新媒介使用者之競選政見認知、政治信任與政治參與之行動研究

The Action Study on Political Issue Perception, Political Trust, and Political Participation for New Media Users

10.29843/JCCIS.201107.0001

呂傑華(Chieh-Hua Lu)

新媒介使用 ； 政治信任 ； 政見 ； 政治參與 ； new media use ； political trust ； political issue ； political participation

資訊社會研究

20期（2011 / 07 / 01）

1 - 38

繁體中文

競選過程中，政見議題常不受重視，甚至轉變爲設定負面議題的選舉策略，與民主理念背道而馳。本研究旨在了解採用新媒介作爲政見傳播管道的可能性？以及新媒介是否有助於公民參與的實踐？本研究採行動研究取向，並使用問卷調查法，首先架設「台北市長候選人政見資訊網」，提供新媒介使用者一個完整獲知台北市長候選人政見的資訊管道，之後再以電子郵件寄發問卷。研究結果發現，新媒介使用者具有注重視候選人政績品德、重視政見資訊公正可信與參考價值的特質，並且擁有接近使用新興政見傳播管道的機會，但此種傳播潛力可能受到政治參與行爲並不熱衷、政治信任態度降低，個人關心政治的程度與屬性，以及期待具有公信力的政治資訊來源的影響，導致他們降低涉入政治訊息與接觸新興政治相關網站的情形。然而，基於新媒介使用者對本研究所實驗之政見資訊網站的肯定與滿意度，顯示透過網路發展具有政見資訊與論證的平台仍具有可能性。

Media reports are fulfilled with negative campaign strategies. it is contrary to the rationalism of the democratic ideal. Can the new media, especially websites, offer in-depth political information with the new media users and be an alternative to political commercials and sound bites?With the action research approach, this study designed an interactive website about the political issues of Taipei City Mayor Candidate, in order to let the new media users' access information. After the campaign, we surveyed the web visitors to examine the relationships between the perceptions of political issues, their political trust and, political participation behaviors.The study finds that the new media users can easily and have the potential access to the new political issue website. However, lower political trust, media malice and some demographic variables made the communication potential impracticability. The survey also indicated that most new media users feel quite contentment with this effort of setting up this informative website, it seems that the political issue website has possibility to do with the political participation.

