题名

線上學習系統使用意向之模式建構與比較分析研究

并列篇名

The Constructionalization and Comparison of Use Intention Model in Electronic Learning System

DOI

10.6295/TAMJ.2005.0502.07

作者

余泰魁(Tai-Kuei Yu);楊淑斐(Shu-Fei Yang)

关键词

線上學習 ; 使用意向 ; 計劃行為理論 ; 科技接受模式 ; 結構方程式 ; Electronic learning e-Learning ; Use intention ; Theory of planned behavior TPB ; Technology acceptance model TAM ; Structural equation model SEM

期刊名称

台灣管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

5卷2期(2005 / 08 / 01)

页次

311 - 337

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在過去線上學習系統採用的相關調查研究,主要在探討影響學習者對採納系統行為,但對於此一新科技的使用意向亦是相當重要,使用意向不僅是扮演對科技的採納並且激勵學習者持續學習的角色。本研究以簡化的消費者行為模式、計劃行為理論模式、科技接受模式、分解式計劃行為理論模式和整合模式為基礎,採結構方程式模式(SEM)方法,蒐集343份資料,分別建構潛使用者對線上學習系統使用意向因果關係模式,並進行比較分析。經結構化方程式模型實證,以整合模式所建構線上學習系統使用意向模式的配適度最佳,並獲得下列研究結果:(1)使用者對線上學習系統的「使用意向」主要受其「行銷組合」、「使用動機」、「行為控制知覺」、「態度」等四項正向和「知覺風險」負向影響;但在顯著水準α=0.05之下,「行為控制知覺」對線上學習系統的「使用意向」,並無顯著影響。(2)使用者對線上學習系統使用意向模式之「態度」變項,主要受其「使用動機」、「認知有用」、「認知易用」等三項正向影響。(3)使用者對線上學習系統使用意向模式之「行為控制知覺」變項,主要受其「使用動機」正向和「知覺風險」的負向影響。(4)使用者對線上學習系統使用意向模式之「認知易用」和「認知有用」兩個變項,主要均受其「行銷組合」、「使用動機」等二項正向和「知覺風險」的負向影響。(5)使用者對線上學習系統的「使用動機」,受到「行銷組合」正向影響。

英文摘要

Previous studies on the adoption of electronic learning system have been made to investigate factors affecting its usage. We believe that the intention to use the electronic learning system is also equally important, not only for promoting the technology but also for encouraging its voluntary continued use. This study is based principally on ”simplified Customer Behavior Model”, ”Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)”, ”Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)”, ”Decomposition TPB” and ”Integrate Model” to construct a causal-effect model about the ”use intention” of users in the electronic learning system. The structural equation modeling is used to assess its adequacy for the use intention study and to compare it with alternative specifications that integrate previous research results. To confirm our hypothesis, data were collected 343 persons, as well as by the evidence of structural equation modeling, to get the following results: (1) The ”marketing mixes,” ”motivation,” ”perceived behavioral control,” and ”attitude toward the behavior” have a positive effect, while the ”risk perception” reveals negative influence. At the 0.05 significance level, the ”perceived behavioral control,” however, has no significant influence on the ”use intention” of electronic learning system. (2) The ”attitude toward the behavior” of the users in the electronic learning system is mainly positively influenced by ”motivation,” ”perceived usefulness,” and ”perceived easy of use.” (3) The ”perceived behavioral control” of users in the electronic learning system is mainly positively influenced by ”motivation” but negatively influenced by ”risk perception.” (4) The ”perceived easy of use” and ”perceived usefulness” of users in the electronic learning system is mainly positively influenced by ”marketing mixes,” and ”motivation,” but negatively influenced by ”risk perception.” (5) The ”marketing mixes” positively affects ”motivation.”

