社交媒體時代社會性的未來：按Sherry Turkle的自我概念進行的考察

The Future of Sociality in the Age of Social Media: A Consideration according Sherry Turkle's Concept of Self

10.29843/JCCIS.201701_(32).0003

毛榮富(Rong-Fu Mao)

Sherry Turkle ； Bernard Stiegler ； 受牽絆的自我 ； 社會性 ； 社交媒體 ； Sherry Turkle ； Bernard Stiegler ； tethered self ； sociality ； social media

資訊社會研究

32期（2017 / 01 / 01）

51 - 82

繁體中文

本文藉Sherry Turkle橫跨三十年的三部著作探討自我形象的嬗變，並考察社交媒體時代社會性的可能性。從個人電腦到當前的社交媒體，自我的形象歷經思維投射、身分認同和情緒牽絆三階段變化。藉由社會和經濟制度對技術挪用的納入考察，本文擴充了Turkle探究的人—機關係的社會心理維度，從技術發展與資本主義結合的整體條件來考察自我形象的變化。在資本主義邏輯支配下，社交媒體中的「人際關係」成為商品，破壞了原初的社會性維度，流為受機器自動連接的社交關係。最後，本文借用Bernard Stiegler的觀點，思考如何社交媒體的技術環境中重建社會性。本文指出兩個方向：其一，在社交媒體環境中重建真摯的人際關係；其二，扭轉社交媒體當前的資本主義邏輯，建立一種貢獻的經濟。

The aim of this article is to explore the transformation of self according to the evolution of relationship of man-computational machines. Based on Sherry Turkle's concept of evocative object, this article argues that, as an evocative object, computational machines have evoked three images of self from the age of personal computer to the age of emotional robots and social media. These three images are the ＂second self＂ , the ＂multiple virtual selves＂, and the ＂tethered self＂. This paper also argues that, in the age of emotional robots and social media, the capitalist appropriation of social media has disparaged the authentic sociality to an purely social relationship automatically connected by social media. This paper suggests two ways for a reconstruction of authentic sociality according to Bernard Stiegler's theory of pharmacology: the one is to reconstruct an authentic sociality within dissociated social media, the other is to reverse the commodity logic of capitalism to an economy of contribution.