1. 張卿卿(2006)。網路的功與過：網路使用與政治參語及社會資產關係的探討。新聞學研究，86，45-90。
   連結：
2. 張卿卿(2002)。競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響─以兩千年總統大選為例。選舉研究，9(1)，1-39。
   連結：
3. 陳陸輝(2003)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望。台灣政治學刊，7(2)，149-188。
   連結：
4. 彭芸(2002)。2001年台灣選民的媒介行為與政治信任。選舉研究，9(2)，1-36。
   連結：
5. 鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇(2008)。選舉事件與政治新任：以2004年總統選舉為例。問題與研究，47(3)，29-50。
   連結：
6. 謝宗學(2003)。網際民主與審議民主之實踐:資訊文化社會的桃花源村？。資訊社會研究，4，87-139。
   連結：
7. 創市際市場研究顧問(2006)《網路使用行為與消費行為調查》，(Http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/crossmedia_200611_2.html),2011/03/04。
8. 梁德馨(2006)《九十五年度台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告》 (Http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/07ch.pdf), 2011/03/04。
9. Ankney, R. N.(2002).The effects of internet usage on social capital.AEJMC Annual conference,New Orleans, Louisiana:
10. Ansolabehere, S.,Shanto, I.(1995).Going negative: How attack Ads shrink and polarize the electorate..New York:Free Press.
11. Ball-Rokeach, S. J.,DeFleur, M. L.(1976).A dependency model of mass media effects.Communication Research,3,3-21.
12. Bennett, S. E.,Rhine, S. L.,Flickinger, R. S.,Bennett, L. L. M.(1999).Video malaise' revisited: Public trust in the media and government.Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,4(4),8-23.
13. Bennett, W. L.(2000).Introduction: Communication and civic engagement in comparative perpective.Political Communication,17(4),307-312.
14. Bennett, W. L.,Entman, R. M(2001).Mediated politics: communication in the future of democracy.Cambridge, U. K.:Cambridge University Press.
15. Bonchek, M. S.(1995).Grassroots in cyberspace: Using computer network to facilitate political participation.53rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association,Chicago, IL.:
16. Boyle, T. P.(2001).Web and traditional media use in the2000 presidential election.Annual Meeting of the AEJMC,Washington, DC:
17. Bucy, E. P.,D''Angelo, P.,Newhagen, J. E.(1999).The engaged electorate: New media use as political participation.The electronic election: Perspectives on 1996 campaign communication,Hillsdale, NJ:
18. Cappella, J. N.,Jamieson, K. H.(1996).News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicsm.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,546,71-84.
19. Cappella, J. N.,Jamieson, K. H.(1997).Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good.London:Oxford University.
20. de Vreese, C. H.(2004).The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment.Mass Communication & Society,7(2),191-215.
21. Deutsch, K.(1963).The nerves of government: Models of political communications and control.New York:Free Press.
22. Dowing, J.(1989).Computers for political change: Peacenet and public data access.Journal of Communication,39(3),154-163.
23. Fang, N. H.(1995).From public sphere to communicative action: An "Applied Turn" of Habermas's theory in computer-mediated communication.annual conference of the Association for Education in and Mass Communication in Washington, D. C.,Washington, D. C.:
24. Finkel, S. E.(1985).Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis.American Journal of Political Science,29(4),891-913.
25. Fountain, J. E.(2001).Building the virtual state information technology and institutional change.Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution Press.
26. Garramore, G. M.,Harris, A. S.,Anderson, R.(1986).Uses of political computer bulletin board.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,30,325-339.
27. Grossman, L. K.(1995).The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age.New York:Viking.
28. Habermas, J.,Thomas, B.(Trans.)(1989).The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
29. Hague, B. N.,Loader, B. D.(1999).Digital democracy: An introduction.Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making on the information,London:
30. Hart, E.,Bond, M.(1995).Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice.Buckingham:Open University press.
31. Herring, S. C.(1993).Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication.Electronic Journal of Communication,3(2)
32. Hill, K. A.,Hughes, J. E.(1998).Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the internet.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield.
33. Howard, T. W.(1992).Purdue University.
34. Jennings, M. K.,Zeitner, V.(2003).Internet use and civic engagement:A longitudinal analysis.Public Opinion Quarterly,67,331-334.
35. Johnson, T. J.,Kaye, B. K.(2004).Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the internet influence perceptions of credibility od weblogs among blog users.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,81(3),622-642.
36. Johnson, T. J.,Kaye, B. K.(2003).A boost or bust for democracy? How the web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections.Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics,8,9-34.
