當核能系統轉化為科技政體：冷戰下的國際政治與核能發展

How a Technopolitical Regime Evolved from the Pursuit of Nuclear Power: The International Politics and Nuclear Development during the Cold War

10.6464/TJSSTM.201304_(16).0003

張國暉(Kuo-Hui Chang)

科技政治 ； 科技政體 ； 冷戰 ； 核能 ； 福島核災 ； technopolitics ； technopolitical regime ； Cold War ； nuclear power ； Fukushima disaster

科技醫療與社會

16期（2013 / 04 / 01）

103 - 160

繁體中文

本文透過科學史、科技史、科學與技術研究（science and technology studies）的發展趨勢評述近年來科技史對研究冷戰（Cold War）的一個新概念：科技政治（technopolitics），並藉此對東亞的核能發展進行初步分析。基本上，透過科技的權力展現即是科技政治，指涉一種利用科技的設計或使用，進而建構、執行及具體化某些政治目的的策略性操作。亦即，特定政治目標的達成必須實質性地仰賴這些物質性及人造性的產物。科技政治承襲及進一步發展了若干科技史重要概念，但在概念層次上與技術的社會建構論卻出現若干扞格，並恐欠缺技術內生政治性的考量。不過，科技政治當中關於「文化及政治脈絡」上的洞見，應可做為一個檢視福島核災的重要途徑。雖然目前東亞各國社會已因福島核災而對核能發展有更進一步的檢討，但除了技術性議題外，仍恐難帶給東亞各國政府與人民在文化及政治脈絡上的根本改變，亦即東亞各國的科學發展早已不只是手段，更是深化為國家目的。本文建議東亞的核能發展可跳脫東亞各國國內的架構，而從跨國角度檢討，進而發展更具歷史縱深及區域整合的觀點，並可藉科技政治的看法，檢視國際政經及歷史文化結構下的東亞核能「科技」及「科技家」是可能如何地扮演政治行動者。

This article reviews a new historical concept of technopolities during the Cold War, by which it aims to offer a technopolitical perspective on the nuclear development in East Asia after the Fukushima disaster. In addition to introduce Gabriel Hecht's research of nuclear technopolities in France, the first part of this article analyzes the concept of technopolities with some recent accounts from history of international relations, history of science and technology, and science and technology studies. Hecht's concept shared a contextualist approach with some critical accounts such as the idea of large technological system in history of technology, but her arguments suggest paying more attention on exploring the cultural and political contexts embedded within technology. Accordingly, the idea of technopolitics shows some dissatisfaction with those explanations about the Cold War history of technology offered by the theories of social construction/shaping of technology and history of international relations. In the second part, this article applies the heuristic concept of technopolitics to explore the development of nuclear power in East Asia. It argues the Fukushima disaster might bring limited impacts on projects for nuclear power and/or weapons in countries such as China, South Korea, North Korea, Japan and Taiwan. In addition to the technological momentum of large nuclear systems that keeps pushing these countries to pursue their nuclear projects, their intensive international relations in terms of hostile military and economic competition to each other leave them little room to make a difference. However, the Fukushima disaster has generated some discussions in societies such as in Taiwan to rethink if they should build their national visions on projects of nuclear development.