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 教育部電子計算機中心
  2. 中華民國85年教育改革諮議總報告書。
  3. Ajzen, I(2002).Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,32,1-20.
  4. Ajzen, I(1985).action-control: from cognition to behavior.Heidelberg:Springer.
  5. Ajzen, I.(1988).Attitude, personality, and behavior.Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
  6. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50,179-211.
  7. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M(1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
  8. Arbaugh, J. B(2000).Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA.Journal of Management Education,24(1),32-54.
  9. Bagozzi, R. P(1981).Attitudes, intentions and behavior: a test of some key hypotheses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41,607-627.
  10. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y(1988).On the evaluation for structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
  11. Baumgartner, H.,Homburg, C(1996).Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review.International Journal of Research in Marketing,13,139-161.
  12. Boyd, T. C.,Mason, C. H(1999).The link between attractiveness of `extrabrand` attributes and the adoption of innovations.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,27,306-319.
  13. Burns, J.,Clift, J.,Duncan, J(1999).Understanding of understanding: implications for learning and teaching.British Journal of Educational Psychology,61,276-289.
  14. Carmines, E.,McIver, J,G. Bohmstedt,E. Borgatta (Eds.)(1981).Social measurement: Current Issues.Calif:Sage, Beverly Hills.
  15. Chau, Y. K.,Hu, J. H(2001).Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach.Decision Sciences,32(4),699-719.
  16. Cheol, P.,Jun, J-K(2003).A cross-cultural comparison of internet buying behavior.International Marketing Review,20(5),534-554.
  17. Chin, W. W.,Todd, P(1995).On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in mis research: a note of caution.MIS Quarterly,19(2),237-246.
  18. Davis, F. D(1993).User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,38,475-487.
  19. Davis, F. D(1986).Cambridge, MA,MIT Sloan School of Management.
  20. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R(1992).Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,22(14),1111-1132.
  21. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
  22. Deci, E.L.,R.M. Ryan(2000).The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human need and the self-determination of behavior.Psychological Inquiry,11,227-268.
  23. Ding, L.,Velicer, W.,Harlow, L(1995).Effect of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices.Structural Equation Modeling,2,119-143.
  24. Dishaw, M. T.,Strong, D. M(1999).Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs.Information & Management,36,9-21.
  25. Engel, J. F.,Kollat, D. T.,Blackwell, R. D(1984).Consumer behavior.Hinsdale, Illinois:The Dryden Press.
  26. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I(1975).Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research reading.Massactusetts:Addison-Wesley.
  27. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unbervables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
  28. Gay, L. R(1998).Educational research copetencies for analysis and application.N.Y.:Macmillan.
  29. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C(1998).Multivariate data analysis.N.Y.:Macmillan.
  30. Hiltz, R. S(1994).Virtual classrooms: learning without limits via computer networks.Norwood, N.J.:Ablex.
  31. Hiltz, R. S(1990).Collaborative learning: The virtual classroom approach.The Journal: Technological Horizons,17(10),59-65.
  32. Holak, S. L(1988).Determinants of innovative durables adoption and empirical study with implications for early product screening.Journal of Product Innovation Management,5,50-69.
  33. Igbaria, M.,Guimaraes, T.,Davis, G. B(1995).Testing the determinants of microcomputer usages via a structural equation model.Journal of Management Information Systems,11(4),87-114.
  34. Joreskog, K. G.,Sorbom, D(1996).LISREL8: User`s reference guide.Mooresville:Scientific Software.
  35. Kotler, P(1998).Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control.N.Y.:Prentice-Hall Inc.
  36. MacCallum, R. C.,Roznowski, M.,Mar, C. M.,Reith, J. V(1994).Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models.Multivariate Behavioral Research,29(1),1-32.
  37. Marsh, H. W.,Balla, J. R.,McDonald, R. P(1988).Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size.Psychological Bulletin,103,391-410.
