科學生態學發展歷史中的多元思維樣式

The Thought Styles in the History of Scientific Ecology

10.6464/TJSSTM.201410_(19).0004

陳恒安(Heng-An Chen)

生態學史 ； 生態哲學 ； 公共生態學 ； history of ecology ； philosophy of ecology ； public ecology

科技醫療與社會

19期（2014 / 10 / 01）

177 - 223

繁體中文

本文嘗試先從歷史發展的角度指出，科學生態學在成為自主學科那時起，便同時接納了自然史與精確科學兩種相異的自然觀與研究方法。其次， 本文將以「生態系統」理論的發展為例， 分析群落生態學（community ecology）與系統生態學（systems ecology）中的預設。群落生態學含有自然史的色彩。系統生態學雖承繼整體（holistic）哲學，但是引入控制論的反饋迴路（feedback loops）等概念。第三，本文將略述科學生態學理論、生態哲學與環境運動之間的關係。簡單來說，強調整體的生態學容易與古老神秘主義產生聯想，與環境運動關係較為密切。群落生態學，特別是走向數學模擬族群競爭的生態學，則與環境運動似乎較無關聯。最後，本文呼籲在生態問題層出不窮的今天，應強調生態學知識的溝通，肯認「公共生態學」的重要性，並嘗試與政府推動的環境教育結合。

The purpose of this paper is to show that there are different ＂thought styles＂ in modern scientific ecology. We will begin by providing historical evidences that scientific ecology contains viewpoints and research methods both from natural history and exact sciences. Secondly, this paper is to analyze the development of two major ecological theories, i.e. community ecology and systems ecology. The former based on the studies of natural history. The latter inherited a holistic philosophical thinking on one hand, and built new theories with the concepts from cybernetics, such as ＂feedback loops＂, on the other hand. Thirdly, we may consider the possible relationships among ecological theories, ecological philosophy and environmental movements. Finally, in response to increasing disparities over political, social, and environmental concerns, we might pay more attention to the ＂public ecology＂, which exists at the interface of science and policy.

