校本資優教育適才服務方案之行動研究

An Action Study on the School-Based Differentiated Programs for the Gifted in Taiwan

10.7089/JGE.200912.0035

陳長益(Charng-Yi Chen)；陳美芳(Mei-Fang Chen)；李乙明(I-Ming Li)；張昇鵬(Sheng-Peng Chang)；蔡桂芳(Kuei-Fang Tsai)；呂金燮(Chin-Hsieh Lu)；黃家杰(Chia-Chieh Huang)；吳君珍(Jyun-Jhen Wu)；郭宗明(Tzung-Ming Kuo)；張哲智(Jhe-Jhih Jhang)

資優方案 ； 區分性教學 ； 學生學習需求評量 ； 教師教學行爲觀察 ； 社區資源與支援調查 ； gifted programs ； differentiated instruction ； needs assessment ； observation of teaching behaviors ； survey on community resources and supports

資優教育研究

9卷2期（2009 / 12 / 01）

35 - 63

繁體中文

本研究乃因應2008年發表資優教育白皮書所掲櫫之行動方案，提倡以學校爲本位，發展區分性教學方案，希望有資優特質的學生，不論在普通班或資優班，皆有機會達到適性學習的目標。行動研究主要分爲兩大部分進行，第一部分在於發展研究工具，以協助第二部分區分性教學實驗的進行。研究工具發展結果總共發展出三種信、效度良好之實用工具，包括：1.教師教學行爲觀察量表：檢視教師的區分性教學行爲；2.學生學習需求評量表：了解學生的學習偏好之輸入、歷程與產出及學科領域學習興趣與態度；及3.社區資源與支援調查問卷：協助教師分析社區資源及支援系統的使用情形。區分性教學實驗的實施區域涵蓋臺灣地區北、中、南部，研究對象包含國民中小學教育階段，安置於普通班及資優班之資優生與普通生，實施的科目和領域包括數理與人文。實施結果分別從區分性的層次、策略與成效加以分析比較。最後，並提出建議的實施方式。

This study was in response to one of the action project of The White Book of Gifted Education in Taiwan 2008. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the applicability of school-based differentiated programs for the gifted, expecting the students would fulfill their potentials wherever they were in regular classes or gifted programs. The action research proceeded in two parts. Part Ⅰ was developing three instruments to assist the experimented teaching of differentiated instruction. Part Ⅱ was the implementation of differentiated instruction. Three research instruments in good reliability and validity were developed. They were Observation Scale of Teaching Behaviors (OSTB), Needs Assessment Scale of Students' Learning (NASSL), and Questionnaire of Community Resources and Supporting Systems (QCRSS). The OSTB was designed to examine the teachers' behaviors of differentiated instruction. The NASSL was designed to understand students' preferred way of input, processing and output upon learning in varied subjects. The QCRSS was designed to assist teachers in analyzing the applicability of community resources and supporting systems. The implementation of differentiated instruction was experimented in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. Subjects were students both in elementary and secondary schools from regular classes and gifted programs. Mathematics, science, and language arts were implemented in differentiated approaches. The results of experimented teaching were analyzed in the aspects of differentiated levels, strategies and effects. Also a proposed framework of implementing differentiated programs was provided.

1. 黃家杰、陳美芳、陳長益、李乙明、呂金燮(2009)。教師區分性教學行為觀察量表（學生版）之編製。
   連結：
2. Borland, J. H.(1989).Planning and implementing programs for the gifted.New York:Teachers College Press.
3. Bull, K. S.(1988).Developing community resources to support rural gifted programs.Paper presented at National Rural Special Education Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 299738)
4. California Department of Education(2007).California standards for the teaching profession.
5. Clark, B.、花敬凱譯(2007)。啟迪資優：如何開發孩子的潛能。臺北:心理。
6. Maker, J.(1982).Curriculum development for the gifted.Rockville, MD:Aspen Systems Corporation.
7. Matthews, D. J.,Foster, J. F.(2005).Being smart about gifted children: A guidebook for parents and educators.Scottsdale, AZ:Great Potential Press.
8. Roberts, J. L.,Inman, T. F.(2007).Strategies for differentiating instruction: Best practices for the classroom.Waco, TX:Prufrock Press.
9. Rock, M. L.,Gregg, M.,Ellis, E.,Gable, R. A.(2008).REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction.Preventing School Failure,52(2),31-47.
10. Rogers, L. B.(2002).Re-forming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child.Scottsdale, AZ:Great Potential Press.
11. Tomlinson, C. A.,Allan, S. D.(2000).Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. Tomlinson, C. A.,Edison, C. C.(2003).Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades 5-9.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
13. Tucker, P. D.、Stronge, J. H.、賴麗珍譯(2006)。教師評鑑方法－結合學生學習的模式。臺北:心理。
14. VanTassel-Baska, J.,Stambaugh, T.(2006).Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
15. VanTassel-Baska, J.、呂金燮譯、李乙明譯(2003)。資優課程。臺北:五南。
16. 王振德(1996)。國民中小學資優教育課程與教學實況調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，14，207-227。
17. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式－SIMPLIS的應用。臺北:高等教育。
18. 教師專業評鑑網
19. 教師專業評鑑網
20. 洪照明(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹，國立新竹教育大學應用科學系。
21. 徐薇(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所。
22. 張幸愉(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
23. 教師專業評鑑網
24. 張德銳、蔡秀媛、許籐繼、江啓昱、李俊達、蔡美錦、李柏佳、陳順和、馮清皇(2000)。發展性教學輔導系統－理論與實務。臺北:五南。
25. 教育部(1995)。中華民國教育報告書。臺北:教育部。
26. 郭爲藩、高強華(1992)。教育學新論。臺北:正中。
27. 教師專業評鑑網
28. 蔡典謨(1997)。資源整合與資優教育。資優教育季刊，64，6-10。
29. 蔡瑞榮、中華民國社區教育學會主編(1996)。學校社區化。臺北:師大書苑。

1. 蔡桂芳(2017)。屏東縣國小普通班教師其區分性教學態度之研究。資優教育論壇，15，25-51。