流行病學的政治：RCA流行病學研究的後設分析

The Politics of Epidemiology:A 'Meta-Analysis' on RCA's Epidemiological Research

10.6464/TJSSTM.201104.0113

陳政亮(Cheng-Liang Chen)

流行病學 ； RCA ； 科學民主化 ； Epidemiology ； RCA ； democratization of science

科技醫療與社會

12期（2011 / 04 / 01）

113 - 157

繁體中文

在公害與工安訴訟中，流行病學往往扮演著關鍵的角色，其研究結果也決定了不同團體的利益，因此也是激烈對抗的場域，本文便企圖分析此場域的政治性與其超越的可能。從RCA訴訟的例子出發，本文首先討論流行病學在司法中的角色、其知識上的潛力與限制、與其所處的社會位置。並進一步後設的分析與RCA相關的本地學術論文，以討論流行病學超越其限制的可能。本文認為，在當前資本主義社會下，流行病學被夾在企業與受害者之間，極容易透過方法設計而成為生產「科學不確定性」的學科，它經常失卻了其學科宣稱的「保衛公眾健康」目標，甚至走向企業那一邊去。而透過分析RCA案中的流行病學論文，本文討論了台灣流行病學例行化的風格，以及相對保守的推論；一般而言，它較缺乏受害者的身體感受與歷史經驗，對於社會變遷缺乏敏感度。另外，也指出了納入受害者的身體經驗的研究較能夠接近真實。最後，本文提出一個公民／科學聯盟的策略，此聯盟有助於流行病學對抗企業與捍衛受害者，並形成新的政治／知識形式。

In toxic tort litigation, epidemiology often plays a crucial role. Since its research conclusion influences interests of two parties, it becomes an area with fierce conflict. Focusing on the RCA (Radio Corporation of America) lawsuit in Taiwan, this article sees the nature of the conflict as a form of politics of knowledge, and intends to explore, blur and go beyond its boundary. It is found that epidemiology is put in an untoward position between corporations and victims in capitalist societies, and is easily manipulated to produce 'uncertainty'; as a result, it retreats from victims or leans to corporations for the worse. By 'meta-analyzing' four epidemiological articles on RCA Taiwan, in which the causation between diseases found on workers and organic solvents used on the shop floor is studied, this article indicates a kind of routinized and conservative style in these studies, and suggests that bringing workers' bodily experiences into research is beneficial in pursuit of both social and biological facts. It also suggests that a 'citizen-scientist alliance' can help epidemiology challenging the power of corporations. In relation to knowledge, in such alliance epidemiology can be democratized along with the participation of lay people, based on which it will have the possibility to go beyond its social and intellectual limits.

