题名

A Review for the Evaluation of Science Textbooks in Western Countries

并列篇名

歐美科學教科書評鑑回顧

DOI

10.6388/JES.200208.0035

作者

許健將(Jen Jang Sheu)

关键词

科學教科書 ； 評鑑 ； Science Textbooks ； Evaluation

期刊名称

教育科學期刊

卷期/出版年月

2卷1期（2002 / 08 / 01）

页次

35 - 62

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

本文乃是針對有關科學教科書的評鑑進行相關的文獻探討。從科學教科書的本質、科學教科書評鑑的程序、科學教科書評鑑的判準、到科學教科書中的偏見與意識型態等均進行廣泛的研究與分析，以作為國內編寫高品質科學教科書時的重要參考。
英文摘要

The purpose of this paper is to make a review of the previous studies related to the evaluation of science textbooks. Many researchers have evaluated the nature of science textbooks. Some have proposed procedures for others to follow in making such assessments. Some have proposed standards for use in judging the appropriateness of given books to specific student levels and needs. Some have raised issues regarding the textbooks bias and ideology. Some have suggested how to design quality textbooks to match science education goals. The following are the important research results related to the major questions posed for the evaluation of science textbooks.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Armbruster, B.(1985).Producing Considerate Expository Text: or Easy Reading is Damned Hard Writing.Journal of Curriculum Studies,7(3),247-263.
  2. Armstrong, H.E.(1993).The Teaching of Scientific Method.London:Macmillian.
  3. Bazler, J.A.(1991).Are High School Chemistry Textbooks Gender Fair?.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(4),356-362.
  4. Chiapetta, E.L.(1991).Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(8),713-725.
  5. Chiapetta, E.L.,Fillman, D.A.,Setbna, GH.(1988).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.Ozark Lake:
  6. Collette, A.T.,Chiappetta, E.L.(1989).Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary School.Columbus, Ohio:Merrill Publishing Company.
  7. Cook, L. K.(1988).Teaching Readers about the Structure of Scientific Text.Journal of Educational Psychology,80,448-456.
  8. Costa, A. L.,A. L. Casta(Eds.)(1985).Teacher Behaviours that Enable Student Thinking.Developing Minds:A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking.
  9. Crosby, G.A.(1986).The Evolution of Chemistry Texts.Science Books and Film: Chemistry Textbooks,21(5),248.
  10. Dsu.(1980).A Report from the Investigation of the Textbook Market.Stockholm.
  11. Fuhrman, M.,Lunetta, V. N.,Novick, S.,Tamir, P.(1987).The Laboratory Structure and Task Analysis Inventory(LAI): A Users Book. Technical Report #14.the University of Iowa.
  12. Fuhrman, M.,Lunetta, V.N.,Novick, S.(1982).Do Secondary School Laboratory Texts Reflect the Goals of the New Science Curriculum?.Journal of Chemical Education,59(7),563-565.
  13. Gabel, D. L.(1983).High School Chemistry Textbook: What High School Chemistry Texts Do Well and What They Do Poorly.Journal of Chemical Education,60(10),893-895.
  14. Guo, C.J.(1984).Content Analysis and the Intrinsic Evaluation of Science Textbooks.Journal of the National Taiwan College of Education,9,703-721.
  15. Harms, N.C.,Yager, R.E.(1981).What Research Says to the Science Teacher.NSTA, Washington, D.C..
  16. Heikkinen, H.(1973).University of Maryland, U.S. Unpublish thesis.University of Maryland, U.S..
  17. Helgeson, S.,Blosser, P.,Howe, R.(1977).Center for Science and Mathematics Education, The Ohio State University.Washing, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office.
  18. Herron, M. D.(1971).The Nature of Scientific Enquiry.School Science Review,79,171-212.
  19. Hofstein, A.,Lunetta, V. N.(1982).The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research.Review of Educational Research,52(2),201-217.
  20. Holliday, W. G.(1988).The Perils of Illustrations.Basic Education,32(10),13-15.
  21. Huxley, T. H.(1992).Physiography.London:Macmillion.
  22. Johnson, E.B.(1993).Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope.Oslo:Scandinaviar University Press.
