漂浮的技術地景：台灣生質能源計畫的技術選擇與規模的三重邊界

A Floating Technoscape: The Threefold Boundaries of Biofuel Projects in Taiwan

10.6464/TJSSTM.201210.0187

李宜澤(Yi-Tze Lee)

生質燃料 ； 技術地景 ； 規模與模型 ； 農業生物技術 ； Biofuels ； Technoscape ； Scale and Model ； Agricultural Biotechnology

科技醫療與社會

15期（2012 / 10 / 01）

187 - 252

繁體中文

這篇論文針對農業技術發展的全球化與在地性特質，以及國家政策之歷史因素，探討生質燃料計畫過程中相關行動者如何形成網絡，以及不同規模涉及的技術思維：包括行動者參與計畫的軌跡，農業轉型的想像，以及種植規模的討論。本文以能源作物發展的背景以及在台灣試驗的「失敗」，討論農地種植需求的實際考量，除了呈現政策設計與實際種植考量的差異，也討論不同參與者以歷史記憶，對專家論述的質疑與重塑。從台灣設置雜糧種植區的歷史背景，以及2005-2008年間以休耕雜糧區作為示範能源作物的種植為實例，討論技術使用在田間種植與實驗規模的不同。比較能源作物實驗田區計畫中農民與農政系統，國營與私人技術投資公司，以及生技實驗室研究人員的不同觀點。本文主要關注技術的敘說如何連結不同行動者，並且操作環境治理議題在地化的過程。整個台灣就是各種農業技術的實驗田區，透過對於不同規模操作上的差異和實際需求的問題，本文以三種生質能源運用模式，討論當代生質能計畫在禮物經濟，區域組裝，與生物資本間的不同。進一步指出脫離農民參與的農業生技成果，不易回到農業生產部門的困境，並以此計畫反省生質能源導向社區公共性的思考。

In this paper, I take the innovative project of bioenergy in Taiwan as an example to show the case of problematic professionalism in applying agricultural materials for fuel production. The experiment of energy crop cultivation was promoted vigorously from 2005 to 2008 in Southern Taiwan based on the expectation of revitalizing dormant farmland into open lab for agricultural residues and coarse grains cultivation. My discussion delves back to the establishment of assigned coarse grain regions as a convenient but bounded scale for energy crop plantation under subsidy policies and local specialties. For the farmers in Southern Taiwan, their memories over massive plantation on sugarcane during Japanese colonial period resonate with personal evaluation of current project. Furthermore, the contested responses to the failed advocacy indicate diverse imagination on the efficacy of bioenergy and related environmental initiatives. This paper then focuses on the cacophony of different interest parties, including agricultural specialists, farmers, policy makers, biotech scientists, and venture-capital investors, among three types of bioenergy projects. Two points are discussed in the end of this article: First, the conflict between land application and biotech professionalism results in the miscalculation between ”scale” and ”model.” Second, responses of local communities transform biofuel project into new social common interests, and creates an arena for new perception on agrarian environment, turning the failed initiative into public awareness of alternative modernity.

