閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式之適配度研究

The Verification of A Writing Process Model-IntegratedReading and Composition

10.29882/JTNUE.200004.0001

陳鳳如(Feng-Ru Chen):郭生玉(Sheng-Yu Kuo)

閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式 ； 寫作者內部的讀者角色功能 ； 寫作者角色功能 ； 寫作情意反應 ； 寫作表現 ； A Writing Process Model-Integrated Reading and Composition ； reader-role function ； writer-role function ； affective reaction ； writing performance

師大學報：教育類

45卷1期（2000 / 04 / 01）

1 - 18

繁體中文

本研究的目的在建構閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式，並以實徵資料來驗證此一模式的適配度。在研究中，根據社會建構論的觀點及文獻的證據，提出一個涵蓋寫作者內部的讀者角色功能、寫作者角色功能、寫作情意反應和寫作表現等四個成份的歷程模式，並以國中二年級學生為觀察資料，經由LTSREL的統計套裝軟體進行分析。研究結果發現，本研究所提出的理論模式在整體適配度的考驗上，除易受樣本數影響的卡方考驗外，其餘各項指標都顯示本研究所提出的理論模式與觀察資料可以適配。在模式內在品質的評鑑方面，也顯示理論模式的內在品質尚稱理想。這些結果顯示，本研究所建構的閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式，可以用來解釋一般國中二年級學生的觀察資料，而且在這個模式中，變項之間結構關係的假定也大部分獲得支持。最後，研究者根據研究結果，提出幾項建議作為未來進一步研究的參考。

The purposes of this study was to verify the goodness of fit between empirically observed data and the ”Writing Process Model-Integrated Reading and Composition” proposed by the researcher.The researcher proposed the ”Writing Process Model-Integrated Reading and Composition” which included the components of ” reader-role function”, ”writer-role function”, affective reaction, and writing performance and verify the goodness of fit of the ”Writing Process Model-Integrated Reading and Composition”. The participants were 270 eighth-grade students from three junior high schools in Taipei. The instruments were used in this study which include Reading Experience Inventory, Reading Strategy Inventory” Reading Comprehension Test, Self Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory, Writing Strategy Inventory, Self-Awareness of Writing Strategy Inventory, Writing Affection Reaction Inventory, Writing Scale, and Creative Writing Scale. Data was analyzed by LISREL. The results indicated that the ”Writing Process Model-Integrated Reading and Composition” fitted the observed data well, either when overall or when internal structure model fit criteria was used.Based on the results, the researcher provided some suggestions and future studies.

1. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., Goetz, E. T.(1997).Frameworks for comprehending discourse.American Educational Research Journal,14,267 - 382.
2. Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., Albertson, L. R.(1996).Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence.Educational Psychology Review,8(3),239 - 298.
3. Frederiksen, C. H.(1975).Effects of context-induced processing operations on semantic information acquired from discourse.Cognitive Psychology,7,371 - 458.
4. Gordon, C.(1990).Changes in readers' and writers' metacognitive knowledge: Some observations.Reading Research and Instruction,30(1),1 - 14.
5. Graham, S., Harris, K. R.(1993).Self-regulated strategy development: Helping students with learning problems develop as writer.The Elementary School Journal,94(2),169 - 181.
6. Hayes, J. R., Flower, L. S.(1980).Identifying the organization of writing processes.Cognitive processes in writing
7. Juel, C.(1988).Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology,80(4),437 - 447.
8. Kaufer, D. S., Geisler, C.(1989).Novelty in academic writing.Writing Communication,6,296 - 311.
9. Murray, D. M.(1985).A writer teach writing.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
10. Newkirk, T.(1995).The writing conference as performance.Research in the Teaching of English,29(2),193 - 215.
11. Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J.(1994).Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension.Research in the Teaching of English,28(3),313 - 331.
12. Perl, S.(1979).The composing process of unskilled college writers.Research in the Teaching of English,13,317 - 336.
13. Roth, R. G.(1987).The evolving audience: Alternatives to audience a accommodation.College Composition and Communication,38,47 - 55.
14. Spivey, N. N.(1995).Written discourse: A constructivist perspective.Constructivism in education,313 - 329.
15. Spivey, N. N.(1990).Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing.Written Communication,7,256 - 287.
16. Spivey, N. N.(1987).Construing constructivism: reading research in the United States.Poetics,16,169 - 192.
17. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
18. Witte, S. P.(1985).Revising, composing theory, and research design.The acquisition of written language,250 - 284.
19. 王萬清 Wang, Wan-Ching(1992)。寫作教學初學者之教學內容知識結構及其改變歷程研究。
20. 張景媛 Chang, Ching-Yuan(1994)。國中生數學學習歷程統整模式的驗證與應用：學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字題教學策略的研究。
21. 陳正昌 Chen, Cheng-Chang、 程炳林 Cherng, Biing-Lin(1994)。SPSS、SAS、BMOP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
22. 程炳林 Cherng, Biing-Lin(1995)。自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。

1. 蔡家姍、黃筱雯(2004)。國中學生語言能力、閱讀理解能力及寫作表現三者之關係研究：以桃園縣爲例。教育科學期刊，4(2)，118-160。
2. 曾世杰、陳淑麗、林慧敏(2018)。以讀寫合一課程提昇五年級偏鄉地區學生的寫作能力。教育研究與發展期刊，14(4)，71-100。
3. 陳鳳如(2007)。寫作者的讀者覺察能力分析及其影響效果之研究。教育心理學報，38(3)，291-310。
4. 陳鳳如(2013)。自我詢問檢核策略的介入對讀者覺察能力的實驗效果。新竹教育大學教育學報，30(1)，39-69。
5. 廖本裕(2010)。寫作歷程模式數位教學平臺之設計與實施成效之研究。教育學刊，34，109-141。
6. 葉辰楨、張惠博、張文華、林雅慧(2010)。錨定寫作教學對不同教師互動知覺學生的科學學習影響之研究。科學教育學刊，18(6)，493-519。
7. 張麗娟(2022)。投資理財課程融入心智繪圖教學活動設計之研究。國立虎尾科技大學學報，36(4)，97-118。