「開放」之後，九年一貫課程中教科書的再建構：以社會學習領域為例

The Reconstruction of Textbooks in the Nine-year Articulated Curriculum after Textbook Release: Reconstructing Social Studies Textbooks as Example

10.29882/JTNUE.200010.0002

黃譯瑩(Yi-Ying Huang)

九年一貫課程 ； 社會學習領域 ； 教科書再建構 ； 教科書開放 ； 統整課程模式 ； the nine-year articulated curriculum ； social studies ； textbook reconstruction ； textbook release ； models of integrated curriculum

師大學報：教育類

45卷2期（2000 / 10 / 01）

17 - 36

繁體中文

臺灣教育系統中國民中小學教師的教學與學生的學習過度依賴教科書是不爭的事實，這種對教科書依賴的現象，提醒著教育工作者在推動課程革新理想之際、一定要同步革新建構教科書的典範，使教師與學生對教科書的這種依賴反而成為一種革新教育的力量；雖然教育部己於民國八十五年宣告開放民騙，教科書的設計與使用觀念仍未見相對地更新、多元化的理想未能落實。本文目的即在探究教科書開放民編之後，教科書再建構之必要性與各種可能性，並以九年一貫課程中社會學習領域為例，發展各種教科書編輯模式與建構策略。首先，討論教科書開放民騙的意義與運作狀說，以及教科書在教育系統中的角色；其次，分析學習領域課程綱要之架構與內涵，以作為教科書教材選擇的依據；復次，以課程統整原則與統整課程模式為基礎，發展學習領域統整模式；接著以前述統整模式為參考架構，提出學習領域教科書的各種可能編輯模式、以及建構不同模式教科書時之共同策略；最後，提出教科書再建構之未來展望。

It is admitted that teachers and students in the elementary and middle school have been overdepending on textbooks while teaching and learning. This phenomenon reminds educators of renewing the paradigm of textbook construction so that such overdependence can be transferred into a power for facilitating educational changes. Although the textbook policy was released in 1996, the theory and practice of textbook design and usage however have not been relatively reconstructed. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to probe the necessity and possibility of textbook reconstruction from the textbook release viewpoint, and reconstruct social studies textbooks as example. First, discussed are the meaning and current situation of textbook release, and the role of textbooks in the educational system. Second, the structure and content of social studies in the nine-year articulated curriculum is analyzed so as to decide the domain for choosing textbook materials. Third, constructed are four interconnected models of integrated curriculum, applied as the theoretical framework for developing the social studies textbook model. Fourthly, presented are four textbook models for social studies, and then ten strategies for textbook reconstruction. Finally, the prospect of textbook reconstruction is claimed.

