經濟認知與經濟參與相關性之調查－以北區商業類技職學生為例

A Study of the Relationship between Economic Literacy and Economic Participation: College of Business Students in Northern Taiwan

10.29882/JTNUE.200504.0006

曾永清(Yung-Ching Tseng)

經濟認知 ； 經濟參與 ； 商業技職院校 ； economic literacy ； economic participation ； College of Business

師大學報：教育類

50卷1期（2005 / 04 / 01）

123 - 138

繁體中文

技職院校係以培育學生兼具分析與實務技能結合之專才為教育目標，經濟教育於此扮演良好角色。經濟學為商學類科之基礎課程，加強其教學方法，將有助於相關理論延續及經濟現況分析運用。經濟參與是公民參與重要的一環，培養學生對經濟事務之參與和關心時事的主動積極態度，亦正是經濟教育之主要目標。國內並無技職學生經濟認知與經濟參與相關研究，本文嘗試設計調查表，取得兩部分資料，以多變量方法分析其間關係，觀察經濟認知與參與間有否具有統計顯著相關。結果顯示性別、學習興趣高低不同學生群中對經濟認知產生顯著差異，雙親職業狀況與教育程度間，則無顯著差異，學生經濟認知能力與其對經濟參與間無典型相關。

The purpose of a College of Business is to enable students with analytic and practical skills to play an important role in their nation's economy. Economics is the foundation of the curriculum in every Commercial subject, yet little research has been conducted on the relationship between ”economic literacy” (students' basic understanding of economics, of the whole economic system) and the participation of students in Commercial courses. In fact such economic literary depends on students active ”economic participation” (participation in their country's economy), itself an important part of citizenship. Thus training Commercial students to actively (even aggressively) participate in and (therefore) be vitally concerned about current business and economic affairs in their society should also be an important goal of economic education. Setting out to explore how such a teaching method for Business or Commercial courses might be further developed and improved, this study examined the relationship between Commercial students' family backgrounds, gender and degree of economic participation on the one hand and their ”economic literacy” on the other. A survey was used to collect data, which were then analyzed via a multivariate method. The findings were as follows: there is a significant correlation between economic literacy score and both gender (males scoring higher) and learning interest, but no significant correlation between this score and parental social status and education level; furthermore, no canonical correlation between this score and the degree of their economic participation.

1. 林麗婷(2001)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育所。
   連結：
2. 黃美筠(2002)。國三學生對公民與道德經濟教材認知成效之評估。公民訓育學報，12，59-108。
   連結：
3. 鄭慧蘭(2002)。高中生公民參與態度與行為之研究。公民訓育學報，11，233-250。
   連結：
4. Aigner, D.,Thum, F.(1986).On student evaluation of teaching ability.Journal of Economic Education,17(4),243-265.
5. Baumol, W.,Highsmith, R.(1988).Variables affecting success in economic education: preliminary findings from a new data base.American Economic Review,78(2),257-262.
6. Becker, W. E.(2000).Teaching economics in the 21st century.Journal of Economic Perspective,14(1),109-119.
7. Becker, W.,Greene, W.,Rosen, S.(1990).Research on high school economic education.American Economic Review,80(2),14-22.
8. Becker, W.,Watts, M.(2001).Teaching economics at the start of the 21st century.American Economic Review,91(2),446-451.
9. Becker, W.,Watts, M.(1995).Teaching methods in undergraduate economics.Economic Inquiry,33(14),692-700.
10. Chizmar J. F.,McCarney B. J.,Halinski R. S.,Racich M. J.(1985).Give and take, economics achievement, and basic skills development.Journal of Economic Education,16(2),99-110.
11. Colander, D.(2000).New millennium economics.Journal of Economic Perspective,14(1),121-132.
12. Gibbs, J. D.(1985).Georgia,University of Georgia.
13. Greene, B.(1997).Verbal abilities, gender, and the introductory economics course.Journal of Economic Education,28(1),13-30.
14. Hirschfeld, M.,Moore, R. L.,Brown, E.(1995).Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics.Journal of Economic Education,26(1),3-14.
15. Jameson Boex, L. F.(2000).Attributes of effective economics instructors.Journal of Economic Education,31(3),211-228.
16. Mankiw, N. G.(1998).Principles of economics.Fort Worth:The Dryden Press.
17. Miller, S.(1991).In W. Walstsd ＆ J. Soper (Eds.), Effective economic education in the schools.Washington D.C.:NEA.
18. Salemi, M.,Siegfried J.,Sosin, K.,Walstad, W.,Watts, M.(2001).Research on economic education.American Economic Review,91(2),440-445.
19. Salemi, M.,Siegfried, J.(1999).The state of economic education.American Economic Review,89(2),355-361.
20. Saunders, P.(1980).The lasting effects of introductory economics courses.Journal of Economic Education,12(1),1-14.
21. Stigler, G.(1970).The case, if any, for economic education.Journal of Economic Education,1(1),77-84.
22. Stock, P. A.(1995).Ohio,Ohio University.
23. Tobin, J.(1986).Economic literacy isn't marginal investment.Wall street journal
24. Tumrong, U.(1984).Oregon,Oregon StateUniversity.
25. Walstad, W. B.,Rebeck, K.(2001).Assessing the economic understanding of U.S. high school students.American Economic Review,91(2),452-457.
26. Walstad, W.,Soper, J.(1988).A report card on the economic literacy of U.S high school students.American Economic Review,78(2),251-256.
27. Watts M.,Lynch, G. J.(1989).The principles course revisited.American Economic Review,79(2),236-241.
28. Watts, M. S.(1987).Student gender and school district difference affecting the stock and flow of economic knowledge.Review of Economics and Statistics,69(3),225-237.
29. 方詠菁(2000)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育所。
30. 王若文(1992)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育所。
31. 江家慧(2003)。台北市，國立政治大學公共行政所。
32. 余宗義(2001)。花蓮，花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所。
33. 周秋潔(2000)。台北，淡江大學教育科技學系。
34. 許文傑(2000)。「公民參與」的理論論述與「公民性政府」的形成。公共行政學報，4，65-97。
35. 黃美筠(2000)。臺灣地區公立高中三年級學生經濟認知之評量。公民訓育學報，9，129-160。
36. 黃美筠(1993)。國立臺灣師範大學大一新生經濟認知之研究。公民訓育學報，3，217-262。
37. 黃劍華(1999)。臺北地區國民小學高年級學生經濟知識之評量。公民訓育學報，8，311-341。
38. 楊志賢(2000)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育所。
39. 廖添富、劉美慧、董秀蘭(1998)。我國師範院校學生「公民參與態度」與「公民教育觀點」相關性之研究。公民訓育學報，7，1-26。
40. 蔣崇禮(2003)。台北市，銘傳大學公共管理與社區發展所。
41. 蔡欣穎(2000)。屏東，屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。
42. 蕭碧惠(2000)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育所。
43. 賴佩伶(1998)。彰化，彰化師範大學商業教育系。
44. 鍾聖校(1990)。認知心理學。臺北市:心理。

1. 林方婷(2017)。資訊融入團隊導向學習高職經濟學課程學習成效與學習動機研究。淡江大學教育科技學系數位學習碩士在職專班學位論文。2017。1-160。