社交機器人的該與不該：自閉症參與負責任創新研究的戲劇方法

Ought to be or Ought not to be for Social Robots: Using Theatre to Invite Autism to be Part of Responsible Research and Innovation

10.6464/TJSSTM.202310_(37).0002

周紹傑(Shao-Jie JHOU)

自閉症光譜 ； 社交機器人 ； 自主權 ； 負責任創新 ； 戲劇 ； autism ； social robot ； responsible research and innovation ； theatre

科技醫療與社會

37期（2023 / 10 / 01）

53 - 112

繁體中文;英文

社交機器人作為科技創新的成果，近年投入於自閉症光譜患者的醫護情境。為了符合倫理地進行科技應用，許多區域組織提出「負責任創新」之概念，將科技物的利害關係人納入開發歷程之中，藉以廣納多元的倫理觀與價值觀。作為醫護機器人最直接的關係人－「自閉症光譜患者」卻因為認知上的多樣性，以致難以蒐集該族群的倫理觀。這導致自閉症光譜患者在社交機器人的創新歷程中無法參與倫理議題。本研究中，我們在倫理調查中加入「戲劇方法」嘗試取得8位自閉症參與者的人機互動倫理觀，他們將作為觀眾觀賞我們設計的照護機器人互動情境劇，並在觀賞完後回應戲劇中的自主權議題，藉此取得醫護情境中的自主權倫理判斷。根據我們的研究結果，戲劇方法使部分參與者在倫理議題的應答上轉為積極發言。綜合上述結果，我們認為有必要持續地開發戲劇方法這類多元的參與管道讓自閉症光譜患者能夠共同參與科技創新的歷程，以此落實「負責任創新研究」的前瞻性責任觀。

Social robots, as a technological innovation, have been applied in healthcare scenarios for individuals with autism spectrum disorder in recent years. In order to ethically implement such technological applications, many organizations have proposed the concept of "responsible innovation," which involves including stakeholders in the development process to incorporate multiple values. However, due to the neurodiversity of people with autism spectrum disorder, it is difficult to set up the circumstances in which they can share their perspectives on the ethical issues of social robots in healthcare. In this study, we incorporated a "Theatre method" to encourage eight participants with autism to share their human-robot interaction ethics with us. They acted as audience members and watched the interactive scenarios we designed for the healthcare robot, and then we asked them for their thoughts and feelings about potential ethical issues concerning autonomy. We found that our theatre methods encouraged some participants to actively engage in ethical discussions. In conclusion, we believe that it is necessary to continue developing diverse methods to enable individuals on the autism spectrum to participate in the technology innovation process so that the "responsible research and innovation" can be fulfilled.