37. Kaid, L. L.,Johnston, A.(1991).Negative versus positive television advertising in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960-1988.Journal of Communication,41(3),53-64.
38. Katz, J. E.,Rice, R. E.(2000).Social consequences of internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction.MA:MIT Press.
39. Kellner, D.(1998).Intellectuals, the new public spheres, and techno-politics.The politics of cyberspace,London:
40. Lather, P.(1986).Research as praxis.Harvard Educational Review,56(3),257-77.
41. Lin, N.(2000).Social capital: Social networks,civic engaement, or trust?.Workshop on Social Capital,Italy:
42. Malina, A.(1999).Perspectives on citizen democratization and alienation in the virtual public sphere.Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age,London:
43. Martinez, E. M.(1994).Access to information technologies among school-age children: implications for a democratic society.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,45(6),395-4.
44. Mazzoleni, G.,Schulz, W.(1999).Mediatization of politics: a challenge for democracy.Political Communication,16(3),247-262.
45. McNiff, J.(1995).Action research: Principles and practice.New York:Praeger Publishers.
46. Moy, P.,Pfau, M.(2000).With malice toward all? The media and public confidence in democratic institutions.New York:Praeger Publishers.
47. Moy, P.,Scheufele, D. A.(2000).Media effects on political and social trust.Journalism of Mass Communication Quarterly,44(4),744-759.
48. Norris, P.(1999).Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government.New York:Oxford University Press.
49. Patterson, T. E(1993).Out of order.New York:Vintage Books.
50. Peng, B.(2003).Voter cynicism, perception of media negativism and voting behavior in Taiwan's 2001 election.2003 International Communication Association Annual Conference,San Diego:
51. Putnam, R. D.(1995).Bowling alone: America's declining social capital.Journal of Democracy,6,65-78.
52. Rheingold, H.(1993).The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier.Reading, M. A.:Addison-Wesley.
53. Rogers, E. M.,Collins-Jarvis, L.,Schmitz, J.(1994).The PEN Project in Santa Monica: Interactive communication, equality, and politics action.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,45(6),401-11.
54. Rozell, M.(1994).Press coverage of congress, 1946-1992.Congress, the press and the public,Washington, D. C.:
55. Sachs, H.(1995).Computer networks and the formation of public opinion: An ethnographic study, media.Culture, Society,17,81-79.
56. Schmidtke, O.(1998).Berlin in the net: Prospects for cyberdemocracy from above and from below.Cyberdemocracy: Technology, cities and civic networks,New York:
57. Shen, F.,Edwards, H. H.,Dardis, F. E.(2008).Effects of negative political advertising on individuals' cynicism and self-efficacy: The impact of ad type and message.Mass Communication & Society,11,24-42.
58. Silverstone, R.(1999).Why study the media?.London:Sage.
59. Slayden, D.(Ed.),Whillock, R. K.(Ed.)(1999).Soundbite culture: The death of discourse in a wired world.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
60. Smithson, M.(1989).Ignorance and uncertainty: Emerging paradigms.New York:Springer-Verlag.
61. Tehranian, M.(1990).Technologies of power: Information machines and democratic prospects.Norwood. NJ:Ablex.
62. Thurlow, C.,Lengel, L.,Tomic, A.(2004).Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet.London:Sage.
63. Tumber, H.(2001).Democracy in the information age: The role of the fourth estate in cyberspace.Information, Communication and Society,4(1),95-112.
64. van Dijk, J.(1999).The network society.London:Sage.
65. Wilkins, K. G.(2000).The role of media in public disengagement from political life.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,44(4),569-580.
66. 方念萱、蘇彥豪(1998)。網路傳播中的對話與對峙。新聞學研究，56，183-218。
67. 王佳煌(2002)。誰的電子公共領域。網路與社會研討會，新竹:
68. 王泰俐(2003)。誰的互動性網站？從2000年和2002年選舉看台灣選舉網站互動性概念的演進。新聞學研究，77，107-141。
69. 呂傑華(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。文化大學新聞研究所。
70. 林宏達(2005)。名人部落格 自爆私家消息炒人氣：擦亮明星光環新招數。商業週刊，928，82。
71. 林嘉誠(1989)。政治心理行程與政治參與行為。台北:商務印書館。
72. 張苙雲(1997)。當代台灣社會的信任與不信任。社會變遷基本調查研究系列二，台北:
73. 張苙雲、譚康榮(2005)。制度信任的趨勢與結構：「多重等級評量」的分析策略。台灣社會學刊，35，75-126。
74. 張卿卿(2002)。競選新聞框架與廣告訴求對選民政治效能與信賴感的影響。新聞學研究，70，135-165。
75. 陳義彥、陳陸輝(2002)。台灣大學生政治定向的持續與變遷。「台灣政治學會會議年會暨『全球化與台灣政治』學術研討會，嘉義:
76. 陳義彥、陳陸輝(2002)。政治功效意識 政治信任感以及台灣選民的民主價值。2001年選舉與民主化調查國際學術研討會，台北:
77. 陳憶寧(2001)。總統候選人攻擊性新聞報導與其支持度的關聯：以公元兩千年總統大選為例。新聞學研究，69，113-140。
78. 彭芸(2001)。新媒介與政治：理論與實證。台北:五南。
79. 黃秀瑞(1995)。1994年省市長選舉選民與競選活動之分析。選舉研究，2(1)，51-76。
80. 黃睿迪(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。政治大學新聞研究所。
81. 賴淑敏(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。文化大學新聞學研究所。

1. (2021)。互聯網使用對政府信任的影響－基於CGSS2010數據的研究。傳播與社會學刊，55，57-91。