题名

數位語藝批評與文本探勘工具－以反核臉書粉絲團形塑幻想主題為例

并列篇名

An Exploration of Text Mining Tools on Digital Rhetoric Criticism – How Anti-nuclear Facebook Fanpages Shaped Fantasy Themes

DOI

10.29843/JCCIS.201701_(32).0002

作者

曹開明(Kai-Ming Tsao)；黃鈴媚(Lin-Mei Huang)；劉大華(Ta-Hua Liu)

关键词

數位語藝 ； 幻想主題分析 ； 覆誦 ； 文本探勘 ； 混合取徑 ； digital rhetoric ； fantasy theme analysis ； chain out ； text mining ； hybrid approach

期刊名称

資訊社會研究

卷期/出版年月

32期（2017 / 01 / 01）

页次

9 - 49

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文數位語藝具有「互動性」與「互文性」特質，形成龐大的網路文本量，導致數位語藝批評研究的重大挑戰。本研究主張進行數位語藝研究時，可採取「混合取徑」原則：提供結合文本探勘工具與語藝研究者評斷分析的步驟，以擴大語藝批評在數位環境下的實用性。本研究並以反核臉書粉絲團進行案例分析，將資料科學發展出之文本探勘工具結合人力瀏覽、評判方式，進行幻想主題分析。研究結果指出，採取文本探勘工具，除有利於確認被「覆誦」的關鍵字，更有助於語藝研究者論證社群成員共享與共創的「幻想主題」。
英文摘要

