题名

公司治理與盈餘品質:公司治理評鑑級距的影響

并列篇名

Corporate Governance and Earnings Quality: The Influence of Corporate Governance Ranking Mechanisms

DOI

10.6295/TAMJ.201808_18(2).0002

作者

劉福運(Fu-Yun Liu);吳宗翰(Tsung-Han Wu);林岳喬(Yuah-Chiao Lin)

关键词

公司治理評鑑 ; 盈餘品質 ; 資訊揭露透明度 ; corporate governance ranking mechanisms ; earnings quality ; information disclosure transparency

期刊名称

台灣管理學刊

卷期/出版年月

18卷2期(2018 / 08 / 01)

页次

29 - 47

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討台灣證券交易所公布公司治理評鑑指標後,上市櫃公司是否因更加重視公司治理機制,使得公司財務報表品質提升。證交所於2014年開始實施第一屆公司治理評鑑,首次結果揭露三個級距;隨後,第二屆增加至四個級距,第三屆更增加為七個。據此,本研究檢視在揭露級距逐次增加下,公司更加重視其結果,公司是否會因此改善治理品質。實證結果顯示,於第二屆呈現負相關情形,即隨著揭露級距增加,公司治理品質有較為改善的現象。因此,增加公司治理評鑑結果的揭露,公司會對其結果更加重視,故而改善其公司治理品質,與研究預期相符。但第三屆僅呈現不顯著負相關,可能是受到公司強制設立審計委員會,而影響實證結果。

英文摘要

This study aims to explore whether the publicly traded company has increased the quality of its financial statements by paying more attention to corporate governance mechanisms after the corporate governance evaluation system implemented by Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE). In 2014, the first round, TWSE announced the first corporate governance evaluation results for the companies ranked into three interval of TWSE listed companies. In 2015, they announced the second corporate governance evaluation results into four interval. Starting from 2016, the rankings results for all listed companies were announced into seven interval. Accordingly, this study examined weather the gradually improve the ranking content of the evaluation system, the company would pay more attention to the results, then improve its quality of governance (to restrain the use of the absolute value of discretionary accruals). The empirical results show that based on the first round evaluation results, the function of corporate governance is insignificantly correlated with the absolute value of the discretionary accruals. Whereas based on the results in the second and third rounds, there are negative correlated between the function of corporate governance and the proxy of earnings quality. To sum up, it indicates that increasing the disclosure of corporate governance assessment results, the company gradually improve their implementation of corporate governance system.

