超越召喚：線上遊戲的快感從Žižek的觀點解析線上遊戲的意識型態運作

Beyond Interpellation: Enjoyment in Online Game from the Perspective of Žižek to Analyze the Ideology of Online Game

10.29843/JCCIS.201001.0004

林宇玲(Yu-Lin Lin)

召喚 ； 自傳式民俗誌 ； 快感 ； 爽 ； 意識型態 ； 齊澤克 ； 線上遊戲 ； interpellation ； autoethnography ； enjoyment ； jouissance ； ideology ； Žižek ； online game

資訊社會研究

18期（2010 / 01 / 01）

245 - 274

繁體中文

本文嘗試從Žižek的觀點，發展出一套解析線上遊戲意識型態的分析策略，並輔以實例來說明。首先，本文介紹Žižek對Lacan完整欲望圖的詮釋和對傳統意識型態的批評，試圖以其「超越召喚」的訴求，走出文本分析的侷限。其次，利用完整欲望圖的兩層次－即意義層和快感層，發展一套解讀線上遊戲文本的意識型態分析策略。 最後則以目前風行的免付費線上遊戲【楓之谷】，進行自傳式民俗誌的實例解讀。作者利用親身經驗來說明線上遊戲如何在無意識層面發揮意識型態的效果，同時配合玩家的電玩實踐一再生產遊戲的信念。本文試圖藉由個案進一步解釋Žižek的「超越召喚」觀點，如何用來彌補傳統意識型態研究的不足。

Based on Žižek's work, this paper tries to develop a set of strategies online game Maplestory as an example. This paper includes three parts. In order to go beyond textual analysis, first of all, this paper introduces Žižek's interpretation about Lacan's complete graph of desire and his critique of traditional ideological studies. Secondly, based on the two levels of complete graph of desire, this paper develops a set of strategies of ideological analysis to examine the ideology of online games. Thirdly, this paper is engaged in auto-ethnographic reading Maplestory, a free-of-charge massively multiplayer online role playing game, in order to explain how the online games exercise their ideological effects in the unconscious aspect and how the gamers reproduce the beliefs of online games through the process of playing. Moreover, this paper also tries to affirm Žižek's idea that 'beyond interpellation' is a necessary complement to traditional ideological studies.