  23. Kuehl, E.(1984).On Evaluation of high School Physics Laboratory Manuals.Physics Teacher,22(4),222-235.
  24. Kuhn, T. S.(1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolution.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  25. Levin, F. S.,Lindbeck, J. S.(1979).An Analysis of Selected Biology Textbooks for the Treatment of Controversial Issues and Biosocial Problems.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,16(3),199-203.
  26. Lin, S.H.(1989).An analysis of primary school science textbooks.Science Education,25(4),10-25.
  27. Lowery, L. F.,Leonard, W. H.(1987).Comparison of Questioning Styles among Four Widely used High School Biology Textbooks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,15(1),1-10.
  28. Lynch, P. P.,Strube, P.(1985).That is the Purpose of the Science Textbooks? A Study of Author prefaces in the Mid-nineteenth Century.European Journal of Science Education,7(2),121-130.
  29. Matthews, C. E.(1994).Native American Related Materials in Elementary Science Instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(4),363-380.
  30. Meiphan, R.,Robert, M.,Meiphan, R. (Ed.)(1993).A Sociology of Educating.London:Cassel.
  31. Moyer, W. A.,Mayer, W. V.(1985).People for the American Way.Washington, D.C.:
  32. Novak, J. D.(1988).Learning Science and the Science of Learning.Studies in Science Education,15,77-109.
  33. Pella, M. O.(1976).The Place or Function of Science for a Literate Citizenry.Science Education,60(1),97-101.
  34. Podenderf, I.(1974).Characteristics of Good Science Materials for Young Readers.Library Trends.
  35. Price, R. F.,Cross, R. T.(1988).Politics, Patriotism and Chemistry.Education in Chemistry.
  36. Richaudeau, F.(1986).2 reimp. .Conception et Production des Manvels Scolares: Gvide Pratique.Paris:UNESCO.
  37. Rosenthal, D.B.(1984).Social Issues in High School Biology Textbooks: 1963-1983.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,21(8),819-831.
  38. Schwab, J. J.,Schwab, J. J.,Brandwein, P. F. (Eds.)(1962).The Teaching of Science.Cambridge, MA.:Harvard University Press.
  39. Shepardson, D. P.,Pizzini, E. L.(1991).Questioning Level of Junior High School Science Textbooks and Their Implications for Learning Information.Science Education,75(6),673-682.
  40. Shymansky, J.A.(1993).A Study of Changes in Middle School Teachers` Understanding of Selected Ideas in Science as a Function of an Inservice Program Focusing on Student Preconceptions.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30,737-355.
  41. Sigurgeirsson, I.,Johnson, E.B. (Ed.)(1990).Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope.Oslo:Scandinavian University Press.
  42. Stake, R.E.,Easley, I.A.(1978).Overview and General finds. (NSF Publication No. Se-78-74).Urbana:Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  43. Stray, C.,Johnson, E.B. (Ed.)(1991).Textbooks in the Kaleidoscope.Oslo:Scandinavian University Press.
  44. Suchman, J. R.(1965).Inquiry: The Condition for Inquiry.Instruction,12(3),15.
  45. Tamir, P.(1977).How are laboratories used?.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,14,311-316.
  46. Tamir, P.,Lunetta, V.N.(1981).Inquiry-Related Tasks in High School Science Laboratory Handbooks.Science Education,65(5),477-484.
  47. Tobin, K.(1990).Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning.School Science and Mathematics,90(5),403-418.
  48. Weiss, I.(1978).Center for Education Research and Evaluation, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.Washington, D.C.:Government Printing Office.
  49. Westbury, I.(1982).Textbooks. In: The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum.Tel Aviv Israeli:Tel Aviv University.
  50. Yager, R .E.,T. P. Sachse,(Ed.)(1989).Science Education Occasional Paper Series(No. 12).Sacramento, CA:California Development of Education.
  51. Yager, R.E.(1989).The Constructivist Learning Model.Science Teacher,58(6),22-57.
print cancel