合作學習教學策略對七年級國中學生論證能力的影響

The Influence on the Seventh Graders' Argumentation Quality Based on Cooperative-learning

10.6388/JES.200906.0113

鄧又仁(Teng-Yu Jen)；林素華(Shu-Hua Lin)

合作學習 ； 論證 ； 論證能力 ； argumentation ； argumentation quality ； cooperation-learning

教育科學期刊

8卷1期（2009 / 06 / 01）

113 - 140

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討合作學習教學策略對學生論證能力的影響。研究對象爲兩班七年級國中生共68人，其中一班實驗組採用合作學習教學，另一班則採用傳統教學，教學內容爲「人工生殖」、「複製羊」、「器官移殖」、「基因改造食品」四個議題，在歷經四週的教學後，探討兩班學生論證能力的差異。研究者擬定出一套論證能力評分標準，來分析教學前、後所作的前、後測的半結構訪談資料，並評定學生的論證能力。研究結果發現實驗組與對照組在經過教學後，論證能力均有顯著提升。另外，實驗組在論證能力總分顯著高於對照組，表示合作學習在提升學生論證能力的效果，優於傳統教學。

The purpose of this study was to inquire the influence of students' argumentation quality based on cooperation-learning instruction. The samples were 68 seventh-grade students. Experimental group used cooperative-learning instruction, and the other class used traditional instruction. The content of instruction included four issues, that is, assisted reproduction, cloning sheep, organ transplant and genetically modified organism. After four-week instruction, the study showed the differences of argumentation quality in two classes at the beginning and the end of the instruction. In order to facilitate comparison, the researchers developed a set of verification criteria to analyze the interview data and to evaluate the argumentation quality of students. The results showed that students’ argumentation quality becoming better in both experimental and control group after instruction. Additionally, the experimental group showed significantly better argumentation ability than control group. This result shows that cooperation-learning instruction has a better effect on improving student's argumentation ability than traditional instruction.

1. Driver, R.,Asoko, H.,Leach, J.,Mortimer, E.,Scott, P.(1994).Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher,23,5-12.
2. Driver, R.,Newton, P.,Osborne, J.(2000).Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom.Science Education,84,287-312.
3. Duschl R. A.,Osborne J.(2002).Supporting and Promting Argumentation discourse in science education.Studies in science education,38,39-72.
4. Erduran, S.,Simon, S.,Osborne, J.(2004).TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse.Science Education,88(6),915-933.
5. Gredler, M. E.(1997).Learning and instruction: theory into practice.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
6. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.,Rodriguez, A.,Duschl, R.(2000).'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics.Science Education,84(6),757-792.
7. Johnson D. W.,Johnson R.T.(1994).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.Boston:Alllyn and Bacon.
8. Johnson D.W.,Johnson R.T.,Holubec E.J.(1994).Cooperative learning in the classroom.Alexandria, VA.:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9. Joiner, R.,Jones, S.(2003).The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking.International Journal of Educational Research,39,861-871.
10. Kelly, G. J.,Takao, A.(2002).Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing.Science Education,86,314-342.
11. Kuhn, D.(1991).The skill of argument.New York:Cambridge University Press.
12. Marttunen, M.(1994).Assessing argumentation skill among finish university students.Learning and Instruction,4,175-191.
13. Newton, P.,Driver, R.,Osborne, J.(1999).The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science.International Journal of Science Education,21,553-576.
14. Osborne, J.,Erduran, S.,Simon, S.(2004).Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(10),994-1020.
15. Polman, J. L.,Pea, R. D.(2001).Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science.Science Education,85,223-238.
16. Sadler, T. D.,Fowler, S. R.(2006).A threshold model of content knowledge transfer on socioscientific argumentation.Science Education,90(6),986-1004.
17. Sadler, T. D.,Zeidler, D. L.(2005).Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(1),112-138.
18. Simon, S.,Erduran S.,Osborne, J.(2006).Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom.International Journal of Science Education,28(2-3),235-260.
19. Slavin, R. E.(1995).Cooperative Learning: theory, research, and practice.N.J.:Prentice Hall.
20. Toulmin, S.(1958).The uses of argument.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
21. Wray, D.,Lewis, M.(1997).Extending literacy: Children reading and writing non-jiction.London:Routledge.
22. Yore, L. D.,Bisanz, G.L.(2003).Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research.International Journal of Science Education,25(6),689-725.
23. Zohar, A.,Nemet, F.(2002).Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39,35-62.
24. 洪振方(1994)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大科學教育研究所。
25. 黃政傑、彬佩璇(2006)。合作學習。台北市:五南。