1. 張國暉(2011)。追尋主體性的工程設計：轉型的威權政治及開放的台灣高鐵土木工程設計。台灣社會研究季刊，85，157-200。
   連結：
2. 張國暉(2011)。對技術的社會建構論（SCOT）之挑戰：建構東亞技術研究主體性的一個契機。科技、醫療與社會，13，171-222。
   連結：
3. 張國暉(2012)。科學、技術與自由民主政治秩序的演變：近代美國政治體制的科學意識型態與現實政治。政治與社會哲學評論，42，153-205。
   連結：
4. (1999).The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology.MA:The MIT Press.
5. (1998).Beyond Joseph Needham: Science, Technology and Medicine in East and Southeast Asia.
6. Kuznick, Peter (2011). Japan's Nuclear History in Perspective: Eisenhower and Atoms for War and Peace. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 13 April. http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/japans-nuclear-history-perspective-eisenhower-and-atoms-war-and-peace (檢索日期 : 2011年11月29日)
7. Albright, David,Gay, Corey(1998).Taiwan: Nuclear Nightmare Averted.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,54(1),54-60.
8. Alder, Ken(2010).Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763-1815.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
9. Armytage, W. H. G.(1965).The Rise of the Technocrats: a Social History.NY:Routledge.
10. Carroll, Patrick(2005).Review: Honoring Thomas Hughes, Appealing to Historians.Social Studies of Science,35(2),313-321.
11. Chan, Chang-Chuan,Chen, Ya-mei(2011).A Fukushima-Like Nuclear Crisis in Taiwan or a Nonnuclear Taiwan?.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,5(3),403-407.
12. Chang, Soon Heung(2011).The Implications of Fukushima: The South Korea Perspective.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,67(4),18-22.
13. Chen, Dung-sheng(2011).Taiwan's Antinuclear Movement in the Wake of the Fukushima Disaster, Viewed from an STS Perspective.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,5(4),567-572.
14. DiMoia, John(2010).Atoms for Sale? Cold War Institution-Building and the South Korean Atomic Energy Project, 1945-1965.Technology and Culture,51,589-618.
15. Downey, Gary L.,Lucena, Juan C.(2004).Knowledge and Professional Identity in Engineering: Code-Switching and the Metric of Progress.History and Technology,20,393-420.
16. Edwards, Paul N.,Hecht, Gabrielle(2010).History and the Technopolitics of Identity: The Case of Apartheid South Africa.Journal of Southern African Studies,36(3),619-639.
17. Fan, Fa-ti(2007).East Asian STS: Fox or Hedgehog?.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal,1,243-247.
18. Fu, Daiwie(2007).How Far Can East Asian STS Go? A Position Paper.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal,1(1),1-14.
19. Fujigaki, Yuko,Togo, Tsukahara(2011).STS Implications of Japan's 3/11 Crisis.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal,5(3),381-394.
20. Greene, J. Megan(2008).The Origins of the Developmental State in Taiwan: Science Policy and the Quest for Modernization.MA:Harvard University Press.
21. Guigueno, Vincent(2008).Building a High-Speed Society: France and the Aerotrain, 1962-1974.Technology and Culture,49,21-40.
22. Harrison, Carol E.,Johnson, Ann(2009).Introduction: Science and National Identity.Osiris,24,1-14.
23. Hecht, Gabrielle(2001).Technology, Politics, and National Identity in France.Technology of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes,MA:
24. Hecht, Gabrielle(2009).The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II.MA:The MIT Press.
25. Hecht, Gabrielle(2009).The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II.NY:The MIT Press.
26. Hecht, Gabrielle(2002).Rupture-Talk in the Nuclear Age: Conjugating Colonial Power inAfrica.Social Studies of Science,32(5/6),691-727.
27. Hecht, Gabrielle(ed.)(2011).Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War.MA:The MIT Press.
28. Hecht, Gabrielle,Allen, Michael Thad(2001).Introduction: Authority, Political Machines, and Technology's History.Technology of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes,MA:
29. Hecht, Gabrielle,Edwards, Paul N.(2010).The Technopolitics of Cold War: Toward a Transregional Perspective.Essays on Twentieth-Century History,Philadelphia:
30. Heyck, Hunter,Kaiser, David(2010).Focus: New Perspectives on Science and the Cold War.Isis,101(2),362-366.
31. Hong, Sungook(2011).Where Is the Nuclear Nation Going? Hopes and Fears over Nuclear Energy in South Korea after the Fukushima Disaster.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,5(3),409-415.
32. Hughes, Thomas P.(1989).American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm.NY:Viking.
33. Hughes, Thomas P.(1989).Machines, Megamechines, and Systems.In Context: History and the History of Technology, Essays in Honor of Melvin Kranzberg, Research in Technology Studies,Bethlehem, PA:
