； field theory ； world-system theory ； academic autonomy

教育與社會研究

5期（2003 / 02 / 01）

1 - 46

繁體中文

本研究運用Wallerstein的世界體系理論及Bourdieu的場域理論，並引用實際的數據，從語文應用、國際書市、留學人口及文獻引用四面向，檢驗世界知識的生產、傳播與消費活動，以探究「知識的世界體系」的形構。繼之，本研究從學術資本與行動主體的主客觀關係位置，分析世界知識場域的競爭與運作機制。最後以實證研究方法，針對台灣各大學人文社會科學系所的教師進行調查，以理解大學教師在知識生產、傳播與消費活動中所扮演的角色。 本文認為，世界上知識的生產、傳播與消費確實在世界體系中進行，與經濟的世界體系一樣，具有階層性、不平等交換及動態關係；而調查結果顯示，台灣學者從事的學術活動，仍然具有邊緣性格，在知識的世界體系中，扮演西方核心國家知識傳播與消費的角色。本文主張，深化外來學術及理論，對本土學術增加關注，並建立自己的學術出版體系將有助於改善台灣學術邊緣化之現象。

Adopting Wallerstein's world-system theory and Bourdieu's field theory, this thesis examines the production, dissemination and consumption of knowledge around the world and tries to investigate the formation of the 'world-system of knowledge'. Additionally, this paper, from the perspective of academic capital and the subjective/objective positions of agent, seeks to analyze the competing and operating mechanisms of the global intellectual field. Finally, a survey of Taiwanese university teachers in social sciences and humanities reveals the roles and functions which they perform in the world-system of knowledge. The relevant statistics and evidence show that the development of global knowledge, which is characterized by a hierarchical structure, imbalance exchange and a dynamic system, corresponds extremely closely with Wallerstein's world-system theory. According to the survey, academic activities among Taiwanese scholars tend to be marginal. In the globalised knowledge system, Taiwanese scholars serve only as disseminators and consumers of Western knowledge. It is therefore claimed that the grounding of imported academic knowledge, reinforcing the attention of indigenous academic work and establishing Taiwan's own scholarly publishing system is needed to remedy the marginalizing of the Taiwanese academic world.

