AI時代的人類優勢－《造局者：思考框架的威力》

The Human Advantage in the Age of AI: Book Review of Framers: Human Advantage in an Age of Technology and Turmoil

10.29843/JCCIS.202301_(44).0006

曾懷寬(Huai-Kuan, Zeng)

人工智慧 ； 心智模型 ； 決策 ； 思考框架 ； 造局者 ； AI ； mental model ； decision making ； frame ； framer

資訊社會研究

44期（2023 / 01 / 01）

163 - 174

繁體中文;英文

《造局者：思考框架的威力》一書，著眼於「建立思考框架」以及「另起思考框架」。首先，作者群先定義何為思考框架，並展示建立思考框架所需的三大元素：「因果關係」、「反事實」以及「限制條件」。接著，本書提出另起思考框架的三大方法：從現有框架獲取、借用並調整其他領域的框架、以及另起思考框架。最後，本書的目標不僅止於提出如何「建立思考框架」與「另起思考框架」，其一書的問世有三大意義：理解使用的思考框架為何、擁抱思考框架的多元性、以及展現AI時代的人類競爭優勢。作者群鼓勵人們彼此合作，找出正確的思考框架以建立人類的永續生存。

The book, Framers: Human Advantage in an Age of Technology and Turmoil, focuses on (1) building frames and (2) recreating frames. At the beginning of the book, the authors define what a "frame" is. There are three key components of a frame: causal effect, counterargument, and constraints. Second, there are three ways to create frames: repertoire, repurpose and reinvent. Third, the book not only proposes a way to build and recreate frames but aims at helping people to understand what frames they use, embrace frame pluralism and demonstrate Human Advantage in an Age of AI. The authors encourage people to cooperate and find the correct frame to build a sustainable life for human beings.

1. Bingaman, J.,Brewer, P. R.,Paintsil, A.,Wilson, D. C.(2021).“Siri, show me scary images of AI”: Effects of text-based frames and visuals on support for artificial intelligence.Science Communication,43(3),388-401.
2. Brewer, P. R.,Bingaman, J.,Paintsil, A.,Wilson, D. C.,Dawson, W.(2022).Media use, interpersonal communication, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence.Science Communication,44(5),559-592.
3. Chollet, F. (2017, July 17). The limitations of deep learning. The Keras Blog. https://blog.keras.io/the-limitations-of-deep-learning.html
4. Hern, A. (2022, December 4). AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability. The Guardian. The Guardian. Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/04/ai-bot-chatgpt-stuns-academics-with-essay-writing-skills-and-usability
5. Hick, D. H. (2022, December 17). Today, I turned in the first plagiarist I’ve caught using A.I. software to write her work, and I thought some people might be curious about the details. Facebook. [Status update]. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0DGMaFGECVRd3BwGc3Ue6BAruy9bdtQ8yz3MDsEQYxdiFXV2diE7HYz2H3xv5W74bl&id=5722102&mibextid=qC1gEa
6. Rook, L.(2013).Mental models: A robust definition.The Learning Organization,20(1),38-47.
7. Shaffer, V. A.,Tomek, S.,Hulsey, L.(2014).The effect of narrative information in a publicly available patient decision aid for early-stage breast cancer.Health communication,29(1),64-73.
8. Sommerfeldt, E. J.,Pilny, A.,Saffer, A. J.(2022).Interorganizational homophily and social capital network positions in Malaysian civil society. Communication and social capital network positions in Malaysian civil society.Communication Monographs,90(1),46-68.
9. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,211(4481),453-458.
10. Vishwanath, A.(2009).Using frames to influence consumer willingness to pay for the patient health record: a randomized experiment.Health communication,24(5),473-482.
11. 田孟心（2022 年 12 月 7 日）。〈論文已死？文組教授：學術界完全沒有為 Chat GPT 做好準備〉。天下。取自：https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5123855
12. 林俊宏（譯）,Mayer-Schönberger, V.,Cukier, K.(2013).大數據：「數位革命」之後,「資料革命」登場：巨量資料掀起生活、工作和思考方式的全面革新.臺北:天下文化出版.
13. 林俊宏（譯）,Mayer-Schonberger, V.,Ramge, T.(2018).大數據資本主義：金融資本主義退位,重新定義市場、企業、金錢、銀行、工作與社會正義.臺北:天下文化出版.
14. 林麗雪（譯）,Weinberg, G.,McCann, L.(2021).超級思維：跨界、跨域、跨能,突破思考盲點,提升解決能力的心智模式大全.臺北市:采實文化出版.
15. 陳依萍（譯）,Wasserman, N.(2019).你永遠有更好的選擇：哈佛頂尖商學院教授的 8 堂人生經營學.臺北市:商周出版.
16. 數位時代（2022 年 12 月 19 日）。〈AI 要畫得美又精準，得靠「提示工程師」！這項未來職業要具備哪些技能？〉。取自：https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/73303/what-is-prompt-engineering
17. 鄧舒澤（2022 年 12 月 7 日）。〈雷亞 AI 溝通師職缺引熱議，作為數位時代下的「魔法師」需要哪些關鍵技能？〉。奇摩新聞，取自：https://tw.news.yahoo.com/news/%E9%9B%B7%E4%BA%9E-ai-%E6%BA%9D%E9%80%9A%E5%B8%AB%E8%81%B7%E7%BC%BA%E5%BC%95%E7%86%B1%E8%AD%B0-%E4%BD%9C%E7%82%BA%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E6%99%82-%E4%BB%A3%E4%B8%8B%E7%9A%84-%E9%AD%94%E6%B3%95%E5%B8%AB-042156901.html
18. 聯合新聞網（2022 年 12 月 11 日）。〈吵翻天！AI 藝術作品到底算不算抄襲藝術家「挫在等」〉。取自：https://udn.com/news/story/7086/6830878