1. 林宜平(2011)。死了幾位電子廠女工之後：有機溶劑的健康風險爭議。科技、醫療與社會，12，61-112。
   連結：
2. (2007).Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
3. Adam, Barbara,Groves, Chris(2011).Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility.Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society,31(1),17-27.
4. Arai, Tamio,Kato, Ryu,Fujita, Marina(2010).Assessment of Operator Stress induced by Robot Collaboration in Assembly.CIRP Annals,59(1),5-8.
5. Banks, Sarah,Rifkin, Frances,Davidson, Heather,Holmes, Claire,Moore, Niamh(2014).Performing Ethics: Using Participatory Theatre to Explore Ethical Issues in Community-based Participatory Research.Centre for Social Justice and Community Action Durham University.
6. Battistuzzi, Linda,Sgorbissa, Antonio,Papadopoulos, Chris,Papadopoulos, Irena,Koulouglioti, Christina(2018).Embedding Ethics in the Design of Culturally Competent Socially Assistive Robots.2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Madrid, Spain:
7. Blond, Lasse(2019).Studying Robots Outside the Lab: HRI as Ethnography.Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics,10,117-127.
8. Breazeal, Cynthia,Brooks, Andrew,Gray, Jesse,Hancher, Matthw,Kidd, Cory,McBean, John,Strickon, Joshua(2003).Interactive Robot Theatre.Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003),Las Vegas, NV, USA.:
9. Butler, John Travis,Agah, Arvin(2001).Psychological Effects of Behavior Patterns of a Mobile Personal Robot.Autonomous Robots,10(2),185-202.
10. Cabibihan, John-John,Javed, Hifza,Ang, Marcelo,Aljunied, Sharifah Mariam(2013).Why Robots? A Survey on the Roles and Benefits of Social Robots in the Therapy of Children with Autism.International Journal of Social Robotics,5(4),593-618.
11. Cao, Hoang-Long,Esteban, Paul,Bartlett, Madeleine,Baxter, Paul,Belpaeme, Tony,Billing, Erik,Ziemke, Tom(2019).Robot-Enhanced Therapy: Development and Validation of Supervised Autonomous Robotic System for Autism Spectrum Disorders Therapy.IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine,26(2),49-58.
12. Chatley, Amiy,Dautenhahn, Kerstin,Walters, Michael,Syrdal, Dag,Christianson, Bruce(2010).Theatre as a Discussion Tool in Human-Robot Interaction Experiments - A Pilot Study.2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions,Saint Maarten, Netherlands:
13. Coeckelbergh, Mark,Pop, Cristina,Simut, Ramona,Peca, Andreea,Pintea, Sebastian,David, Daniel,Vanderborght, Bram(2016).A Survey of Expectations about the Role of Robots in Robot-assisted Therapy for Children with ASD: Ethical Acceptability, Trust, Sociability, Appearance, and Attachment.Science and Engineering Ethics,22(1),47-65.
14. Corbett, Blythe,Gunther, Joan,Comins, Dan,Price, Jennifer,Ryan, Niles,Simon, David,Schupp, Clayton W.,Rios, Taylor(2011).Brief Report: Theatre as Therapy for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,41(4),505-511.
15. Costa, Andreia,Schweich, Tonie,Charpiot, Louise,Steffgen, Georges(2018).Attitudes of Children with Autism towards Robots: An Exploratory Study.Interaction Design and Children,Trondheim, Norway:
16. Duncan, Brittany,Murphy, Robin,Shell, Dylan,Hopper, Amy(2010).A Midsummer Night’s Dream.Proceeding of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction - HRI ‘10,Osaka, Japan:
17. Edwards, Brydne,Smart, Erik,King, Gillian,Curran, James,Kingsnorth, Shauna(2018).Performance and Visual Arts-based Programs for Children with Disabilities: A Scoping Review Focusing on Psychosocial Outcomes.Disability and Rehabilitation,42(4),574-585.
18. Fischer, Kerstin,Jensen, Lars,Bodenhagen, Leon(2014).To Beep or Not to Beep Is Not the Whole Question.Social Robotics. ICSR,Sydney, Australia:
19. Hajer, Marteen(2003).Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20. Hajer, Marteen(2003).Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void.Policy Sciences,36,175-195.
21. Hakli, Raul,Mäkelä, Pekka(2019).Moral Responsibility of Robots and Hybrid Agents.The Monist,102(2),259-275.
22. Jochum, Elizabeth,Vlachos, Evengenios,Christoffersen, Anja,Nielsen, Sally,Hameed, Ibrahim,Tan, Zheng-Hua(2016).Using Theatre to Study Interaction with Care Robots.International Journal of Social Robotics,8(4),457-470.
23. Johal, Wafa,Calvary, Gaëlle,Pesty, Sylvie(2015).Non-verbal Signals in HRI: Interference in Human Perception.Social Robotics,Cham:
24. John, Bessant(ed.),Richard, Owen(ed.),Maggy, Heintz(ed.)(2013).Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society.London:Wiley.
25. John, Carroll(1995).Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development.New York, USA:John Wiley, Inc..
26. Kumazaki, Hirokazu,Warren, Zachary,Muramatsu, Taro,Yoshikawa, Yuichiro,Matsumoto, Yoshio,Miyao, Masutomo,Nakano, Mitsuko,Mizushima, Sakae,Wakita, Yujin,Ishiguro, Hiroshi,Mimura, Masaru,Minabe, Yoshio,Kikuchi, Mitsuru(2017).A Pilot Study for Robot Appearance Preferences among High-functioning Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Implications for Therapeutic Use.PLoS One,12(10),e0186581.
