建構環境藝術教育課程設計與實施之行動研究

Action Research for Art Educational Curriculum of Built Environment

10.29882/JTNUE.200504.0003

廖敦如(Tun-Ju Liao)

行動研究 ； 統整課程 ； 藝術教育 ； 建構環境藝術教育 ； action research ； integrated curriculum ； art education ； built environment art education

師大學報：教育類

50卷1期（2005 / 04 / 01）

53 - 78

繁體中文

長久以來學校教育往往過度依賴視廳器材，來引介教室外所發生之事，卻很少帶領學生，直接去經驗環境週遭的事物，因而許多藝術教育學者紛紛主張，藝術教育課程必需更積極推動社區參與，來反應學生對社會意義的關心和自我意識的表現；也因此本文研究目的在於透過「行動研究」來研擬：（1）「建構環境」的藝術教育課程；（2）以社區環境資源為媒介來進行教學之可行性；（3）進一步省思「建構環境」藝術課程未來實施的取向；據此目的，研究者挑選學校附近具有歷史及文化意涵的四個場域，分別以藝術為主軸的統整方式進行教學，其研究過程為：「產生問題」、「研擬可行方案」、「修正後再規劃」、「採取實施方案」、「評鑑與回饋」、「公開結果」等等。此課程長達一學期，其中需不斷地檢討與反省，並與校內、外專業人士協同教學，才能逐步修正與完成教學。故本研究的心得為：（1）本研究是藉由文獻資料、教學場域評估、學校團隊支援，而逐一發展「建構環境」的藝術課程；（2）抽取社區環境中相關歷史、人文、生態等資源，可以設計多元性及廣泛性的藝術課程；（3）藉由教師教學資料和學生學習過程的綜合分析，可以省思「建構環境」藝術課程，未來實施的取向；據此並進一步提出的研究檢討為：教學者不斷進修有助於提升教學內容；學校團隊的支持有助於課程的推展；社區資源的融入有助於藝術教學的延展。

The purpose of this study, through action research, aims to design an integrated curriculum of ”built environment” for art education and to understand how this curriculum is implemented. According to Laurie E. Hicks & Roger J. H. King, Ginny W. Graves, Anne Taylor, and Eileen Adams, ”built environment” is a society-made phenomenon and a conscious organization of physical elements intended to provide protection, social integration and aesthetic pleasure. Meanwhile, ”built environment art education” is interdisciplinary, including art and aesthetics, design, history, ecology, and philosophy, and art educators should teach designed environment as an expression of social meaning. Four areas around a primary school with historical and cultural significance are selected for this study. The researching process, lasting for a semester, includes generating problems, proposing possible projects, amending and implementing these projects, evaluating as well as revealing results, etc. Results of this study are as the followings: 1) An art educational curriculum of built environment can be developed gradually through analysis of documents, evaluations of teaching subjects, and supports from school teams. 2) It also can be designed by making use of community art resources and professionals as mediums to further discover its strength and weakness. 3) The propriety of implementing art educational curriculums of built environment in the future is positively concerned after analyzing overall teaching data and students' learning process. Based on these results, the researcher concludes that the teachers' proficiency, supports from school teams, and integrating community resources are all necessary and important in developing art curriculum of build environment.

