The Operational Coherence of Data Reduction in Millikan's Oil-Drop Experiment

密立根油滴實驗中數據簡化的操作融貫性

10.6464/TJSSTM.202204_(34).0002

嚴偉哲(Jonathon HRICKO)

Hasok Chang ； operational coherence theory of truth ； Robert Andrews Millikan ； oil-drop experiment ； data reduction ； 張夏碩 ； 操作融貫真理理論 ； 羅伯特．安德魯．密立根 ； 油滴實驗 ； 數據簡化

科技醫療與社會

34期（2022 / 04 / 01）

11 - 54

英文

Robert Andrews Millikan's oil-drop experiment provided a fairly accurate measurement of the charge of the electron. However, Millikan discarded data that did not fit with his initial hypothesis regarding the value of the charge and was not honest about doing so in his published work. I use this case in order to develop an objection to Hasok Chang's operational coherence theory of truth, according to which a statement is true if belief in that statement is needed when engaging in a coherent activity. I argue that Millikan's data reduction is a coherent activity, and that Millikan's belief in his initial hypothesis regarding the charge of the electron was needed in this coherent activity because it provided the grounds for discarding some of the data. According to Chang's theory, Millikan's initial hypothesis is therefore true. Even if we think that Chang's theory provides the correct result in this case, it does so for the wrong reason. The fact that Millikan needed to believe in his initial hypothesis in order to determine which data to discard is not a good reason for concluding that his initial hypothesis is true.

羅伯特．安德魯．密立根的油滴實驗對電子電荷提供了準確的測量。但是，密立根也刪除了與最初假設不相符的電荷數據，並且沒在出版的著作中據實以告。我用此案例來發展一個對張夏碩操作融貫真理論的反駁。張夏碩的操作融貫真理論主張，若一個主張中的信念是從事融貫活動時所需要的，則此主張為真。我論證密立根簡化數據的活動是一種融貫活動。再者，密立根對電子電荷的實驗初始假設，是其從事簡化數據這種融貫活動是需要的。因此，根據張夏碩的操作融貫真理論，我們應該主張密立根對電子電荷的實驗初始假設為真的。然而，即便我們認為密立根對電子電荷的實驗初始假設確實為真，我主張張夏碩的操作融貫真理論所提供的理由（密立根對電子電荷的實驗初始假設，是其從事簡化數據這種融貫活動是需要的）不是一個好理由。

1. Arabatzis, Theodore(2006).Representing Electrons: A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
2. Chang, Hasok(2012).Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism.Dordrecht:Springer.
3. Chang, Hasok(2016).Pragmatic Realism.Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso,4(8),107-122.
4. Chang, Hasok(2018).Is Pluralism Compatible With Scientific Realism?.The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism,London:
5. Chang, Hasok(2014).Epistemic Activities and Systems of Practice: Units of Analysis in Philosophy of Science after the Practice Turn.Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History, and Social Studies of Science,New York:
6. Chang, Hasok(2017).Operational Coherence as the Source of Truth.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,117(2),103-122.
7. Fletcher, Harvey(1982).My Work With Millikan on the Oil-drop Experiment.Physics Today,35(6),43-47.
8. Franklin, Allan D.(1981).Millikan’s Published and Unpublished Data on Oil Drops.Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences,11(2),185-201.
9. Franklin, Allan D.(1998).Selectivity and the Production of Experimental Results.Archive for History for Exact Sciences,53(5),399-485.
10. Goodstein, David(2001).In Defense of Robert Andrews Millikan.American Scientist,89(1),54-60.
11. Holton, Gerald(1978).Subelectrons, Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute.Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences,9,161-224.
12. Massimi, Michela(ed.),McCoy, Casey D.(ed.)(2020).Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects.London:Routledge.
13. Millikan, Robert Andrews (1912). New Proofs of the Kinetic Theory of Matter and the Atomic Theory of Electricity. The Popular Science Monthly 80(28): 417-440.
14. Millikan, Robert Andrews (1910a). A New Modification of the Cloud Method of Determining the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Most Probable Value of that Charge. Philosophical Magazine 19(110): 209-228.
15. Millikan, Robert Andrews (1917). The Electron: Its Isolation and Measurement and the Determination of Some of Its Properties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Millikan, Robert Andrews (1913). On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant. Physical Review 2(2): 109-143
17. Millikan, Robert Andrews (1910b). The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of Its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes’s Law. Science 32(822): 436-448.
18. Millikan, Robert Andrews (1911). The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of Its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes’s Law. Physical Review 32(4): 349-397.
19. Niaz, Mansoor(2005).An Appraisal of the Controversial Nature of the Oil Drop Experiment: Is Closure Possible?.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,56(4),681-702.
20. Putnam, Hilary(1995).Pragmatism: An Open Question.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
21. Rutherford, Ernest and Hans Geiger (1908). The Charge and Nature of the α-particle. Proceedings of the Royal Society 81(546): 162-173.
22. Stoney, George Johnstone (1891). On the Cause of Double Lines and of Equidistant Satellites in the Spectra of Gases. The Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, Second Series, 4: 563-608.
23. van Fraassen, Bas C.(1980).The Scientific Image.Oxford:Clarendon Press.