生命教育方案對國小資優學童生命意義感影響之研究

The Effect of a Life Education Course on Improving the Sense of Life Meaning of Elementary Gifted Students

10.7089/JGE.200412.0017

吳淑英(Shu-Ying Wu)

資優生 ； 生命意義感 ； 生命教育

資優教育研究

4卷2期（2004 / 12 / 01）

17 - 42

繁體中文

本研究的主要目的在根據以Frankl的意義治療法之的核心概念，編製一套國小高年級資優生適用之生命教育課程與國小資優學童生命意義感量表；進一步的探討生命教育方案對國小（五年級）資優學童之生命意義感之影響，根據研究結果，提出具體建議，以為實施生命教育與資優生諮商輔導的參考。

The major purpose of this study was to examine the impacts of Life Education Course on improving the sense of life meaning of gifted elementary students. The secondary purpose was to compile a life education course for gifted students of elementary schools. The third purpose was to design a scale of life meaning of gifted elementary students. The study used the pretest-posttest control group design. The subjects arc 40 gifted students in 5(superscript th) grade from two elementary schools in Taipei. The experimental group participated in thirteen sessions of the training course, one session per week and 90 minutes per session. During the experimental period, the researcher who taught the training course wrote teaching records as well as the observer wrote observation records. After experiment, subjects were interviewed in-depth by the researcher. Instruments used for this study included the Scale of Life Meaning of gifted elementary students, the feedback questionnaire of the programs, the suggestion questionnaire of the course, the teaching record form, the observation record form and the interviewed guideline form. The data were analyzed by one way ANCOVA. The opinions of the experimental subjects, observer's observation, comments by means of the feedback questionnaires, and teaching records were used as supplementary to analyze results of this study. The main findings were as follows: 1. There were positive effects on improving the sense of life moaning of the experimental group. 2. The subjects reported that they enjoyed the whole training course, and also reported that the Life Education Course was an excellent curriculum. 3. Positive effects on students' development were found which were as follows: (1) Help students to develop their self-concept self-esteem and self-acceptance. (2) Help students to develop their multiple abilities. (3) Help students to understand the positive moaning of death and reduce the fear of death. (4) Help students to find their life moaning and to appreciate the other variant lives. (5) Help students to arrange their lives for their life purposes. (6) Help students to understand the positive meanings of difficulties and improve their frustration bearing abilities. (7) Help students to approve their interpersonal relationship and the ability of love. (8) Prevent students from committing suicide. Based on the research findings and discussion, several suggestions for the practicing of the Life Education Course were offered and the future researches were proposed.

1. Dabrowski, K.(1964).Positive Disintegration.Boston:Little Brown & Co.
2. Edward, M.J.(1999).Kingston, Canada,Master Dissertation, Queen`s University.
3. Frankl V.E.(1986).The doctor and the soul.New York:Vintage Books.
4. Gust-Brey, K.,Cross, T.(1999).An examination of the literature base on the suicidal behaviors of gifted students.Roeper Review,22(1),28-36.
5. O` Connor, K.,Chamberlain, K.(1996).Dimensions of life meaning: A qualitative investigation at mind life.British Journal of Psychology,87(3),461-488.
6. Reker, G.T.,Peakock, E.J.(1981).The life attitude profile (LAT): A multi-dimensional instrument for assessing attitudes toward life.Canadian Journal Sciences,13,264-273.
7. Silverman, L.K.(1993).Counseling the gifted and talented.New York:Love Publishing Company.
8. Wbear, J.P.(1995).UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
9. 孫效智(2001)。生命教育的內涵與實施。哲學雜誌季刊，35，4-31。
10. 張美蘭(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
11. 張振成(2001)。生命教育的本質與實施。教育資料與研究雙月刊，39，79-52。
12. 張德聰(2001)。生命的回顧與省思－綻放生命的花朵。教育資料與研究，39，11-12。
13. 趙可式、沈錦惠譯、Frankl, V.L.原著(1989)。活出意義來－從集中營說到存在主義。台北:光啟。
14. 劉德威(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。私立中原大學心理研究所碩士論文。
15. 生命教育球資訊綱
16. 錢永鎮(1998)。生命教育的實施背景與基本理念。研習資訊，15(4)，23-30。
17. 羅文基(2001)。新世紀教改的議題－生命教育。翰林文教雜誌，17，6-7。

1. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。融入式生命教育課程對在職幼兒教師心理幸福感之提升效果。課程與教學，10(4)，123-140。
2. 陳學志、許禕芳、徐芝君、邱發忠、吳相儀(2008)。樂觀訓練課程對國小高年級學童樂觀信念之影響研究。師大學報：教育類，53(2)，193-221。
3. 陳怡如(2020)。長期照顧機構社工員幸福感與生命意義感之相關性研究。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，16(1)，1-33。
4. 連羽涵(2014)。以拓延建構理論為基礎探討感恩教學對國小學生問題解決、憂鬱、生命意義感的影響。教育學誌，32，45-96。