题名

朝向與超越拉卡托斯:當代經濟哲學發展的回顧與展望

并列篇名

Towards and Beyond Lakatos: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Economics

DOI

10.6464/TJSSTM.200910.0019

作者

趙相科(Hsiang-Ke Chao)

关键词

拉卡托斯 ; 經濟哲學 ; 模型 ; 科學實作 ; Imre Lakatos ; models ; philosophy of economics ; scientific practices

期刊名称

科技醫療與社會

卷期/出版年月

9期(2009 / 10 / 01)

页次

19 - 55

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文回顧當代經濟哲學的發展並介紹未來研究的取向。我們以拉卡托斯的歷史取向科學哲學為經濟哲學發展的分水嶺,討論科學哲學與經濟學的互動關係,並指出當代經濟哲學的研究議題。最後建議以包含模型操作等科學實作作為經濟哲學的研究重心。

英文摘要

This paper on the philosophy of economics contains two parts. The first part reviews the history of the philosophy of economics, and its connection with the philosophy of science. The second part suggests some salient research topics that are currently under debate in this field. The philosophy of models is specially introduced in order to understand their heuristic powers and the role that models play in economics and philosophy of economics, respectively.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
醫藥衛生 > 醫藥衛生綜合
醫藥衛生 > 醫藥總論
醫藥衛生 > 基礎醫學
醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 陳思廷(2009)。遊走於理論和實情之間:一項經濟模型操作的案例研究。科技、醫療與社會,9
    連結:
  2. Marshall, Alfred (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan
  3. Fisher, Irving (1911). The Purchasing Power of Money. New York: Macmillan.
  4. Haavelmo, Trygve M. (1944). The Probability Approach in Econometrics. Econometrica 12, Supplement: 1-118.
  5. Blang, Mark(1991).The Methodology of Economics: or How Economists Explain.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  6. Blung, Mark(1994).Not Only an Economist-Autobiographical Reflections of a Historian of Economic Thought.American Economist,38,12-27.
  7. Boland, Lawrence A.(1979).A Critique of Friedman's Critics.Journal of Economic Literature,17,503-522.
  8. Boumans, Marcel(2003).How to Design Galilean Fall Experiments in Economics.Philosophy of Science,70,308-329.
  9. Boumans, Marcel(2005).How Economists Model the World into Numbers.London:Routledge.
  10. Carnap, Rudolf(1966).Philosophical Foundations of Physics.New York:Basic Books.
  11. Cartwright, Nancy(1983).How the Laws of Physics Lie.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  12. Cartwright, Nancy(2007).Hunting Causes and Using Then: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Chao, Hsiang-ke(2009).Representation and Structure in Economics: The Methodology of Econometric Models of the Consumption Function.London:Routledge.
  14. Chao, Hsiang-ke(2007).A Structure of the Consumption Function.Journal of Economic Methodology,14,227-48.
  15. Christ, Carl F.(1994).The Cowles Commission's Contributions to Econometrics at Chicago, 1939-1955.Journal of Economic Literature,32,30-59.
  16. De Marchi, Neil,Blaug, Mark(1991).Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programmes.Aldershot:Edward Elgar.
  17. Eatwell, John(ed.),Milgate, Murray(ed.),Newman, Peter(ed.)(1987).The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics.London:McMillam.
  18. Fridman, Milton(1953).Essays in Positive Economics.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  19. Giere, Ronald N.(1988).Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  20. Hacking, Ian(2009).Scientific Reason.Taipei:The NTU Press.
  21. Hausman, Daniel M.(1992).The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  22. Hausman, Daniel M.(Ed.)(2007).The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  23. Hesse, Mary(1966).Models and Analogies in Science.Norte Dame:Norte Dame University Press.
  24. Kincaid, Harold(2008).Structural Realism and the Social Sciences.Philosophy of Science,75,720-731.
  25. Koopmans, Tjalling C.(ed.)(1950).Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Ladyman, James(2008).Structural Realism and the Relationship between the Special Sciences and Physics.Philosophy of Science,75,744-755.
  27. Latsis, Spiro J.(1972).Situational Determinism in Economics.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,23,207-245.
  28. Morgan, Mary S.(1990).The History of Econometric Ideas.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  29. Morgan, Mary S.(Ed.),Morrison, Margaret(Ed.)(1999).Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  30. Ross, Don(2008).Ontic Structural Realism and Economics.Philosophy of Science,75,732-743.
  31. Samuelson, Paul A.(1963).Problem of Methodology-Discussion.American Economic Review,53,231-236.
  32. Su, Huei-chun(2007).University of Exeter.
  33. Sudgen, Robert(2005).Experiments as Models and Experiments as Tests.Journal of Economic Methodology,12,291-302.
  34. Suppe, Frederick(2000).Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998.Philosophy of Science,67,S102-S115.
  35. Teller, Paul(2001).Twilight of The Perfect Model Model.Erkenntnis,55,393-415.
  36. Warrick, Andrew(2003).Masters of Theory: Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  37. Weintraub, E. Roy(2002).How Economics Became a Mathematical Science.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  38. Weintraub, E. Roy(1985).General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Woodward, John(2003).Making Things Happen.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  40. Worrall, John(1989).Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?.Dialectica,43,99-124.
  41. 陳瑞麟(2004)。科學理論版本的結構與發展。台北:台大出版中心。
被引用次数
  1. 嚴如玉(2022)。神經科學建模歷程的多元知識價值。科技醫療與社會,34,103-140。
  2. 趙相科(2014)。孔恩與經濟學知識的增長。科技、醫療與社會,18,241-280。