1. 黃厚銘、曹家榮(2015)。「流動的」手機： 液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係。新聞學研究，124，39-81。
   連結：
2. 賴曉黎(2004)。網路的禮物文化。資訊社會研究，6，149-172。
   連結：
3. Sprenger, F. (2015). The Politics of Micro-Decisions: Edward Snowden, Net Neutrality, and the Architectures of the Internet . open access monographs published by meson press(http://meson.press/).
4. Pasquinelli, M. (2016). The spike: On the growth and form of pattern police . open access monographs published by Meson Press(http://meson.press/).
5. Turkle, S. (2012). The flight from conversation. The New York Times.
6. Barbrook, R.,Cameron, A.(1996).The Californian Ideology.Science as Culture,6(1),44-72.
7. Baudrillard, J.(1981).For A Critique of Political Economy of Signs.St. Louis, Missouri:Telos Press.
8. Cohen, T.(Ed.)(2012).Telemorphosis: Theory in the Era of Climate Change.Ann Arbor, Michigan:University of Michigan Library.
9. Hallinan, B,Striphas, T.(2014).Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture.New media & Society,1-21.
10. Hildebrandt, M.(Ed.),Rouvroy, A.(Ed.)(2011).Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing.New York, NY:Routledge.
11. Katz, J. E.(ed.)(2008).Handbook of Mobile Communication studies.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
12. Lemmens, P.(2011)."This system does not produce pleasure anymore": An Interview with Bernard Stiegler.Krisis,1,33-42.
13. Lovink, G.(2014).Hermes on the Hudson: Notes on Media Theory after Snowden.E-flux Journal,54(4),2014.
14. Lovink, G.(2012).What is the social in social media.E-flux Journal,40,1-12.
15. Lovink, G.(2013).After the social media hype: Dealing with information overload.E-flux Journal,45(4),1-9.
16. Lovink, G.(Ed),Rasch, M.(Ed)(2013).Unlike Us Reader: Social Media Monopolies and Their Alternatives.Amsterdam:Institute of Network Cultures.
17. Lovink, G.(Ed.)Rasch, M.(Ed.)(2013).Unlike Us Reader: Social Media Monopolies and Their Alternatives.Amsterdam, Netherlands:Institute of Network Cultures.
18. Mitchell, W. J. T.(Ed.),Hansen, M. B. N.(Ed.)(2010).Critical Terms for Media Studies.Chicago, Illinois:The University of Chicago Press.
19. Oevermann, U.(2000).The analytical difference between community ("Gemeinschaft") and society ("Gesellschaft") and its consequences for the conceptualization of an education for European citizenship.Developing Identities in Europe: citizenship education and higher education. Proceedings of the second Conference of the Children's Identity and Citizenship in Europe
20. Pasquale, F.(2015).The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
21. Pasquinelli, M.(2009).Google's PageRank algorithm: A diagram of cognitive capitalism and the rentier of the common intellect.Deep Search: The Politics of Search Beyond Google,152-162.
22. Stiegler, B.(2010).Taking Care of Youth and the Generations.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
23. Stiegler, B.(2012).A Rational Theory of Miracles: on Pharmacology and Transindividuation.New Formation,77,164-184.
24. Stiegler, B.(2013).Uncontrollable societies of disaffected individuals.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
25. Stiegler, B.(2013).What makes life worth living: On pharmacology.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
26. Stiegler, B.(2014).The re-enchantment of the world: the value of spirit against industrial populism.London, UK:Bloomsbury Publishing PLC..
27. Turkle, S.(2005).The Second Self : Computers and the Human Spirit.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
28. van Dijck, J.(2013).'You have one identity': Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn.Media, Culture & Society,35(2),199-215.
29. van Dijck, J.(2013).The Cult of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
30. 毛榮富(2001)。從APARNET到沖繩IT憲章—數位落差的政治經濟考察。思與言，39(1)，29-87。
31. 何道寬譯、Peters, J. D.(2003)。交流的無奈：傳播思想史。北京:華夏出版社。
32. 李尚霖譯、吉見俊哉(2013)。聲的資本主義：電話、Radio、留聲機的社會史。台北:群學出版有限公司。
33. 周逵譯、劉菁荊譯、Turkle, S.(2014)。群體性孤獨。杭州:浙江人民出版社。
34. 邱林川(2014)。告別i奴：富士康、數位資本主義與網路勞工抵抗。社會，34(4)，119-137。
35. 苗華健譯、陳體仁譯、Roszak, T.(1994)。信息崇拜：計算機神話與真正的思維藝術。北京:中國對外翻譯出版公司。
36. 孫周興譯、Heiddeger, M.(1994)。林中路。台北:時報出版。
37. 陳世敏譯、Cztrom, D. J.(1994)。美國大眾傳播思潮。台北:遠流出版事業。
38. 黃厚銘、林意仁(2015)。流動的群聚（mob-ility）：網路起鬨的社會心理基礎。新聞學研究，115，1-50。
39. 黃聖哲(2012)。社會性的雙重性結構。社會理論學報，15(1)，115-133。
40. 盧嵐蘭譯、Schutz, A.(1992)。舒茲論文集，第一冊：社會現實的問題，台北:
41. 譚天譯、吳佳真譯、Turkle, S.(1998)。虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同。台北:遠流。

1. 陳昭宏,曹家榮(2022)。組裝行動與混成的情緒：Instagram使用者的憂鬱書寫、連結與共生。新聞學研究，150，97-148。
2. 莊佳穎(2020)。「讓世界看見台灣」？「2017台北世大運」論述中的自我與他者。臺灣國際研究季刊，16(3)，107-153。
3. (2024).An Investigation of Mobile Retouching Behavior and Image Management on Social Media: The Case of Females Aged 25 to 34.教育資料與圖書館學,61(1),29-56.