题名

芬蘭小學數學教師培育與課程規劃之探究

并列篇名

A Study of Elementary School Mathematics Teacher's Education and Curriculum Planning in Finland

DOI

10.6388/JES.201006.0125

作者

蔡清田(C. T Tsai);魏曼伊(M. Y. Wei)

关键词

芬蘭 ; 班級教師 ; 數學師資培育 ; Finland ; class teacher ; Mathematics teacher training

期刊名称

教育科學期刊

卷期/出版年月

9卷1期(2010 / 06 / 01)

页次

125 - 141

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

目前芬蘭小學數學教師在職前教育階段需修習5年300學分課程,撰寫碩士論文並取得碩士學位,接受師資培育的學生在大學附屬之教師培訓學校進行教學實習,通過教師資格考試後,即可申請班級教師職位。在職進修方面,教師擁有數學進修課程內容主導權。另外芬蘭並透過發展數學社團以作爲推動數學教師教育的方式。本文在透過理解芬蘭小學數學師資培育模式後,提供臺灣有關小學數學師資培育之入學篩選、師資培育課程規劃、提升數學研究能力及培養對數學興趣與自發性之省思。

英文摘要

Currently, Mathematics teachers in primary school have to complete a 5-year education with 300 credits in the pre-service education for teachers in Finland. They have to complete a master thesis and to achieve a Masters degree. After passing through the examination of teacher qualification, students undertaking class teacher training at the class teacher training school provided by universities are able to apply for a position of class teacher. From the aspect of in-service education, teachers get themselves participated in the in-service mathematics courses. On the other hand, Finland drives the education of Mathematics class teacher by forming Mathematics study group. This article aims to provide review on the entry selection of the Mathematics teacher training of primary school, development and planning of the teacher training courses, raise the analytical skills of Mathematics and foster interest in Mathematics in Taiwan through understanding the teacher training model of Mathematics teacher for primary school in Finland.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 蔡清田、鄭勝耀(2008)。師資培用策略聯盟可行性指標之研究。當代教育研究,16(1),41-76。
    連結:
  2. Turun Normaalikoulu(2007). Turun Normaalikoul Teacher Training School, University of Turku. Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.tnk.utu.fi/index.php?id=140&lang_id=1
  3. University of Oulu(2007). Department of educational sciences and teacher education 2006-2007. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from http://www.oulu.fi/intl/exchange_students/ects/ktk/KASOPE06-07.pdf
  4. 屏東教育大學(2005)。各學系、所招收大學部學生預先修讀碩士班課程要點。2010 年3 月18 日,取自 http://c002.npue.edu.tw/ezcatfiles/c002/img/img/218/law14-1.pdf
  5. University of Jyväskylä(2010).Curriculum of teacher education. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from https://www.jyu.fi/edu/laitokset/okl/en/curriculum/curriculum%20pdf/view
  6. Government Decree on University Degrees 794/2004 (2004).
  7. Näätänen, M.(2005). PISA –survey, Finnish schools, teacher training and math. Education. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from http://www.unavarra.es/VIIRDYDM/pdf/PISA%20-survey,%20Finlandia.doc
  8. Savonlinna Normaalikoulu(2010). Savonlinna University Practice School. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from http://snor.joensuu.fi/sivut/in-english.html
  9. Malaty, G. (2008). Mathematics teacher training in Finland. Retrieved January 24, 2010, from http://www.cfbt.com/evidenceforeducation/pdf/MathsTeachTrain_reportFINAL%20%28WEB%29_%28v5%29.pdf
  10. Stedøy, I. M.(2004).Mathematics education - The Nordic Way. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from http://www.matematikksenteret.no/attachment.ap?id=430
