题名

網路謠言的跨國傳播現象初探

并列篇名

An Exploratory Study on the Transnational Dissemination Phenomenon of Internet Rumors

DOI

10.29843/JCCIS.200307.0007

作者

李欣穎(Hsin-Ying Lee);汪志堅(Chih-Chien Wang);駱少康(Shao-Kang Lo);方文昌(Wen-Chang Fang)

关键词

網際網路 ; 網路謠言 ; 跨國傳播 ; 內容分析 ; 質化研究 ; Internet ; Internet rumor ; Transnational communication ; content analysis ; Qualitative research

期刊名称

資訊社會研究

卷期/出版年月

5期(2003 / 07 / 01)

页次

175 - 207

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

謠言是一種古老的現象,過去謠言多透過口耳相傳的方式流傳,但網路所具備的特性改變人類傳遞謠言的方式。本研究在觀察國內及國外所流傳的網路謠言後,發現許多在台灣地區以及國外地區流傳的網路謠言內容非常相似,因此推測,在台灣地區所流傳的部分謠言,極可能是從國外所流傳之謠言內容中擷取某一段原文直接翻譯或改編而來,這也使得網路成為跨國傳播謠言的媒介。本研究蒐集台灣地區及國外闢謠網站上所收錄之網路謠言,並採用內容分析法針對內容相同或相近的網路謠言進行歸納及比較。分析結果發現,在台灣地區的謠言中,有25%的謠言是從國外謠言翻譯或改編而來,顯示已有相當多比率的謠言有跨國傳播的現象,進一步分析其內容發現,翻譯謠言多為負面且不實的訊息,另外,謠言在傳遞的過程中也有刪減、強調、同化、滾雪球等現象產生。

英文摘要

Rumor is an ancient phenomenon. In the past, it was usually passed along from person to person orally. However, the Internet has changed the way people transmit the rumors. We found that the content of some prevailing Internet rumors in Taiwan are the same with as or similar to those spread in the other foreign countries. Therefore, it could be conjectured that some rumors in Taiwan were possibly translated from or adapted to Chinese from the overseas originals; in other words, the Internet is also a form of mass media that facilitates the spread of rumors abroad. This paper collected the Internet rumors from four websites in Taiwan and in other foreign areas and adopted content analysis to find out the similarities and differences between the Chinese translations and the originals. The results reveal that twenty-five percent of the Internet rumors in Taiwan are translations, thus the transnational dissemination phenomenon does exist in Taiwan. Moreover, most of the translated rumors are not only negative but also false, and they involve the several kinds of processes along the communication chain: reduction, accentuation, assimilation and snowballing effect.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Allport, G. W.,L. J. Postman(1947).The psychology of rumor.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  2. Bordia, P.,N. DiFonzo,A. Chang(1999).Rumor as group problem solving: developing patterns in information computer mediated groups.Small Group Research,30(1),8-28.
  3. Bordia, P.,R. L. Rosnow(1998).Rumor rest stops on the information highway.Human Communication Research,25(2),163-179.
  4. Buckner, H. T.(1965).A theory of rumor transmission.The Public Opinion Quarterly,29(1),54-70.
  5. Caplow, T.(1947).Rumors in war.Social Force,15,302.
  6. Chorus, A.(1952).The basic law of rumor.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,48,313-314.
  7. DiFonzo, N.,P. Bordia(1994).Reining in rumors.Organizational Dynamics,23,47-62.
  8. DiFonzo, N.,P. Bordia(2002).Corporate rumor activity, belief and accuracy.Public Relations Review,28,1-19.
  9. DiFonzo, N.,P. Bordia(2000).How top PR professionals handle hearsay :corporate rumors, their effects, and strategies to manage them.Public Relations Review,26(2),173-190.
  10. Fisher, D. R.(1998).Rumoring theory and the Internet.Social Science Computer Review,16(2),158-168.
  11. Fiske, S. T.,Taylor, S. E.(1958).Social Cognition.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  12. Hannah, D. B.,Sternthal, B.(1984).Detecting and Explaining the Sleeper Effect.Journal of Consumer Research,11(2),632-11.
  13. Herr, P. M.,Kardes, F. R.,Kim, J.(1991).Effect of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility diagnostic perspective.Journal of Consumer Research,17,454-462.
  14. Hollingshead, A. B.,McGrath, J. E.,O`Connor, K. M.(1993).Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face work groups.Small Group Research,24,304-333.
  15. Kapferer, J. N.(1990).Rumors-uses, interpretations, and images.New Brunswick:Transaction.
  16. Kapferer, J.N. (原著)(1990).Rumors: uses, interpretations, and images.New Brunswick:Transaction.
  17. Knapp, R. H.(1944).A psychology of rumor.Public Opinion Quarterly,53,467-481.
  18. Mizerski, P.(1982).An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavourable information.Journal of Consumer Research,19,301-310.
  19. Pendleton, S. C.(1998).Rumor research revisited and expanded.Language & Communication,18,69-86.
  20. Peterson, W.,N. Gist(1951).Rumor and public opinion.America Journal of Sociology,57,159-167.
  21. Rogers, E.(1995).Diffusion of innovation.New York:Free Press.
  22. Rosnow, R. L.(1977).Gossip and marketplace psychology.Journal of Communication,27(1),158-163.
  23. Rosnow, R. L.(1988).Rumor as communication: A contextual approach.Journal of Communication,38(1),12-28.
  24. Shibutani T.(1966).Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor.Indianapolis, IN:Bobbs-Merrill.
  25. Walther, J. B.(1995).Rational aspects of computer –mediated communication: experimental observations.Organizational Science,6,180-203.
  26. Walther, J. B.(1996).Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction.Communication Research,23(1),3-43.
  27. Walther, J. B.,Burgoon, J. K.(1992).Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction.Human Communication Research,19,50-88.
  28. Wheelan,S. A.,Verdi,A. F.,McKeage, R.(1994).The group development observation system: origins and applications.Philadelphia:PEP Press.
  29. 王石番(1992)。傳播內容分析法:理論與實證。台北:幼獅文化事業。
  30. 鄭若麟、邊芹譯(1992)。謠言。台北:桂冠圖書。
被引用次数
  1. 龍希文,蔡楨永,林家安,龍希文,蔡楨永,林家安(2019)。高齡者面對網路謠言困境之探討。國際數位媒體設計學刊,11(1),53-59。
  2. 羅藝方,歐昱傑,楊淑晴,宋庭瑋(2022)。新冠肺炎謠言內容分析之探究。台灣公共衛生雜誌,41(1),51-68。
  3. (2005)。企業網路謠言回應策略及其影響因素初探。廣告學研究,23,1-33。