1. Altbach, P.G.(1997).Straitjacket scholars.South China Mornin Post,10
2. Altbach, P.G.(1987).The knowledge context: Comparative perspectives on the distribution of knowledge.Albany, N.Y.:State University of New York Press.
3. Altbach, P.G.,Mcvey, S.(1975).Preface.The Annuals of American Academy of Political Social Science,421
4. American Psychological Association(1995).Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.Washington:American Psychological Association.
5. Bailey, F.G.(1977).Morality and expediency: The folklore of academic politics.Oxford:Blackwell.
6. Baldauf, R.B.,Jernudd, B.H.(1983).Language of publications as a variable in scientific communication.Australian Review of Applied Linguistics,6,97-108.
7. Barnard, W.M.(1957).University of North Carolina.
8. Barnett, C.,Low, M.(1995).Department of Geography.UK:The University of Reading.
9. Bazerman, C.,J.S. Nelson,A. Megill,D.N. McCloskey(Eds.)(1987).The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences.Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
10. Ben-David, J.(1977).Centers of learning: Britain, France, Germany, United States.New York:McGraw Hill.
11. Bhatia, V.K.(1993).Analysing genre.London:Longman.
12. Bogart, D.(1998).The Bowker annual: Library and book trade almanac.New Providence:R.R. Bowker.
13. Bolles, C.A.(1975).University of Minnesota.
14. Bookbank.(computer file) Whitaker Bibliographic Services.London:Whitaker & Sons Ltd.
15. Bottle, R.T.,Efthimiadis, E.N.(1984).Library and information science literature: Authorshiop and growth patterns.Journal of Information Science,9,107-116.
16. Bourdieu, P.(1993).The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature.London:Polity Press.
17. Bourdieu, P.(1991).Language and symbolic power.Cambridge:Polity.
18. Bourdieu, P.,Loic J.D. Wacquant(1992).An invitation to reflexive sociology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
19. Brodkey, L.(1987).Academic writing as social practice.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
20. Budd, J.M.(1985).The University of north Carolina t Chapel Hill.
21. Canagarajah, A.S.(1996).`Nondiscursive` equirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production.Written Communication,13(4),435-474.
22. Coffman, J.W.(1985).Case Western Reserve University.
23. Crotty, R.(1999).Towards a sociology of academic publishing.Annual cconference paper,Melbourne:
24. Curwen, P.(1986).The world book industry.London:Euromonitor.
25. Euromonitor(1992).The Euromonitor world book report.London:Euromonitor.
26. Foster, D.L.(1969).Journal of Education for Librarianship.
27. Foucault, M.,A. Sheridan(Trans.)(1976).The archeology of knowledge.New York:Harper & Row.
28. Garfield, E.(1983).Mapping science in the Third World.Science and Public Policy,10,114-126.
29. Garfield, E.,K. Warren(Ed.)(1978).Coping with the bio-medical literature explosion: A qualitative approach.New York:Rockefeller Foundation.
30. Ghai, O.P.,Kumar, N.(1984).International publishing today.Delhi:the Bookman`s Club.
31. Gibbs, W.W.(1995).Information have-nots.Scientific American.
32. Harris, J.(1989).The idea of community in the study of writing.College Composition and Communication,40(1),11-22.
33. Heilbron, Johan(1999).Towards a sociology of translation: Book translations as a cultural world-system.European Journal of Social Theory,2(4),429-444.
34. Henkel, M.(2000).Academic identities and policy change in higher education.London:Jessica Kingley.
35. Heussman, J.W.(1970).university of Illinois.
36. Homi Bhabha(1994).The location of culture.NY:Routledge.
37. Institute of International Education(2000).Open doors.New York:TIE.
38. IST Database: The journal selection process
39. Kaplan, R.B.(1966).Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education.Language Learning,16,1-20.
40. Karki, R.(1996).Searching for bridges between disciplines: An author coitation analysis on the research into scholarly communication.Journal of Information Science,22,324.
41. Knorr-Cetina, K.D.(1981).The manufacture of knowledge.Oxford, UK:Pergamon.
42. LaBoire, T.,Halperin, M.(1976).Citation paper in library science dissertations.Journal of Education for Librarianship,16,271-283.
43. Leavy, M.D.(1996).The university of Chicago Press and the rise of the `Chicago School of Sociology` 1892-1920.Publishing Research Quarterly,1(3),30-79.
44. Lievrouw, L.A.(1989).The invisible college reconsidered.Communication Research,16(5),615-628.