1. (1974)。省府決在嘉南設置雜糧生產專區。現代畜殖，2(2)，1。
2. (1971)。學甲農機中心很受農民歡迎。豐年，21(20)，23。
3. （能源大豆台南選一號栽培示範資料）（2005）。台南農改場。
4. （台糖通訊三十周年期刊目錄）（1978）。台糖糖業公司。
5. Agrawal, Arun(2005).Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects.Durham:Duke University Press.
6. Appadurai, Ajurn(1990).Technology and the Reproduction of Value in Rural Western India.Dominating Knowledge-Development, Culture, and Resistance,Oxford:
7. Appadurai, Ajurn(1993).Modernity at Large.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
8. Argyrou, Vassos(2009).Virtualism and the Logic of Environmentalism.Virtualism, Governance and Practice: Vision and Execution in Environmental Conservation,London:
9. Bain, Irene(1993).Agricultural Reform in Taiwan: From here to Modernity.Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
10. Boras, Saturnino,McMichael, Philip,Scoones, Ian(2010).The Politics of Biofuels, Land and Agrarian Change: Editiors' Introduction.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),575-592.
11. Bray, Francesca(1994).The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies.Berkeley:University of California Press.
12. Carrier, James(ed.),West, Paige(ed.)(2009).Introduction.Virtualism, Governance and Practice: Vision and Execution in Environmental Conservation,London:
13. Dauvergne, Peter,Neville, Kate(2010).Forest, Food and Fuel in the Tropics: The Uneven Social and Ecological Consequences of the Emerging Political Ecology of Biofueks.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),631-660.
14. Dryzek, John(2005).The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
15. Dube, Saurabh(edited)(2009).Enchantments of Modernity: Empire, Nation, Globalization.London:Routledge.
16. Fernandez, Bernardo,Welch, Clifford,Goncalves, Elienai(2010).Agrofuel Policies in Brazil: Paradigmatic and Territorial Disputes.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),793-819.
17. Flint, Kate(edited),Morphy, Howard(edited)(2000).Culture, Landscape and Environment: The Linacre Lectures 1997.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
18. Geertz, Clifford(1972).The Wet and the Dry: Traditional Irrigation in Bali and Morocco.Human Ecology,1(1),23-29.
19. Geertz, Clifford(1969).Agricultural Involution: the process of ecological change in Indonesia.Berkeley:University of California Press.
20. Gillon, Sean(2010).Fields of Dreams: Negotiating an Ethanol Agenda in the Midwest United States.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),723-748.
21. Goodman, D. B. Sorj(ed.),Wilkinson, J.(ed.)(1987).From Farming to Biotechnology: A theory of Agro-Industrial Development.New York:Basil Blackwell.
22. Goodman, David(2003).The Brave New Worlds of Agricultural Technoscience: Changing perspectives, recurrent themes, and new research directions in agro-food studies.Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and its Discontents,Berkeley:
23. Higgins, Vaughan(edited),Lawrence, Geoffrey(edited)(2005).Agricultural Governance: Globalization and the New Politics of Regulation.London:Routledge.
24. Hollander, Gail(2010).Power is Sweet: Sugarcane in the Global Ethanol Assemblage.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),699-721.
25. Hollander, Gail(2008).Raising Cane in the Glades: The Global Sugar Trade and the Transformation of Florida.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
26. Latour, Bruno(2005).Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory.London:Oxford University Press.
27. Latour, Bruno,Sheridan, Alan(translated),Law, John(translated)(1988).The Pasteurization of France.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
28. Law, John(edited)(1986).Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge.London:Routledge.
29. McCarthy, John(2010).Processes of Inclusion and Adverse of Incorporation: Oil Palm and Agrarian Change in Sumatra, Indonesia.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),821-850.
30. McMichael, Philip(2010).Agrofuels in the Food Regime.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),609-629.
31. Mol, Arthur(2007).Boundless Biofuels? Between Environmental Sustainability and Vulnerability.Sociologia Ruralis,47(4),297-315.
32. Nazarea, Virginia(2006).Local Knowledge and Memory in Biodiversiety Conservation.Annual Review of Anthropology,35,317-335.