1. 高雄後勁中油遷廠促進會。http://hjf2015.blogspot.tw/（Retrieved. June 27, 2014）
2. 〈看見台灣〉。《維基百科》。http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E7%9C%8B%E8%A6%8B%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3（Retrieved June 26, 2014）
3. (2011).Encyclopedia of Life Sciences.John Wiley & Sons.
4. Clements, Frederic E. (1936). “Nature and Structure of the Climax”. The Journal of Ecology 24 (1): 252-284.
5. 生物學科中心網站。http://www.bio.hchs.hc.edu.tw/xms/（Retrieved: August 20, 2012）
6. Thoreau, Hengy David (1854). Walden. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.
7. Funtowicz, Silvio and Jerome Ravetz “Post-Normal Science”, Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, http://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf (Retrieved: April 27, 2014)
8. White, Gilbert (1789). The Natural History of Selborne. London: Bemjamin White.
9. 林益仁（2001），〈多元文化社會之環境價值觀〉。http://e-info.org.tw/issue/thesis/enviedu/enviedu01072701.htm（Retrieved:January29,2014）
10. Tansley, Arthur G. (1935). “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms”. Ecology 16: 284-307.
11. Bertalanffy, Ludwig von (1928). Kritische Theorie der Formbildung. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.
12. Arendt, Hannah、王寅麗譯(2009)。人的境況。上海:上海世紀出版集團。
13. Beck, Ulrich(1988).Gegengifte. Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit.Frankfurt:Suhrkamp.
14. Begon, Michael,Harper, John L.,Townsend, Colin R.(1996).Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities.Blackwell Science.
15. Blühdorn, Ingolfur(2000).Post-Ecologist Politics: Social Theory and the Abdication of the Ecologist Paradigm.London:Routledge.
16. Bowler, Peter J.(1993).The Environmental Sciences.New York:Norton & Company.
17. Brennan, Andrew(1988).Thinking about Nature. An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology.Athens:The University of Georgia Press.
18. Chen, Heng-an(2003).Die Sexualitätstheorie und "Theoretische Biologie" von Max Hartmann in der ersten Hälfte des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts.Stuttgart:Franz Stein Verlag.
19. Craige, Betty Jean(2001).Eugene Odum. Ecosystem Ecologist & Environmentalist.Athens:The University of Georgia Press.
20. Cuddington, Kim,Beisner, Beatrix E.(2005).Ecological Paradigms Lost. Routes of Theory Change.Amsterdam:Elsevier Academic Press.
21. Daniel, Terry C.(2001).Whither Scenic Beauty? Visual Landscape Quality Assessment in the 21st Century.Landscape and Urban Planning,54,267-281.
22. Dawkins, Richard(1986).The Blind Watchmaker.New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
23. Eisel, U.(ed.),Schultz, H-D(ed.)(1997).Geographisches Denken.H-D Schultz.
24. Gleason, Henry Allan(1971).The Structure and Development of the Plant Association.Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club,43,463-481.
25. Hagen, Joel(1992).An Entangled Bank.New Brunswick. NJ:Rutgers University Press.
26. Höxtermann, Ekkehard(ed.),Hilger, Hartmut H.(ed.)(2007).Lebenswissen. Eine Einführung in die Geschichte der Biologie.Natur & Text.
27. Jahn, Ilse(ed.)(1998).Geschichte der Biologie. Theorien, Methoden, Institutionen, Kurzbiographien.Jena:Gustav Fischer.
28. Kim, Cuddington(ed.),Beisner, Beatrix E.(ed.)(2005).Ecological Paradigms Lost. Route of Theory Change.Elsevier Academic Press.
29. Kingsland, Sharon E.(2005).Evolution of American Ecology, 1890-2000.Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
30. Kovacs, Zsuzsi I.,LeRoy, Carri J.,Fischer, Dylan G.,Lubarsky, Sandra,Burke, William(2006).How do Aesthetics Affect our Ecology.Journal of Ecological Anthropology,10,61-65.
31. Koyré, Alexandre、陳瑞麟譯、張樂霖譯(2005)。從封閉世界到無限宇宙。台北:商周。
32. Kricher, John(2009).The Balance of Nature. Ecology's Enduring Myth.Princeton University Press.
33. Larson, Edward J.、陳恒安譯(2012)。了不起的演化論。台北:究竟。
34. Lovelock, James、金恆鑣譯(1994)。蓋婭，大地之母。台北:天下文化出版公司。
35. Luke, Timothy W.(2005).The Death of Environmentalism or the Advent of Public Ecology?.Organization & Environment,18(4),489-494.
36. McIntosh, Robert P.(1985).The Background of Ecology. Concept and Theory.Cambridge University Press.
37. Myerson, George(1997).Ecology and the End of Postmodernity.Totem Books.
38. Odum, Eugene P.(1983).Basic Ecology: Fundamentals of Ecology.CBS College Publishing.
39. Peters, Robert Henry(1991).A Critique for Ecology.Cambridge University Press.
40. Pojman, L. P.(ed.)(1994).Environmental Ethics.Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
41. Rheinberger,Hans-Jörg(2005).Iterationen.Berlin:Merve Verlag.
42. Robertson, David P.,Hull, Bruce R.(2003).Public Ecology: an Environmental Science and Policy for Global Society.Environmental Science & Policy,6,399-410.
43. Robertson, David P.,Hull, Bruce R.(2001).Beyond Biology: toward a More Public Ecology for Conservation.Conservation Biology,15(4),970-979.
44. Schwarz, Astrid E.(2000).Technische Universitat Munchen.
45. Schwarz, Astrid(ed.),Jax, Kurt(ed.)(2011).Ecology Revisited. Reflecting on Concepts, Advancing Science.Springer.
46. Sears, Paul(1964).Ecology: a Subversive Subject.Bioscience,14,11-13.
47. Shrader-Frechette, Kristin S.,McCoy, Earl D.(1993).Method in Ecology. Strategies for Conservation.Cambridge University Press.
48. Trepl, Ludwig(1994).Geschichte der Ökologie.Frankfurt am Main:Athenaum.
49. Voigt, Annette C. E.(2008).Technische Universitat Munchen.
50. Worster, Donald(1994).Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas.New York:Cambridge University Press.
51. Wuketits, Franz M.(1998).Eine Kurze Kulturgeschichte der Biologie: Mythen, Darwinismus, Gentechnik.Darmstadt:Primus Verlag.
52. 許璧如(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，中興大學農業推廣教育研究所。
53. 陳恒安(2013)。大眾史學的理論與實務：英美與德語世界的經驗。應用史學的理論與實踐學術研討會
54. 陳恒安(2009)。20 世紀後半葉台灣演化學普及知識的思維樣式。台北:記憶工程。
55. 陳恒安(2012)。STS 四不之二：STS 不是環境保護。科學發展，471，80-82。
56. 曾華璧(2008)。台灣的環境治理（1950-2000）：基於生態現代化與生態國家理論的分析。台灣史研究，15(4)，121-148。
57. 劉大椿編、劉勁揚編(2011)。科學技術哲學經典研讀。北京:中國人民大學出版社。