1. 蔣興儀、魏建國(2008)。拉岡的欲望倫理學：從弗洛伊德的「原初受虐性」到紀傑克的「穿越幻象」。人文及社會科學集刊，20(1)，105-139。
   連結：
2. Althusser, L.,Rivkin, J. (eds.),M. Ryan (eds.)(1998).Literary Theory: An Anthology.Malden:Blackwell Publishers.
3. Anderson, L.(2006).Analytic autoethnography.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,35(4),373-395.
4. Autoethnography: A Method of Research and Teaching for Transformative Education
5. de Freitas, E.,Paton, J.(2009).(De)facing the self: Poststructural disruptions of the autoethnographic text.Qualitative Inquiry,15(3),483-498.
6. Dyson, M.(2007).My story in a profession of stories: autoethnography-an empowering methodology for educators.Australian Journal of Teacher Education,32(1),36-48.
7. Fiske, J.,Rivkin, J. (eds.),M. Ryan (eds.)(1998).Literary Theory: An Anthology.Malden:Blackwell Publishers.
8. Level Up Conference Proceedings
9. Glynos, J.(2001).The grip of ideology: A Lacanian approach to the theory of ideology.Journal of Political Ideologies,6(2),191-214.
10. Gray, J. B(2005).Althusser, ideology, and theoretical Foundations: theory and Communication.The Journal of New Media & Culture,3(1)
11. Hall, S.,J. Rivkin (eds.),M. Ryan (eds.)(1998).Literary Theory: An Anthology.Malden:Blackwell Publishers.
12. International Journal of Qualitative Methods
13. Horwitz, N.(2005).Contra the Slovenians: Returning to Lacan and away from Hegel.Philosophy Today,49(1),24-32.
14. What Computer Games Can and Can't Do?
15. M.A. Thesis 1998
16. The International Journal of Computer Game Research
17. Game Studies
18. Mallon, B.,Webb, B.(2005).Stand up and take your place.ACM Computer in Entertainment,3(1),1-20.
19. McIlveen, P.(2008).Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology.Australian Journal of Career Development,17(2),13-20.
20. McNay, L.(2003).Out of the orrery? Situating language.Journal of Political Ideologies,8(2),139-156.
21. Moolenaar, R.(2004).Slavoj Žižek and the real subject of politics.Studies in East European Thought,56(4),259-297.
22. Doctoral Dissertation Volda College and University of Bergen
23. Nicol, B.(2000).Normality and other kinds of madness: Zizek and the traumatic core of the subject.Psychoanalytic Studies,2(1),7-19.
24. Parker, I.(2003).Psychoanalytic narratives: Writing the self into contemporary cultural phenomena.Narrative Inquiry,13(2),301-315.
25. Parker, I.(2004).Slavoj Zizek: A Critical Introduction.London:Pluto Press.
26. Genders
27. Schleiner, Anne-Marie.(2001).Does Lara Croft wear fake polygons? Gender and gender-role subversion in computer adventure games.Leonardo,34(3),221-226.
28. Schott, G. R.,Hornell, K. R.(2000).Girl gamers and their relationship with the gaming culture.Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,6(4),36-53.
29. Spry, T.(2001).Perfoming autoethnography: an embodied methodological praxis.Qualitative Inquiry,7(6),706-732.
30. Steintuehler, C. A.(2006).Massively multiplayer online video game as participation in a discourse.Mind, Culture and Activity,13(1),38-52.
31. Taylor, T. L.(2003).Multiple pleasures: Women and online gaming.Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies,9(1),21-46.
32. Tie, W.(2004).The psychic life of governmentality.Culture, Theory & Critique,45(2),161-176.
33. Vighi, F.,Feldner, H.(2007).Ideology critique or discourse analysis? Žižek against Foucault.European Journal of Political Theory,6(2),141-159.
34. Walden, E.(2006).Subjects after new media.Quarterly Review of Film and Video,23(1),45-53.
35. Wright, E.,Wright. E.(1999).The Žižek Reader.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
36. You may
37. Zizek, S.(1999).The Ticklish Subject: the Absent Centre of Political Ontology.London:Verso.
38. Žižek, S.(1989).The Sublime Object of Ideology.London:Verso.
39. Žižek, S.(1994).Mapping Ideology.London:Verso.
40. Žižek, S.(2004).The structure of dominance today: a Lacanian view.Studies in East European Thought,56,383-403.
41. The Interpassive Subject
42. Žižek, S.(2001).On Belief.London:Routledge.
43. Is This Digital Democracy, or A New Tyranny of Cyberspace?
44. Žižek, S.(1997).The Plague of Fantasies.London:Verso.
45. Žižek, S.(2000).Looking Awry: an Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
46. Žižek, S.(1994).The Metastases of Enjoyment: Six Essays on Woman and Causality (Wo Es War).London:Verso.
47. Žižek, S.(2003).The violence of the fantasy.Communication Review,6(4),275-287.
48. Žižek, S.(1998).The inherent transgression.Cultural Values,2(1),1-17.
49. 林宇玲(2006)。兒童與線上遊戲：性別建構與文化實踐。香港「數碼傳播與社會轉型：中華社會及其他地區之經驗」國際研討會
50. 林宇玲(2008)。兒童與網路：從批判角度探討偏遠地區兒童網路使用。台北:秀威資訊科技。
51. 林宇玲、林祐如(2006)。世新五十學術專書－傳播研究的傳承與創新。台北:世新大學出版中心。
52. 傅鏡暉(2003)。線上遊戲產業Happy書：帶領你深入暸解On-Line Game產業。台北:遠流。
53. 齊澤克譯、季廣茂譯(2002)。意識形態的崇高客體。大陸:中央編輯出版社。

1. 張玉佩(2012)。台灣線上遊戲的在地情境與全球化文化流動。新聞學研究，113，77-122。