不同類別評量者對國小校長領導能力知覺評量之比較

A Comparison of the Assessments of Elementary School Principals' Leadership Competence by Different Types of Evaluators

10.29882/JTNUE.200812.0001

葉連祺(Lain-Chyi Yeh)

校長領導能力 ； 校長學 ； 國民小學 ； principal leadership competence ； principalship ； elementary school

師大學報：教育類

53卷3期（2008 / 12 / 01）

1 - 28

繁體中文

校長領導能力決定領導成效，過去校長領導能力研究多採校長自評分數，有主觀之譏，如由其他學校教育人員評量有無差異，則待探討。本研究探討不同類別評量者對國小校長領導能力知覺評量的影響，以自編、具良好信、效度的校長領導能力量表，調查台灣地區122所366位國小校長、主任和教師對校長領導能力的知覺，自差異、差距和相關角度探討影響效果。結果發現評量者評量知覺有差異，三類人員對應然和實然層面校長領導能力不論向度或項目的知覺評量均見顯著差異，知覺結構模式亦不均等，綜合能力項目部分有顯著差異，向度部分則無，顯然評量知覺差異現象因能力計量方式而異；比較應然和實然層面評量結果可見知覺落差現象，應然知覺明顯高於實然表現知覺。

A principal's leadership competence influences his/her leadership effectiveness. In past studies, measurements of principals' leadership competence (PLC) based on their own self-assessment were criticized as being too subjective. The study explored what influential effects about elementary principal's leadership competence had made by different types of evaluators. One self-made scale with good reliability and validity was used to survey the perceptions of PLC of 366 principals, official directors and teachers in 122 elementary schools in Taiwan. It studied the influential effects with the views of difference, discrepancy and correlation. The findings indicated that perceptual gap in evaluators existed. Principals, other school officials and teachers had significantly different perceptions and perceptual structural models with regard to some dimensions and items in the ”ought to do” and ”had done” domains. But the only significant difference concerned items in the ”synthetic competence” dimension. This showed that the different methods of scoring PLC caused the perceptual difference among evaluators. Furthermore, a perceptual gap existed between the ”ought to do” and ”had done” domains, for the perceptions of ”ought to do” were significantly more positive than those of ”had done.”

1. Bergman, A. B.(1998)。A survival kit for the elementary school principal: With reproducible forms, checklists & letters。San Francisco:John Wiley。
2. Blaydes, J.(2004)。Survival skills for the principalship: A treasure chest of time-savers, short-cuts, and strategies to help you keep a balance in your life。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。
3. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),232-255.
4. Daft, R. L.(2002).The leadership experience.Orlando, FL:Harcourt College.
5. Daresh, J. C.(2006).Beginning the principalship: A practical guide for new school leaders.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
6. Drake, J. M.,Miller, B. P.(1982).Determining the competencies: The expanding role of the principal in the 1980s.NASSP Bulletin,66(456),18-26.
7. Guggenheimer, P.,Szulc, M. D.(1998).Understanding leadership competencies: Creating tomorrow`s leaders today.Menlo Park, CA:Crisp.
8. Hair. J. F.,Black, B.,Babin, B.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2005).Multivariate data analysis with readings.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
9. Harris, S.,Lowery, S.(2003).Standards-based leadership: A case study book for the principalship.Lanham, MA:Scarecrow Education.
10. Holman, L. J.(1997).How to select a good assistant principal.Principal,76(5),26-27.
11. Jirasinghe, D.,Lyons, G.(1996).The competent head: A job analysis of heads` tasks and personality factors.London:Falmer Press.
12. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:SPSS.
13. Lambert, L.(1995).Building leadership capacity in schools.Alexandria, VI:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Lau, R.(1996).Applying the principles of the assessment center in the selection process of senior administrators in education.District, CA:Compton Community Coll.
15. Lei, M.,Lomax, R. G.(2005).The effect on varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling,12(1),1-27.
16. Maxwell, J. C.(1999).The 21 indispensable qualities of a leader: Becoming the person others will want to follow.Nashville, TE:Thomas Nelson.
17. McCleary, L. E.(1975).Assessing competency needs in administration.Bozeman, MT:National Council for Professors of Educational Administration.
18. Ponder, R. D.(2001).The leader`s guide: 15 essential skills.Central Point, OR:The Oasis Press.
19. Sergivonnai, T. J.(1999).Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles.Arlington Heights, IL:SkyLight Training.
20. Sergivonnai, T. J.(2001).The principalship: A reflective practice perspective.Boston:Pearson Education.
21. Spencer, L. M.,Spencer, S. M.(1993).Competence at work: Models for superior performance.New York:John Wiley.
22. Trotter, A.,Ellison, L.,B. Davies,L. Ellison (Eds.)(1997).School leadership for the 21st century: A competency and knowledge approach.New York:Routledge.
23. Wehmeier, S.(2000).Oxford advanced learner`s dictionary of current English.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
24. Wendel, F. C.(1992).Measurements of personality and leadership: Some relationships.Seward, NE:Concordia College.
25. Xam, Inc..Florida educational leadership exam.Worcester, MA:Author.
26. 李芳齡譯、D. D. Dubois(2002)。績效躍進－才能評鑑法的極致運用Competency-based performance improvement: A strategy for organizational change。台北市:商周。
27. 倪千茹(2001)。南投縣，國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所。
28. 陳智育(2002)。台北市，國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
29. 陳雅新(2002)。南投縣，國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所。
30. 葉連祺(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。南投縣:國立暨南國際大學。
31. 葉連祺、吳青玲(2001)。析論評量中心法在教育領域之應用。國民教育研究集刊，12，221-233。
32. 葉連祺、倪千茹、中華民國學校行政研究學會主編(2002)。我國國中校長領導能力之探討。「學校行政論壇第十次研討會」論文集，台北市:
33. 葉連祺、陳羿君(1999)。大學行政人員領導能力分類之研究。國科會研究彙刊－人文及社會科學類，9(1)，80-97。
34. 魏梅金譯、L. M. Spencer、S. M. Spencer(2002)。才能評鑑法－建立卓越績效的模式Competence at work: Models for superior performance。台北市:商周。

1. 黃文三、沈碩彬(2014)。「國中校長多元型模領導力量表」的編製及分析。教育科學研究期刊，59(2)，1-30。
2. 廖敦如(2009)。建構社區文化圖像之藝術行動課程：「行動學習」導向在大學通識藝術教育上的應用。教育科學研究期刊，54(2)，163-193。
3. 楊家瑜(2010)。國小校長說故事領導能力指標重體系之初步研究：應用AHP和ANP。學校行政，65，88-107。
4. 葉連祺(2010)。領導能力類型學之初步建構。當代教育研究，18(3)，91-124。
5. 鄭茹方、葉連祺、楊家瑜(2009)。校長說故事領導理論與應用之初步探討。學校行政雙月刊，59，137-154。
6. (2010)。國小校長情緒智慧領導能力與學校教育人員情緒智慧關係之分析。教育行政與評鑑學刊，10，27-54。
7. (2010)。國小校長說故事領導能力初探。教育研究與發展期刊，6(3)，147-182。
8. (2010)。校長領導行為與學校組織執行力之相關性研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，10，85-110。
9. (2011)。桃園縣國民小學校長領導能力狀況調查之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，12，59-86。