题名

競爭或合作？：聚合服務使用新聞媒體內容的法律與實務分析

并列篇名

Competition or Cooperation?: A Legal and Practical Analysis of News Media Content Used by Aggregators

DOI

10.29843/JCCIS.201801_(34).0001

作者

羅彥傑(Yen-Chieh Lo)

关键词

新聞聚合 ； 新聞內容 ； 著作權 ； 合理使用 ； news aggregator ； news content ； copyright ； fair use

期刊名称

資訊社會研究

卷期/出版年月

34期（2018 / 01 / 01）

页次

1 - 31

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

聚合服務使用新聞業生產的內容，對新聞業帶來程度不一的衝擊。歐美傳統新聞業以著作權受侵害為由提告，聚合服務則以合理使用辯護，雙方在政治遊說、司法訴訟上展開攻防。本文先從過往歐美案例檢視聚合服務與新聞業的衝突，並從本土新聞業的現實狀況與需求出發，透過對臺灣聚合服務與新聞業高階主管的深度訪談，描繪與分析臺灣聚合服務與新聞業在實務面的競合關係，最後建議政府該如何將兩者關係導入良性競爭。
英文摘要

News aggregation, which aims to make use of content produced by the press, has impacted the press variably. Traditional media sued news aggregators for copyright infringement, and news aggregators defended themselves by fair use doctrine. Both have wrestled with each other in political lobbying and legal suits. Beginning with examining the previous cases of the conflicts in the United States and Europe, the article then analyzed the interactive relationship between news aggregators and the press in Taiwan, including competition and cooperation. Finally, the article offers some advice for Taiwanese authorities about how to guide both parties to a virtuous competition.
主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. Auchard, E. (2007, April 7). AFP, Google News settle lawsuit over Google News. Internet news, Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-google-afpidUSN0728115420070407
  2. Beck, J. M.,Scott, A. M.,Sullivan, K. M.(2010).Moral rights and wrongs: Conflicts in the digital world.Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,57(3),587-610.
  3. Beebe, B.(2008).An empirical study of U.S. copyright fair use opinions, 1978-2005.University of Pennsylvania Law Review,156(3),549-624.
  4. Bohannan, C.(2007).Copyright harm, foreseeability, and fair use.Washington University Law Review,85(5),969-1031.
  5. Bourdieu, P.、林志明譯(2016)。布赫迪厄論電視。臺北市:麥田出版。
  6. Bunker, M. D.(2004).Transforming the news: Copyright and fair use in news-related contexts.Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A,52,309-327.
  7. Bunz, M. (2009, December 1). Rupert Murdoch: There's no such thing as a free news story. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/dec/01/rupert-murdoch-no-free-news
  8. Carey, P.,Sanders, J.(2004).Media law.London, UK:Sweet & Maxwell.
  9. Chowdhury, S.,Landoni, M.(2006).News aggregator services: Users expectations and experience.Online Information Reviews,30(2),100-115.
  10. Fisher, W. W., III(1988).Reconstructing the fair use doctrine.Harvard Law Review,101(8),1659-1795.
  11. Holte, R. T.(2008).Restricting fair use to save the news: A proposed change in copyright law to bring more profit to news reporting.University of Florida Journal of Technology Law & Policy,13(1),1-40.
  12. Isbell, K.(2010).,Berkman Center Research.
  13. Kim, M.(2011).Show me the money: The economics of copyright in online news.Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.,58(2),301-324.
  14. Kugler, L.(2015).New news aggregator apps.Communications of the ACM,58(9),17-19.
  15. Lopez-Tarruells, A.(Ed.)(2012).Google and the law: Empirical approaches to legal aspects of knowledge-economy business models.The Hague, The Netherlands:T. M. C. Asser Press.
  16. Meyer, D. (2016, March 24). EU lawmakers are still considering this failed copyright idea. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/03/24/eu-ancillary-copyright/
  17. Mitchell, A., & Holcomb, J. (2016, June 15). State of the news media 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/06/15/state-of-the-newsmedia-2016/
  18. MMDays（2010.03.08）。〈報業為何如此討厭Google？（一）新聞的網路革命〉。取自http://mmdays.com/2010/03/08/why_newspaper_guys_hates_google/
  19. Newby, T. G.(1999).What's here is not fair everywhere: Does the American fair use doctrine violate international copyright law?.Stanford Law Review,51(6),1633-1663.
  20. Quinn, D. J.(2014).Associated Press v. Meltwater: Are courts being fair to news aggregators?.Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology,15(2),1189-1219.
  21. Sanford, B. W.,Brown, B. D.,Babinski, L. A.(2009).Saving journalism with copyright reform and the doctrine of hot news.Communication Lawyer,26(4),8-11.
  22. Smith, G. (2007, March 13). Copiepresse v Google - the Belgian judgment dissected. Bird & Bird. Retrieved from https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2007/copiepressev-google
  23. Vaidhyanathan, S.(2011).The Googlization of everything: (And why we should worry).Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  24. Valerie（2016.02.18）。〈臉書將全面開放新聞推播工具 Instant Articles，大小媒體都有份〉，《泛科技》。取自https://panx.asia/archives/40191
  25. Yen, A. C.(2010).A preliminary First Amendment analysis of legislation treating news aggregation as copyright infringement.Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law,12(4),947-975.
  26. 中央社（2016.12.24）。〈LINE TODAY推手 林郁芬：提供高品質新聞〉。取自http://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201612240126-1.aspx
  27. 中央社（2017.03.27）。〈Facebook在台推線上課程 加強媒體交流〉。取自http://m.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201703270413.aspx
  28. 何英煒（2016.06.16）。〈LINE轉型生活入口網站〉，《中時電子報》。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160616000138-260204
  29. 林妍溱（2017.01.12）。〈臉書加強與新聞媒體合作，抑制假新聞散佈〉，《iThome》。取自http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/111129
  30. 耿筠、劉江彬(2002)。美國著作權合理使用之重要判例研究。智慧財產權，44，54-77。
  31. 陳玉鳳(2014)。Juiker一起來 企業通訊費用省更多。工業技術與資訊月刊
  32. 經濟日報（2016.06.04）。〈臉書改演算法 衝擊媒體流量〉。取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/5599/1740237
  33. 蔡惠如(2007)。著作權之未來展望：論合理使用之價值創新。臺北市:元照。
  34. 顏晶晶(2015)。報刊出版者權作為鄰接權的正當性探析─基於德國《著作權法》第八修正案的思考。比較法研究，1，61-77。
print cancel