The rhetorics in the digital world demonstrate interactivity and intertextuality, generating the massive volume of internet texts. This study suggest that the frame of ＂hybrid approach＂ combine text mining tools with manual browsing and coding, may be better utilized in the digital world to confirm the analytical results and to rectify any weaknesses,thereby expanding the usability of rhetorical criticism. Moreover, This study takes on the subject of an anti-nuclear Facebook channel. The computer text mining tool is used to determine and analyze the keywords that are chained out in the text. The rhetorical collocation of the main entries and responses is found having extension of meanings; through them, the fantasy themes and rhetorical vision are further strengthened.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 吳佩謙(2013)。以行為展演與敘事經驗建構身分認同：馬來西亞檳榔嶼華人穆斯林之個案研究。新世紀宗教研究，12(1)，89-118。
    連結：
  2. 李蔡彥、鄭宇君(2011)。資訊科技與新媒體研究之發展。傳播研究與實踐，1(1)，75-80。
    連結：
  3. 林頌堅(2010)。以詞語共現網絡分析探勘資訊傳播學領域的研究主題與關係。圖書資訊學研究，4(2)，123-148。
    連結：
  4. 秦琍琍、黃瓊儀、陳彥龍、張嘉予(2010)。組織認定、企業論述與組織文化的變革：從語藝觀點檢視公廣集團的整併過程。新聞學研究，104，67-111。
    連結：
  5. 陳良駒、傅振華、楊誌瑋(2010)。詞彙共現分析在中國大陸信息作戰領域發展之實證研究。中國大陸研究，53(2)，115-116。
    連結：
  6. 陳譽晏(2015)。運用R Shiny建立文字探勘平台之語意分析及輿情分析。數據分析，10(6)，51-78。
    連結：
  7. 齊偉先(2013)。媒體災難敘事的社會意義建構：日本福島核災的戲劇分析。思與言，51(1)，103-134。
    連結：
  8. 劉名峰(2010)。現代性與國族認同的建構：從日治時期到民主鞏固期間之想像中國時的道德視域。台灣社會研究季刊，79，159-202。
    連結：
  9. 蔡鴻濱(2011)。從語藝觀點探討荒誕宗教廣播節目之認同策略。傳播研究與實踐，1(2)，211-243。
    連結：
  10. 蔡鴻濱(2004)。語藝批評方法在網路文化研究之應用與探討。資訊社會研究，6，91-126。
    連結：
  11. 李欣宜(2015.04.01)。一次搞懂大數據（上）。數位時代。2016年12月28日，取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/35807/BN-2015-03-31-151014-36
  12. Burke,K. (1937). Attitudes Towards History (3rd ed.). Berkeley, California: Universityof California Press.
  13. Aleman, M. W.(2005).Embracing and resisting romantic fantasies as the rhetorical ision on a SeniorNet discussion board.Journal of Communication,55,5-21.
  14. Anderson, F.,Prelli, L.(2001).Pentadic cartography: Mapping the universe of discourse.Quarterly Journal of Speech,87(1),73-95.
  15. Arsenault, D.(2005).Rhetorical vision of the independent and sovereign nation of Hawai'i: A fantasy theme analysis.Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science,3(2),57-73.
  16. Bayley, P.(ed.)(2003).Crosscultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse.Amsterdam:Benjamins.
  17. Birdsell, D.(1987).Ronald Reagan on Lebanon and renada: Flexibility and Interpretation in the Application of Kenneth Burke's Pentad.The Quarterly Journal of Speech,73,267-279.
  18. Bishop, R.(2003).The world's nicest grown-up: A fantasy theme analysis of news media coverage of Fred Rogers.Journal of Communication,53(1),16-31.
  19. Blei, D. M.,Ng, A. Y.,Jordan, M. I.(2003).Latent dirichlet allocation.Journal of Machine Learning Research,3,993-1022.
  20. Bormann, E. G.(1972).Fantasy and rhetorical vision:The rhetorical criticism of social reality.QuarterlyJournal of Speech,58,396-407.
  21. Bormann, E. G.(2003).Defending Symbolic Convergence Theory From an Imaginary Gunn.Quarterly Journal of Speech,89(4),366-372.
  22. Bormann, E. G.(1982).The symbolic convergence theory of communication: Applications and implications for teachers and consultants.Journal of Applied Communication Research,10,50-61.
  23. Bormann, E. G.(1973).The Eagleton affair: A fantasy theme analysis.Quarterly Journal of Speech,59,143-159.
  24. Bormann, E. G.(1985).The force of fantasy: Restoringthe America dream.Carbondale, IL:Sourthern Illinosis University Press.
  25. Bormann, E. G.(1982).Fantasy and rhetorical vision: Ten years later.Quarterly Journal of Speech,68,288-305.
  26. Bormann, E. G.(1990).Small group communication: Theory and practice.New York:Harper & Row.
  27. Bormann, E. G.(1985).Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation.The Journal of Communication,35,128-138.
  28. Bormann, E. G.(1982).A fantasy theme analysis of the television coverage of the hostage release and the Reagan inaugural.Quarterly Journal of Speech,68,135-145.
  29. Bormann, E. G.,Cragan, J. F.,Shields, D. C.(1994).In defense of symbolic convergence theory: A look at the theory and its criticisms after two decades.Communication Theory,44,259-294.