主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Chen, C.-L.,Lin, P.-Y.(2015).Real earnings management and subsequent accounting performance: The moderating role of corporate governance.International Journal of Accounting Studies,61,1-36.
    連結:
  2. Huang, C.-H.,Lin, F.-Y.,Wu, S.-F.,Huang, J.-B.(2014).Is corporate governance effective in earnings management in Asian emerging markets?.Chiao Da Mangement Review,34(2),87-111.
    連結:
  3. Kao, L.-F.,Jhuang, S.-Y.(2016).Do rapid reversals of prior-quarter asset impairment recognition and the strength of corporate governance influence earnings quality?.Sun Yat-Sen Management Review,24(2),357-382.
    連結:
  4. 丁秀儀、黃勇達(2010)。資訊揭露程度與內涵對機構投資人持股的影響。證券市場發展季刊,22(3),39-74。
    連結:
  5. 王文聖、Imamah, N.、吳雅婷、洪榮華(2016)。股權結構與權益資金成本—以中國上市公司為例。證券市場發展季刊,28(2),71-105。
    連結:
  6. 王蘭芬、薛敏正、曾乾豪(2011)。資訊透明度的更動與盈餘管理間之關聯。會計審計論叢,1(1),101-131。
    連結:
  7. 林欣美、郭麗華、蘇迺惠(2008)。國際化程度、董事會結構、精練法人監督對盈餘管理之影響:以台灣資訊電子業為例。台大管理論叢,19(1),157-186。
    連結:
  8. 林美鳳、金成隆、林良楓(2009)。股權結構、會計保守性與信用評等關係之研究。台大管理論叢,20(1),289-329。
    連結:
  9. 胥愛琦、李春安、賴秀燕(2015)。好消息、壞消息與報酬動能效應—以台灣股市為例。應用經濟論叢,98,113-148。
    連結:
  10. 張瑞當、方俊儒(2006)。資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響。會計評論,42,1-22。
    連結:
  11. 許恩得、王敬皓(2012)。公司治理、供應商關係與盈餘品質。東海管理評論,14(1),179-205。
    連結:
  12. 陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬、李文智(2004)。應用Ohlson 會計評價模型探究公司治理之價值攸關性—以台灣上市公司電子業為例。台大管理論叢,15(2),123-141。
    連結:
  13. 陳瑞斌、翁慈青、朱全斌(2009)。揭露水準對於信用評等與負債資金成本之影響。財務金融學刊,17(2),71-110。
    連結:
  14. 廖益興、楊清溪(2007)。公司治理機制與財務報表品質之關聯性研究。財務金融學刊,15(3),67-110。
    連結:
  15. 鄭桂蕙、余俊憲、王蘭芬(2012)。內部控制缺失與應計品質—獨立董監之調節效果。東吳經濟商學學報,79,81-120。
    連結:
  16. 薛敏正、李雅琳(2007)。財務困難公司之資訊透明度研究。當代會計,8(2),113-153。
    連結:
  17. 薛敏正、邱彥毅、邱詩婷(2017)。公司治理評鑑與盈餘品質。會計審計論叢,7(2),57-83。
    連結:
  18. Ahmed, A. S.,Duellman, S.(2007).Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis.Journal of Accounting and Economics,43(2-3),411-437.
  19. Bédard, J.,Chtourou, S. M.,Courteau, L.(2004).The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,23(2),13-35.
  20. Botosan, C. A.,Plumlee, M. A.(2002).A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital.Journal of Accounting Research,40(1),21-40.
  21. Chow, C. W.,Wong-Boren, A.(1987).Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations.The Accounting Review,62(3),533-541.
  22. Das, S.,Zhang, H.(2003).Rounding-up in reported EPS, behavioral thresholds, and earnings management.Journal of Accounting and Economics,35(1),31-50.
  23. Dechow, P. M.,Sloan, R. G.,Sweeney, A. P.(1995).Detecting earnings management.The Accounting Review,70(2),193-225.
  24. DeFond, M. L.,Park, C. W.(1997).Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings.Journal of Accounting and Economics,23(2),115-139.
  25. DeFond, M. L.,Subramanyam, K. R.(1998).Auditor changes and discretionary accruals.Journal of Accounting and Economics,25(1),36-67.
  26. Eng, L. L.,Mak, Y. T.(2003).Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,22(4),325-345.
  27. Healy, P. M.,Palepu, K. G.(2001).Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.Journal of Accounting and Economics,31(1-3),405-440.
  28. Jo, H.,Kim, Y.(2007).Disclosure frequency and earnings management.Journal of Financial Economics,84(2),561-590.
  29. Jones, J. J.(1991).Earnings management during import relief investigations.Journal of Accounting Research,29(2),193-228.
  30. Kanagaretnam, K.,Lobo, G. J.,Mathieu, R.(2004).Earnings management to reduce earnings variability: Evidence from bank loan loss provisions.Review of Accounting and Finance,3(1),128-148.
  31. Kim, Y.,Park, M. S.,Wier, B.(2012).Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility?.The Accounting Review,87(3),761-796.
  32. Kothari, S. P.,Leone, A. J.,Wasley, C. E.(2005).Performance matched discretionary accrual measures.Journal of Accounting and Economics,39(1),163-197.
  33. La Porta, R.,Lopez-de-Silanes, F.,Shleifer, A.,Vishny, R.(2002).Investor protection and corporate valuation.The Journal of Finance,57(3),1147-1170.
  34. Schipper, K.(1989).Commentary on earnings management.Accounting Horizons,3(4),91-102.
  35. Singhvi, S. S.,Desai, H. B.(1971).An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure.The Accounting Review,46(1),129-138.
  36. Warfield, T. D.,Wild, J. J.,Wild, K. L.(1995).Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings.Journal of Accounting and Economics,20(1),61-91.
  37. Xie, B.,Davidson, W. N.,DaDalt, P. J.(2003).Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee.Journal of Corporate Finance,9(3),295-316.
  38. Zang, A. Y.(2012).Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management.The Accounting Review,87(2),675-703.
  39. 王瑄、杜榮瑞(2005)。企業資訊揭露之決定因素與效應(上)—資訊透明六種假說 一探自願揭露六大動機。會計研究月刊,237,64-67。
被引用次数
  1. 陳昭蓉,朱全斌(2022)。企業大陸投資盈餘匯回與公司價值:公司治理評鑑及機構投資人之影響。會計評論,75,81-135。
  2. 劉彥余,楊顓和,林宜勉(2023)。分析師及管理當局盈餘預測對股票流動性之影響:來自盈餘品質的證據。台灣管理學刊,23(1),1-23。
  3. 劉怡莉,呂瑞芳(2023)。公司治理評鑑機制對公司績效及關鍵查核事項揭露之影響:董事會政治連結的調節效果。會計審計論叢,13(1),123-171。
  4. (2024)。碳排放量、企業社會責任與公司治理對公司價值之影響。Journal of Data Analysis,19(1),15-49。