1. Adams, E.(1999).n J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler(Eds.), Built environment education in art educatio.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
2. Avery, H. H.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler(Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
3. Ballengee-Morris, C.,Stuhr, P.(2001).Art Education.
4. Blandy D.(1999).Universal design in art education: Principles, pedagogical implications, and resources.In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education,220-227.
5. Center for Understanding the Built Environment (CUBE)(1994).An evaluation of built environment in the curriculum, (July 1994, Technical Bulletin No. 94-4).Prairie Village, KS:Graves.
6. Clark, E.(1986).Option learning: The integrative education model to the classroom.Columbus:Option learning: The integrative education model to the classroom.
7. Clark, G.,Zimmerman, E.(1997).Project arts: Programs for ethnically diverse, economically disadvantaged, high ability, visual arts students in rural communities.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University.
8. Drake, S(1993).Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9. Efland, A.(2002).Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum.New York:Teachers College Press.
10. Efland, A. D.(1995).The spiral and the lattice.Studies in Art Education,36(3),134-153.
11. Francis, B. A.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
12. Gaudelius, Y.,Guinan, L. K.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
13. Graves, G.W.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler(Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
14. Guilfoil, J. K.(1986).Techniques for art education in architectural design research and evaluation.The Journal of Art Education,39(2),10-12.
15. Guinan, K. L.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
16. Hayden, D.(1995).The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
17. Hicks, L. E.,King, R. J. H.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler(Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
18. Jocobs, H. H.(1989).Interdisciplnary curriculum: Design and implementation.Alexandria, VA:ASCD.
19. Katter, E.(1995).Multicultural connections, craft and community.Art Education,49(1),9-13.
20. Klein, S.(1992).Social action and art education.Journal of Multicultural and Crosscultural Research in Art Education,10(11),111-125.
21. Lefebvre, H.(1991).The production of space.Oxford:B. Blackwell.
22. London, P.(1994).Step outside: Community-based art education.Portsmouth, NJ:Heinemann.
23. MacDonald, S.(1995).The outing of school art.In SEA News,2(2),20-23.
24. Marschalek, D.(1989).A new approach to curriculum development in environmental design.Art Education,42(4),8-17.
25. McFee, J. K.(1998).In J. K. McFee (Ed.), Cultural diversity and the structure and practice of art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
26. McFee, J. K.,Degge, R.(1977).Art, culture and environment: A catalyst for teaching.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company.
27. Morris, C. B.(1998).Cultural ecology.Art Education,51(3),14-19.
28. Naperud, R.(1995).In R. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education.New York:Teachers College Press.
29. Parsons, M. J.(2002).Unpublished manuscript, Columbus, OH.Columbus, OH:
30. Sobel, D.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
31. Stuhr, P. L(2002).Unpublished manuscript, Columbus, OH..Columbus, OH:
32. Susi, F. D.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
33. Taylor, A.(1999).In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler (Eds.), Built environment education in art education.Reston, VA:National Art Education Association.
34. Walker, S. R.(2001).Teaching meaning in artmaking.Worcester, Mass:Davis Publications.
35. Walling, D. R.(2000).Rethinking how art is taught: A critical convergence.Thousand Oaks, Calif:Corwin Press.
36. Wilson, B.(1997).The quiet evolution: Changing the face of arts education.Los Angeles:Getty Education Institute for The Arts press.
37. 王昭湄(2001)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。
38. 周儒、張子超、黃淑芬譯(2003)。環境教育課程規劃。台北:五南圖書。
39. 邱鴻麟(2002)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。
40. 夏林清等譯(1997)。行動研究方法導論。台北:遠流圖書。
41. 張美智(2003)。新竹市，國立新竹師範學院美勞教育研究所。
42. 陳瓊花(1998)。試探愛麗克森設計之課程範例。美育，95，35-44。
43. 黃政傑(1997)。課程設計。台北:東華大學。
44. 黃雅雷(2000)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。
45. 黃薇樺(1998)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所。
46. 甄曉蘭(2003)。課程行動研究:實例與方法解析。台北:師大書苑。
47. 蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北:五南圖書。

1. 陳育祥(2017)。高中美術教師戶外教育議題融入課程之探究。藝術教育研究，34，33-64。
2. 韓豐年、曾絲宜、徐昊杲(2013)。臺灣與法國藝術學院藝術教育對學生環境行為影響之比較。藝術教育研究，26，83-120。
3. 廖敦如(2009)。建構社區文化圖像之藝術行動課程：「行動學習」導向在大學通識藝術教育上的應用。教育科學研究期刊，54(2)，163-193。