  30. Boyd, D.,Crawford, K.(2012).Critical questions for big data.Information, Communication & Society,15(5),662-679.
  31. Burke, K.(1969).A Rhetoric of Motives.Berkeley, Ca:California Press.
  32. Burke, K.(1989).The Legacy of Kenneth Burke.Wisconsin:University of Wisconsin.
  33. Burke, K.(1996).Language as Symbolic Action.Berkeley, Ca:California Press.
  34. Burke, K.(1968).Counter-Statement.Berkeley, Ca:California Press.
  35. Church, K. W.,Hanks, P.(1990).Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography.Computational Linguistics,16(1),22-29.
  36. Crable, B.(2000).Defending dramatism as ontological and literal.Communication Quarterly,48,323-342.
  37. Crable, B.(2000).Burke's perspective on perspectives: Grounding dramatism in the representative anecdote.Quarterly Journal of Speech,86,318-333.
  38. Cragan, J.(Ed.)(1981).Applied communication research- A dramatic approach.Prospect Heights:Waveland Press.
  39. Cragan, J.,Shields, D.(1992).The use of symbolic convergence theory in corporate strategic planning: a case study.Journal of applied communication research,20(2),199-218.
  40. Darr, C. R.,Strine, H. C.(2008).A Pentadic Analysis of Celebrity Testimony in Congressional Hearings: Giving Voice to the Voiceless.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association
  41. Denzin, N. K.(1978).The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods.New York:Praeger.
  42. Duffy, M. E.(2003).Web of hate: A fantasy theme analysis of the rhetorical vision of hate groups online.Journal of Communication Inquiry,27,291-312.
  43. Eaves, H.,Savoie, M.(2005).Big Brother: Merging reality and fiction: An application of the narrative paradigm.Texas Speech Communication Journal,29(2),91-97.
  44. Edbauer, J.(2009).Unframing Models of Public Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.Rhetorical Society Quarterly,35(4),155-71.
  45. Elwood,W.,Greene, K.(2005)."Risks both known and unknown": A qualitative method to assess the role of situation in HIV/STD risk and prevention.Journal of Homosexuality,50(1),135-154.
  46. Eyman, G.(2015).Digital Rhetoric: Throry, Method, Practice.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
  47. Fisher, W. R.(1984).Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument.Communication Monographs,51,1-22.
  48. Fisher, W. R.(1988).The narrative paradigm and the assessment of historical texts.Argumentation & Advocacy,25,49-53.
  49. Fisher, W. R.(1985).The narrative paradigm: In the beginning.Journal of Communication,35,74-89.
  50. Fisher, W. R.(1989).Clarifying the narrative paradigm.Communication Monographs,56,55-58.
  51. Fisher, W. R.(1987).Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action.Columbia:University of South Carolina.
  52. Fisher, W. R.(1985).The narrative paradigm: An elaboration.Communication Monographs,52,347-367.
  53. Foss, K.,Griffin, L.(1995).Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal foe A Invitational Rhetoric.Communication Monographs,62,2-18.
  54. Foss, S.(1996).Rhetorical criticism: Exploration & Practice.Prospect Heights, ILL:Waveland Press.
  55. Foss, S.(2004).Rhetorical criticism: Exploration & practice.Prospect Heights, ILL:Waveland Press.
  56. Foss, S.,Foss, K.,Trapp, R.(2002).Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric.Prospect Heights:Wateaveland.
  57. Glaser, B. G.(1978).Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory.Mill Valley, CA:The Sociology Press.
  58. Glaser, B. G.,Strauss, A. L.(1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago:Aldine.
  59. Golden, J.,Berquist, G.,Coleman, W.(1993).The Rhetoric of Western Thought.Iowa:Kendall/Hunt Pub .Co..
  60. Greer, C.(2008).Media literacy and internet discussion lists: A fantasy theme analysis of online postings following the death of Peter Jennings.Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education,8,1-11.
  61. Hart, R. P.(1990).Modern Rhetorical Criticism.Austin:Harper Collins.
  62. Heath, R. L.(1984).Kenneth Burke's break with formalism.Quarterly Journal of Speech,70,132-143.
  63. Hochmuth, M.(1952).Kenneth Burke and the "new rhetoric".Quarterly Journal of Speech,38,133-144.
  64. Johnson, R. B.,Onwuegbuzie, A. L.,Turner, L. A.(2007).Toward a definition of mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research,1(2),112-133.
