鎖定特定時空情境變數以提升資料品質：情境研究的理論與實務操作

Anchoring Time/Space Specified Situational Variables to Increase Data Quality: Theoretical and Practical Approaches in Situation Theory

10.29843/JCCIS.200807.0007

陳祥(Hsiang Chen)

情境研究 ； 意義建構理論 ； 特定時空情境 ； situational research ； Sense-Making theory ； time/space specific situation

資訊社會研究

15期（2008 / 07 / 01）

233 - 248

繁體中文

本文以意義建構理論為基礎，提出訊息意義隨情境改變的觀點，並將此觀點具體實踐在調查題項的建構上，藉以提升資料品質與效度。作者除檢討缺乏特定時空情境的問項會造成資料的劣化與效度的威脅外，並具體建議在調查題項建構過程中，應如何在實務中納入特定時空情境因素以作為讓受測者填答的依據，也讓研究者得以在特定時空的特定情境上詮釋訊息對受測者的意義及受測者的反應。

Based on the Sense-Making Theory, this paper proposes the viewpoint of relative meanings of situational messages, and suggests the inclusion of time/space specific factors in the construction of query items, to increase the quality and validity of data. Practically, the author introduces the process of building situational factors to anchor respondents' answers. Besides, researchers can employ the collected situated data to predict the meanings of messages to users and the reactions from users.

1. 陳志賢、陳志萍(2007)。電視改革的第三人效果與新社會運動模式－以大高雄地區民眾意見調查爲例。新聞學，91，35-83。
   連結：
2. 陳憶寧、羅文輝(2006)。媒介使用與政治資本。新聞學，88，83-134。
   連結：
3. 羅文輝、李郁青、施盈廷、楊秀娟(2005)。網路採用、使用與獲得之滿足。新聞學，83，27-165。
   連結：
4. Atwood, R.(1980).Communication research in Latin America: Cultural and conceptual dilemmas.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association,Acapulco Mexico:
5. Atwood, R.,Dervin, B.,Burgoon, M. (ed.)(1981).Communication yearbook.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Csikszentmihalyi, I.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (eds.)(1988).Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness.Cambridge, United Kingdom:Cambridge University Press.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,LeFevre, J.(1989).Optimal experience in work and leisure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,56(5),815-822.
8. Dalrymple, P. W.(2001).A quarter century of user-centered study: The impact of Zweizig and Dervin on LIS research.Library & Information Science Research,23,155-165.
9. Dervin B.,Nilan, M.,Williams, M. E. (ed.)(1986).Annual review of information science and technology.White Plains, NY:Knowledge Industry.
10. Dervin, B.(1989).Users as research inventions: How research categories perpetuate inequities.Journal of Communications,39(3),216-232.
11. Dervin, B.,Glazier, J. D.(Eds.),Powell, R. R.(Eds.)(1992).Qualitative research in information management.Englewood. CO:Libraries Unlimited.
12. Dervin, B.,Jacobson, T.,Nilan, M., Burgoon, M. (ed.)(1982).Communication yearbook.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction Books.
13. Dervin, B.,Nilan, M.,Jacobson T.,M. Burgoon (Ed.)(1981).Cmmunication yearbook.New Burnswick, NJ:Transaction Books.
14. Dervin, B.,Voigt, M. (eds.)(1980).Progress in communication sciences.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
15. Dervin, B.,Ward, S. A.(Eds.),Reed, L. J.(Eds.)(1983).Knowledge structure and use.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
16. Dervin, B,Rice, R. E.(Eds.),Paisley, W. J.(Eds.)(1981).Public communication campaigns.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
17. Fiske, J.(1982).Introduction to Communication Studies.New York:Routledge.
18. Ghani, J. A.,Deshpande, S. P.(1994).Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human-Computer Interaction.The Journal of Psychology,128(4),381-391.
19. Hews, D.,Haight, L.(1979).The cross-situational consistency of measures of communicative behaviors.Communication Research,6(2),243-270.
20. McQuail, D.(2000).McQuail`s Mass Communication Theory.London:Sage.
21. Rogers, E. M.(1986).Communication Technology.New York:Free Press.
22. Shannon, C.,Weaver, W.(1949).The Mathematical Theory of Communication.Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
23. Trevino, L. K.,Webster, J.(1992).Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication: Electronic Mail and Voice Mail, Evaluation and Impacts.Communication Research,19(5),539-573.
24. Webster, J.,Trevino, L. K.,Ryan, L.(1993).The Dimensionality and Correlates of flow in Human-Computer Interactions.Computers in Human Behavior,9,411-426.
25. Yoon, K.,Nilan, M.(1999).Toward a reconceptualization of information seeking research: focus on the exchange of meaning.Information Processing and Management,35(6),871-890.