1. 林宜平(2006)。女人與水：由性別觀點分析RCA健康相關研究。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，21，185-212。
   連結：
2. Winner, Langdon (?). Is there a Right to Shape Technology? Unpublished
3. Bekelman, Justin,Li, Yan,Gross, Cary(2003).Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review.Journal of American Medical Association,289(4),454-465.
4. Brown, Phil(1992).Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,33,267-281.
5. Brown, Phil,McCormick, Sabrina,Mayer, Brian,Zavestoski, Stephen,Morello-Frosch, Rachel,Altman Gasior, Rebecca,Senier, Laura(2006)."A Lab of Our Own": Environmental Causation of Breast Cancer and Challenges to the Dominant Epidemiological Paradigm.Science, Technology and Human Values,31(5),499-536.
6. Chang, Yung-Ming,Tai, Chi-Fu,Lin, Ruey S.,Yang, Sweo-Chung,Chen, Chiou-Jong,Shih, Tung-Sheng,Liou, Saou-Hsing(2003).A proportionate cancer morbidity ratio study of workers exposed to chlorinated organic solvents in Taiwan.Industrial Health,41,77-87.
7. Chang, Yung-Ming,Tai, Chi-Fu,Yang, Sweo-Chung,Chen, Chiou-Jong,Shih, Tung-Sheng,Lin, Ruey S.,Liou, Saou-Hsing(2003).A cohort mortality study of workers exposed to chlorinated organic solvents in Taiwan.Annals of Epidemiology,13,652-660.
8. Chang, Yung-Ming,Tai, Chi-Fu,Yang, Sweo-Chung,Lin, Ruey S.,Sung, Fung-Chang,Shih, Tung-Sheng,Liou, Saou-Hsing(2005).Cancer incidence among workers potentially exposed to chlorinated solvents in an electronics factory.Journal of Occupational Health,47,171-180.
9. Detels, Roger(ed.),McEwen, James(ed.),Beaglehole, Robert(ed.),Tanaka, Heizo(ed.)(2002).Oxford Textbook of Public Health.Oxford University Press.
10. Edward, Hackett(ed.),Olga, Amsterdamska(ed.),Michael, Lynch(ed.),Judy, Wajcman(ed.)(2008).The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
11. Egilman, David,Billings, Marison(2005).Abuse of Epidemiology: Automobile Manufactures Manufacture a Defense to Asbestos Liability.International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health,11(4),360-371.
12. Egilman, David,Bohme, Susanna(2005).Over a Barrel: Corporate Corruption of Science and Its Effects on Workers and the Environment.International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health,11(4),331-337.
13. Feenberg, Andrew(ed.),Hannay, Alastair(ed.)(1995).Technology and the Politics of Knowledge.Indians University Press.
14. Gennaro, Valerio,Tomatis, Lorenzo(2005).Business Bias: How Epidemiologic Studies May Underestimate or Fail to Detect Increased Risks of Cancer and Other Diseases.International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health,11(4),356-359.
15. Greenland, Sander(1999).Relation of Probability of Causation to Relative Risk and Doubling Dose: A Methodological Error That Has Become a Social Problem.American Journal of Public Health,89(8),1166-1169.
16. Irwin, Alan,Dale, Alison,Smith, Denis(1996).Science in hell's Kitchen: The Local Understanding of Hazard Issues.Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology,New York:
17. Jasanoff, Sheila(2002).Science and the Statistical Victims: Modernizing Knowledge in Breast Implant Litigation.Social Studies of Science,32(1),37-69.
18. Jasanoff, Sheila(ed.),Markle, Gerald E.(ed.),Petersen, James C.(ed.),Pinch, Trevor(ed.)(1995).Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.London:Sage.
19. Kleinman, Arthur(1988).The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition.New York:Basic Books.
20. Kleinman, Daniel Lee(ed.)(2000).Science, Technology, and Democracy.New York:University of New York Press.
21. Krieger, Nancy(2008).Proximal, Distal, and the Politics of Causation: What's Level Got to Do With It?.American Journal of Public Health,98(2),221-230.
22. Lee, L.J.H.,Chung, C. W.,Ma, Y. C.,Wang, G. S.,Chen, P. C.,Hwang, Y. H.,Wang, J. D.(2003).Increased mortality odds ratio of male liver cancer in a community contaminated by chlorinated hydrocarbons in groundwater.Occupational and Environmental Medicine,60,364-369.
23. Lee, Lukas Jyuhn-Hsiarn,Chan, Chang-Chuan,Chung, Chih-Wen,Ma, Yee-Chung,Wang, Gan-Shuh,Wang, Jung-Der(2002).Health risk assessment on residents exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons contaminated in groundwater of a hazardous waste site.Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (A),65,219-235.
24. Mackenzine, Donald(ed.),Wajcman, Judy(ed.)(1999).The Social Shaping of Technology.Buckingham:Open University Press.
25. Markowitz, Gerald,Rosner, David(2002).Deceit and Denial: the Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution.University of California Press.
26. McCormick, Sabrina,Brown, Phil,Zavestoski, Stephen(2003).The Personal Is Scientific, the Scientific Is Political: The Public Paradigm of the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement.Sociological Forum,18(4),545-576.
27. Michaels, David,Monforton, Celester(2005).Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public's Health and Environment.American Journal of Public Health,95(S1),S39-48.
28. Ong, Elisa,Glantz, Stanton(2001).Constructing 'Sound Science' and 'Good Epidemiology': Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms.American Journal of Public Health,91(11),1749-1757.
29. Pearce, Neil(1996).Traditional Epidemiology, Modern Epidemiology, and Public Health.American Journal of Public Health,86(5),678-683.
30. Rothman, Kenneth,Greenland, Sander(2005).Causation and Cause Inference in Epidemiology.American Journal of Public Health,95(S1),S144-150.
31. Shim, Janet(2002).Understanding the Routinised Inclusion of Race, Socioeconomic Status and Sex in Epidemiology: the Utility of Concepts from Technoscience Studies.Sociology of Health and Illness,24(2),129-150.
32. Sung, Tzu-I.,Wang, Jung-Der,Chen, Pau-Chung(2008).Increased risks of infant mortality and of deaths due to congenital malformation in the offspring of male electronics workers.Birth Defects Res (A): Clin Mol Teratol,85(2),119-124.
33. Sung, Tzu-I.,Wang, Jung-Der,Chen, Pau-Chung(2008).Increased risk of cancer in the offspring of female electronics workers.Reprod Toxicol,25(1),115-119.
34. Sung, Tzu-I,Chen, Pau-Chung,Lee, Lukas Jyuhn-Hsiarn,Lin, Yi-Ping,Hsieh, Gong-Yih,Wang, Jung-Der(2007).Increased standardized incidence ratio of breast cancer in female electronics workers.BMC Public Health,7,102.
35. Wang, Fun-In,Kuo, Min-Liang,Shun, Chia-Tung,Ma, Yee-Chung,Wang, Jung-Der,Ueng, Tzuu-Huei(2002).Chronic toxicity of a mixture of chlorinated alkanes and alkenes in ICR mice.Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (A),65,279-291.
36. Winner, Langdon(1993).Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.Science, Technology and Human Values,18(3),362-378.
37. Wong, Otto(2001).Malignant Mesothelioman and Asbestos Exposure among Auto Mechanics: Appraisal of Scientific Evidence.Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,34,170-177.
38. 王榮德(1987)。流行病學方法論（四）：因果關係的判定。當代醫學，162，290-296。
39. 王榮德編(2007)。公共衛生學（中冊）。台北:陳拱北預防醫學基金會。
40. 吳怡伶、王實之(2010)。常民參與對衛生政策與醫療知識的貢獻：台灣職業病賠償制度與認定的歷史分析。返景入深林：理論與實踐研討會，:
41. 林瑞雄、宋鴻樟(2002)。勞委會勞研所委託計畫勞委會勞研所委託計畫,台北:行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。
42. 戴基福、林瑞雄、劉紹興(2000)。勞委會勞研所委託計畫勞委會勞研所委託計畫,台北:行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。
43. 戴基福、林瑞雄、劉紹興(1999)。勞委會勞研所委託計畫勞委會勞研所委託計畫,台北:行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。