  38. Mathieson, K(1991).Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior.Information Systems Research,2(3),173-191.
  39. Mitchell, V. W.,Greatorex, M(1993).Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services.The Service Industries Journal,13(4),179-200.
  40. Moon, J. W.,Kim, Y. G(2001).Extending the TAM for a World Wide Web context.Information & Management,38,217-230.
  41. Moore, M. G.,Kearsley, G(1996).Distance education- A system view.California:Wadsworth.
  42. Pavlou, P.A.(2003).Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model.International Journal of Electronic Commerce,7(3),101-134.
  43. Pintrich, P.R.(1999).The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning.International Journal of Educational Research,31,459-470.
  44. Reilly, T(1995).A necessary and sufficient condition for identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of complexity one.Sociological Methods and Research,23(4),421-441.
  45. Rigdon, E. E(1995).A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice.Multivariate Behavior Research,30(3),359-383.
  46. Robson, J(2000).Evaluating on-line teaching.Open learning,15(2),151-172.
  47. Rogers, E. M(1986).Diffusion of innovations.N.Y.:Free Press.
  48. Selim, H.M.(2003).An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites.Computers & Education,40,343-360.
  49. Senecal, C.,Vallerand, R.J.,Guay, F(2001).Antecendents and outcomes of work-family conflict: Toward a motivational model.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27,176-186.
  50. Shimp, T. A.,Kavas, A(1984).The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage.Journal of Consumer Research,11,795-809.
  51. Szajna, B(1996).Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.Management Science,43(1),85-92.
  52. Tan, S. J(1999).Strategies for reducing consumers` risk aversion in Internet shopping.Journal of Consumer Marketing,16(2),163-180.
  53. Tanaka, J(1987).How big is enough? sample size and goodness-of-fit in structural equation models with latent variables.Child Development,58,134-146.
  54. Taylor, S.,Todd, P.A(1995).Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models.Information Systems Research,6(2),144-176.
  55. Taylor, S.,Todd, P.A(1995).Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions.International Journal of Research in Marketing,12,137-155.
  56. Taylor, S.,Todd, P.A(1995).Assessing it usage: the role of prior experience.MIS Quarterly,19(4),561-570.
  57. Vallerand, R.J.(1997).Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,29,271-361.
  58. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D(1996).A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test.Decision Sciences,27(3),451-481.
  59. Venkatesh, V.,Davis, F. D(2000).A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies.Management Science,46(2),186-204.
  60. Venkatesh, V.,Morris, M.G.,Davis, G.B.,F.D. Davis(2003).User acceptance of information technology: Toward an unified view.MIS Quarterly,27(3),425-478.
  61. 何祖鳳、陳俊榮、陳銘欽(1998)。網路教學系統評估準則之研究。遠距教育,7,20-29。
  62. 余泰魁(2005)。國立雲林科技大學管理研究所。
  63. 余泰魁、吳桂森、楊淑斐(2004)。市場行銷組合與計劃行爲理論之整合性分析-以線上學習爲例。產業論壇,6(1),171-203。
  64. 巫靜宜(2000)。淡江大學資訊管理研究所。
  65. 李美慧、陳鴻基、陳姚真(2001)。科技接受模式在非同步網路學習系統使用意向之應用。TANET 2001 論文集
  66. 邱世宗(1998)。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所。
  67. 洪明洲(1999)。網路教學。台北:華彩軟體股份有限公司。
  68. 張春興、林清山(1990)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。
  69. 許成之(1997)。面對多元媒體遠距教學的衝激。隔空教育論叢,9,155-174。
  70. 陳年興、王敏煌(1997)。全球資訊網上教材製作輔助工具之研發。隔空教育論叢,9,77-103。
  71. 陳志樺(2002)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所。
  72. 黃貝玲(2001)。從線上學習的發展看企業線上訓練。eBusiness Executive Report,19,12-23。
  73. 黃富順(1984)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
  74. 榮泰生(2001)。創新擴散有助市場行銷。管理雜誌,322,118-120。
  75. 鄭慧娟(1995)。電腦網路隔空教學。隔空教育論叢,7,89-105。
被引用次数
  1. 陳儒晰(2013)。幼教人員對資訊科技接受態度之調查研究。教育心理學報,44(3),669-690。
  2. 廖紫柔、林薏昕、巫沛倉(2017)。同儕壓力、知覺風險、顧客滿意度之結構模式研究─以科技接受模式為中介變項。管理資訊計算,6(1),146-156。
  3. 蘇竑彰,陳德霖,邱德原,邱紹群(2022)。玩賞YouTube雙語標竿EMI課程教學之實踐。管理實務與理論研究,16(2),81-99。
  4. 汪志忠、王春榕(2014)。基層公務資訊系統使用接受與滿意度探討。中國行政評論,20(4),49-75。
  5. 余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。
  6. 鄭博文、趙正敏、馬志民(2016)。以整合性觀點探討護理人員對於混合式數位學習使用意向之研究。顧客滿意學刊,12(1),1-31。
  7. 鍾文鑑、胡凱傑、丘志文(2010)。以科技接受模式探討光纖寬頻網路使用者行為意向之影響因素。行銷評論,7(2),161-186。
  8. 莊雅如、呂謙、方彥博(2015)。智慧型手機軟體應用旅遊資訊搜尋、旅遊體驗、旅遊滿意度、行為意圖影響之研究─旅遊金門的遊客為例。休閒產業管理學刊,8(1),41-65。
  9. (2006)。認知型態與網路教學課程採用行爲意向之實證研究。教育與心理研究,29(4),687-717。