题名

化學概念學習之真實評量研究

并列篇名

A Study of the Authentic Assessment in Learning Chemistry

DOI

10.6388/JES.200912.0093

作者

許健將(Jen-Jang Sheu)

关键词

概念構圖 ; 化學概念 ; 迷思概念 ; Concept Mapping ; Chemistry Concept ; Misconceptions

期刊名称

教育科學期刊

卷期/出版年月

8卷2期(2009 / 12 / 01)

页次

93 - 115

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究之目的旨在探討如何應用概念構圖於化學概念學習之上,並對概念構圖在學習評量上之應用,進行幾項議題之探討,包括: (一)探討透過何種概念構圖模式能更真實有效的反應出學習者相關化學知識內涵與結構? (二)探討運用概念構圖的教學與學習模式,是否能更有效的達到化學概念改變的目的? (三)探討如何將其他教學或學習模式與概念構圖模式相結合,以期更有效地讓讓學習者達到化學概念改變的目的? 本研究之研究單元爲有關「游離能」之相關化學概念,研究工具除概念構圖外,尚包括二段式選擇測驗,利用多元之研究工具,藉以發掘學習者之迷思概念進而發展更有效的教學模式以澄清其迷思概念。

英文摘要

The aim of this study is to explore how infusing concept mapping techniques into learning chemistry concepts, and also to discuss issues related as followings: (Ⅰ) To investigate by which way the concept mapping techniques could more efficiently reflect the intrinsic chemistry knowledge and structure owned by students? (Ⅱ) To explore whether concept mapping techniques could efficiently achieve the end of concept change. (Ⅲ) To find which way combined with the concept mapping techniques could more achieve the end of concept change. The ”ionization energy” was the topic to be discussed in this study. There include a two-tier multiple selection test as the research tool, concept mapping techniques besides, to dig out and clarify students' misconceptions.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 岳美群、蔡長添(1994)。高中生物科環境教材概念分析與學生學習成果評量之研究。科學教育,4,83-131。
    連結:
  2. Anderson, J. R.(1995).Cognitive Psychology and It's Implication.New York:Freeman and Company.
  3. Anderson, T. H.,Huang, Shang-cheng Chiu.(1989).Technical Report NoA83Technical Report NoA83,未出版
  4. Beyerbach, B. A.(1988).Developing a technical vocabulary on teacher planning: preservice teachers concept maps.Teaching and Teacher Education,4(4),337-347.
  5. Briscoe, C.(1991).Meaningful learning in college biology through concept mapping.The American Biology Teacher,53(4),214-219.
  6. Edmonson, K. M.(1995).Concept mapping for development of medical curricula.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32(7),777-793.
  7. Hallowell, A. C.(1985).Ithaca,University.
  8. Heinze-Fiy, J. A.,Novak, J. D.(1990).Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning.Science Education,74(4),461-472.
  9. Kinchin, I. M.(2000).Using concept maps to reveal understanding: A two-tier analysis.School Science Review,81,41-46.
  10. Klein, D. C. D.,Chung, G. K.W. K.,Osmundson, E.,Herl, H. E.,O''Neil, H. f.(2001).Examining the validity of knowledge mapping as a measure of elementary students 'scientific understanding.Los Angeles:National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing(CRE 551).
  11. Novak, J. D.,Glynn, S. M. (Eds.),Duit, R.(Eds.)(1995).Concept mapping: strategy for organizing knowledge.Learning science in the schools: Research Reforming Practice.
  12. Novak, J. D,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning how to learn.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Novak, J. D,Gowin, D. B.,Johansen, G. T.(1983).The use of concept mapping and vee mapping with junior high school science student.Science Education,67(5),625-645.
  14. Okebukola, M.(1992).Can good concept mapper be good problem solvers in science.Research in Science & Technological Education,10(2),153-170.
  15. Pankratius, W. J.(1990).Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and chievement in secondary school physics.Journal of in Science Teaching,27(4),315-353.
  16. Ruiz-Primo, M. A.,Shavelson, R. J.,Li, M.,Schultz, S. E.(2001).On the validity of cognitive interpretations of scores from alternative concept-mapping techniques.Educational Assessment,7,99-141.
  17. Rye, J. A.,Rubba, P. A.(2002).Scoring concept maps: An expert map-based scheme weighted for relationships.School science and mathematics,102,33-44.
  18. Stice, C. F.,Alvarez, M. C.(1986).Hierarchical concept mapping: Young children learning how to learn.Eric Reproduction Service No. N,(ED 274946).
  19. Stuart, H. A.(1987).Should concept maps be scored numerically.European Journal of Science Education,7,73-81.
  20. Suen, H. K.,Sonak, B.,Zimmaro, D.,Roberts, D. M.(1997).Concept map as scaffolding for authentic assessment.Psychological Reports,81(3),734.
  21. Wallace, J. D.,Mintzes J. J.(1990).science and technology education.Oxford:Pergamon Press.
  22. Wallace, J. D.,Mintzes J. J.(1990).The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(10),1033-1052.
  23. White, R.,Gunstone, R.(1992).Probing understanding.New York:Falmer Press.
  24. Yin, Y.,Vandide, J.,Ruiz-Primo, M. A.,Alyla, C. C.,Shavelson, R. T.(2005).Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: implications for scoring, interpretation, and use.Journal of Research in science Teaching,42(2),166-184.
  25. 王薌茹(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所。
  26. 全中平(1996)。國民小學五年級生對學習力與運動概念之分析研究。臺北師院學報,9,405-426。
  27. 余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習-概念構圖之研究。台北:商鼎文化。
  28. 李秀娟(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
  29. 張子超、楊冠政(1997)。學生環境知識概念結構發展的研究。師大學報,科學教育類,42,31-48。
  30. 陳李綢(1994)。如何學策略訓練與社會工作經驗對大學生概念建構、V字捷思歷程、後設認知與學習表現的影響。教育心理學報,27,81-103。
  31. 陳嘉成(1998)。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。教育與心理研究,21,107-128。
  32. 湯清二(1993)。我國學生生物細胞概念發展研究-迷思概念之晤談與概念圖。彰化師範大學學報,4,141-170。
  33. 黃達三(1998)。概念分析與水資源教育。全國愛水教材教法研討會會議資料集
  34. 黃鴻博(1998)。概念構圖在自然科教學上的運用。國教輔導,38,13-18。
  35. 羅廷瑛(2001)。「概念構圖教學課程」對國小一年級學生自然科學學習表現影響之研究。教育資料與研究,38,29-35。