45. Lingwood, D.A.(1969).Stanford, CA,Stanford University.
46. Lorimer, R.(1993).The socioeconomy of scholarly and cultural book publishing.Media, Culture and Society,15,203-216.
47. McCarthy, E.D.(1996).Knowledge as culture: The new sociology of knowledge.London:Routledge.
48. McMahon, M.E.(1992).Higher education in a world market: An historical look at the global context of international study.Higher Education,24,465-282.
49. Muchiri, M.N.,Mulamba, N.G.,Myers, G.,Ndoloi, D.B.(1995).Importing composition: Teaching and researching academic writing beyond North America.College Composition and Communication,46(2),175-198.
50. Myers, G.(1985).Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles.Social Studies of Science,15,583-630.
51. Okerson, A.(1989).Report of the ARL serials prices project.Washington:Association of Research Libraries.
52. Omoruyi, J.(1978).Social science dissertations: Characteristics of bibliographic citations.Unesco Bulletin for Libraries,32(3),172-177.
53. Owen, L.(1997).Selling Rights.New York:Taylor & Francis Books.
54. Paisley, W.J.(1972).The rold of invisible colleges in scientific information transfer.Educational Researcher,1(4),5-19.
55. Plonyi, K.(1944).The great transformation.New York:Farrar & Rinehcrt.
56. Price, D.J.(1961).Science since Babylon.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
57. Ritzer, G.(1980).Sociology: A multiple paradigm science.Allyn and Bacon:Boston.
58. Russak, B.(1975).Scholarly publishing in Western Europe and Great Britain: A survey and analysis.The Annuals of American Academy of Political Social Science,421
59. Said, E.(1978).Orientalism.Harmondsworth, UK:Penguin.
60. Sardar, Z.,Loon, B.V.(1997).Cultural studies for beginners.Cambridge:Icon Books Ltd.
61. Schott, T.(1998).Ties between center and periphery in the scientific world system: Accumulatio of rewards, dominance and self-reliance in the center.Journal of World-Systems Research,4(112),112-144.
62. Schott, T.(1991).The World scientific community: Globality and globalization.Minerva,29,440-462.
63. Schumpeter, J.(1939).Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process.New York:McGraw Hill.
64. Smolicz, J.,S. Murray-Smith(Ed.)(1974).Melbourne studies in education.Melbourne:Melbourne University Press.
65. Swales, J.(1990).Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
66. UK book industry in statistics
67. Key figures 1999 from the book trade yearbook 2000
68. DTI value of UK book exports by country
69. Key facts summary
70. UK publishers` export sales by sector
71. Top 25 import sources of books
72. Top 200 U.S. export destinations for books
73. Unesco(1992).International flows of selected cultural goods 1970-1987.Paris:Unesco.
74. Unesco(2001).World education report 2000.Paris:Unesco.
75. Unesco(2000).International flows of selected cultural goods 1980-1998. (Excutive Summary).Paris:Unesco.
76. Unesco(1965).Statistical yearbook.Paris:Unesco.
77. University of Chicago Press(1993).The Chicago manual of style.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
78. Wallerstein, I.(1999).The end of the world as we know it: Social science for the 21st century.Minneapolis, London:University of Minnesota Press.
79. Wallerstein, I.(1974).The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century.New York:Academic Press.
80. 行政院文化建設委員會(1998)。中華民國八十七年台灣圖書出版市場研究報告。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
81. 吳明德(1987)。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之探討。台北:行政院文化建設委員會。
82. 李德竹(1992)。我國圖書館教師研究趨勢及資訊需求之調查報告。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
83. 一九九六年至二○○○年我主要留學國家留學生人數統計表
84. Taiwanese Collegian Magazine Online
85. 陳世敏(2001)。半世紀台灣傳播學的書籍出版。新聞學研究，67，1-23。
86. 陳巨擘(2001)。學術書籍翻譯市場的困境。當代，167，92-99。
87. 陳旭耀(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。輔仁大學圖書資訊學系。
88. 章英華(2000)。學術出版、評審與學術發展：一個社會學家的參與觀察。台灣社會學刊，23，1-23。
89. 曾孝明(2001)。臺灣的知識經濟：困境與迷思。台北:群學出版公司。
90. 新聞學研究(2001)。稿約及論文體例。新聞學研究，67，145-152。
91. 中華讀書報
92. 鄭麗敏(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立淡江大學教育資料科學研究所。

1. 陳雪華、吳紹群(2011)。人文學專書出版問題對學術傳播之影響。大學圖書館，15(2)，39-61。
2. 陳雅琦、陳光華(2014)。探索人文社會學者研究產出之總合軌跡：以臺灣大學人文社會高等研究院為例。圖書資訊學刊，12(2)，81-116。
3. 劉吉軒、郭麗芳、張惠真、柯雲娥、林淑君(2007)。人文社會科學研究資源中心芻議。圖書與資訊學刊，62，1-21。
4. 孫于智(2012)。臺灣英語教學領域教師對SSCI現象的看法 及隱性學群之探討。英語教學期刊，36(4)，79-121。
5. 翟本瑞(2004)。台灣教育體系中的近親繁殖的影響研究：以師範院校為例。教育與社會研究，7，1-40。
6. (2018)。探討海洋漁業科學家合作行為之研究。圖書資訊學研究，13(1)，125-162。