27. Leenes, Ronald,Palmerini, Erica,Koops, Bert-Jaap,Bertolini, Andrea,Salvini, Pericle,Lucivero, Federica(2017).Regulatory Challenges of Robotics: Some Guidelines for Addressing Legal and Ethical Issues.Law, Innovation and Technology,9(1),1-44.
28. Lohse, Manja,Hegel, Frank,Wrede, Britta(2008).Domestic Applications for Social Robots: An Online Survey on the Influence of Appearance and Capabilities.Journal of Physical Agents (JoPha),2(2),21-32.
29. Lu, David,Smart, William(2011).Human-Robot Interactions as Theatre.RO-MAN: 20th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication,Atlanta, GA, USA:
30. Martin-Ortiz, Manuel,Kim, Min-Gyu,Barakova, Emilia(2017).Mobile Application for Executing Therapies with Robots.Advances in Computational Intelligence,Zakopane Poland:
31. Meyer-Dinkgräfe, Daniel(2013).Theatre and Ethics.The European Legacy,18(4),517-517.
32. Nazarko, Łukasz(2017).Future-Oriented Technology Assessment.Procedia Engineering,182,504-509.
33. Ogien, Ruwen,馬向陽（譯）(2017).道德可以建立嗎？在麵包香裡學哲學,法國最受歡迎的19堂道德實驗哲學練習課.臺北:臉譜.
34. Otgaar, Henry,Corine, Ruiter,Rooy, David,Horselenberg, Robert,Hershkowitz, Irit,Geijsen, Koen(2019).The Burden of Proof of the Dutch Police: Why the Scenario Model Continues to Deliver Low‐quality Child Interviews.Applied Cognitive Psychology,33(5),901-903.
35. Pellizzoni, Luigi(2004).Responsibility and Environmental Governance.Environmental Politics,13,541-565.
36. Prescott, Tony,Praminda, Caleb-Solly(2017).Robotics in Social Care: A Connected Care EcoSystem for Independent Living.Social Care Online from SCIE,United Kingdom:
37. Riek, Laurel(2012).Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines.Journal of Hum-Robot Interact,1(1),119-136.
38. Robins, Ben,Dautenhahn, Kerstin,Dubowski, Janek(2004).Investigating Autistic Children’s Attitudes Towards Strangers with the Theatrical Robot - A New Experimental Paradigm in Human-robot Interaction Studies.RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication,Kurashiki, Japan:
39. Ruggiu, Daniele(2019).Models of Anticipation Within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: the Two RRI Approaches and the Challenge of Human Rights.NanoEthics,13(1),53-78.
40. Salem, Maha,Lakatos, Gabriella,Amirabdollahian, Farshid,Dautenhahn, Kerstin(2015).Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?.Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ‘15,Portland, Oregon, USA.:
41. Salem, Maha,Ziadee, Micheline,Sakr, Majd(2013).Effects of Politeness and Interaction Context on Perception and Experience of HRI.International Conference on Social Robotics,Cham:
42. Sochanski, Megan,Snyder, Kassadi,Korneder, Jessica,Louie, Wing-Yue(2021).Therapists’ Perspectives After Implementing a Robot into Autism Therapy.2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),Vancouver, Canada:
43. Stahl, Bernd(2018).Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation for Care Robots through BS 8611. Pflegeroboter.Wiesbaden:Springer Gabler.
44. Stahl, Bernd,Coeckelbergh, Mark(2016).Ethics of Healthcare Robotics: Towards Responsible Research and Innovation.Robotics and Autonomous Systems,86,152-161.
45. Stahl, Bernd,McBride, Neil,Wakunuma, Kutoma,Flick, Cathrine(2014).The Empathic Care Robot: A Prototype of Responsible Research and Innovation.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,84,74-85.
46. Syrdal, Dag,Dautenhahn, Kerstin,Kheng, Lee Koay,Walters, Michaek,Otero, Nuno(2011).The Theatre Methodology for Facilitating Discussion in Human-Robot Interaction on Information Disclosure in a Home Environment.20th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man),Atlanta, USA:
47. Trudel, Céliane,Nadig, Aparna(2019).A Role-play Assessment Tool and Drama-based Social Skills Intervention for Adults with Autism or Related Social Communication Difficulties.Dramatherapy,40(1),41-60.
48. Vallès-Peris, Núria,Angulo, Cecilio,Domènech, Miquel(2018).Children’s Imaginaries of Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare.Int J Environ Res Public Health,15(5),970-988.
49. Walters, Michael,Kheng, Lee Koay,Syrdal, Dag,Campbell, Anna,Dautenhahn, Kerstin(2013).Companion Robots for Dlderly People: Using Theatre to Investigate Potential Users’ views.2013 Ieee Ro-Man,Gyeongju, South Korea:
50. Winfield, Alan(2019).Ethical Standards in Robotics and AI.Nature Electronics,2(2),46-48.
51. Wynsberghe, van Aimee(2016).Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design and Implementation.Farnham:Ashgate.
52. Xu, Qianli,Ng, Jamie Suat Ling,Cheong, Yian Ling,Tan, Odelia Yiling,Wong, Ji bin,Tay, Tiong Chee,Park, Taezoon(2012).The Role of Social Context in Human-Robot Interaction.2012 Southeast Asian Network of Ergonomics Societies Conference (SEAN-ES),Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia:
53. 莫慕貞,林思明,劉志勇,梁寶華,郭伯臣,陶潔瑩,郭嘉榮(2016)。粵劇生行身段要訣：電腦化自動評估與學習系統。全球中文教育研討會
54. 鄭英珠,吳成瑤,劉世雄(2006).歌仔戲的身段：台灣戲劇集粹.臺灣:宜蘭縣文化局臺灣戲劇館.

1. (2024)。社會機器人的倫理問題──儒家觀點的詮釋。哲學與文化，51(11)，39-56。