議會網站評估架構之初探：以台北市議會和上海市人大為例

Preliminary Study on Evaluation Framework for Parliament Websites: The Cases of Taipei City Council and Shanghai People's Assembly

10.29843/JCCIS.201001.0009

左正東(Chen-Dong Tso)

電子化政府 ； 電子議會 ； 資訊公開 ； 台北市議會 ； 上海市人大 ； electronic government ； electronic parliament ； information ； transparency ； Taipei City Council ； Shanghai People's Assembly

資訊社會研究

18期（2010 / 01 / 01）

401 - 430

繁體中文

自從二十世紀九十年代起，各國紛紛投入電子化政府的建設，將資訊科技運用於政府的日常運作，其最具象徵意義者，莫過於各國政府機關所建置的機關網站。儘管最初的努力集中於行政部門的網站建置，但很快的，各國國會也紛紛架構起專屬的機關網站。事實上，立法部門網站的重要性絕不亞於行政部門，對於民主政治來說，立法部門通過網站建置所達成的資訊公開可以強化民眾參與、提升參與品質、以及促進公民社會形成。因此，本文通過檢討資訊時代的代表理論，且參考國際組織和其他研究者的研究成果，提出立法機構網站的評估架構，再以台北市議會和上海市人大作為研究個案，進行實驗性的評估，以了解評估指標|的適用性，並探索影響議會資訊公開的關鍵因素。

Since the 1990s, countries around the world have been involved in promoting electronic government to apply information technology to daily operation of respective governments. Among them, the most symbolic development is the establishment of government websites in these countries. While the initial efforts were made on constructing websites for the executive branch, the focus was turned to those for the legislative branch later on. In fact, the websites for the legislative branch is no less important than those for the executive branch. It bears vital significance for democracies with regard to the contribution of legislature websites to enhance civic participation, improve quality of democratic process, and promote formation of civil society. Knowing that, this paper reflects on theory of representation in the information age and consults on research findings from major international organizations and scholars to establish a preliminary set of evaluation indicators. By this tentative framework, this paper conducts a pioneering study on examining websites of Taipei City Council and Shanghai People's Assembly, so that the fitness of this framework can be evaluated and the factors that resulting in legislature information transparency through official websites can be explored.

1. 左正東(2008)。電子公共論壇和跨國政治參與：以《網路治理公共論壇》和《IGOVAP論壇》爲例。公共行政學報，28，1-38。
   連結：
2. 張福建、劉義周(2002)。代表的理論與實際。政治與社會哲學評論，1，126-127。
   連結：
3. Bellamy C.,C. D. Raab(1999).Wiring-up the Deck-Chairs?.Parliamentary Affairs,52(3),520-522.
4. Beniger, J. R.(1986).The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society.Cambridge. MA:Harvard University Press.
5. Buchstein, H.(1997).Bytes that bite: The Internet and deliberative democracy.Constellations,4(2),248-263.
6. Cairncross, F.(1997).The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
7. Cass R. Sunstein(2001).The Daily We: Is the Internet really a blessing for democracy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
8. Coleman, S.(2005).New mediation and direct representation: reconceptualizing representation in the digital age.New Media & Society,7(2),179-195.
9. Coleman, S.,Hague, B. N. (eds),Loader, B. (eds)(1999).Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age.London:Routledge.
10. Coleman, S.,J. A. Taylor,Van de Donk(1999).Parliament in the age of the Internet.Parliamentary Affairs,52(3),366.
11. Filzmaiera, P.,K. Stainer-H¨ammerleb,I Snellen(2004).Information management of MPs: Experiences from Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands.Information Polity,9(1-2),17-28.
12. Griffith, J. C.(2006).Beyond Transparency: New Standards for Legislative Information Systems.ECPRD: Fulbright Research Scholar June 2006.
13. Grossman, L.(1995).The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age.New York:Viking.
14. Hanna F. Pitkin(1967).The Concept of Representation.University of California Press.
15. Inter-Parliamentary Council(2000).Guidelines for the content and structure of parliamentary web sites.the Inter-Parliamentary Council: 166th session (Amman, 6 May 2000).
16. Kingham, T.(2003).E-Parliaments: The Use of Information and Communication Technologies to Improve Parliamentary Processes.Paper Presented at the WBI Working Papers, e-government in Developing Countries.
17. Lofgren, Anderson, and Sorensen.(1999).The Danish parliament going virtual.Parliamentary Affairs,52(3),494-500.
18. Lusoli, Ward,Gibson.(2006).(Re)connecting Politics? Parliament, the Public andthe Internet.Parliamentary Affairs,59(1),24-42.
19. Norris, P.(2000).Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
20. Open House Project(2007).Congressional Information & the Internet: A Collaborative Examination of the House of Representatives and Internet Technology.Washington D.C.:Sunlight Foundation.
21. Tasgrousianou, R.(1998).Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities and Civic Networks.London:Routledge.
22. UN(2008).World e-Parliament Report 2008.
23. Ward and Lusoli(2005).From Weird to Wired: MPs, the Internet and Representative Politics in the UK.The Journal of Legislative Studies,11(1),57-81.
24. Ward, Lusoli,Gibson(2007).Australian MPs and the Internet: Avoiding the Digital Age?.The Australian Journal of Public Administration,66(2),210-222.
25. Wilhelm, A. G.,Hague, B. N. (eds),Loader, B. (eds)(1999).Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age.London:Routledge.
26. 台北市議會(2007)。活力議會飛揚台北：臺北市議會第十屆議員就職週年慶論　壇論壇實錄。台北市:台北市議會。
27. 人民網
28. 朱堅章譯、王浩博譯、A.H. Birch原著(1978)。代表。台北:幼獅文化事業出版社。
29. 東方網
30. 張慧(2008)。網議，讓代表與百姓心連心。上海人大，211，20-21。
31. 楊建基(2006)。台北，台灣大學政治學研究所，碩士論文。
32. 賈雲霄、李少偉(2007)。陽光監督：以制度爲保障。人大研究，189，22-23。
33. 漆小雲、王海(2005)。監督就是最大的支持：上海市黃浦區人民法院主動接受區人大常委會監督側記。中國人大，22，42-43。
34. 趙澤波(2007)。讓陽光監督成爲一種常態。人大研究，188，25。
35. 劉維林、陳星言(2007)。地方人大常委會實施監督法中的兩個難點問題研究。人大研究，192，14-17。
36. 上海人大公眾網／江西人大信息網