  11. Lapin Yliopiston Harjoittelukoulu(2010). Teacher Training School of the University of Lapland. Retrieved March 30, 2010, from http://www.ulapland.fi/contentparser.asp?deptid=28700
  12. Mikkola, A.(2005).Teacher education in Finland. Retrieved February 15, 2010, from http://www.oph.fi/info/pisahelsinki/lectures/armi%20mikkola.doc
  13. Oulun Normaalikoulu(2003).Welcome to Oulu Teacher Training school. Retrieved March 30, 2010, from http://www.tsoe.eu/studiereis/Secondary%20school%20presentation.ppt
  14. Eurydice (2008). The education system in Finland 2007/08. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/eurybase/pdf/section/FI_EN_C8.pdf
  15. Viikin Normaalikoulun(2010).Viikki Teacher Training School Helsinki University. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.vink.helsinki.fi/pop.php?id=74
  16. University Act 1453/2006 (2006).
  17. Hämeenlinnan Normaalikoulu (2010). Primary school practising School of University of Tampere. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.uta.fi/hnk/www/?In_English
  18. Malaty, G. (2006). What are the reasons behind the success of Finland in PISA? Retrieved January 21, 2010, from http://www.matilde.mathematics.dk/arkiv/M29/M29tema.pdf
  19. Eurydice (2007). The education system in Finland 2006/07. Retrieved March 22, 2010, from http://www.eurydice.org/ressources/eurydice/eurybase/pdf/0_integral/FI_EN.pdf
  20. Finnish National Board of Education(2009).Teacher training. Retrieved January 23, 2010, from http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/pisa/teacher_training
  21. Valanne, E(2007).Teacher Training School of the University of Lapland. Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.ulapland.fi/includes/file_download.asp?deptid=8748&fileid=11665&file=20071008150437.ppt#270,1,Teacher Training School of the University of Lapland
  22. Joensuun Normaalikoulu(2010). The school. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from http://jnor.joensuu.fi/index.php?id=1&lang_id=1
  23. Malaty, G. (2004). Mathematics teacher training in Finland. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from http://smf.emath.fr/VieSociete/Rencontres/France-Finlande-2005/MalatyGB.pdf
  24. 胡清輝(2009 年11 月25 日)。數學差不能當國小老師。自由時報。2009 年12月4 日,取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/091125/78/1vm4s.html
  25. 陳之華(2007)。月有陰晴圓缺─芬蘭打破傳統的教育學系招生法。2010 年2 月22 日,取自http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/yolanda-chen/article?mid=6771&prev=6999&next=6603&l=f&fid=26
  26. Rauman Normaalikoulu(2010).Rauma Teacher Training School. Retrieved March 28, 2010, from http://www.edu.utu.fi/laitokset/rnk/en/
  27. 王世英、張鈿富(2007)。主要國家教育發展資料蒐集與分析。臺北市:國立教育資料館。
  28. 行政院新聞局(2008)。中華民國年鑑
  29. 林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀(2007)。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,3(1),57-80。
  30. 林煥祥(2009)。國科會專題研究計劃成果報告國科會專題研究計劃成果報告,臺北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
  31. 張雅淨、吳雪綺、羅天豪、李詠絮、周仲賢、李嘉鈞(2007)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,79,174-181。
  32. 蔡清田(2008)。「教師即研究者」的理念對課程研究發展與教師專業發展的教育啟示。教育研究月刊,166,99-110。
  33. 蔡清田(2007)。「教師即研究者」的課程改革理念對師資培育課程之啟示。教育研究月刊,163,118-130。
  34. 蔡清田(2007)。透過課程行動研究進行教師在職進修。教育研究月刊,160,146-157。
  35. 蔡清田、侯雅雯、鄭勝耀(2009)。我國師資培育大學進行教育行銷的分析:麥當勞化的觀點。中等教育,60(4),2-28。
  36. 鄭勝耀、蔡清田(2008)。師資培用策略聯盟之理念與實踐。香港教師中心學報,7,68-85。
  37. 魏曼伊(2009)。芬蘭小學師資培育課程規劃之探究。教育資料集刊,411,233-252。