從網絡治理觀點觀察重建區社區總體營造計畫之執行

A Case Study of the Total Community Empowerment in 921 Earthquake Region: The Perspective of Network Governance

10.7070/PR.200706.0035

廖俊松(Chun-Sung Liao)

網絡治理 ； 重建區 ； 社區總體營造 ； 政策網絡 ； 夥伴關係 ； Network Governance ； 921 Earthquake Regions ； Total Community Empowerment ； Policy Network ； Partnership

政策研究學報

7期（2007 / 06 / 01）

35 - 64

繁體中文

本文是從重建區社區總體營造計畫之執行來觀察政府如何結合民間各相關專業社群形成的治理網絡，謀求九二一災損社區之重建。 研究中發現重建區社區總體營造計畫執行網絡的運作，過程雖有起伏與波瀾，但基於決策主導地位的文建會，願意虛心學習尊重民間部門的專業，信任私部門的操作，在平等的基礎上協調公私部門機關文化上的觀點爭議；而民間組織也多善盡配合角色，善意回應公部門的政策指導，協力完成計畫任務；彼此間可以說是在平等、互惠與互信的基礎上學習建立有意義的夥伴關係。 故結語指出此一重建區社區總體營造夥伴關係的網絡治理模式的確有其正面貢獻與值得學習之處。

This study seeks to inspect how government unified governance network, formed by various civil organizations and professional groups, to assist communities, damaged during 921 earthquake, in empowering themselves under the project of total community reengineering in 921 Earthquake Region. It is found that the Council for Cultural Affairs, though as a policy dominator, expressed its willingness to give respects to the specialty of civil organizations and to put trust in their manipulation with a receptive mind. Although there were some disputes between the Council for Cultural Affairs and these network contractors in the course of project running. And civil organizations also made a success of contract works friendly corresponded with government's instructions and project mission. So the civil organizations and the Council for Cultural Affairs had built up good partnership each other on the basis of equality, reciprocity and mutual trust. This study comes to a conclusion of that this partnership model of network governance for the total community Empowerment within 921 Earthquake Region is valuable.

1. Benson, J.K.,D. Rogers,D. Whitten(1982).Interorganizational Coordination.Ames, IA:Iowa State University Press.
2. Bentley, A.F.(1967).The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressure.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
3. Börzel T.A.(1998).Organizing Babylon-on the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks.Public Administration,76(2),253-273.
4. Friend, J.K.,Power, J.M.,Yewlett, C.J.L.(1974).Public Planning: The Inter-Corporate Dimension.London:Tavistock.
5. Hanf, K.,O` Toole, L.J.(1992).Revisiting Old Friends: Network, Implementation Structures and the Management of Inter-Organizational Relations.European Journal of Political Research,21,163-180.
6. Hanf, K.,Scharpf, F.W.(1978).Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control.London:Sage.
7. Hecko, H.,Wildavsky, A.(1974).The Private Government of Public Money.London:Macmillan.
8. Heclo, H.,A. King(ed.)(1978).The New American Political System.Washington D.C.:AEI.
9. Jordan, G.,Richardson, J.J.(1983).Policy Community: The British and European Style.Policy Studies Journal,11,603-615.
10. Kenis,Schneider, V.,B. Marin,R. Mayntz(eds.)(1991).Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations.Frankfurt am Main:Campus Verlag.
11. Kingdon, J.W.(1984).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.HarperCollins.
12. Klijn, E.H.(1996).Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks: A Theoretical Examination of the Concept Policy Network and Its Problem.Administration & Society,28(1),90-119.
13. Klijn, E.H.,Koppenjan, J.,Termeer, K.(1995).Managinh Networks in the Public Sector: A Theoretical Study of Management Strategies in Policy Networks.Public Administration,37(Autumn),437-454.
14. Kneis, P.,B. Marin,R. Mayntz(eds.)(1991).Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations.Frankfurt am Main:Campus Verlag.
15. Kooiman, J.(1993).Modern Governance.London:Sage.
16. Leftwish, A.(1993).Governance, Democracy and Development in the Third World.Third World Quarterly,14,605-624.
17. Lowi, Theodore J.(1979).The End of Liberalism.New York:W.W. Norton.
18. O`Toole, L.J.(1988).Strategies for Intergovernmental Management: Implementing Programs in Interorganizational Networks.International Journal of Public Administration,11(4),417-441.
19. Pierre, J.,Peters, B.G.(2000).Governance, Politics and the State.London:Macmillan.
20. Rhodes, R.A.W.(1997).Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity nad Accountability.Buckingham, PA:Open University Press.
21. Scharpf, F.W.(1993).Games in Hierarchies and Networks: Analytical and Empirical Approaches to the Study of Governance Institutions.Frankfurt am Main:Campus Verlag.
22. Scott, J.(2000).Social Network Analysis.London:Sage.
23. Smouts, M.C.(1998).The Proper Use of Governance in International Relations.International Social Science Journal,50(1),81-89.
24. Stoker, G.(1998).Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.International Social Science Journal,50(1),17-29.
25. 文建會(2003)。九二一重建區社區總體營造計畫執行方案專案行政中心總檢討報告。中興新村:文建會（中部辦公室）。
26. 廖俊松(2004)。重建區社區營造與政府治理。新台灣、新社會、新價值－九二一重建區社區總體營造學術研討會，中興新村:
27. 廖俊松(2003)。地方政府夥伴治理關係之比較研究。立法院院聞，31(6)，35-51。

1. 蘇暐勝(2017)。立法院政策過程之論述網絡分析研究—以2008至2015年產業創新條例修法歷程為例。國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文。2017。1-181。