國民中學學校行政瘋狂行為的成因與影響之路徑分析

A Path Analysis of the Causes and Effects of Madness at the Administrative Level in Taiwan's Junior High Schools

10.29882/JTNUE.200210.0004

黃乃熒(Nai-Ying Whang)；陳麗霞(Li-Shy Chen)

學校行政 ； 瘋狂行為 ； 線性結構模式 ； 路徑分析 ； school administration ； madness ； linear structural model ； path analysis

師大學報：教育類

47卷2期（2002 / 10 / 01）

175 - 202

繁體中文

本文旨在探索國民中學學校行政瘋狂行為成因及影響的路路徑分析。學校行政瘋狂行為，係指人們超越文化慣例，且失控、脫序的行為。學校行政瘋張行為起因於學校行政結機關係的不合理。通常學校行政結構包括開放型及封閉型，並經由衝突而產生，包括心理、社會及生理衝突，最後對於學校行政目標產生影響，包括效率、效能、創意性及正當性。這樣的關係及影響流程會構成學校行政瘋狂行為解釋的模式。因此討論學校行政瘋狂行為的成因及影響，益形重要。為達此目的，本研究主要採用調查研究法蒐集資料，並在全臺灣地區718所國民中學中，以分層隨機抽取101所學校為樣本。共寄出1306份問卷，有效回收問卷為985份，有效回收率為75.42％。同時，本研究採用線性結構模式進行統計處理，並根據結果，提出結論與建議。

This study presents a path analysis of the causes and effects of madness in junior high school administrations in Taiwan. Here ”madness” is defined as uncontrolled or ”out-of-order” behavior, behavior which transgresses and produced through psychological, social and physical conflicts. Eventually, madness influences the specific goals of a school administration, and more generally its effectiveness, efficiency, legitimacy, and creativity. These four categories then provide a theoretical basis for determining the degree of madness in junior high school administrations. In order to improved administrations, the degree of madness (or distortion or limitation within these four categories) must be measured. Therefore this study uses the questionnaire method to collect data, choosing 101 out of 718 junior high schools, through a stratified random sampling approach, as samples; of 1036 questionnaires sen4t out, 985 completed ones were obtained and studied. The Linear Structural Model was then used to test the theoretical basis of madness in Taiwan’s junior high school administrations.

1. 黃乃熒 Whang, Nai-Ying(2001)。學校行政瘋狂行為實際之探究－以國民中學為例。教育研究集刊，47，215 - 251。
   連結：
2. (1986).Webster's Third International Dictionary.Springfield, MA:Merriam-Webster INC..
3. Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411 - 423.
4. Berger, P., Luckmann, T.(1967).The reality of social construction: Treatise in sociology of knowledge.Garden City, NY:Anchor.
5. Blanke, V.(1993).Doctor core I: Understanding organizations.Columbus, OH:The Ohio State University.
6. Capper, C. A.(1998).Critically oriented and post-modern perspectives: Sorting out the differences and applications for practice.Educational Administration Quarterly,34(3),354 - 379.
7. Caputo, J., Yount, M.(1993).Institutions, normalization, and power.Foucault and the critique of institutions,1 - 15.
8. Daft, R.(1989).Organizational theory and design.San Francisco:Sage.
9. Derrida, J.(1978).Writing and difference.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
10. Dimmock, G., Walker, A.(2000).Globalization, societal culture and effective school reform.
11. Edelstein, M.(1983).Kristeva's politics of change: Tracking essentialism with the help of a sex/ gender map.Ethics, politics, and difference in Julia Kristeva writing,196 - 214.
12. Fay, B.(1987).Critical social science: Liberation and its limits.NY:Cornell University Press.
13. Foucault, M.(1979).Madness and civilization.London:Tavistock.
14. Foucault, M.(1990).The will to truth.NY:Routledge.
15. Foucault, M.(1980).Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977.New York, NY:Pantheon Books Press.
16. Gutting, G.(1989).Michel Foucault's: Archaeology of scientific reason.NY:Cambridge University Press.
17. Hatcher, L.(1994).A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling.Cary, NC:SAS Institute Inc..
18. Hofstede, G. H.(1991).Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.London:McGraw-Hill.
19. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., Brett, J. M.(1982).Causal analysis.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publication.
20. Joreskog, K. G., Sorbom, D.(1989).LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications.Chicago:SPSS INC..
21. Kinloch, G. C.(1981).Ideology and contemporary sociological theory.Englewood, NJ:Prentice-Hill.
22. Kristeva, J.(1984).Revolution in poetic language.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
23. Lindblom, C. E.(1990).Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand ＆ shape society.New York, NY:Yale University Press.
24. Luhmann, N.(1990).Essays on self-reference.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
25. Morgan, G. H.(1986).Images of organization.Newbury Park:Sage Publication.
26. Oliver, K.(1983).Introduction: Julia Kristeva's outlaw ethics.Ethics, politics, and difference in Julia Kristeva writing,1 - 22.
27. Schein, E. H.(1985).Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
28. Sheridan, A.(1980).Michel Foucault: The will to truth.NY:Routledge.
29. Wheatley, M. J.(1994).Leadership and the new science.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
30. 毛榮富(1992)。傅科－勾勒權力／知識之譜系的雕手。當代社會思想巨擘－當代社會思想家，158 - 187。
31. 行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書摘要。臺北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。

1. 葉欣誠、陳孟毓、于蕙清(2017)。我國民眾減緩全球暖化之願付價值與影響因素分析。都市與計劃，44(4)，339-374。