34. Hughes, Thomas P.(1983).Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930.MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Jasanoff, Shiela,Kim, Sang-Hyun(2009).Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.Minerva,47,119-146.
36. Klein, Hans K.,Kleinman, Daniel Lee(2002).The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations.Science, Technology, & Human Values,27(1),28-52.
37. Kranakis, Eda(1989).Social Determinants of Engineering Practice.Social Studies of Science,19(1),5-70.
38. Krige, John(ed.),Barth, Kai-Henrik(ed.)(2006).Global Power Knowledge: Science, Technology, and International Affairs.
39. Kristensen, Hans M.,Norris, Robert S.(2011).Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2011.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,67(6),81-87.
40. Mitcham, Carl(2009).A Historico-ethical Perspective on Engineering Education: From Use and Convenience to Policy Engagement.Engineering Studies,1(1),35-53.
41. Mitchell, Timothy(2002).Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity.CA:University of California Press.
42. Moon, Suzanne(2007).Justice, Geography, and Steel: Technology and National Identity in Indonesian Industrialization.Osiris,24,253-277.
43. Nöggerath, Johannis,Geller, Robert J.,Gusiakov, Viacheslav K.(2011).Fukushima: the Myth of Safety and the Reality of Geoscience.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,67(5),37-46.
44. Norio, Okada,Ye, Tao,Yoshio, Kajitani,Shi, Peijun,Hirokazu, Tatano(2011).The 2011 Eastern Japan Great Earthquake Disaster: Overview and Comments.International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,2(1),34-42.
45. Pannabecker, John(2005).Technocracy and the École Polytechnique: Bruno Belhoste, La formation d'une technocratie.Technology and Culture,46(3),618-622.
46. Perrow, Charles(2011).Fukushima and the Inevitability of Accidents.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,67(6),44-52.
47. Perrow, Charles(1999).Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies.NJ:Prince University Press.
48. Picon, Antoine(1992).French Architects and Engineers in the Age of the Enlightenment.MA:Cambridge University Press.
49. Schneider, Mycle,Froggatt, Antony,Thomas, Steve(2011).2010-2011 World Nuclear Industry Status Report.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,67(4),60-77.
50. Smith, Merritt Roe(ed.),Marx, Leo(ed.)(1995).Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism.MA:The MIT Press.
51. Staudenmaier, John M.(1990).Recent Trends in the History of Technology.American Historical Review,95,715-726.
52. Stoneman, Timothy(2009).A Bold New Vision: The VOA Radio Ring Plan and Global Broadcasting in the Early Cold War.Technology and Culture,50,316-344.
53. Takubo, Masa(2011).Nuclear or Not? The Complex and Uncertain Politics of Japan's Post-Fukushima Energy Policy.Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,67(5),19-26.
54. Van der Vleuten, Erik(2008).Toward a Transnational History of Technology: Meanings, Promises, Pitfalls.Technology and Culture,49,974-994.
55. Weinberger, Hans(2011).The Neutrality Flagpole: Swedish Neutrality Policy and Technological Alliances, 1945-1970.Technology of Power: Essays in Honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes,MA:
56. Winner, Landon(1977).Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of Controls as a Theme in Political Thought.MA:MIT Press.
57. Winner, Landon(1986).The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology.IL:The University of Chicago Press.
58. 王奐若(2000)。中共火箭飛彈之父錢學森感念三位哲人。傳記文學，76(6)，60-65。
59. 王奐若(1998)。敬悼中科院創建人唐君鉑將軍。傳記文學，74(4)，64-66。
60. 朱敬一編(2000)。核四何去何從研討會實錄，台北:
61. 池上善彥、馮啟斌編譯、胡清雅編譯(2011)。在核能意外爭議中，導入戰後史的視野。文化研究週報，116
62. 吳大猷(1991)。我國「核能」政策史的一個補註。傳記文學，52(5)，41-43。
63. 胡湘玲(1995)。核工專家VS.反核專家。台北:前衛。
64. 翁寶山(2001)。臺灣核能史話。台北:行政院原子能委員會。
65. 傅大為(2011)。大海嘯、褔島核災、與東亞的科技與社會。科技、醫療與社會，13，9-14。
66. 傅大為(2012)。SCOT 的新發展與何謂「區域研究」─針對第十三期張國暉文獻評述的兩點意見與澄清。科技、醫療與社會，15，285-290。
67. 黃德源(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，台北大學公共行政暨政策研究所。
68. 楊翠華(2003)。臺灣科技政策的先導：吳大猷與科導會。臺灣史研究，10(2)，67-110。

1. 蔡友月,張國暉(2020)。驅不走達悟惡靈的民主治理夢魘：蘭嶼核廢遷場僵局的政策史分析。台灣社會研究季刊，115，77-149。
2. 江俊宜(2018)。重新審視福島核災之後的台灣核能政治爭議：從「正當性」轉向「防止危害」。中國行政評論，24(3)，128-153。
3. 張國暉(2017)。大型科技系統理論之評析：兼論探索移入台灣之系統的幾個構想。科技、醫療與社會，24，91-144。
4. 張國暉(2023)。轉型管理的興起、定位及新治理構思：自成一家的演變及挑戰。公共行政學報，64，79-116。
5. (2020).Emergence, Social and Cognitive Trends, and the Next Step? Two Decades of STS in Contemporary Taiwan.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,14(2),411-418.
6. (2023)。Understanding the Political Power of Water Engineering-Colonial Modernity and the Production of Waterscape in Taiwan under Japanese Ruling-。台灣水利，71(4)，14-32。