1. 陳瑞麟(2013)。建構RCA事件調查的因果推理─結構因果與模型逆推法的取向。政治與社會哲學評論，46，81-130。
2. 范玫芳(2017)。誰的風險？誰的管制與檢測標準？蘭嶼核廢料爭議之研究。傳播研究與實踐，7(1)，107-139。
3. 邱文聰(2012)。如何克服公衛訴訟中因果推論的難題：法律系統面對風險社會的一個挑戰。科技、醫療與社會，14，227-264。
4. 蘇上雅(2019)。傷害之後，法律如何動起來：臺灣油症公害的法律與社會研究（1979－1990）。科技醫療與社會，29，119-181。
5. 吳怡伶、王實之(2012)。常民參與對醫療知識與衛生政策的貢獻：職業病認定與補償之爭議的歷史分析。臺灣社會研究季刊，89，127-184。
6. (2014)。掙脫鳥籠─反思臺灣公共衛生議題裡的因果關係。中研院法學期刊，15，283-329。
7. (2016)。RCA 判決與環境責任法制之關聯性。月旦法學雜誌，253，45-54。
8. (2022)。法律與現代性。政大法學評論，特刊，179-223。
9. (2023).Field Report: Taiwan’s RCA Litigation and Its Multiple Outreaches: The Experience of an STS Community, 2011–2023.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,17(4),494-520.
10. (2023).Late Industrialism, Advocacy, and Law: Relays Toward Just Transition.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,17(4),462-493.