  65. Lewis, S. C.,Zamith, R.,Hermida, A.(2013).Content analysis in an Era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,57(1),34-52.
  66. Liu, F.,Lu, X.(2011).Survey on text clustering algorithm.Proceedings of 2ndInternational IEEE Conference on Software Engineering and Services Science (ICSESS)
  67. Lucas, S. E.(1986).Book review on the Force of Fantasy: Restoring the American Dream.Rhetoric Society Quarterly,16,199-205.
  68. McCabe, J.(2009).Resisting alienation: The social construction of internet communities supporting eating disorders.Communication Studies,60(1),1-16.
  69. Meisenbach, R.,Remake, R.,Buzzanell, P.,Liu, M.(2008).They Allowed": Pentadic mapping of women's maternity leave discourse as organizational rhetoric.Communication Monograph,75(1),1-24.
  70. Mohrmann, G. P.(1982).As essay on fantasy of theme criticism.Quarterly Journal of Speech,4(1),1-6.
  71. Pashaei, F. H.(2010).Virginia,George Mason University.
  72. Perry, S. D.,Roesch, A. L.(2004).He's in a new neighborhood now: Religious fantasy themes about Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.Journal of Media and Religion,3,199-218.
  73. Putnam, L.(Ed.),Paconowsky, M. E.(Ed.)(1983).Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage.
  74. Ridolfo, J.(2006).(C).omprehensive (O).nline (D).ocumen (E).valuation.Kairos: A Journal of rhetoric, technology, and pedagogy,10(2)
  75. Shields, D.,Preston, C., Jr.(1985).Fantasy theme analysis in competitive rhetorical criticism.National Forensic Journal,3,102-115.
  76. Smudde, P.(2004).Implications on the practice and study of Kenneth Burke's idea of a "Public relations counsel with a heart".Communication Quarterly,52(4),420-432.
  77. Sovacool, B.,Brossmann, B.(2010).Symbolic convergence and hydrogen economy.Energy Policy,38,1999-2012.
  78. Steward, J. C.,Smith, A. C.,Denton, E. R.(2001).Persuasion and Social Movement.Prospect Heights,Ill:Waveland Press.
  79. Sweden, L.,Kreuter, F.,Berg, M.,Biemer, P.,Decker, P.,Lampe, C.,Lane, J.,O'Neol, C.,Usher, A.(2015).Bid data in survey research.Public Opinion Quarterly,79(4),839-880.
  80. Tell, D.(2007).Kenneth Burke and the politics of "Pure Persuasion".Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association,Washington:
  81. Temple, A. N.(2011).North Carolina,State University of North Carolina.
  82. Vultee, F.(2012).Man-child in the White House: The discursive construction of Barack Obama in reader comments at foxnews.com.Journalism Studies,13,54-70.
  83. Warnick, B.(2007).Rhetoric online: Persuasion and Politics on the World Wide Web.NY:Peter Lang.
  84. Warnick, B.(1987).The narrative paradigm: Another story.Quarterly Journal of Speech,73,172-182.
  85. Williams, C. E.(1987).Fantasy theme analysis: Theory vs. Practice.Rhetoric Society Quarterly,17,11-20.
  86. Zappen, J. P.(2005).Digital rhetoric: Toward an integrated theory.Technical Communication Quarterly,14(3),319-325.
  87. 牛隆光(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所。
  88. 周緗妮(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，淡江大學大眾傳播學系。
  89. 林頌堅(2014)。資訊科學期刊的主題分布與多樣性研究。圖書資訊學研究，9(1)，171-200。
  90. 林靜伶(2000)。語藝批評理論與實踐。台北:五南。
  91. 施旭峰、李蔡彥、鄭宇君、陳百齡(2014)。災難事件中社群媒體訊息之自動分類設計。ICIM2014第25屆國際資訊管理學術研討會，台北:
  92. 施懿珊(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，世新大學傳播研究。
  93. 張秀蓉(1998)。口語傳播概論。台北:正中。
  94. 張裕亮、陳奕任(2008)。爭辯中的中國網路民族主義論述。香港社會科學，35，103-142。
  95. 陳中淋(2013)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，國立台北教育大學體育學系。
  96. 陳中淋。社會科學研究中的文字探勘應用：以文意為基礎的文件分類及其問題。人文及社會科集刊，27(4)，683-718。
  97. 陳佳靖(2004)。喃喃囈語話語藝：管它新瓶裝舊酒， 定生出新味道。資訊社會研究，6，114-126。
  98. 陳佳靖(2002)。網路情色的符號地景：一個從語藝批評出發的觀點。資訊社會研究，3，25-62。
  99. 黃新生(1992)。媒介分析方法。台北:遠流。
  100. 黃鈴媚、曹開明、沈錦惠、劉大華(2015)。社群媒體的「微」傳播影響力：從符號融合理論看反核臉書中核電真實之共構。第二屆兩峽兩岸口語傳播學術研討會，中國，廣西:
  101. 趙雅麗(2001)。民進黨社會運動的「語藝」批評。新聞學研究，68，151-192。
  102. 劉大華、黃鈴媚、林頌堅、曹開明(2016)。從數位人文觀點看語藝在運算轉向的機會與挑戰。2016第七屆數位典藏與數位人文國際研討會，台北:
  103. 劉吉軒(2016)。大數據分析與人文社會科學跨領域研究應用。傳播文化，15
  104. 劉德昌(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，政治作戰學校新聞研究所。
  105. 蔡哲明(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北，中國文化大學新聞系。
被引用次数
  1. 劉大華,曹開明(2019)。網路論述的語藝生態學初探：以網路社群討論軍中同志議題為例。傳播研究與實踐，9(1)，65-103。
  2. 張益誠,張育傑,余泰毅(2021)。探討環境教育論文的文件自動分類技術－以2013－2018年環境教育研討會摘要為例。環境教育研究，17(1)，85-128。
print cancel