33. Ong, Aihwa(edited),Chen, Nancy(edited)(2010).Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate.Durham:Duke University Press.
34. Ong, Aihwa(edited),Collier, Stephen(edited)(2005).Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems.London:Blackwell.
35. Ong, Aihwa(edited),Zhang, Li(edited)(2008).Privatizing China.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
36. Pheiffenberger, Bryan(1992).Social Anthropology of Technology.Annual Review of Anthropology,21,491-516.
37. Raffies, Hugh(2010).Insectopedia.New York:Vintage Publisher.
38. Rajan, Kaushik S.(2006).Biocapital: the Constitution of Postgenomic Life.Durham:Duke University Press.
39. Sassen, Saskia(2006).Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
40. Scott, James(1976).The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia.New Haven:Yale University Press.
41. Sillitoe, Paul(ed.)(2007).Local Science vs. Global Science: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge in International Development.London:Berghahn Books.
42. Stone, Glenn(2010).Anthropology of Genetically Modified Crops.Annual Review of Anthropology,39,381-400.
43. Stone, Glenn(2002).Both Sides Now: Fallacies in the Genetic-Modification Wars, Implications for Developing Countries, and Anthropological Perspectives.Current Anthropology,43(4),611-630.
44. Strathern, Marilyn(2004).Partial Connection.New York:Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
45. Tilman, David,Hill, Jason,Lehman, Clarence(2006).Carbon-negative Biofuels from Low-input High-diversity Grass Land.Science,314,5805.
46. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt(2005).Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
47. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt(2008).Predator vs. Alien. Presentation to the Danish Association for Science and Technology Studies Annual Meeting.STS: Encounter,1(1),1-22.
48. West, Paige(2006).Coservation is Our Government Now: The Politics of Ecology in Papua New Guinea.Durham:Duke University Press.
49. White, Ben,Dasgupta, Anirban(2010).Agrofuels Capitalism: A View from Political Economy.Journal of Peasant Studies,37(4),569-607.
50. Wolf, Eric(1982).Europe and the People without History.Berkeley:Univ. of California Press.
51. Yang, Mayfair Meihui(1989).The Gift Economy and State Power in China.Comparative Studies in Society and History,31(1),25-54.
52. Yang, Mayfair Meihui(1994).Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: the Art of Social Relationships in China.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
53. 王啟柱、吳信滏、高景輝(1981)。台灣雜糧增產芻議。科學農業，29(3-4)，73-80。
54. 吳銘塘、徐玉標(1980)。灌溉及施肥與台灣雜糧增產。科學農業，28(1-2)，25-46。
55. 李佩錞、孫樹根(1998)。教育性與契約性農業推廣之比較。農業推廣學報，15，55-76。
56. 李堅明、葛復光、曾姵茵(2007)。行政院原子能委員會委託計畫報告行政院原子能委員會委託計畫報告,行政院原子能委員會。
57. 林俊義(2006)。行政院農業委員會農糧署九十五年度科計計畫研究報告行政院農業委員會農糧署九十五年度科計計畫研究報告,行政院農業委員會農糧署。
58. 林俊義、賴吉雄、陳邦華、陳志昇、劉嘉仁、吳惠卿、吳錫家、陳烈夫(2006)。能源作物導入輪作體系的理念、作法及潛力。科學農業，54(1-3)，23-35。
59. 柯志明(2003)。米糖相剋－日本殖民主義下台灣的發展與從屬。台北:群學出版社。
60. 柯志明、翁仕杰(1993)。台灣農民的分類與分化。中央研究所民族所集刊，72，107-150。
61. 張宏政(2005)。農業草根知識的意義：農業技術之交換、分享、體驗與創新。苗栗文獻，35，119-145。
62. 黃正華、朱永康(1980)。台灣雜糧生產現況與增產潛力之探討。科學農業，28(1-2)，1-12。
63. 楊弘任(2007)。社區如何動起來－黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造。台北:左岸文化出版社。
64. 溫祖康(2007)。生質能源發展現況與我國推動能源作物之探討。農政與農情，186，65。
65. 趙致康、蔡文福(1980)。從台灣農業區域探討雜糧增產。科學農業，28(1-2)，47-55。
66. 劉志偉(2009)。國際農糧體制與台灣的糧食依賴：戰後台灣養豬業的歷史考察。臺灣史研究，16(2)，105-160。
67. 劉志偉、柯志明(2002)。戰後糧政體制與土地制度轉型過程中的國家、地主與農民（1945-1953）。臺灣史研究，9(1)，107-180。
68. 劉振宇、柯海生、徐金錫、許勝雄(2002)。學甲試驗田綠肥種植對休耕田土層構造之影響之調查研究暨U形渠道設施效益之調查研究。農業水利科技研究發展91年度成果討論會論文集，桃園:
69. 劉嘉哲(2007)。臺糖出產品質酒精的發展。綠色油田在農業永續發展扮演的角色研討會專刊，台北:
70. 蔡必焜(2001)。鄉村發展的後現代意涵。農業推廣學報，18，123-137。
71. 蔡培慧(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北，台灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學系。
72. 蕭崑杉(2000)。知識經濟的農業推廣策略。農業推廣學報，17，105-128。
73. 賴爾柔(1998)。農業技術創新與採用之研究－以葡萄產業創新為例。台灣經濟，255，62-79。
74. 薛月順、曾品滄(2008)。出類拔萃人物訪談錄：畜牧產業－洪嘉謨訪談錄。台北:國史館。
75. 謝桑煙、呂坤泉、黃資國(2000)。糧食作物農機代耕中心之發展。台灣農業機械雙月刊，15(1)，1-10。
76. 謝順景(1982)。能源作物。科學農業，30(1-2)，74-85。
77. 鍾書豪(2009)。百年來的花蓮糖業發展史1899-2002。台東:東台灣研究會。
78. 蘇宗振、陳銓燦、張永欣(2003)。台灣大豆及其加工產業之研究。科學農業，51(1-2)，1-11。

1. 李宜澤(2018)。「組裝」醬料的當代風土論述：以臺中地區發酵釀造工坊的生產網路為例。中國飲食文化，14(2)，71-126。
2. 林文源(2013)。打造科技、打造人：後進實驗室的追趕實作文化與人材培育。文化研究，17，159-214。
3. (2020)。活力的部落，培力的評鑑？原住民族部落活力計畫現場的民族誌觀察。臺灣人類學刊，18(2)，129-174。