1. 黃譯瑩 Huang, Yi-Ying(2000)。教育實習典範之探究：實務理論的觀點。課程與教學，3(1)，95 - 112。
   連結：
2. Armstrong, T.(1994).Multiple intelligences in the classroom.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Ball, D. L., Feiman-Nemser, S.(1988).Using textbooks and teachers' guide: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators.Curriculum Inquiry,18(4),401 - 423.
4. Bernstein, B.(1971).On the classification and framing of educational knowledge.Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education,47 - 69.
5. Briggs, J., Peat, F. D.(1984).Looking glass universe: The emerging science of wholeness.New York, NY:Simon and Schuster.
6. Briggs, J., Peat, F. D.(1989).Turbulent mirror: An illustrated guide to chaos theory and the science of wholeness.New York, NY:Harper Collins.
7. Brooks, D. A.(1942).The concept of integration.Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania.
8. Bruner, J. S.(1960).The Process of Education.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
9. Caine, R. N., Caine, G.(1991).Making connections: Teaching and the human brain.Alexandria, Virginia:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10. Chambers, J. H.(1989).The achievement of education.New York, NY:Harper and Row.
11. Doll, W. E., Jr.(1986).Prigogine: A new sense of order, a new curriculum.Theory Into Practice,25,10 - 16.
12. Doll, W. E., Jr.(1989).Foundations for a post-modern curriculum.Journal of Curriculum Studies,21,243 - 253.
13. Drake, S. M.(1993).Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Eisner, E. W.(1985).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs.New York:Macmillan.
15. English, R.(1980).The politics of textbook adoption.Phi Delta Kappan,64(4),275 - 278.
16. Frymier, J. R., Davis, D. L., Clinefelter, D.(1977).Curriculum materials used by eleven-year-old pupils.Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association
17. Gagne, R. M.(1964).The implications of instructional objectives for learning.Defining educational objectives
18. Good, C. V.(1973).Dictionary of education.New York:McGraw-Hill.
19. Gwynn, J. M., Chase, J. B., Jr.(1969).Curriculum principles and social trends.New York, NY:Macmillan.
20. Harris, P.(1937).Philosophical aspects of integration.Integration: Its meaning and application
21. Hartly, J.(1978).Designing instructional text.New York:Nichols.
22. Hirst, P. H.(1974).Knowledge and the Curriculum: A Collection of Philosophical Papers.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
23. Hopkins, L. T.(1937).Integration: Its meaning and application.New York, NY:D. Appleton-Century Company, Inc..
24. Jacobs, H. H.(1989).Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
25. Jantsch, E.(1980).The Self-organization Universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution.Oxford:Pergamon Press.
26. Levit, M.(1971).Interdisciplinary education and understanding the disciplines.Curriculum
27. McCutcheon, G.(1982).Textbook used in a central Ohio elementary school.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
28. McCutcheon, G.(1995).Developing the curriculum: Solo and group deliberation.New York, NY:Longman.
29. Miller, J. P., Cassie, J. R. B., Drake, S. M.(1990).Holistic learning: A teacher's guide to integrated studies.Ontario:The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
30. Pagels, H. R.(1982).The cosmic code: Quantum physics as the language of nature.New York, NY:Simon and Schuster.
31. Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.(1984).Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature.New York, NY:Bantam Books.
32. Talmage, H.(1972).The textbook as arbiter of curriculum and instruction.The Elementary School Journal,73(1),20 - 25.
33. Watson, G.(1937).The psychological evidence for integration.Integration: Its meaning and application
34. 張秀雄 Chang, Hsiu-Hsiung(2000)。國民中學「公民科」現況之探討。翰林文教雜誌，7，23 - 29。
35. 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。臺北:教育部。
36. 陳伯璋 Chen, Po-Chang(1985)。潛在課程研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
37. 黃政傑 Hwang, Jenq-Jye(1994)。課程設計。臺北:東華書局。
38. 黃炳煌 Huang, Ping-Huang、 詹志禹 Chan, Jason Chih-Yu、 王大修 、 丁志仁 Ting, Chih-Jen、 鄧國雄 Teng, Kou-Hsiung、 彭明輝 Pang, Ming-Fui、 周愫嫻 Jou, Su-Syan、 林杏慶 、 陳麗華 Chen, Li-Hua、 黃譯瑩 Huang, Yi-Ying、 高新建 Gau, Shin-Jiann(1999)。九年一貫社會學習領域課程綱要研究報告。教育部。
39. 黃譯瑩 Huang, Yi-Ying(1999)。九年一貫課程中課程統整相關問題探究。教育研究資訊，60 - 81
40. 黃譯瑩 Huang, Yi-Ying(1997)。教科書開放後的省思：開放的圖像與願景。研習資訊，14(3)，14 - 24。
41. 黃譯瑩 Huang, Yi-Ying(1998)。課程統整之意義探究與模式建構。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，8(4)，616 - 633。
42. 黃譯瑩 Huang, Yi-Ying、 湯梅英 Tang, Mei-Ying、 丁志仁 Ting, Chih-Jen(2000)。九年一貫綜合活動學習領域教科書審查基準研究。教育部。
43. 歐用生 Ou, Yung-Sheng(1994)。課程發展的基本原理。高雄，臺灣:復文圖書出版社。
44. 歐用生 Ou, Yung-Sheng(1997)。從教師專業自主談教科書開放。政策月刊，26，8 - 9。

1. 郭丁熒(2012)。不同版本國小國語教科書中學生角色之比較─以民國 80 與 90 年代為例。教科書研究，5(2)，73-101。
2. 黃譯瑩(2003)。統整課程及其「系統分形模式」之再認識：尋找另一條認識的出路。科學教育學刊，11(2)，211-234。
3. 黃政傑(2013)。課程轉化整合探究之概念架構研析。課程與教學，16(3)，1-30。
4. 楊國揚、陳麗華、張芬芬(2010)。臺灣九年一貫課程轉化之議題與因應。教科書研究，3(1)，1-40。
5. (2002)。九年一貫課程實施後國語文第一冊 教科書識字教材之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報，33，345-378。
6. (2004)。國民中小學教科書適性化編輯出版之探討。國立編譯館館刊，32(4)，27-38。
7. (2004)。九年一貫社會領域教科書比較研究－以國中一年級為例－。中學教育學報，11，179-208。